Reference:
Ershova, N.V..
Legal consequences for the claim for recognizing falsified
(counterfeited) evidence in civil judicial proceedings
// Actual problems of Russian law. – 2014. – № 5.
– P. 842-848.
Read the article
Abstract: The article contains comparative legal analysis of the legislative regulations in the Civil Procedural
Code and the Arbitration Procedural Code of the Russian Federation of the issues regarding the legal consequences
of the claim for recognizing some evidence as being counterfeited (falcified). The author substantiates
the conclusion on the need to explain the criminal law consequences both in the arbitration and civil proceedings,
when such a claim arises. The author also resolves the issue on to whom ( to a party in a case or his representative)
the consequences for the deliberately fraudulent claims and falcification of evidence in a civil case.
The author offers to exclude the norm of Art. 161 of the Arbitration Procedural Code of the Russian Federation,
according to which the challenged evidence may be excluded from the list of evidence upon the agreement of
the party providing such evidence, since falcification of evidence is a crime with formal elements. The author
studies the problems of interaction between the arbitration courts and law-enforcement bodies, when the
elements of a crime are revealed, and proposes the ways to overcome the problems.
Keywords: legal nature of a claim, falcification, counterfeit, criminal law consequences, libel, deliberately fraudulent claim, bringing to liability, excluding the disputed evidence, judicial practice, civil law proceedings.
References:
Shvarts M.Z. K voprosu o fal'sifikatsii dokazatel'stv v arbitrazhnom protsesse // Arbitrazhnye spory. 2010. № 3. S. 79-92.
Skoblikov P.A. Arbitrazhnyy i ugolovnyy protsessy: kollizii v sfere dokazyvaniya i puti ikh preodoleniya.-M.: Norma, 2006.-143s.
Ugolovnoe pravo Rossiyskoy Federatsii. Osobennaya chast': Uchebnik / Yu.V. Gracheva, L.D. Ermakova, G.A. Esakov i dr.; pod red. L.V. Inogamovoy-Khegay, A.I. Raroga, A.I. Chuchaeva. 2-e izd., ispr. i dop. M.: KONTRAKT, INFRA-M, 2009.-800 s.
Poteeva A., Koryukaeva T. Izoblichenie poddelki// «EZh-Yurist», 2008, № 34.
Ryzhakov A.P. Postateynyy kommentariy k Arbitrazhnomu protsessual'nomu kodeksu Rossiyskoy Federatsii // SPS «Konsul'tantPlyus». 2008.
Grazhdanskiy protsess zarubezhnykh stran: ucheb.posobie/pod red. d–ra yurid. nauk A.G.Davtyan.-M.: TK Velbi, Izd-vo Prospekt, 2008.-480 s.
Grazhdanskoe protsessual'noe pravo: Uchebnik / S. A. Alekhina, V. V. Blazheev i dr.; Pod red. M.S. Shakaryan.-M.: TK Velbi, Izd-vo Prospekt, 2004
Reference:
Panokin, A.M..
Grounds for the appeals on the judgment according
to the Charter of Criminal Judicial Proceedings of 1864
// Actual problems of Russian law. – 2014. – № 4.
– P. 577-581.
Read the article
Abstract: The article provides the study of the system of appeals to the judicial decisions, which appeared in
the pre-Revolution Russia due to the judicial reform of 1860s. The author studies the grounds for the appeals
review of the judicial decisions of justices of peace and district courts, prior to their entry into force (non-final
decisions). The grounds for appeal are divided into procedural and material legal ones. Special attention is
paid to the types of decisions of the court of appeals. The author provides comparative legal characteristics
of the grounds for the appeals and the causes (bases) for termination of final decisions via cassation. The
article uses decisions of the Criminal Cassation Department of the Governing Senate, scientific works of the pre-Revolution scholars and legal practitioners (I.Y. Foynitskiy, S.Y. Viktorskiy, V.K. Sluchevskiy, L.Y. Tauber). The
author draws a conclusion on the results of the reform of judicial appeals of 1864 and the possibility of use of
its experience in the current reforms of the Russian criminal judicial procedure.
Keywords: judicial reform, the Charter of Criminal Judicial Proceedings of 1864, appeals, challenging the decision of a court on a criminal case, grounds for appeal, procedural grounds, material legal grounds, review of a judicial case, grounds for cassation review, court of appeals.
References:
Viktorskiy S. I. Russkiy ugolovnyy protsess: uchebnoe posobie. M., 1997. 448 S. (pereizdanie posobiya 1910 g.).
Voskobitova L. A. Osnovaniya otmeny ili izmeneniya prigovora v apellyatsionnoy instantsii//Lex Russica. 2012. № 5. S. 976-991.
Koni A. F. Kurs ugolovnogo sudoproizvodstva. M., 2011. 280 S.
Rossiyskoe zakonodatel'stvo X-XX vekov. V 9 t. Tom 8. Sudebnaya reforma//red.: Vilenskiy B. V. M., 1991. 496 S.
Sluchevskiy V. K. Uchebnik russkogo ugolovnogo protsessa. Chast' II: Sudoproizvodstvo. M., 2008. 488 S. (pereizdanie uchebnika 1913 g.).
Ustav ugolovnogo sudoproizvodstva. Izdanie 1914 goda so vsemi pozdneyshimi uzakoneniyami i s ob'yasneniyami po resheniyam ugolovnogo kassatsionnogo departamenta Pravitel'stvuyushchego Senata//sost.: Kaplan D. A. 2-e izd. Ekaterinoslav, 1916. 938 S.
Ustav ugolovnogo sudoproizvodstva: Sistematicheskiy kommentariy//red.: Gernet M. N. Vyp. V. St. st. 796-999. M., 1916. 1594 S.
Foynitskiy I. Ya. Kurs ugolovnogo sudoproizvodstva. V 2 t. Tom. II. SP
Reference:
Gladysheva, O.V..
Guarantees of lawful interests and rights of a victim
in a criminal judicial proceedings in Russia: history
and modern situation
// Actual problems of Russian law. – 2014. – № 4.
– P. 686-691.
Read the article
Abstract: The object of studies concerns the works of renowned Russian, Soviet and post-Soviet procedural law
scholars on the issues of the guarantees of lawful interests and rights of a victim in a criminal judicial proceedings.
The author notes the need to implement guarantees in several directions: regarding lawful interests and
rights of a citizen and rights of a participant of a criminal judicial proceedings. Limitations of rights in criminal
judicial proceedings may be both lawful and unlawful. At the same time, the limitations of the rights of
a participant of the criminal judicial proceedings may be solely illegal. The study is based upon the methods
of analysis, synthesis, generalization, as well as historical, formal legal, logical and comparative method. It is
stressed in the article that incorrect scientific attitude towards normative regulation in part of guarantees of
proprietary rights of a victim in the Russian pre-Revolution criminal judicial proceedings has its influence on
the current attitude towards this procedural institution. The guarantees of rights of a victim, including the right
of proprietary claims, requires more detailed studies of historical heritage, which should be carefully preserved
as the basis for the system of legal guarantees in criminal judicial proceedings in the Russian Federation.
Keywords: Charter, criminal, judicial proceedings, lawfulness, victim, rights, interests, limitations, citizen, participant.
References:
Sluchevskiy V.K. Uchebnik russkogo ugolovnogo protsessa. V 2 ch. Ch. II. Sudoproizvodstvo / Pod red. V.A. Tomsinova. M., 2008.
Samoylova Zh.V. Protsessual'noe polozhenie grazhdanskogo isttsa na stadii pred-varitel'nogo rassledovaniya v rossiyskom ugolovnom sudoproizvodstve. M., 2013.
Viktorskiy S.I. Russkiy ugolovnyy protsess: ucheb. posobie. M., 1997.
Kurs ugolovnogo prava. Obshch. ch. v 2 t. T. 1. Uchenie o prestuplenii: uchebnik dlya vuzov / pod red. N.F. Kuznetsovoy i I.M. Tyazhkovoy. M., 2002.
Erdelevskiy A.M. Kompensatsiya moral'nogo vreda. M., 1996.
Azarov V.A., Suprun S.V. Okhrana imushchestvennykh interesov v sferakh operativ-no-rozysknoy i ugolovno-protsessual'noy deyatel'nosti. Omsk, 2001.
Boykov A.D. Zhertvy prestupleniy v Rossii, pravovye i sotsial'nye problemy ikh zashchity. Tret'ya vlast' v Rossii. V 2 kn. Kn. 2: Prodolzhenie reform. M., 2002.
Mel'nikov V.Yu. Garantii prav i zakonnykh interesov grazhdan v ugolovnom pro-tsesse. Rostov-n/D, 2010.
Cheprasov M.G. Zak
Reference:
Svirkov, S.A..
Problems of civil law regulation
of technological infrastructure
in heating supply system
// Actual problems of Russian law. – 2013. – № 9.
– P. 1139-1143.
Read the article
Abstract: The article concerns the key topical issues of current legislation in the sphere of use of heat supply
infrastructure. The author studies specific features of legal status of the heat supply organization and the
contract for the heat supply services. The article contains detailed analysis of sub-recipients in heat and electricity
supply. The author also notes the tendency for the refusal from the traditional scheme for sub-recipient
relations in the current legislation. The author evaluates the issues of access to heat supply infrastructure,
provides characteristics of the contract for the connection to the heat supply system. The substantial defect of
legal regulation in this sphere is lack of state-guaranteed right to connect to the heat supply system. The author evaluates legal nature of technical conditions, which the heat supply organization provides to consumers,
and their role in the mechanism of legal regulation of access to heat supply system.
Keywords: jurisprudence, heat supply, infrastructure, contact, services, transfer, sub-recipients, access, energy, heat supply system.
References:
1. Matiyashchuk S.V. Pravovoe regulirovanie dogovornykh otnosheniy v sfere elektro- i teplo-
snabzheniya. — M.: INFRA-M, 2011.
Reference:
Baranovskaya, I.G..
Legal bases for the lease
of land in Germany
// Actual problems of Russian law. – 2013. – № 9.
– P. 1144-1147.
Read the article
Abstract: This article concerns the issue of contract-based lease of land relations in Germany, including definition
for the lease of land, types of lease, substantial clauses of such contracts, data on the object of lease,
term and order of concluding the contract, parties to the contract, their rights and obligations as well as the
grounds for termination of such a contact. The author also contains analysis of specific features of this type of
contract, which are only typical for the lease of land.
Keywords: comparative legal studies, contract, lease, Germany, land, right, law, legislation, obligations, Code, Civil.
References:
Baranova E.A. Oborot nedvizhimosti s rossiyskom i germanskom prave: sravnitel'noe is-sledovanie: dis. … kand. yurid. nauk. — M., 2005.
Zemel'nyy uchastok: sobstvennost', arenda i inye prava v RF i inostrannykh gosudarstvakh / pod red. V.A. Zalesskogo. — M.: Izd-vo Tikhomirova M.Yu., 2005.
Kuznetsov A.V. Nemetskiy opyt registratsii prav na zemel'nye uchastki i vozmozhnost' ego ispol'zovaniya v Rossii // Gosudarstvo i pravo. — 1996. — №12.
Kuznetsov A.V., German G. Sravnitel'no-pravovoy analiz rossiyskoy i germanskoy gosudar-stvennoy registratsii prav na nedvizhimost' // Yuridicheskiy mir. — 2000. — №1.
Toyber A. Poryadok zemlevladeniya v Germanii s bolee podrobnym rassmotreniem voprosa o sel'skokhozyaystvennykh zemlyakh (materialy kruglogo stola «Zemel'naya reforma kak dey-stvennyy mekhanizm upravleniya zemel'nymi resursami». Moskva. 21 marta 2001 g.) [Elek-tronnyy resurs] // URL: http://dpr.ru/journal/journal_6_5.htm.
Chubarov V.V. Problemy pravovogo regulirovaniya nedvizhimosti. — M.:
Reference:
Petruchak, R.K..
The invalid and void transaction
as a new condition for the revision
of the effective judicial acts
in civil and arbitration processes
// Actual problems of Russian law. – 2013. – № 4.
– P. 465-469.
Read the article
Abstract: The article is devoted to the recognition of the deal as void by the court of general jurisdiction or arbitration
court, as a new circumstance, which may serve as grounds for the revision of the effective judicial acts
in civil and arbitration process due to the fact of their unlawfulness or lack of material grounds. This matter was
included by the legislator into the list of new circumstances in the Civil Procedural Code of the Russian Federation and the Arbitration Procedural Code of the Russian Federation within the process of reform of the institution of
the review of the effective judicial acts due to the new or newly found circumstances under the Federal Law of
December 9, 2010 № 353-FZ and the Federal Law of 23 December, 2010 n. 379 –FZ. The author notes, that if the
provisions of part 1 of Art. 166 of the Civil Code of the Russian Federation were to be interpreted literally, then
the deal which is void based upon the grounds provided by the above-mentioned Code due to its recognition as
void by the court or by law without need for such recognition (voidable and invalid deals), both of these types of
void deals should be regarded as grounds for the review of the effective decision of the court. Due to this fact, the
author comes to a conclusion that the legislator had mistakenly included voidance of the invalid deal as the new
circumstance, which lead to the confusion in the process of application of this type of review.
Keywords: jurisprudence, new circumstances, review, civil process, arbitration process, effective judicial acts, voidable deal, invalid deal, void deal, invalidity, dualism of judicial protection.
References:
Aliev T.T. Problema klassifikatsii osnovaniy peresmotra po vnov' otkryvshimsya obstoya-tel'stvam postanovleniy suda, vstupivshikh v zakonnuyu silu, v grazhdanskom sudoproizvod-stve // Arbitrazhnyy i grazhdanskiy protsess. — 2010. — №1.
Borisova E.A. Reformirovanie protsessual'nogo zakonodatel'stva: nastoyashchee i budushchee // Arbitrazhnyy i grazhdanskiy protsess. — 2011. — №4.
Il'in A.V. Priznanie sudebnym postanovleniem nedeystvitel'noy sdelki, povlekshey za soboy prinyatie nezakonnogo i neobosnovannogo sudebnogo postanovleniya po drugomu delu, kak osnovanie dlya peresmotra sudebnykh postanovleniya po novym obstoyatel'stvam // Yurist. — 2012. — №9
Reference:
Vasilkova Svetlana Vitalievna.
Problem of the protection of interests of the group of persons in the arbitration process
// Actual problems of Russian law. – 2013. – № 3.
– P. 305-311.
Read the article
Abstract: The article is devoted to the problems of protection of interests of a group of persons in the arbitration
process. The author states that the group claim combines the institution of the judicial representation
and the procedural co-participation. Studying the issues of protection of the group of persons In
the arbitration process, the author comes to a conclusion that the general condition for the group claim
in the Arbitration Procedural Code of the Russian Federation is incorrect and it allows for non-uniform
interpretations.
Keywords: jurisprudence, group claim, protection of rights and legal Interests of persons, joining the claim for the protection of rights and legal interests of persons, group claim as a combination of the judicial representation and procedural co-participation, multi-subject relations, lack of procedural rights of members of the group, except for the right to join the group, initiator as a key figure, identification of the group of interested persons, conditions established by a judicial decision on group claim as res judicata.
References:
Alekseev S.S. Obshchaya teoriya prava. T. II. M., 1982.
Arbitrazhnyy protsess: uchebnik / pod red. M.K. Treushnikova. M.: Gorodets-izdat, 2008.
Orlova Yu.R. Gruppovaya prestupnost' nesovershennoletnikh: osnovnye tendentsii i proble-my preduprezhdeniya // Rossiyskiy sledovatel'. 2010. №4.
Eliseev N.G. Grazhdanskoe protsessual'noe pravo zarubezhnykh stran: ucheb. M.: TK «Velbi»; Izd-vo «Prospekt», 2004.
Kareva T.Yu. Iski v zashchitu neopredelennogo kruga lits // Pravovedenie. 2008. № 4.
Kolesov P.P. Gruppovye iski v SShA. M., 2004.
Kommentariy k Arbitrazhnomu protsessual'nomu kodeksu RF / pod red. V.F. Yakovleva i M.K. Yukova. M., 2008.
Khodykin R.M. Nekotorye voprosy primeneniya novykh polozheniy Arbitrazhnogo protsessu-al'nogo kodeksa RF o gruppovom proizvodstve // Vestnik Federal'nogo arbitrazhnogo suda Ural'skogo kruga. 2010. № 1.
Rozhkova M.A. Sovershenstvovanie poryadka rassmotreniya del po sporam, svyazannym s pred-prinimatel'skoy ili inoy ekonomicheskoy deyatel'nost'yu
Reference:
Egorova Lyubov Vladimirovna.
Persons, filing a counter-claim
// Actual problems of Russian law. – 2013. – № 3.
– P. 312-318.
Read the article
Abstract: The article is devoted to the subjects of the counter-claim, namely, to the question on who may
file a counter-claim. The author analyzes the positions among the scholars on filing the counter-claim by
the «new» persons. In particular, the author analyzes two topical Issues, that is whether a counter-claim
may be filed by a respondent and a person, who did earlier was not a party to the case, and whether the
counter-claim may be filed against claimant and a person, who earlier was not a party to a case. The author
analyze the issue on whether the third parties, who have an independent claim towards the object of the
legal dispute (interveners of right) and the third parties who do not have such a claim (interveners) may
present counter-claims, and whether the counter-claims may be brought against them. The author also
evaluates the question on whether the prosecutor may file a counter-claim, when participating in the civil
process in two forms provided by the law. Namely, based upon the analysis of the current legislation and
judicial practice, the author analyzes the issues of whether the prosecutor has a right to file a counter-claim
to protect the rights and interests of other persons (that is whether the prosecutor may join the case with
a counter-claim, if he did not previously participated in the case), and whether the prosecutor may change
the form of his participation in the cases where he is involved in order to obtain his opinion on the case, and
file a counter-claim In order to protect the interests of the respondent in a case. The author also provides
proposals on improvement of the legislation, and evaluates the issue of the possibility of a counter-claim
against a counter-claim.
Keywords: jurisprudence, counter-claim, procedural co-participation, filing a counter-claim by a person, who previously did not participate In a case, intervener of right, intervener, prosecutor entering the case with a counter-claim, change for form of participation of a prosecutor in a case, counter-claim by a prosecutor, counter-claim against the counter-claim.
References:
Arapov N.T. Vstrechnyy isk v sovetskom grazhdanskom protsessual'nom prave: dis. ... kand. yurid.nauk. Saratov, 1964.
Kleyn N.I. Vstrechnyy isk v sovetskom grazhdanskom protsesse: dis. … kand. yurid. nauk . M., 1951.
Komarov I.S. Zashchita otvetchika protiv iska v grazhdanskom i arbitrazhnom protsesse: dis. … kand. yurid. nauk. Ekaterinburg, 2012.
Kommentariy k Arbitrazhnomu protsessual'nomu kodeksu RF (postateynyy) / pod red. Yarko-va V.V. Infotropik Media, 2011 (avtor glavy — D.B. Abushenko).
Popov V.V. Pravo na vstrechnyy isk // Yuridicheskiy mir. №12. 2007.
Tsoy V.I. K voprosu o podsudnosti vstrechnogo iska // SPS «Konsul'tantPlyus».
Shveytser D.V. Protsessual'nye formy uchastiya prokurora v grazhdanskom protsesse // Sotsia-listicheskaya zakonnost'. №5. 1951
Reference:
Ershova Natalia Vladimirovna.
History of development of the norms on the falsified evidence
in the Russian procedural legislation
// Actual problems of Russian law. – 2013. – № 3.
– P. 319-324.
Read the article
Abstract: The article is devoted to the positions in the key sources of the Russian Law starting with the time
of the Russkaya Pravda and to the time of the current Arbitration and Civil Procedural Codes of the Russian
Federation on the matter of falsified evidence. The author establishes the pattern regarding the connection
between the greater role of written evidence and the changes in the regulation of Issues regarding their
authenticity or falsified character. It is noted that the detailed regulation of the issues regarding falsified
judicial evidence was started in the middle of the XIX century due to the Articles for the Civil Judicial Procedure
of 1864. The author expresses an opinion on the need to amend the current Arbitration and Civil
Procedural Codes of the Russian Federation, since the existing legal regulation of the issues of falsification
of judicial evidence does not meet all of the demands of the legal practice.
Keywords: jurisprudence, falsification, fraud, dispute on fraud, dispute on doubts in authenticity, the Russkaya Pravda, the Law Codes of 1497 and 1550, the 1649 Code of Tsar Alexis, the Articles for the Civil Judicial Procedure of 1864, the Civil Procedural Code of the RSFSR
References:
Annenkov K. Opyt kommentariya k Ustavu grazhdanskogo sudoproizvodstva. T. II. O dokazatel'-stvakh. 2-e izd., ispr. i dop. SPb.: Tip. M.M. Stasyulevicha, 1887. 558 c.
Bonner A.T. Problemy ustanovleniya istiny v grazhdanskom protsesse: monografiya. SPb.: OOO Universitetskiy izdatel'skiy konsortsium «Yuridicheskaya kniga», 2009. 832 s.
Grazhdanskoe protsessual'noe zakonodatel'stvo: kommentariy / pod red. M.K. Yukova. M., 1991. 720 s.
Kutafin O.E., Lebedev V.M., Semigin G.Yu. Sudebnaya vlast' v Rossii: istoriya, dokumenty: v 6 t. T. I. Nachala reformirovaniya sudebnoy vlasti / otv. red. N.M. Zolotukhina. M.: Mysl', 2003. 701 s.
Martysevich I.D. Pskovskaya sudnaya gramota: istoriko-yuridicheskoe issledovanie / I.D. Martysevich; otv. red. P.N. Galanza. M.: Izd-vo Moskovskogo gosudarstvennogo universi-teta, 1951. 208 s.
O sudebnykh dokazatel'stvakh po drevnemu russkomu pravu, preimushchestvenno grazhdanskomu, v istoricheskom ikh razvitii: Rassuzhdenie Semena Pakhmana. M.: Univ. tip., 1851.
Reference:
Papulova Zoya Aleksandrovna.
On the issue of procedural specific features
of the modern court order procedure in Russia
// Actual problems of Russian law. – 2013. – № 3.
– P. 325-330.
Read the article
Abstract: The article is devoted to the institution of the court order procedure in the civil process from the
standpoint of the topical issues, regarding the procedural specific features of issuing a court order. The author
provides the formulae for the various amendments to the legislation in order to deal with the existing problems
in this sphere. She also analyzes the issues of the correlation between the court order procedure and the
simplified arbitration procedure on the cases regarding protest of a bill, non-payment, non-acceptance, and
non-dated acceptance at the modern stage due to the changes in the Chapter 29 of the Arbitration Procedural
Code of the Russian Federation.
Keywords: jurisprudence, court order, statistics, contents, form, refusal, motivation, the bill, simplified procedure, jurisdiction.
References:
Gromoshina N.A. Prikaznoe proizvodstvo // Grazhdanskoe protsessual'noe pravo: uchebnik / pod red. M.S. Shakaryan. M., 2004.
Diordieva O.N. Sudebnyy prikaz kak forma zashchity v grazhdanskom protsesse // Arbitrazh-nyy i grazhdanskiy protsess. 2003. № 6.
Zagaynova S.K. Sudebnye akty v mekhanizme realizatsii sudebnoy vlasti v grazhdanskom i ar-bitrazhnom protsesse. M., 2007.
Maslennikova N.I. Sudebnyy prikaz // Rossiyskiy yuridicheskiy zhurnal. №3. 1996.
Mitenkova O.A. Institut sudebnogo proizvodstva v grazhdanskom protsesse: aktual'nye vo-prosy teorii i praktiki // Rossiyskaya yustitsiya. 2010. № 9.
Reshetnikova I.V. Prikaznoe proizvodstvo // Grazhdanskiy protsess / otv. red. V.V. Yarkov. M., 2006.
Reshetnyak V.I., Chernykh I.I. Zaochnoe proizvodstvo i sudebnyy prikaz v grazhdanskom pro-tsesse. M., 1997.
Tumanov D.A. Prikaznoe proizvodstvo v nastoyashchee vremya: protsess ili fiktsiya protsessa? // Zhurnal rossiyskogo prava. 2008. № 7.
Tsaregorodtseva E.A. Sposoby optimizatsii
Reference:
Rajskai Irina Yuryevna.
Cases on changes in citizen status within the system
of types of civil judicial procedure
// Actual problems of Russian law. – 2013. – № 1.
– P. 72-77.
Read the article
Abstract: The article is devoted to the complicated character of the legal relations, appearing in accordance with
the judicial cases on changes in the legal positions of persons with mental disorders. The issue of including this
category into the above-mentioned category of cases in accordance to the civil judicial procedure is quite controversial.
Having analyzed the cases on limitations to legal capacity, on recognizing a person legally incapable,
and on involuntary hospitalization, the author concludes that these cases should be dealt with in adversary
proceedings, and regarded as transformative cases, which are aimed to change or limit legal status of a citizen.
Keywords: jurisprudence, lack of legal capability, judicial procedure, hospitalization, disorder, mental, illness, dispute, psychiatric, stationary.
References:
Normativnye pravovye akty
1. Konstitutsiya Rossiiskoi Federatsii// "Rossiiskaya gazeta". 21.01.2009. N 7.
2. Grazhdanskii kodeks Rossiiskoi Federatsii.//"Rossiiskaya gazeta". 08.12.1994. N 238-239.
3. Grazhdanskii protsessual'nyi kodeks Rossiiskoi Federatsii// "Rossiiskaya gazeta". 20.11.2002. N 220.
4. Zakon RF ot 02.07.1992 N 3185-1 «O psikhiatricheskoi pomoshchi i garantiyakh prav grazhdan pri ee okazanii»// "Rossiiskaya gazeta". 23.11.2011. N 263.
Ranee deistvovavshie akty
1. Grazhdanskii protsessual'nyi kodeks RSFSR// "Vedomosti VS RSFSR". 1964. N 24. st. 407.
Postanovleniya Plenuma Verkhovnogo Suda Rossiiskoi Federatsii
1. Opredelenie Konstitutsionnogo Suda RF ot 03.07.2008 N 612-O-P "Po zhalobe grazhdanina Timchenko Stepana Stepanovicha na narushenie ego konstitutsionnykh prav polozheniem abzatsa vtorogo chasti vtoroi stat'i 44 Zakona Rossiiskoi Federatsii "O psikhiatricheskoi pomoshchi i garantiyakh prav grazhdan pri ee okazanii"//"Sobranie zakonodatel'stva RF
Reference:
Petruchak Ruslan Constantinovich.
Judicial mistake in the revision
of the judicial decision due to new or newly found circumstances
// Actual problems of Russian law. – 2013. – № 1.
– P. 78-83.
Read the article
Abstract: This article is devoted to the analysis of various points of view towards the term “judicial mistake” in
cases of review of judicial acts, which are in force, due to new or newly found circumstances in civil and arbitration
processes. The author analyzes the positions of the scientists, who work with this problem. The author
also pays much attention to the definition of “judicial mistake”, based on the legislation of the Russian Federation
and scholarly literature, then establishing the position clearly. It is considered that when the court fails to
establish the fact, of which due to objective reasons the judge could not have known, should not be regarded
as a judicial mistake. In spite of the dubious attitude towards correcting judicial mistakes at this stage of civil
process, the author concludes that judicial mistake is not the basis for the revision of judicial decision due to
new or newly found circumstances. The author then comes to a conclusion that in order to correct judicial
mistakes one can use appeals, cassation and general revision procedures.
Keywords: jurisprudence, judicial mistake, review, Civil Code, arbitration process, review of the judicial acts, which are in force, new circumstances, newly found circumstances, judicial acts, grounds.
References:
Aliev T. T. Proizvodstvo po vnov' otkryvshimsya obstoyatel'stvam v grazhdanskom sudoproizvodstve // M., 2007. Arbitrazhnyy protsess: Uchebnik / Pod red. R. E. Gukasyana. M., 2006.
Akhmedov S. M. Proizvodstvo po peresmotru sudebnykh aktov po vnov' otkryvshimsya obstoyatel'stvam v sisteme peresmotra sudebnykh aktov v arbitrazhnom protsesse: Dis. … kand. yurid. nauk. M., 2008.
Blazheev V. V. Peresmotr sudebnykh postanovleniy po vnov' otkryvshimsya obstoyatel'stvam v mekhanizme sudebnoy zashchity prav i zakonnykh interesov grazhdan i organizatsiy // Zakony Rossii: opyt, analiz, praktika. 2008, №11.
Borisova E. A. Proverka sudebnykh aktov po grazhdanskim delam. M., 2005.
Gol'msten A. Kh. Uchebnik russkogo grazhdanskogo sudoproizvodstva. SPb., 1907.
Gros' L. A. Akty Konstitutsionnogo Suda RF i pravo na sudebnuyu zashchitu // Rossiyskaya yustitsiya. 1998, №11, №12.
Zhilin G. A. Pravosudie po grazhdanskim delam. Aktual'nye voprosy. M., 2010.
Zaytsev I. M. Ustranenie sudebnykh oshibok v g
Reference:
Mikhaleva N.V..
Problemy razgranicheniya yurisdiktsionnykh polnomochii sudov obshchei yurisdiktsii i arbitrazhnykh sudov i kriterii ikh opredeleniya
// Actual problems of Russian law. – 2012. – № 4.
– P. 181-205.
Read the article
Abstract:
Keywords: Sudy obshchei yurisdiktsii, arbitrazhnye sudy, kriterii opredeleniya
References:
Reference:
Tishina V.G..
Podgotovka k sudebnomu razbiratel'stvu grazhdanskogo dela o zashchite imushchestvennykh prav sotrudnikov OVD
// Actual problems of Russian law. – 2012. – № 4.
– P. 206-214.
Read the article
Abstract:
Keywords: Sotrudnik organov vnutrennikh del, narushennye imushchestvennye prava, sudebnaya zashchita.
References: