Review: The article reveals the debatable topic of analyzing the balance of political, economic costs and benefits when choosing a responsible integration decision on Tajikistan's entry into the Eurasian Economic Union. The official positions of the government, expert opinions of supporters, skeptics and opponents of the country's participation in the economic union are considered. The argumentation about the adoption by the leadership of Tajikistan of a responsible political decision ensuring further socio-economic modernization of the country as part of the Eurasian Economic Union is substantiated. On May 29, 2014, the Presidents of Russia, Belarus and Kazakhstan signed an agreement on the establishment of the Eurasian Economic Union (EAEU), Armenia joined the EAEU on January 2, 2015, and Kyrgyzstan on May 8. It seemed obvious that in the political and economic elites of the Republic of Tajikistan, the understanding of long-term economic and political benefits will prevail, their predominance over short-term risks of reducing customs and tax revenues, and the country will become the next member of this integration union. However, the leadership of the Republic of Tatarstan did not take the initiative to join the EAEU. For 8 years, the possible membership of the Republic of Tajikistan in the EAEU has been actively discussed in the scientific, expert community and the media, but the government structures of the Republic of Tajikistan have actually stopped in the integration movement, justifying this by the need for a deeper consideration of national interests, a detailed calculation of benefits and risks when joining the economic union. Let's agree that the analysis of the balance of political and economic benefits and costs is really necessary for making strategic development decisions.

Keywords: integration loyalty, integration risks, advantages of integration, integration, economic aspects, political aspects, EAEU, Tadjikistan, foreign policy decisions, management decisions

Review: This article attempts to systematize all currently existing at the EU level areas of supranational regulation of public relations in the digital sphere. An appropriate systematization can be useful both from the point of view of further theoretical understanding of supranational regulation at the present stage, and from the point of view of using the EU experience to harmonize the regulation of the digital space within the EAEU. Despite the fact that, individually, almost all areas of supranational regulation have become the subject of research, their cumulative, systemic effect has not been analyzed. This predetermines the scientific novelty of the present study. In addition, the scientific novelty of the article is also manifested in the fact that the author involves in scientific circulation the most relevant areas of supranational legal regulation of social relations arising in the digital sphere (in particular, we are talking about supranational regulation of artificial intelligence and crypto assets). In this article, based on an analysis of the EU experience, a general conclusion is made that supranational regulation of social relations in the digital sphere today has significantly expanded (and continues to expand) due to the inclusion of fundamentally new areas of public life that have arisen in connection with the development of information and communication technologies. In addition, the article carried out a detailed systematization and classification of the key areas of supranational regulation of social relations arising in the digital sphere.

Keywords: artificial intelligence, cyberterrorism, cloud infrastructure, digital public procurement, gatekeeper companies, antitrust requirements, digital services, copyright protection, personal data, crypto assets

Review: The relevance of the reasearch topic stems from the fact that different state bodies are involved in addressing cybersecurity services. While each of the state bodies has their own goals and objectives, the successful resolution of the issues entirely depends on their effective cooperation. The existing resources and expertise available in the EU member states and corresponding EU institutions, bodies and agencies provide a solid basis for a collective response to cybersecurity threats. As a result, the EU has established a system of cyber security risk management bodies. The purpose of this article is to investigate the activities of key EU cyber security authorities. To achieve this goal and analyse the activities of the main EU bodies in the field of cybersecurity , the author has used several methods, such as the systematic approach, the formal-legal method, the comparative-legal method and the historical method. The author has come to the conclusion that cooperation and information exchange are essential elements in addressing cyber security issues. At the same time, to achieve coherence among cyber security bodies, the EU is taking measures to strengthen their joint work. In addition, it has been concluded that the EU, as a regional integration organization where member states act on the basis of mutual trust, is a reliable platform for addressing cyber security issues.

Keywords: information security, cyber attack, cyber space, cyber defence, cyber resilience, cyber threats, cyber security, EU law, cybercrime, cyber incident