Issues of administrative and municipal legal relationship
Vinnitskiy A. —
The objects of exclusive public property: gaps in legislation and case law
// NB: Administrative Law and Administration Practice.
– 2019. – ¹ 6.
– P. 1 - 11.
DOI: 10.7256/2306-9945.2019.6.31998 URL: https://en. nbpublish.com/library_read_article.php?id=31998
Read the article
The subject of this research is the provisions of current legislation establishing the categories of the objects of exclusive public property and regulating their legal regime. The author explores, generalizes and critically analyzes the practice of arbitration courts on consideration of property disputes involving objects of exclusive public property. The topic in question is examined in the context of the foreign and Russian public trust doctrine. Particular attention is paid to the critical analysis of the Decree of Supreme Council of the Russian Federation of 12.27.1991 No.3020-1 and its practical implementation. The following conclusions were made: 1) the concept of exclusive property objects is similar to the category of public domains in Roman Law countries; 2) the Decree of Supreme Council of the Russian Federation of 12.27.1991 No.3020-1 cannot be used as a normative criterion for the objects of exclusive property; 3) the relevant list of categories of exclusive property objects has not yet been systematized. The author underlined the need for qualitative development and prompt passage of the federal law “On the State and Municipal Property”, which would establish the exhaustive list of the categories of objects attributed as the exclusive public property, as well as codify their legal regime, including inalienability from property of the corresponding public formation, and inapplicability of the statutes of limitation for protecting the right to property by public administration.
separation of state property, res extra commercium, public assets, exclusive state property, public domains, public property, privatisation, public administration, public functions, property law
Vinnitskiy A. V. Institut publichnoy sobstvennosti v prave Frantsii, Ispanii i Italii // Vestnik grazhdanskogo prava. 2013. ¹ 4.
Breban G. Frantsuzskoe administrativnoe pravo / Per. s frants. D. I. Vasil'eva, V. D. Karpovicha; pod red. i so vstup. st. S. V. Bobotova. M., 1988. S. 166–167.
Auby J.-B., Auby J.-M., Bon P. Droit administratif des biens. 4e éd. P.: Dalloz, 2003. P. 3
Kartoteka arbitrazhnykh del (https://ras.arbitr.ru).
Stat'ya 26.11 Federal'nogo zakona ot 06.10.1999 ¹ 184-FZ «Ob obshchikh printsipakh organizatsii zakonodatel'nykh (predstavitel'nykh) i ispolnitel'nykh organov gosudarstvennoy vlasti sub'ektov Rossiyskoy Federatsii» (SZ RF. 1999. ¹ 42. St. 5005).
Stat'ya 50 Federal'nogo zakona ot 06.10.2003 ¹ 131-FZ «Ob obshchikh printsipakh organizatsii mestnogo samoupravleniya v Rossiyskoy Federatsii» (SZ RF. 2003. ¹ 40. St. 3822).
Federal'nyy portal proektov normativnyy pravovykh aktov (https://regulation.gov.ru/projects#npa=95159).
Sayt Konstitutsionnogo Suda Rossiyskoy Federatsii (http://doc.ksrf.ru/dec