Abstract: The author discusses issues related to the impact of sanctions on the Russian economy in general, and, in particular, on its financial segment. The author pays attention to the most problematic aspects of the financial sector of the Russian economy, analyzing the measures taken by the Central Bank of the Russian Federation, the Government of the Russian Federation, and other competent state authorities to stabilize the situation in the country and get out of the crisis situation. The main directions of Russia's financial policy are considered, the key problems hindering the effective functioning of the economic system in the prevailing geopolitical and macroeconomic conditions are identified. Proposals are made to improve the regulatory impact on the Russian financial market in the context of economic sanctions. On the basis of the dialectical method of cognition, formal logical, general scientific and private scientific ways of research are used. The unprecedented nature of the situation dictates the need to form fundamentally new approaches to the organization and regulation of economic activity, which would not only preserve the existing potential, but also maximize it. In the current situation, the importance of systemic regulatory impact on the financial market is of key importance for the stabilization of the Russian economy. A comprehensive approach to solving existing problems is needed, which, among other things, should include a well-thought-out legal policy in the field of regulating the activities of participants in the financial market infrastructure, improving mechanisms for attracting domestic investment. It is necessary to review the provisions and the investment legislation itself. Measures should also be taken to intensify the use of financial instruments to solve the problem of technological sovereignty.

Keywords: partner financing, mutual funds, financial literacy, non-governmental pension provision, participatory financing, investments, sanctions, financial policy, financial market, regulatory impact

Abstract: The subject of the study is technological sovereignty in the 21st century. The article provides a comparative historical analysis of the concept, features and experience of technological sovereignty from the point of view of representatives of socialist development with Chinese specifics. The research focuses on the main problems of technological sovereignty in the context of globalization of the XXI century. The study deeply examines the definition and significance of technological sovereignty and its unique characteristics in the modern world, including the impact of technological innovations on national competitiveness, security problems caused by technological dependence, as well as the maintenance of sovereignty in international technological cooperation and competition. In particular, the article considers China as a typical case for analyzing its practical experience, problems and coping strategies in building technological sovereignty. Historical, documentary, survey and comparative studies were chosen as the methods of study. The scope of the results and their novelty lies in the awareness of the value of accumulated political and trade experience to protect State security and prevent a new form of war against the background of prolonged globalization and technological revolution, thereby promoting international cooperation and positive rivalry. Conclusions and results. Technological sovereignty means that a country retains its sovereignty and independent status in political, economic, and other fields, independently mastering key technologies and innovative opportunities. It emphasizes the autonomy of the country and the rights of control in the technical field and is an extension and embodiment of national sovereignty in the technical field. The problem of China's technological sovereignty is characterized by distinctive features. On the one hand, China is committed to strengthening independent innovation and increasing technological self-sufficiency in order to get rid of external dependence and restrictions and ensure the security of technological sovereignty. On the other hand, China actively participates in the global governance of science and technology and promotes the creation of an open, cooperative and mutually beneficial international system of scientific and technical cooperation to maintain the balance and stability of the global technological ecosystem. The study of technological sovereignty has given new life to the theory of political science. This encourages political scientists to pay more attention to the impact of technological factors on the global political landscape and international relations, and also promotes interdisciplinary integration and innovation of political science theory.

Keywords: public policies, globalization, international relations, digital technologies, China, conceptualization, technonationalism, trade exchange, state security, technological sovereignty