Culture of art and the process of creation
Reference:
Ding Y. —
Novelty of Lin Zhaohua’s play “All people are Hamlets”
// Culture and Art.
– 2020. – ¹ 6.
– P. 1 - 9.
DOI: 10.7256/2454-0625.2020.6.33012 URL: https://en. nbpublish.com/library_read_article.php?id=33012
Read the article
Review:
The “Hamlet 1990” directed by Lin Zhaohua represents a variant of the Shakespeare’s “Hamlet”. The title of the play hints to the spirit of creative search and novelty, characteristic for the theater era of the 1990s. It was a specific socially transformative period, when “various Soviet-style creative positions were sacrificed” and china moved towards independent thinking and development of social reforms. It is possible that “Hamlet” performed in 1990 reflected these trends in social transformations, which led to the director’s interpretation and restructuring of Shakespeare’s play based on new views and independent aesthetic perception. “Revenge is a scene, a story” and the director acts as the storyteller; it is up to him how this story will be told. In accordance with methodology of the formal school, the author conducts a reconstruction of this play and analyses the scenic texts from the perspective of modern Chinese theater, as well as from the position of director’s style. “Hamlet 1990” directed by Lin Zhaohua became a new word in theatrical arts. In an open scenic space, the connection between the actors and the viewers is not unidirectional, but is two-way; there is an effect of transfer of psychological payload and emotional interaction between them.
Keywords:
directorial interpretation restructuring, restructuring, innovation, stage director's view, directed by Lin Zhaohua, Hamlet, Shakespeare, All people are Hamlets, minimalistic style, aesthetic perception
References (transliterated):
Din Din. Lin' Chzhaokhua i ego "Gamlet 1990"//IT tszinli shitsze (Mir Ay-Ti menedzherov), 2009 (5): 25. （丁丁.林兆华与他的《哈姆雷特1990》[J].IT经理世界,2009(5):25.）（Din Din. Lin Zhaohua and his "Hamlet 1990"//IT Jingli Shizze (Mir A&T Managers), 2009 (5): 25p.）
Sun Vey. Podstupayas' k Gamletu-analiz obraza Gamleta //Shen'chzhou (Rodina), 2012 (07Z): 4. （宋玮.走进哈姆雷特——哈姆雷特形象分析[J].神州,2012(07Z):4.）（Sun Wei. Approaching Hamlet-Analysis of the Image of Hamlet // Shenzhou (Motherland), 2012 (07Z): 4p.）
Lyu Bin'. Vpechatleniya pri prochtenii "Gamleta" // Chzhungo ketszyao chuansin' daokan' (Spravochnik-rukovodstvo po vnedreniyu innovatsiy v oblasti nauki i obrazovaniya v Kitae), 2014 (2): 62 （刘斌.读《哈姆&#
Culture and Cult
Reference:
Beskov A. —
// Culture and Art.
– 2020. – ¹ 6.
– P. 10 - 28.
DOI: 10.7256/2454-0625.2020.6.31675 URL: https://en. nbpublish.com/library_read_article.php?id=31675
Read the article
Keywords:
Rock music, Christian rock, Orthodox rock, Orthodox missionary work, band Nautilus Pompilius, Ilya Kormiltsev, Dmitry Revyakin, Yuri Shevchuk, Konstantin Kinchev, Boris Grebenshchikov
References (transliterated):
Thompson John J. Raised by Wolves: The Story of Christian Rock & Roll. Toronto: ECW Press, 2000. 262 p.
Beaujon A. Body Piercing Saved My Life: Inside the Phenomenon of Christian Rock. Cambridge, MA: Da Capo Press, 2006. 304 p.
Howard Jay R., Streck John M. Apostles of Rock: The Splintered World of Contemporary Christian Music. Lexington, Kentucky: The University Press of Kentucky, 1999. 299 p.
Yuriy Shevchuk: Esli Boga net, to zhit' voobshche nezachem // Sayt «Pravoslavie i mir», 16.05.2017. URL: https://www.pravmir.ru/yurij-shevchuk-esli-boga-net/ (data obrashcheniya: 05.12.2019).
Khvashchevskaya O. Dmitriy Revyakin: Pomnyu, chto zasnul na kvartirnike Bashlacheva // Informatsionnoe agentstvo «Bel.Ru», 15.02.2018. URL: https://bel.ru/interview/15-02-2018/dmitriy-revyakin-pomnyu-chto-zasnul-na-kvartirnike-bashlachyova (data obrashcheniya: 04.12.2019).
Tarasyukov A. Alisomaniya v «tserkovnom dvorike» ili o «pravoslavnom roke» // Antimodernizm.Ru, 08.06.2009. URL: https://antimodern.ru/alisa/ (data obrashcheniya: 06.12.2019).
Symbol, word, speech, language
Reference:
Rozin V.M. —
// Culture and Art.
– 2020. – ¹ 6.
– P. 29 - 37.
DOI: 10.7256/2454-0625.2020.6.33084 URL: https://en. nbpublish.com/library_read_article.php?id=33084
Read the article
Keywords:
sign, scheme, symbols, icons, works of art, semiotics, reality, semiosis, value, discipline
References (transliterated):
Avgustin A. Antologiya srednevekovoy mysli. T. 1. ‒ SPb.: RKhGI, 2001. ‒ 539 s.
Benyumov M.I. Khudozhestvennye sredstva muzykanta-ispolnitelya: paradoks ponyatiya, istoricheskiy genezis, struktura, funktsii. Krasnoyarsk, 2012.
Gadamer Kh.-G. Aktual'nost' prekrasnogo.‒ M.: Iskusstvo, 1991. ‒ S.266-323.
Gegel' G.F.N. Entsiklopediya filosofskikh nauk. T. 3. Filosofiya dukha. M., 1977
Kanke V.A. Semioticheskaya filosofiya. – Obninsk, 1977
Mel'vil' Yu.K. Charlz Pirs i pragmatizm. ‒ M.: MGU, 1968. ‒ 503 s.
Pirs, Ch.S. Izbrannye filosofskie proizvedeniya / Ch.S. Pirs; per. s angl. K. Golubovich, K. Chukhrukidze, T. Dmitrieva.-M: Logos, 2000.-448 s.
Platon. Pir. Sobr. soch. v 4 t. T. 2. ‒ M.: Mysl', 1993. ‒ S. 81-135.
Popov S. V. Metodologiya organizatsii obshchestvennykh izmeneniy // Etyudy po sotsial'noy inzhenerii: ot utopii k organizatsii.‒ M.: URSS, 2002. ‒ S. 45-63.
Rozin V.M. Pandemiya kak «test na beremennost'» i predvestnik sotsial'nykh izmeneniy? // Pravo i polit
Art and Art History
Reference:
Goncharenko A.A. —
// Culture and Art.
– 2020. – ¹ 6.
– P. 38 - 46.
DOI: 10.7256/2454-0625.2020.6.26460 URL: https://en. nbpublish.com/library_read_article.php?id=26460
Read the article
Keywords:
The USSR’s cultural policy, literary criticism, socialist realism, literary centrism, The USSR's cinema, criticism of the arts, Ivan Makaryev, RAPP, Union of Writers of the USSR, Sergey Eisenstein
References (transliterated):
Pervyy vsesoyuznyy s'ezd sovetskikh pisateley. Stenograficheskiy otchet. M.: GIKhL, 1934. 721 s.
O kharaktere kritiki // Sovetskiy ekran. 1927. ¹49. S. 1.
Nikol'skiy D. Voprosy kinoliteratury // Iskusstvo kino. 1936. ¹12. S. 59–61.
Matsa I. Tvorcheskiy metod v proletarskom iskusstve // Literatura i iskusstvo. 1930. ¹3–4. S. 25–39.
Mar'yamov G. Kremlevskiy tsenzor. M.: Kinotsentr, 1992. 129 s.
Makar'ev I. Puti perestroyki // Molodaya gvardiya. 1932. ¹1. S. 122–128.
Lebedev N. A. Predislovie // Balash B. Dukh fil'my. M.: Khudozhestvennaya literatura, 1935. 201 s.
Mazaev A. I. O «Literaturnom kritike» i ego esteticheskoy programme // Mazaev A. I. Iskusstvo i bol'shevizm (1920–1930-e gg.). M.: KomKniga, 2007. 320 s.
Korev S. O muzykal'noy kritike // Sovetskoe iskusstvo. 1927. ¹8. S. 9–16.
Kirshon V. Schet kritike // Kirshon V. O literature i iskusstve. M.: Khudozhestvennaya literatura, 1967. S. 192–206.
Kirpotin V. Pis'mo tov. Stalina v redaktsiyu zhurnala «Proletarskaya revolyutsiya» «O nekotorykh voprosakh istorii
Art and Art History
Reference:
Tanyushina A.A. —
// Culture and Art.
– 2020. – ¹ 6.
– P. 47 - 59.
DOI: 10.7256/2454-0625.2020.6.31742 URL: https://en. nbpublish.com/library_read_article.php?id=31742
Read the article
Keywords:
dadaism, photograhy, photomontage, Weimar Germany, new realism, new objectivity, avant-garde, photographic art, magical realism, collage
References (transliterated):
Baader Y. Velichie i zakat Germanii. // Al'manakh dada / Pod red. R. Khyul'zenbeka. Per. M. Izyumskoy i M. Golovanivskoy.-M., «Gileya», 2000. – S. 68-71.
Bart R. Camera lucida. Kommentariy k fotografii.-M.: «Ad Marginem Press», 2016. – 227 s.
Bart R. Sistema mody. Stat'i po semiotike kul'tury. (Per. s fr., vstup. st. i sost. S.N. Zenkina).-M., Izdatel'stvo im. Sabashnikovykh, 2003. – 512 s.
Ben'yamin V. Proizvedenie iskusstva v epokhu ego tekhnicheskoy vosproizvodimosti / Izbrannye esse (Predisl., sost., per. i prim. S.A. Romashko).-M., Medium, 1996. – 240 s.
Gross G. Mysli i tvorchestvo.-M., 1975. – 139 s.
Daymonid. K teorii dadaizma. // Al'manakh dada / Pod red. R. Khyul'zenbeka. (Per. M. Izyumskoy i M. Golovanivskoy).-M., «Gileya», 2000. – S. 45-50.
De Dyuv T. Zhivopisnyy nominalizm. Marsel' Dyushan, zhivopis' i sovremennost'. – M.: Izdatel'stvo instituta Gaydara, 2012. – 368 s.
Krauss R. Fotograficheskoe: opyt teorii raskhozhdeniy.-M.: Ad Marginem Press, 2014. – 303 s.
Partens A. Dada-iskusstvo. // Al'manakh
Scenic arts
Reference:
Smirnova E.A. —
// Culture and Art.
– 2020. – ¹ 6.
– P. 60 - 74.
DOI: 10.7256/2454-0625.2020.6.31526 URL: https://en. nbpublish.com/library_read_article.php?id=31526
Read the article
Keywords:
Vladimir Magar, Boris Blank, the Sevastopol theatre named after A. V. Lunacharsky, the production Don Juan, musical build, Directing methodology, Directing plot, multi-piece basis, montage construction, double counterpoint
References (transliterated):
Mikirtumova N. Defile v preispodnyuyu [Elektronnyy resurs] // Grafskaya pristan': gorodskoy sayt. 2006. 21 iyunya. URL: http://prichal.sevhome.ru/article.php?id=468. (data obrashcheniya: 26.11.19)
Mol'er Zh.-B. «Don Zhuan, ili Kamennyy gost'» / Poln. sobr. soch.: v 3 t. T. 2. M.: Iskusstvo, 1986. 461 s., 1 l. portr.
Bodler Sh. Tsvety zla: Stikhotvoreniya. Per s fr. M. : TOO Letopis', 1998. 291 s., portr.
Berezkin V. I. Spektakl' i stsenicheskoe prostranstvo. M. : Sov. Rossiya, 1968. 88 s. : il.
Volynskiy Yu. Dve takie nepokhozhie… [Elektronnyy resurs] // Ofitsial'nyy sayt Sevastopol'skogo russkogo dramaticheskogo teatra imeni A. V. Lunacharskogo: biblioteka. URL: http://lunacharskiy.com/library/show/913 (data obrashcheniya: 26.11.19).
Ryaposov A. Yu. Rezhisserskaya metodologiya Meyerkhol'da. 2. Dramaturgiya meyerkhol'dovskogo spektaklya: mysl', zritel', teatral'nyy montazh. SPb.: RIII, 2004. 287 s.
Dolzhanskiy A. N. Kratkiy muzykal'nyy slovar'. L.: Muzyka, 1964. 517 s.
Muzykal'naya entsiklopediya. Gl. red. Yu.V. Keldysh. T. 4. Oku
Eng
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
© 1998 – 2019 Nota Bene. Publishing Technologies. NB-Media Ltd.
