Question at hand
Dubovik O.L. —
Criminal offences against public security: a comparative analysis of Russian and Polish criminal codes
// National Security.
– 2020. – ¹ 4.
– P. 20 - 27.
DOI: 10.7256/2454-0668.2020.4.29079 URL: https://en. nbpublish.com/library_read_article.php?id=29079
Read the article
The problem of ensuring public security is recognized by society and the state as an increasingly important, which is discussed by not only politicians and lawyers, but also political scientists, philosophers, and religious figures. Terrorism, taking of hostages, piracy, mass disturbances, extremism, racism and religious persecution have turned into a bitter daily occurrence. Russian and foreign criminal legislation establishes responsibility for such criminal offences. Despite the adopted conventions, the development of common positions on the prevention of crimes against public security, as well as criminal law regulations substantially differ from country to country. In pursuance of unification of criminal legislation on combating terrorism, extremism and other assaults on public security, as well as efforts taken in this regard, the author observes both, shared goals and aspirations, as well as substantial differences thereof. From this perspective, the differences and similarities of criminal law institution (community), which establishes responsibility for offences against public security in the criminal codes of Russia and Poland, are evident. Such comparative analysis would be applicable in comprising Russian and foreign experience overall, but taking into account the historical, cultural, political, geographical and other indicators, it seems reasonable to use the regulation of the corresponding criminal law prohibitions in the two indicated countries.
consequences of crime, public danger of crime, hazardous production facilities, hazardous substances, threat, security, law, legal benefit, terrorism, ecology
Kochoi S.M. Kommentariy k Ugolovnomu kodeksu Rossiyskoy Federatsii (postateynyy). M.: Wolters Kluwer, 2011. – 936 s.
Osobennaya chast' Ugolovnogo kodeksa Rossiyskoy Federatsii: kommentariy, sudebnaya praktika, statistika / Pod obshchey red. V.M. Lebedeva, otv. red. A.V. Galakhova. M.: ID «Gorodets», 2009. – 1168 s.
Polnyy kurs ugolovnogo prava. Tom IV. Prestupleniya protiv obshchestvennoy bezopasnosti / Pod red. A.I. Korobeeva. Spb.: izd. R. Aslakhanova «Yuridicheskiy tsentr Press», 2008. – 674 s.
Uchebno-prakticheskiy kommentariy k Ugolovnomu kodeksu Rossiyskoy Federatsii.2-e izd. / Pod. red. A.E. Zhalinskogo. M.: Eksmo, 2006. –1088 s.
Bojatski M., Radecki W. Kodeks wukroczen. Komentarz. 4 wyd. Warszawa: C.H. Beck, 2006. – 886 s.
Kodeks karny.45 Wyd. Warczawa: C.H. Beck, 2016. – 125 s.
Kodeks karny. Czesc szczeolna. Komentarz. Tom II. Komentarz do art. 117–277 k.k./Andrzeji Zoll, Ted. Wyd. II. Krakow: Zakamycze, 2006. – 1438 s.
Kodeks wykroczen. Wyd. Specialne. Bielsko-Biala: Wyd. OD. Nova, 2016. – 132 c.