
	Journal of Foreign Legislation and Comparative Law Reference: Belyakova A.V. "Reasonable Time" and the Principle of Reasonableness in the Laws of Some Foreign Countries // Journal of Foreign Legislation and Comparative Law. 2014. № 1. P. 143-150. URL: https://en.nbpublish.com/library_read_article.php?id=64853 Belyakova A.V. "Reasonable Time" and the Principle of Reasonableness in the Laws of Some Foreign Countries Abstract: This article discusses the principle of reasonableness in the European Union; analyzes legal category of " reasonable time", and discusses the key points of the right to trial within a reasonable time in accordance with Article 6 of the European Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms, the ratio is defined with the principle of reasonableness concept of "reasonable time" in Italy, France, Germany and Russia. Defined key stages of reforming civil proceedings in Italy, France, Germany and Russia. Positive ways to overcome a lengthy trial on the example of Germany are highlighted.Author analyzes the jurisprudence of the ECHR and the national courts in Russia. Keywords: Reasonable duration of the proceedings in the European Union, the principle of reasonableness, the accessibility of the European Court of Human Rights Law " Pinta", the principles of law. This article can be downloaded freely in PDF format for reading. Download article This article written in Russian. You can find original text of the article here . References 1. Avis C.E. sur la proposition de loi insérant un art. 21ter dans le Titre préliminaire du Code d'instruction criminelle, Doc. parl., Ch. Repr., sess. ord. 1998–1999, № 1961/4, p. 4. 2. Interview with Vladimiro Za-grebelsky, judge at the European Court of Human Rights (Urbino, November 2002). 3. D. Carnevali (2006), "La violazione della ragionevole durata del processo: alcuni dati sull'applicazione della 'legge Pinto'" in C. Guarnieri e F. Zannotti (eds), Giustoprocesso?, Mi-lano, Giuffre pp. 289–314. 4. M. Fabri (2009), "E-justice in Finland and in Italy: enabling versus constraining models" in F. Contini and G.F. Lanzara (eds), ICT and Innovation inthe Public Sector, Trowbridge, UK, Palgrave Mcmillan, pp. 115–146. 5. Round Table organised by the Slovenian Chairmanship of the Committee of Ministers of the Council of Europe, Bled, Slovenia, 21–22 September 2009. – Ljubljana: Ministry of Foreign Affairs: Ministry of Justice, 2009. 6. Mclntosh D. and Holmes M. Civil Procedure in EC Countries, An Industry Report. – Lloyd's of London Press Ltd. Davis Arnold Cooper, London,1991 – p.87. 7. G. CORNU,Vocabulaire juridique, Association Henri Capitant, P.U.F., 2000. 8. J. VAN COMPERNOLLE, Incidence des traités internationaux sur l’aménagement de la function judiciaire in “Etudes offertes à P. De Visscher", Pedone, Paris, 1984, p. 100, № 28. 9. G. CORNU, Vocabulaire juridique, Association Henri Capitant, P.U.F., 2000. 10. C.E.D.H., arrêt Neumeister, 27.6.1968 et C.E.D.H., arrêt Boddaert, 12.10.1992. 11. Notamment C.E.D.H., arrêt Martins Moreira, 26.10.1988, Publ. Cour, série A, № 143, § 50. 12. The complete text of the Report is available online at/. 13. Papkova O.A. Grazhdasnkiy protsess v gosudarstvakh – chlenakh Evropeyskogo Soyuza: Uchebnoe posobie. – M.: Mezhdunarodnyy universitet (v Moskve), 2000. – 45–52 str. 14. Evropeyskiy grazhadsnkiy protsess i ispolnitel'noe proizvodstvo: Sbornik materialov Mezhdunarodnoy nauchno-prakticheskoy konferentsii, g. Kazan', Kazanskiy (Privolzhskiy) federal'nyy universitet, 25 marta 2011 g./Otv. red. D.Kh.Valeev. –.:Statut, 2012. – s. 26–27. 15. Davtyan A.G. Grazhdanskoe protsessual'noe pravo Germanii. – M.: Gorodets-izdat, 2000. 16. Grazhdanskoe protsessual'noe ulozhenie Germanii. – M. :VoltersKluver, 2006

Journals

Books

Belyakova A.V. "Reasonable Time" and the Principle of Reasonableness in the Laws of Some Foreign Countries