
	Actual problems of Russian law Reference: Borisov, A.M. On the issue of interpretation of the “object” category in legal studies // Actual problems of Russian law. 2014. № 3. P. 323-329. URL: https://en.nbpublish.com/library_read_article.php?id=63995 Borisov, A.M. On the issue of interpretation of the “object” category in legal studies Abstract: The theory of law contains many unsolved problems, which, while seeming unconnected to the legal hermeneutics, form terminological cocoons, hiding and obscuring legal truth, and forming obstacles to the studies of legal materials, scientific legal rationalization and clarification of its directions, leaving us without due understanding of substantial legal terms. One of the topical problems concerns object in law. The author has a critical evaluation of the existing interpretations, considering it to be necessary to develop a unified understanding of an object in law, which may be related only with the behavior of the subject of law, forming material legal contents of the legal relation. Analyzing the terms “object of law”, “object of influence of objective law”, “object of norm of law”, “object of influence of a legal norm”, “object of regulation of a legal norm”, “subjective right object”, “object of rights and obligations”, “object of legal relation” the author comes to a conclusion that a unified position of legal scholars should be based upon the recognition of solely the object of legal regulation (constitutional legal, administrative legal, civil law, etc.) or an object of a legal relation. The interrelation between the legal form and legal contents logically draws us to a conclusion on the substantive basis for the concept of elements of a legal relation, including legal form, material legal contents, subject of law, object and immediate object o a legal relation. Keywords: subject of law, object of legal regulation, object of legal relation, legal regulation, theory of legal relation, theory of legal relation, elements of legal relation, law, legal relation, legal form, de facto contents of the legal relation. This article can be downloaded freely in PDF format for reading. Download article This article written in Russian. You can find original text of the article here . References 1. Tolstoy Yu.K. K teorii pravootnosheniya. – Leningrad: Izd-vo Leningradskogo Un-ta. – 1959. – 88 s. 2. Khalfina R.O. Obshchee uchenie o pravootnoshenii. – M.: Yur. lit. – 1974. – 340 s. 3. Tedeev A.A., Parygina V.A. Nalogovoe pravo: Uchebnik / A.A. Tedeev, V.A. Parygina. – M.: Izd-vo Eksmo, 2004. – 864 s. . 4. Ozhegov S.I. i Shvedova N.Yu. Tolkovyy slovar' russkogo yazyka: 80 000 slov i frazeologicheskikh vyrazheniy / Rossiyskaya akademiya nauk. Institut russkogo yazyka im. V.V. Vinogradova. – 4-e izd., dopolnennoe. – M.: Azbukovnik, 1999. – 944 s. 5. Syrykh V.M. Teoriya gosudarstva i prava: Uchebnik dlya vuzov. – 4-e izd., ster. – M.: ZAO Yustitsinform, 2005. – 704 s. 6. Malyy entsiklopedicheskiy slovar': v 4 t. T. 4 / Reprintnoe vosproizve-denie izdaniya Brokgauza-Efrona. – M.: TERRA, 1994. – 592 s. 7. Gulyaikhin V.N. Strukturno-funktsional'nye osobennosti razlichnykh sostoyaniy pravosoznaniya cheloveka // Voprosy prava i politiki.-2012.-№2.-C. 90-116. DOI: 10.7256/2305-9699.2012.2.153. 8. Kratkiy filosofskiy slovar' / Kirilenko G.G., Shevtsov E.V. – M.: Filol. o-vo SLOVO: Izd-vo Eksmo, 2003. – 480 s. 9. Goyman-Kalinskiy I.V., Ivanets G.I., Chervonyuk V.I. Elementarnye nachala obshchey teorii prava: Uchebnoe posobie dlya vuzov / Pod obshchey red. d-ra yurid. nauk, prof. V.I. Chervonyuka. – Pravo i zakon, M.: KolosS, 2003. – 544 s. 10. Alekseev S.S. Obshchaya teoriya prava: ucheb. – 2-e izd., pererab. i dop. – M.: TK Velbi, Izd-vo Prospekt, 2008. – 576 s.

Journals

Books

Borisov, A.M. On the issue of interpretation of the “object” category in legal studies