Library
|
Your profile |
Psychologist
Reference:
Kapustina T.V.
Development and testing of screening method for diagnosing the propensity for extremism
// Psychologist.
2022. ¹ 1.
P. 29-52.
DOI: 10.25136/2409-8701.2022.1.37293 URL: https://en.nbpublish.com/library_read_article.php?id=37293
Development and testing of screening method for diagnosing the propensity for extremism
DOI: 10.25136/2409-8701.2022.1.37293Received: 11-01-2022Published: 18-01-2022Abstract: The subject of this research in the propensity for extremism in the context of socio-psychological maladaptation of personality, determined via a newly developed screening method. The empirical object of this research is the school students of Primorsky Krai (n=395) and students from other regions of the Russian Federation (n=629). The author examines the retest reliability, content and constructive validity of the method, including its theoretical substantiation. Description is given to the test norms for two versions of the method (form A-1 for schoolers and form A-2 for students). Special attention is turned to the construct of screening method – the proclivity for extremism, which is viewed through the lens of socio-psychological maladaptation of personality and may manifest in the instance of the following criteria: signs of depressiveness, loneliness, dehumanization of others, sense of superiority, motives of vengeance, positive attitude towards death. The scientific novelty lies in testing and adaptation of the two forms of screening method. The main conclusion lies in the validation of the psychometric properties of the questionnaire. It is worth noting that the individual with propensity for extremism not necessarily would commit extremist actions, however, falls into a risk group, since their behavior in maladaptive state can be unpredictable, inflicting conflict, suicide, deviant behavior. Screening method for diagnosing the propensity for extremism should be viewed as an instrument for preventing extremism in youth environment. Keywords: extremism, propensity to extremism, extremist tendencies, socio-psychological maladjustment, school shooting, psychodiagnostics, express method, screening method, questioning, personality diagnosticsThis article is automatically translated. You can find original text of the article here. Gender___________ Age ______________ Specialty / Direction of training ______________________
Course of study ______________ References
1. Aizenk G., Vil'son G., Dzhekson K. Lichnostnyi profil' po Aizenku. Rukovodstvo. M.: Kogito-tsentr, 1999. 53 s.
2. Baturin N.A., Mel'nikova N.N. Tekhnologiya razrabotki testov: Chast' II /// Vestnik Yuzhno-Ural'skogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Seriya: Psikhologiya. 2009. ¹ 42 (175). S. 11-25. 3. Byzov A.A. Shkala pravogo avtoritarizma lichnosti: otsenka psikhometricheskikh svoistv na primere studencheskoi vyborki // Sotsiologiya: metodologiya, metody, matematicheskoe modelirovanie. 2017. ¹ 45. S. 72-102. 4. Grzhibovskii A.M., Gorbatova M.A., Narkevich A.N., Vinogradov K.A. Ob''em vyborki dlya korrelyatsionnogo analiza // Morskaya meditsina. 2020. T. 6. ¹ 1. S. 101-106. 5. Grzhibovskii A.M., Ivanov S.V., Gorbatova M.A. Korrelyatsionnyi analiz dannykh s ispol'zovaniem programmnogo obespecheniya Statistica i SPSS // Nauka i Zdravookhranenie. 2017. ¹1. S. 7-36. 6. Gritsina O.P., Trankovskaya L.V., Semaniv E.V., Lisetskaya E.A. Faktory, formiruyushchie zdorov'e sovremennykh detei i podrostkov // Tikhookeanskii meditsinskii zhurnal. 2020. ¹ 3. S. 19-24. https://doi.org/10.34215/1609-1175-2020-3-19-24 7. Gutsykova S.V. Metod ekspertnykh otsenok. Teoriya i praktika. M.: Institut psikhologii RAN, 2011. 170 s. 8. Druzhinin, V. N. Eksperimental'naya psikhologiya : uchebnoe posobie dlya bakalavriata, spetsialiteta i magistratury: 2-e izd., dop. M. : Izdatel'stvo Yurait, 2019. 386 s. 9. Ermolaev O.Yu. Matematicheskaya statistika dlya psikhologov: Uchebnik. M.: Moskovskii psikhologo-sotsial'nyi institut: Flinta, 2011. 336 s. 10. Kamenyukin A. G., Kovpak D. V. Stress-menedzhment. 3-e izd. SPb.: Piter, 2012. 208 s. 11. Kapustina T.V. Ekspress-diagnostika tipov lichnosti: proektivnyi metod: dis. … kand. psikhol. nauk. Khabarovsk, 2019. 229 s. 12. Kozlov V.V., Mazilov V.A., Fetiskin N.P. Sotsial'no-psikhologicheskaya diagnostika razvitiya lichnosti i malykh grupp. M., 2018. S. 477-480. 13. Mikhailova E.V. Kriminologicheskaya kharakteristika vooruzhennykh napadenii v obrazovatel'nykh uchrezhdeniyakh Rossiiskoi Federatsii (schoolshooting) // Nauchnyi vestnik omskoi akademii MVD Rossii. 2021. ¹ 1. S. 20-25. DOI: 10.24411/1999-625X-2021-11004 14. Nikitina, L. N. Ispol'zovanie rezul'tatov pervichnoi diagnostiki sklonnosti molodezhi k destruktivnomu povedeniyu v preventivnoi deyatel'nosti sotrudnikov organov vnutrennikh del / L. N. Nikitina // Prikladnaya yuridicheskaya psikhologiya. – 2019. – ¹ 3(48). – S. 73–80. – DOI : 10.33463/2072-8336.2019.3(48).073-080. 15. Puchnin A.V., Puchnina M.Yu. Ideologiya "kolumbain" kak ekstremistskaya i terroristicheskaya ugroza natsional'noi bezopasnosti Rossiiskoi Federatsii // Obshchestvo i pravo. 2021. ¹ 2(76). S. 38-43. 16. Rukavishnikov A.A., Sokolova M.V. Faktornyi lichnostnyi oprosnik Kettella: metodicheskoe rukovodstvo. SPb.: IMATON, 2020. 92 s. 17. Test aktsentuatsii svoistv temperamenta (TAST): metodicheskoe rukovodstvo / V.V. Plotnikov, L.A. Sever'yanova, D.V. Plotnikov, D.V. Berdnikov. Izdanie 3-e. SPb.: IMATON, 2016. 80 s. 18. Harpviken A.N. Psychological Vulnerabilities and Extremism Among Western Youth: A Literature Review // Adolescent Research Review. 2020. ¹ 5. P. 1-26. 19. Kunst J. R, Obaidi M. Understanding violent extremism in the 21st century: the (re)emerging role of relative deprivation // Current Opinion in Psychology 2020. ¹ 35. p. 55-59. 20. McCauley C. Predictors of Activism and Radicalism: past activism, past radicalism and grievance against the government, 2015, 429. 21. Nivette A., Eisner M., Ribeaud D. Developmental Predictors of Violent Extremist Attitudes: A Test of General Strain Theory // Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency. 2017. Vol. 54. ¹ 6. P. 755-790. 22. Peshkovskaya A., Mundrievskaya Y., Serbina G., Matsuta V., Goiko V., Feshchenko A. Followers of School Shooting Online Communities in Russia: Age, Gender, Anonymity and Regulations // Intelligent Systems and Applications. IntelliSys 2020. Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, vol 1252. Springer, Cham. p. 713-716. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-55190-2_58 DOI:10.1007/978-3-030-55190-2_58 23. Powis B., Randhawa-Horne K., Bishopp D. An Examination of the Structural Properties of the Extremism Risk Guidelines (ERG22+): A Structured Formulation Tool for Extremist Offenders. Terrorism and Political Violence. 2019. pp. 1-19. https://doi.org/10.1080/09546553.2019.1598392 24. Powis B., Randhawa-Horne K., Bishopp D. The Structural Properties of the Extremism Risk Guidelines (ERG22+): a structured formulation tool for extremist offenders. Ministry of Justice Analytical Series. 2019. 17 p. 25. Psychological Mechanisms Involved in Radicalization and Extremism. A Rational Emotive Behavioral Conceptualization / Trip S., [et al.] // Frontiers in Psychology. 2019. Vol. 10. URL: https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.00437/full (data obrashcheniya: 07.01.2022) https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.00437 26. Saunders B., Ngo J. The Right-Wing Authoritarianism Scale. Encyclopedia of Personality and Individual Differences. Berlin: Springer International Publishing, 2017. pp. 1-4. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-28099-8_1262-1. 27. Stankov L., Saucier G., Knezevic G. Militant Extremist MindSet: Proviolence, Vile World, and Divine Power. Psychological assessment, 2010, (22): 70-86. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0016925. 28. The biological roots of political extremism / Keene J.R., [et al.] // Politics and the Life Sciences. 2017. ¹ 2. P. 37-48. https://doi.org/10.1017/pls.2017.16
First Peer Review
Peer reviewers' evaluations remain confidential and are not disclosed to the public. Only external reviews, authorized for publication by the article's author(s), are made public. Typically, these final reviews are conducted after the manuscript's revision. Adhering to our double-blind review policy, the reviewer's identity is kept confidential.
Second Peer Review
Peer reviewers' evaluations remain confidential and are not disclosed to the public. Only external reviews, authorized for publication by the article's author(s), are made public. Typically, these final reviews are conducted after the manuscript's revision. Adhering to our double-blind review policy, the reviewer's identity is kept confidential.
|