Ðóñ Eng Cn Translate this page:
Please select your language to translate the article


You can just close the window to don't translate
Library
Your profile

Back to contents

Philosophy and Culture
Reference:

Tsygankov A.S. National identity and structuring of historical memory: from “unity” to “dispersion”

Abstract: This article conducts the analysis of the processes of commemoration implemented in the city-hero Volgograd in the post-war period, as well as their correlation with the projects of national identity. Based on the examination of memorials erected in the Soviet and post-Soviet period, dedicated to the Soviet soldiers who died during the Battle of Stalingrad, it is stated that the process of commemoration are grounded due to the presence of the project of national identity within the collective conscience of the society, which is genetically structured into the concept of “ideal society”, or social duty. This project is a so-called goal of historical development, which defines not only the vector that substantiates the possibility of existence of the historical path within social conscience, but also the process of structuring of historical memory. After the collapse of the Soviet Union, memory begins to be subjected to “dispersion”, which manifests in the processes of commemoration and their results. This process of “dispersion” of historical memory of the Battle of Stalingrad, which started the commemoration during the post-Soviet era, is based on many projects of national identity created by separate nationalities, representatives of regions and individuals, thus establishing new personal or collective identity outside the total Soviet project.  


Keywords:

World War II, social conscience, social identity, spiritual life of society, monument, the Battle of Stalingrad, commemoration, historical memory, national identity, Ibárruri


This article can be downloaded freely in PDF format for reading. Download article

This article written in Russian. You can find original text of the article here .
References
1. Burlakova N.S., Oleshkevich E.V. Travmaticheskiy opyt Kholokosta kak chast' istoricheskoy pamyati i identichnosti vtorogo pokoleniya // Psikhologiya i Psikhotekhnika. - 2014. - 9. - C. 922 - 931. DOI: 10.7256/2070-8955.2014.9.12781.
2. N. A. Soboleva Rossiyskaya gosudarstvennaya simvolika v kontekste problem rekonstruktsii natsional'noy identichnosti // Istoricheskiy zhurnal: nauchnye issledovaniya. - 2011. - 4. - C. 32 - 41.
3. Parkhomenko R.N. Grazhdanstvo i natsional'naya identichnost' v ponimanii Yu. Khabermasa // Pravo i politika. - 2014. - 3. - C. 379 - 386. DOI: 10.7256/1811-9018.2014.3.7797.
4. Koptseva N.P., Kistova A.V. Konstruirovanie etnokul'turnoy i obshchenatsional'noy identichnosti kak filosofskaya problema // Filosofiya i kul'tura. - 2015. - 1. - C. 12 - 19. DOI: 10.7256/1999-2793.2015.1.10695.
5. Postanovlenie Administratsii Volgogradskoy obl. ot 30.09.1994 ¹ 467 «O sozdanii Voinskogo memorial'nogo kladbishcha»//http://volgograd.news-city.info/docs/sistemsu/dok_peynbz.htm (data obrashcheniya: 05.01.2015)
6. Vasil'ev A. Memorializatsiya i zabvenie kak mekhanizmy proizvodstva kul'turnogo edinstva i raznoobraziya. Sb. st. po materialam kongressa.: Novyy khronograf: Eydos. T.6: Kul'turnoe nasledie: Ot proshlogo k budushchemu. 2009: 56-68.
7. Skorchenko I. Ispanskiy akkord stalingradskogo marsha//Argumenty nedeli – Nizhnee Povolzh'e. 2010. (1)
8. Mamardashvili M. K. Moy opyt netipichen. SPb.: Azbuka, 2000.
9. Skorchenko I. Prorochestvo Dolores Ibarruri//Byt' chelovekom.2013.(5)
10. Pyat' geroev Stalingrada//Sayt «Russkaya semerka» //http://russian7.ru/2014/11/5-geroev-stalingrada/ (data obrashcheniya: 15.01.2015)
11. Khaydegger M. Bytie i vremya. M.: Akademicheskiy proekt, 2013.
12. Ibarruri Ruben Ruis// Sayt Geroi strany //http://www.warheroes.ru/hero/hero.asp?Hero_id=281 (data obrashcheniya:15.01.2015)
13. Istoriya ulits Volgograda: fakty i foto// Sayt Pravda Volgograda// http://www.pravda34.info/?page_id=1145 (data obrashcheniya:15.01.2015)
14. Arendt Kh. Istoki totalitarizma. M.: TsentrKom, 1996.
15. Losev A.F. Ocherki antichnogo simvolizma i mifologii. M.: Mysl', 1993.
16. Assman A. Refreymiruya pamyat'. Mezhdu individual'nymi i kollektivnymi formami konstruirovaniya proshlogo. 28.03.2014. // http://gefter.ru/archive/11839 (Data obrashcheniya: 14. 01. 2015)
17. Megill A. Istoriya i pamyat': za i protiv//Filosofiya i obshchestvo. 2005. (2): 132-165.
18. Arendt Kh. Istoki totalitarizma. M.: TsentrKom, 1996.
19. Brecht B. Notizen zu Heinrich Mann „Mut“// Brecht B. Schriften. Frankfurt am Main., 1963.
20. Malaya Sovetskaya Entsiklopediya. M.: Sovetskaya entsiklopediya, 1941.
21. Arendt Kh. Istoki totalitarizma. M.: TsentrKom, 1996.
22. Stalin I.V. Marksizm i natsional'nyy vopros//V.I. Lenin, I.V. Stalin o natsional'nom voprose. M.: OOO «Pravda-Press», 2013.
23. Stalin I.V. Marksizm i natsional'nyy vopros//V.I. Lenin, I.V. Stalin o natsional'nom voprose. M.: OOO «Pravda-Press», 2013.
24. Lokk Dzh. Opyt o chelovecheskom razumenii. M.: Mysl', 1985.
25. Lenin V.I. O prave natsiy na samoopredelenie//V.I. Lenin, I.V. Stalin o natsional'nom voprose. M.: OOO «Pravda-Press», 2013.
26. Khorkkhaymer M., Adorno T. V. Dialektika prosveshcheniya. Filosofskie fragmenty. M., S-Pb.: «Medium» «Yuventa», 1997.
27. Khobsbaum E. Natsii i natsionalizm posle 1780 goda. SPb.: Aleteyya, 1998.
28. Roginskiy A. Pamyat' o stalinizme // Doklad na konferentsii «Istoriya stalinizma». 05.12.2008. // http://polit.ru/article/2008/12/11/memory/(data obrashcheniya: 12.01.2015)
29. Zaretskiy Yu. Istoriya, pamyat', natsional'naya identichnost'//Neprikosnovennyy zapas. 2008. (3)// http://magazines.russ.ru/nz/2008/3/za4.html (data obrashcheniya: 12.01.2015)