Ðóñ Eng Cn Translate this page:
Please select your language to translate the article


You can just close the window to don't translate
Library
Your profile

Back to contents

International relations
Reference:

A. O. Lasarya The peculiarities of ethno-political conflicts on the post-Soviet space

Abstract: The article analyzes the theoretical, conceptual and applied aspects of ethno-political conflicts settlement on the post-Soviet space, defining the context of regional security on the post-Soviet space (South Caucasus region). The modern society of this region is diverse and heterogeneous; it forms a complex structure which includes several thousands of various ethnic communities, different in the population size, the linguistic, political, socio-cultural, civilizational and religious guidelines. Undoubtedly, in their complex these differences to some extent determine the genesis of ethno-political conflicts in this region. The methodological base of the research includes the following methods: system, structural and functional, cultural and civilizational, comparative historical, comparative political, geopolitical, and the methods of induction, deduction, observation, analysis, synthesis, and modeling. The end of the 20th century brought into the world the variety of unprecedented challenges and threats. The decline of the socialistic order, caused by the collapse of the USSR, marked the appearance of the expected critical ethno-political contradictions on the post-Soviet space. They had been developing into bloody armed conflicts, and their endings caused the appearance of virtually independent self-proclaimed states like Abkhazia, South Ossetia, Transdniestria and Nagorno-Karabakh.


Keywords:

international relations, foreign policy, Russia, South Caucasus, ethno-political conflict, diplomacy, state, interests, values, security.


This article can be downloaded freely in PDF format for reading. Download article

This article written in Russian. You can find original text of the article here .
References
1. Abdulatipov R.G. Etnopoliticheskie konflikty v stranakh SNG: nekotorye mirotvorcheskie i pravovye mekhanizmy razresheniya. Obozrevatel', 1997. ¹1.;
2. Kushtavkina E.A. Etnopoliticheskie otnosheniya i konflikty: teoriya i praktika. M.: Dom MISiS., 2010.;
3. Manoylo A.V. Psikhologicheskie operatsii SShA v voyne protiv Yuzhnoy Osetii i Abkhazii. // Mir i politika. ¹5. 2009.;
4. Markedonov S.M. De-fakto obrazovaniya postsovetskogo prostranstva: dvadtsat' let gosudarstvennogo stroitel'stva. Erevan: Institut Kavkaza, 2012.;
5. Sultygov A.-Kh.A. Etnopoliticheskie protivorechiya i formy ikh razresheniya: istoricheskiy opyt i sovremennye realii. M.: Maks Press, 2006.;
6. Tishkov V.A., Shabaev Yu.P. Etnopolitologiya: politicheskie funktsii etnichnosti: Uchebnik dlya vuzov. M.: Izdatel'stvo Moskovskogo universiteta. 2011.;
7. Khintba I.R. Osnovnye etapy peregovornogo protsessa (1992-2008): evolyutsiya podkhodov i analiz rezul'tatov //Transformatsiya gruzino-abkhazskogo konflikta: pereosmyslenie paradigmy. Sukhum: Dom pechati, 2011.;
8. Khobsbaum E. Epokha kraynostey. Korotkiy dvadtsatyy vek. 1914-1991. M., 2004.;
9. Yuri U. Etnicheskie konflikty: chto mozhno sdelat'? // Natsional'naya politika v Rossiyskoy Federatsii. M., 1993.;
10. Gurr T.R. Minorites at Risk: A Global View of Ethnopolitical Conflicts. D.C., 1993.;
11. Stavenhagen R. Erhnic Conflict and the Nation State. Basingstoke, 1996.;
12. Manoylo A.V. Siriyskiy tupik «Arabskoy vesny». // Vestn. Mosk. Un-ta. Ser. 12. Politicheskie nauki. 2013. ¹6. S. 49-56
13. Egorov V.G. Postsovetskie nezavisimye gosudarstva: poisk formy pravleniya // Mezhdunarodnye otnosheniya. - 2014. - 1. - C. 31 - 46. DOI: 10.7256/2305-560X.2014.1.9798.
14. Gusher A.I. Vyzovy i ugrozy bezopasnosti Rossii // NB: Mezhdunarodnye otnosheniya. - 2014. - 1. - C. 64 - 75. DOI: 10.7256/2306-4226.2014.1.10748. URL: http://www.e-notabene.ru/wi/article_10748.html
15. Karyakin V.V. Tsivilizatsionnaya antropologiya
16. amerikanskogo ekspansionizma:
17. ot doktriny Monro
18. k global'nomu liderstvu // Mezhdunarodnye otnosheniya. - 2013. - 4. - C. 487 - 468. DOI: 10.7256/2305-560X.2013.4.9722.
19. Bocharnikov I.V. Ukrainskiy krizis kak element poyasa strategicheskogo okruzheniya Rossii // NB: Mezhdunarodnye otnosheniya. - 2014. - 4. - C. 7 - 32. DOI: 10.7256/2306-4226.2014.4.11617. URL: http://www.e-notabene.ru/wi/article_11617.html