Ðóñ Eng Cn Translate this page:
Please select your language to translate the article


You can just close the window to don't translate
Library
Your profile

Back to contents

Philology: scientific researches
Reference:

Boyko, M.E. Approaches to Studying Diegetic Actors: Classification, Brief History and Prospects

Abstract: The author of the article offers to divide all approaches to studying diegetic actors into the two large groups, hermeneutical and structuralistic approaches. The separate subgroup of hermeneutic approaches related to psychoanalysis and its branches is specially specified. The author describes the history of development and topical issues of the theory of diergetic actors. He analyzes approaches offered by Lev Vygotsky, Sigmund Freud, Carl Jung, Daniel Rancour-Laferriere, Karl Leonhard, Vadim Rudnev and other researchers. The author criticizes the naïvehermeneutic approach that has been preventing researchers from recognizing diegetic actors as a true subject of research. The author uses historical, hermeneutic, semiotic and structure-typological methods as well as combinatory analysis, functional analysis and structural analysis. The author demonstrates that structuralistic approaches have important limitations and prove to be efficient only when combined with certain hermeneutical procedures. Thus, further studies of diegetic actors are associated with overcoming the gap between structuralistic and hermeneutic approaches by creating a unified structural-hermeneutic method based on the complementarity principle.


Keywords:

philology, diegetic actor, hermeneutics, character, psychoanalysis of literature, structuralism, structure analysis, personality, artistic discourse, logic.


This article can be downloaded freely in PDF format for reading. Download article

This article written in Russian. You can find original text of the article here .
References
1. P.S. Gurevich Kak skladyvaetsya kharakter // Psikhologiya i Psikhotekhnika.-2012.-10.-C. 4-8.
2. Boyko M.E. Kharakterologicheskaya reduktsiya: kharaktery aktorov v faktual'nom i vymyshlennom diskursakh // Psikhologiya i Psikhotekhnika.-2013.-10.-C. 926-933. DOI: 10.7256/2070-8955.2013.10.9263.
3. Boyko M.E. Problema 0-kharaktera na materiale romana Roberta Muzilya «Chelovek bez svoystv» // Filologiya: nauchnye issledovaniya.-2013.-3.-C. 248-253. DOI: 10.7256/2305-6177.2013.3.9189.
4. Stekel W. Sadism and Masochism: The psychopathology of sexual cruelty. Solar Books, 2010.
5. M.E. Boyko Strukturnyy analiz i tipologiya aktorov v narrativnoy kul'ture // Filosofiya i kul'tura.-2013.-8.-C. 1141-1151. DOI: 10.7256/1999-2793.2013.8.8938.
6. Möbius P. J. Ausgewalte Werke. Leipzig: Barth, 1909.
7. Asch S. E. Social Psychology. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1987.
8. Yung K. G. Psikhologicheskie tipy. Minsk: Popurri, 1998. S
9. Yung K. G. Problemy dushi nashego vremeni. M. Progress, 1993.
10. Freyd Z. Khudozhnik i fantazirovanie. M.: Respublika, 1995.
11. Fromm E. Dusha cheloveka. M.: AST-LTD, 1992.
12. Federn F. Vklady v analiz sadizma i mazokhizma. Izhevsk: ERGO, 2012.
13. Todorov Ts. Vvedenie v fantasticheskuyu literaturu. M.: Dom intellektual'noy knigi, 1999.
14. Teplov B. M. Zametki psikhologa pri chtenii khudozhestvennoy literatury // Teplov B. M. Izbrannye trudy v 2 tt. M.: Pedagogika, 1985. T. 1.
15. Saletsl R. (Iz)vrashcheniya lyubvi i nenavisti. M.: Khudozhestvennyy zhurnal, 1999.
16. Sirotkina I. Klassiki i psikhiatry: Psikhiatriya v rossiyskoy kul'ture kontsa XIX – nachala XX v. M.: NLO, 2008.
17. Rudnev V. P. Vvedenie v shizoreal'nost'. M.: Agraf, 2011.
18. Rudnev V. P. Slovar' bezumiya. M.: Klass, 2005.
19. Rudnev V. P. Kharaktery i rasstroystva lichnosti: Patografiya i metapsikhologiya. M.: Klass, 2002.
20. Rankur-Lafer'er D. Russkaya literatura i psikhoanaliz. M.: Ladomir, 2004.
21. Riker P. Konflikt interpretatsiy: Ocherki o germenevtike. M.: Akademicheskiy Proekt, 2008.
22. Raykh V. Funktsiya orgazma. SPb.: AST, 1997.
23. Popper K. Logika i rost nauchnogo znaniya. M.: Progress, 1983.
24. Propp V. Ya. Morfologiya volshebnoy skazki. M.: Labirint, 2001.
25. Miller B. Mozhet li vymyshlennyy personazh sushchestvovat' na samom dele? // Logos, ¹ 3 (13), 1999. S. 103–112.
26. Nabokov V. V. Lektsii po russkoy literature. M.: Izd-vo Nezavisimaya gazeta, 1999.
27. Nordau M. Vyrozhdenie. Sovremennye frantsuzy. M.: Respublika, 1995.
28. Lombrozo Ch. Genial'nost' i pomeshatel'stvo. M.: Respublika, 1996.
29. Margolin U. Ot personazhey k lyudyam, pokhozhim na nas: Tipy chitatel'skogo vospriyatiya literaturnykh personazhey // Narratorium, ¹ 1 (3), 2012.
30. Lichko A. E. Psikhopatii i aktsentuatsii kharaktera u podrostkov. SPb: Rech', 2010.
31. Lipps T. Puti psikhologii // Fundamental'naya psikhologiya u istokov neklassicheskoy paradigmy. M.: KomKniga, 2007. S. 136–137.
32. Levi-Stros K. Struktura i forma (Razmyshleniya nad odnoy rabotoy Vladimira Proppa) // Zarubezhnye issledovaniya po semiotike fol'klora. M.: Nauka, 1985. S. 9–34.
33. Arapov A.V. Dve paradigmy v protestantskoy bibleyskoy germenevtike // NB: Filosofskie issledovaniya.-2014.-1.-C. 1-19. URL: http://www.e-notabene.ru/fr/article_10746.html
34. Krechmer E. Ob isterii. SPb.: Piter, 2001.
35. Kraft-Ebing R. Polovaya psikhopatiya. M.: Respublika, 1996.
36. Klassicheskiy psikhoanaliz i khudozhestvennaya literatura. SPb.: Piter, 2002.
37. Zhenett Zh. Strukturalizm i literaturnaya kritika // Zhennet Zh. Figury. V 2-kh tt. M.: Izd-vo im. Sabashnikovykh, 1998. T. I. S. 159–179.
38. Ermakov I. D. Psikhoanaliz literatury. Pushkin. Gogol'. Dostoevskiy. M.: NLO, 1999.
39. Greymas A. Zh. Strukturnaya semantika: Poisk metoda. M.: Akademicheskiy Proekt, 2004.
40. Greymas A.-Zh., Kurte Zh. Semiotika: ob'yasnitel'nyy slovar' teorii yazyka // Semiotika / Sost. Yu. S. Stepanov. M.: Raduga, 1983.
41. Vygotskiy L. S. Psikhologiya iskusstva. 3-e izd. M.: Iskusstvo, 1986.
42. Boyko M. E. Kharakterologicheskaya reduktsiya: kharaktery aktorov v faktual'nom i vymyshlennom diskursakh // Psikhologiya i psikhotekhnika, ¹ 10, 2013. S. 926–933.
43. Boyko M. E. Strukturnyy analiz i tipologiya aktorov v narrativnoy kul'ture // Filosofiya i kul'tura, ¹ 8, 2013. S. 1141–1151.
44. Batarshev A. V. Tipologiya kharaktera i lichnosti. M.: Izd-vo instituta psikhoterapii, 2005.
45. Boyko M. E., Rudnev V. P. Realizm i kharakter // Znanie. Ponimanie. Umenie, ¹ 3, 2011. S. 51–56.
46. Adamar Zh. Issledovanie psikhologii protsessa izobreteniya v oblasti matematiki. M.: Sovetskoe radio, 1970.
47. Augustinavichyute A. Sotsionika: Vvedenie. M.: AST, 1998.
48. M. E. Boyko Strukturnyy analiz slozhnykh kharakterov literaturnykh personazhey na materiale romana F. M. Dostoevskogo «Idiot» // Kul'tura i iskusstvo.-2013.-4.-C. 465-477. DOI: 10.7256/2222-1956.2013.4.9182.
49. R.S. Granin. Problema rekonstruktsii eskhatologicheskoy paradigmy v metafizike prostranstva-vremeni P.A. Florenskogo. // Filosofiya i kul'tura.-2011.-¹ 6.-C. 31-38