|
Library
|
Your profile |
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.|
Actual problems of Russian law
Reference:
Kozheurov, Y.S.
International responsibility for
the violations of the WTO law:
correlation with the common
international law
// Actual problems of Russian law.
2013. ¹ 10.
P. 1334-1340.
URL: https://en.nbpublish.com/library_read_article.php?id=63224
Kozheurov, Y.S. International responsibility for the violations of the WTO law: correlation with the common international lawAbstract: The article contains analysis of the issues of correlation of the World Trade Organization (WTO) law with the common International law within the framework of international responsibility law. The author supports a point of view that norms of international common law on responsibility of the states, as codified by the International Law Commission of the UN in the Articles on State Responsibility for Internationally Wrongful Acts of 2001, are applicable to the relationships within the WTO framework. The WTO law, being an autonomous legal regime within the general framework of international law, contains a number of special rules and procedures regulating contents and implementation of responsibility for violation of the obligations in the WTO. However, in all cases when the WTO law provides otherwise, the general principles of international law should apply. Moreover, these principles are used to interpret and define the contents of special rules and procedures in the WTO law, such as counter-measures. Keywords: common international law, international responsibility, the WTO law, fragmenting international law, counter-measures, restitution, compensation, proportionality, autonomous regimes, lex specialis.
This article can be downloaded freely in PDF format for reading. Download article
This article written in Russian. You can find original text of the article here . References
1. Anufrieva L.P. «Pravo VTO»: ponyatie i sootnoshenie s mezhdunarodnym torgovym pravom // Materialy IV Mezhdunarodnoy nauchno-prakticheskoy konferentsii «Kutafinskie chteniya». Sektsiya mezhdunarodnogo prava: sb. tezisov / otv. red. E.G.Moiseev. — M., 2012. — S. 6–12.
2. Anufrieva L.P. Otvetstvennost' gosudarstv za deystviya, ne zapreshchennye mezhdunarodnym pravom: voprosy teorii i praktiki mezhdunarodnogo ekonomicheskogo prava (na primere de-yatel'nosti v sfere osvoeniya kosmosa i mezhdunarodnykh vozdushnykh soobshcheniy i perevozok) // Lex Russica — Russkiy zakon. — 2012. — ¹5. — S. 1071–1078. 3. Kozheurov Ya.S. Mezhdunarodnaya otvetstvennost' za vrednye posledstviya deystviy, ne za-preshchennykh mezhdunarodnym pravom // Al'manakh kafedry mezhdunarodnogo prava Ceteris Paribus. — M., 2012. — S. 103–119. 4. Kozheurov Ya.S. Differentsiatsiya mezhdunarodnoy otvetstvennosti // Rossiyskiy yuridiche-skiy zhurnal. — 2013. — ¹3. — S. 31–37. 5. Doklad Komissii mezhdunarodnogo prava o rabote ee pyat'desyat vos'moy sessii (1 maya — 9 iyunya i 3 iyulya — 11 avgusta 2006 g.). General'naya Assambleya. Ofitsial'nye otchety. Shest'-desyat pervaya sessiya. Dopolnenie ¹ 10 (A/61/10). 6. Fragmentatsiya mezhdunarodnogo prava: trudnosti, obuslovlennye diversifikatsiey i ras-shireniem sfery okhvata mezhdunarodnogo prava. Doklad Issledovatel'skoy gruppy Komis-sii mezhdunarodnogo prava OON. 13.04.2006. Dok. OON A/CN.4/L.682. 7. Pauwelyn J. Conflict of Norms in Public International Law: How WTO Law Relates to other Rules of International Law. Cambridge University Press, 2003. 8. Trachtman J. The Domain of WTO Dispute Resolution // Harvard International Law Journal. 1990. Vol. 40. 9. Yearbook of the International Law Commission. 2001. Vol. II. Part II. UN, New-York and Geneva, 2007 |
© 1998 – 2024 Nota Bene. Publishing Technologies. NB-Media Ltd.
Eng
