|
Library
|
Your profile |
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.|
Administrative and municipal law
Reference:
Dilbandyan, S. A.
Participation of Juvenile Crime Defenders in the Criminal Procedure in Russia and Armenia
// Administrative and municipal law.
2011. ¹ 5.
P. 82-85.
URL: https://en.nbpublish.com/library_read_article.php?id=58292
Dilbandyan, S. A. Participation of Juvenile Crime Defenders in the Criminal Procedure in Russia and ArmeniaAbstract: The article is devoted to the questions of participation of a juvenile crime defender in the court procedure on juvenile crime in Russia and Armenia. Considering peculiarities of a legal status of the accused and suspect in such affairs, the author believes it is important to provide them with a suitable legal assistance. The article also discuses certain issues related to defending tactics. Keywords: defender, advocate, defense, process, procedure, enforcement, the suspect, the accused, under-age, teacher
This article is unavailable for unregistered users.
Click to login or register
References
1. Baranov A.M. O momente dopuska i obyazatel'nom uchastii zashchitnika v dosudebnom proizvodstve po UPK RF // Zakonodatel'stvo i praktika. — 2002. — ¹ 1.
2. Gorbacheva E.V. Problemy regulirovaniya sudoproizvodstva po delam nesovershennoletnikh v UPK RF. // Materialy mezhdunarodnoy nauchno-prakticheskoy konferentsii «Ugolovno-protsessual'nyy kodeks Rossiyskoy Federatsii: god pravoprimeneniya i prepodavaniya». — M., 2004. 3. Kondrusov E.V. Zashchitnik. Ponyatie, ego protsessual'noe polozhenie, dopusk zashchitnika k uchastiyu v dele, obyazatel'noe uchastie zashchitnika // Rossiyskiy sud'ya. — 2007. — ¹ 3. 4. Motovilovker Ya., Shirshov M. Psikhicheskiy nedostatok obvinyaemogo kak uslovie obyazatel'nogo uchastiya za-shchitnika v ugolovnom sudoproizvodstve // Sovetskaya yustitsiya. — 1983. — ¹ 2. 5. Makarenko I.A. Zashchitnik kak garant soblyudeniya prav i zakonnykh interesov nesovershennoletnego obvinya-emogo // Zakon i pravo. — 2006. — ¹ 12. 6. Mishchenko E.V. K voprosu ob uchastii zashchitnika v proizvodstve po delam nesovershennoletnikh // Pravo i gosudarstvo: teoriya i praktika. — 2006. — ¹ 8. 7. Tetyuev S.V. K voprosu o zashchitnike nesovershennoletnego v ugolovnom sudoproizvodstve (analiz chasti 2 stat'i 49 KPK RF) // Advokatskaya praktika. — 2007. — ¹ 5. 8. Tetyuev S.V. Zashchitnik — obyazatel'nyy uchastnik proizvodstva po ugolovnym delam v otnoshenii nesover-shennoletnikh // Nauchnye trudy. Rossiyskaya akademiya yuridicheskikh nauk. Vyp. 9. V 3-kh tt. T. 3. — M., 2009. 9. Podol'nyy N.A. Vsegda li v interesakh doveritelya, chtoby advokat deystvoval v sootvetstvii s ego voley? // Advokatskaya praktika. — 2004. — ¹ 3 |
© 1998 – 2024 Nota Bene. Publishing Technologies. NB-Media Ltd.
Eng
