Рус Eng Cn Translate this page:
Please select your language to translate the article


You can just close the window to don't translate
Library
Your profile

Back to contents

International relations
Reference:

Vertically integrated oil and gas companies in Russia. The history of formation and their role in the country's foreign policy

Khadzhi Aleksandr Sergeevich

Postgraduate student; Department of International Relations; Diplomatic Academy of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs of the Russian Federation

53/2 Ostozhenka Street, Moscow, 119021, Russia

haji.sasha@gmail.com
Other publications by this author
 

 

DOI:

10.7256/2454-0641.2025.2.73920

EDN:

SNIYCE

Received:

31-03-2025


Published:

07-04-2025


Abstract: The relevance of the research is determined by the current state of the global energy market: after 2022, a rapid process of forming new trade and economic ties and diversifying the geography of energy resource supplies began. In these conditions, states and companies are making active efforts to occupy new niches and enhance the quality of their supplied goods portfolio. The object of the study is the vertically integrated oil and gas companies of Russia. Vertical integration in energy sector has been characteristic of the development of Western structures since the first half of the 20th century; however, in Russia, despite the historical emergence of such organizations, this process has taken a different path. The subject of the study is the role of vertically integrated oil and gas companies in Russia's foreign policy as an important element of the country's economy and politics. Promising projects of the largest oil and gas companies are now positioning the country among the global leaders in the fuel and energy sector, enhancing Russia's prestige and generating necessary high revenues from export activities in the context of large-scale sanctions and pressure from the West. The methodological foundation of the research includes general scientific, historical, and other methods used in similar studies: in particular, historical-comparative method, systemic and critical analysis, content analysis, etc. The scientific novelty lies in the comprehensive analysis of the historical experience of forming vertically integrated structures in Russia, identifying the main problems at the turn of the USSR's collapse, and focusing on several key features of the activities of vertically integrated oil and gas companies in the country's foreign policy. The study allows for the following conclusions: firstly, the construction of vertically integrated companies occurred with the support of the state and enabled the free movement of capital in the sector, accelerated technological breakthroughs, and developed lagging areas. Secondly, this affected the entire industry and provided Russia with an effective tool for foreign energy policy – the promising projects of the largest oil and gas companies now position the country among the global leaders in the fuel and energy sector and contribute to enhancing Russia's prestige.


Keywords:

Russia, Energy, History, Vertically integrated oil and gas business, Foreign policy, International relations, International cooperation, Oil and Gas, Politics, Fuel and energy complex

This article is automatically translated. You can find original text of the article here.

Introduction

Today, the largest vertically integrated oil and gas companies (VICS) - Gazprom, Rosneft and LUKOIL – are the largest taxpayers and employers, play a key role in the development of the Russian fuel and energy complex, contribute to the country's economic growth and scientific and technological progress.

Their place as a subject of Russia's foreign policy is especially important. The implementation of large infrastructure projects for the extraction and processing of energy resources in other countries is an important tool of Russian energy diplomacy, contributing to improving the country's image on the world stage and the formation of new trade and economic partnerships.

The emergence of vertically integrated oil and gas companies in Russia

Vertical integration, which involves building a financial, economic, organizational and managerial chain from production to processing and sales, is today a characteristic element of the functioning of the energy industry, dominating the structure of the oil and gas business since the 1930s. Extractive companies, in an effort to gain and further strengthen their position in the retail market, have quite reasonably embarked on the path of involving or creating new economic entities at different stages of the production and economic activity of the oil and gas industry [1, p. 172.173].

Despite the fact that the modern domestic raw materials industry, after the collapse of the USSR, actually needs to adapt to the development trends associated with the functioning of WINK, the palm of the world championship in creating such structures still belongs to Russia: in 1874, the first joint–stock company in the Russian oil industry was established - the Baku Oil Company, which united the entire technological the chain from the borehole to the end user (enterprises for the extraction, processing, storage, transportation and marketing of petroleum products) [2,3].

Established in 1879, the vertically integrated Nobel Brothers Oil Production Partnership strengthened the position of the Russian oil business by introducing promising developments in the field of production, transportation and storage of petroleum products [4].

The establishment of Soviet power, coupled with the nationalization of the fuel and energy complex and structural changes in the entire economy, radically changed the approach to the energy industry management system.

The statement about the development of the vertical integration system in the USSR is true: such organizational forms of production as territorial production complexes, production associations, scientific production associations, etc., really worked within the framework of such an economic architecture [5].

However, it is worth noting an extremely important point here: the directive economy, which requires subordination to the State Planning Committee, in which the enterprises of the Soviet fuel and energy complex existed, made all links of the chain (geological prospecting office, drilling management, refineries and others) extremely "slow" and dependent on each other. Moreover, the planned system created obstacles to the technological re-equipment and supply of oil and gas enterprises, which greatly slowed down the development of the entire industry [1, pp.27-28].

As a negative factor in the management system of the industry, we will also highlight the existence of a whole group of executive authorities involved in the work of neftegaz. Among them were the Ministry of Geology of the USSR, the Ministry of the Petroleum Industry, the Ministry of the Gas Industry, the Ministry of Oil Refining and Petrochemical Industry, the Main Directorate for Transportation, Storage and Distribution of Petroleum and Petroleum Products, the Ministry of Construction of Oil and Gas Industry Enterprises – such an overblown bureaucratic apparatus, where powers were often overlapped by different bodies, simply could not ensure the adoption of quick and effective effective solutions that contribute to the qualitative development of the oil and gas industry [6].

The constant increase in plans for the extraction and processing of raw materials, aimed at obtaining even more foreign exchange earnings from exports, also had a significant impact on the state of the entire fuel and energy complex of the USSR: firstly, the pressure of the directive economy remained, requiring new indicators, and secondly, financial problems that were trying to be alleviated by extensive development of the raw materials sector., had an even greater negative impact. It is worth adding to this the already mentioned problem of the backlog of the logistics system, which causes the degradation of enterprise funds. The deep crisis of the financial and economic system of the former USSR led to the collapse of the raw materials industry and the emergence of non-governmental companies in the early 90s, marking the transition of the industry to a market economy [7, p.50].

Vertically integrated companies have become a form of ensuring "the interest of combining the efforts of oil production, refining and marketing enterprises in order to save on production costs and through the introduction of new technologies", which was needed to improve the industry and bring it out of the complex crisis of management and finance [1, p. 7].

One of the founders of the idea of introducing, or rather, the actual return of VINK to Russia, was the future head of LUKOIL, V.Y. Alekperov, who held the post of Deputy Minister of the Oil and Gas Industry in the early 90s. Familiarization with the experience of Western companies was of great importance [8].

On November 17, 1992, Decree of the President of the Russian Federation No. 1403 "On the Specifics of Privatization and Transformation into Joint-stock Companies of State-owned Enterprises, Production Associations of the Petroleum, oil refining industry and petroleum Products Supply" was signed.

The decree provided for the creation of three types of organizations in the oil industry:

1) Oil production, refining and oil product supply enterprises, which, through the transfer of blocks of shares, come under the control of the state enterprise Rosneft;

2) Private WINK: LUKOIL, Yukos, and Surgutneftegaz, which combined oil production, refining, petroleum products supply, and other related industries;

3) Enterprises in the field of oil and petroleum products transportation, whose shares are included in the authorized capital of Transneft and Transnefteprodukt companies.

LUKOIL became the first vertically integrated oil company in modern Russia. Its history began with the Decree of the Government of the RSFSR No. 18 dated November 25, 1991 "On the formation of the LANGEPASURAIKOGALYM Oil Concern (LUKOIL)".

Rosneft, on the contrary, has become one of the last vertically integrated oil joint-stock companies in Russia. Rosneftegaz was established by Resolution No. 555 of the Council of Ministers of the RSFSR dated October 18, 1991 on the basis of the disbanded Ministry of Oil and Gas Industry of the USSR. In April 1993, it was transformed into the state-owned enterprise Rosneft, and in 1995 it became a full-fledged joint-stock company, where the state remained the main shareholder.

The previously mentioned Yukos, as well as smaller companies like Sidanko, Slavneft and others, will eventually come back under de facto state control, being absorbed by Rosneft. However, some large regional WINCs, such as Tatneft or Surgutneftegaz, continue their activities to this day.

A process similar to the history of Rosneft was associated with the formation of a large vertically integrated Gazprom holding company, which was formed in 1989, which marked the first step in the transformation of the Soviet gas industry to market realities in the late 1980s and early 1990s. In fact, the management of the gas industry was transferred from the hands of the Ministry of Oil and Gas the USSR industry is in the hands of a new entity, independent in decision-making. This made it possible to remove the entire industry from bureaucratic red tape and preserve it for further development in the conditions of a worsening economic and political situation [8,9].

On November 5, 1992, a Decree of the President of the Russian Federation was signed on the transformation of the state concern Gazprom into RAO Gazprom, and on February 17, 1993, RAO Gazprom was established by a Decree of the Council of Ministers - the Government of the Russian Federation. The company has become an essential element of the domestic stock market and the largest joint-stock company in Russia.

The emergence of vertically integrated oil and gas companies in the post-Soviet crisis made it possible to preserve the industry and give an impetus to development, transferring control of the entire production chain from production to supply to the end user into hands more or less free from the bureaucratic pressure of a planned economy. The system of maximum vertical integration that existed in the USSR, with a large number of authorities, regional scientific and industrial associations and local enterprises united by the goal of Gosplan, simply could not work effectively due to directive management methods rather than a free market.

The state, in its attempts to stop the degradation of the country's economy, would not have been able to ensure effective management of the oil and gas industry, which was already in a declining state. An example of a political decision to transfer the industry to "parastatal" hands, as happened with Gazprom and then Rosneft, became the key to positive trends in the oil and gas industry.

WINCS were able to ensure the free movement of capital within the industry, and the consolidation of enterprises in related sectors of the economy contributed to the required logistical support and scientific and technological progress.

The place of vertically integrated companies in Russia's foreign policy

Today, Russia's oil and gas sector plays an important role not only in the national economy, but also contributes to ensuring the energy security of many countries around the world.

Vertically integrated companies are an effective instrument of Russia's energy diplomacy, enhancing the country's international authority and prestige through the implementation of large and often promising strategic projects for the extraction and transportation of raw materials.

Ensuring international energy security through the supply of energy resources

One of the key tasks that large Russian oil and gas companies are solving is to meet the needs of importing countries for raw materials for the efficient operation of the economy and industry.

The most striking example in this area is Gazprom's long-term natural gas supplies to European countries, which contributed to the intensive development of all industries.

Soviet contracts with European countries and the logistical structure became the basis for the development of VINK's export activities in 1990-2000. Since the 21st century. Gazprom has begun actively expanding its network of main pipelines, connecting European consumers with the Russian fuel and energy complex. The expansion strategy, especially in terms of gas supplies, was based on maximizing benefits (occupying new niches, developing existing potential), minimizing risks, and, importantly, outperforming competitors and creating obstacles to their activities [10].

It was important in this context to ensure national energy security in the context of reducing dependence on transit states, in particular, Ukraine, through whose territory Soviet export pipelines were historically built [11].

· Yamal-Europe is a gas pipeline built in 1994-1999 through the territory of Belarus, Poland and Germany. The design capacity is 32.9 billion cubic meters of gas per year. It has not been operational since March 30, 2022.

· Blue Stream is a gas pipeline built in 2001-2002 through the Black Sea for transit–free gas exports to Turkey. The design capacity is 16 billion cubic meters of gas per year.

· Turkish Stream – built in 2017-2018 through the Black Sea to increase supplies to Turkey and ensure the interests of importing countries in Southeastern Europe. The design capacity is 31.5 billion cubic meters of gas per year.

· Nord Stream and Nord Stream – 2 a are transit–free export gas pipelines to Germany via the Baltic Sea. They were built in 2010-2012 and 2018-2021, respectively. The design capacity is 55 billion cubic meters of gas per year (for each branch). They are currently not functioning after the sabotage in September 2022.

Support for developing countries

The operational activities of oil and gas companies in developing countries are related to a number of important aspects. Firstly, companies provide an influx of investment funds to countries in Africa, the Middle East and Latin America for the purpose of geological exploration, extraction and processing of raw materials. Secondly, the activities of the oil and gas business are also related to the development of cooperation in terms of strengthening human, technological and professional capacities in the countries of presence through training programs, education, exchange of experience, etc. [12].

This process is typical not only for Russian oil and gas companies, on the contrary, it is a distinctive feature of the entire global oil and gas business in the context of a changing global agenda, increasing attention to issues of sustainable development and human capital. This forces global companies to pay more and more attention to issues of social investment, support for local communities, solving local problems and promoting development [13].

Here are a couple of examples: in 2015 Rosneft has signed a four-party agreement with the Venezuelan company PDVSA, the Gubkin Russian State University of Oil and Gas and the University of Hydrocarbons of the Republic of Venezuela. The agreement implied strengthening energy cooperation, in particular, the export of Russian oil to Venezuelan refineries, as well as cooperation in the field of education and science. And in 2024, on the sidelines of the XXVII St. Petersburg International Economic Forum, an agreement on cooperation in the field of education and training was signed between Rosneft and the Cuban State Oil Company (CUPET).

Symbiosis of government and business

Large Russian oil and gas companies, while carrying out their activities in the field of extraction and production of energy resources, simultaneously carry out representative functions of Russia in terms of national policy on oil and gas issues. Such activities help companies to obtain additional preferences and administrative resources on both domestic and foreign policy tracks. For example, companies receive preference in the allocation of licenses for the development of new deposits, secondly, the state provides protectionist functions, restricting access of foreign players to the domestic market, provides comprehensive political support in controversial issues at the international level [14].

The expansion of the geographical presence of Russian oil and gas companies and the intensification of activities related to the implementation of joint production and production projects with foreign partners, firstly, reduces dependence on high volatility in oil prices, and secondly, helps minimize political and economic risks [15] - the participation of Russian companies, especially where the share in The cost of the project is high, it forms a certain "safety cushion" from the pressure of government structures or third parties.

The large-scale sanctions pressure exerted by the West is forcing Russia and fuel and energy companies to form new partnerships and diversify their geography and supply portfolio. The so-called turn of energy to the East, the pace of which increased after 2022, is today one of the main trends in the Russian energy sector.

The Asia-Pacific region, where consumption growth is growing many times and there is a high interest in Russian energy resources, opens up new horizons for domestic WINCS.

Moreover, it is important to note that countries such as India are ready to defend their national interests and engage in energy cooperation with Russia, despite condemnation from Western countries. This forces Russia's main competitors on the world stage to start looking for new approaches to the leaders of the Global South.

Prospects for a multiple increase in supplies to China through the construction of new large gas and oil pipelines are also being discussed at the highest level.

Russian companies are also paying great attention to the development of mining and processing projects in Africa, where competition with the United States and Arab countries is beginning to increase.

Separately, it is worth highlighting another vertically integrated company that also operates in the energy sector, but is not a representative of neftegaz - the state corporation Rosatom.

Rosatom's projects are now making Russia a global leader in the use of peaceful atomic energy: promising models of new-generation reactors, safety and control systems for nuclear power plants are attracting the attention of potential customers from other countries. The company is actively involved in the construction of facilities in other countries: currently, nuclear power plants are already being built in Bangladesh, Hungary, Egypt, India, Iran, China, Turkey and other countries. And the world's only fleet of nuclear icebreakers gives Russia a strategic advantage in implementing projects near the North Pole [16].

Conclusion

Today, Russian vertically integrated giants are actively involved in the implementation of Russia's energy policy aimed at diversifying markets, finding new partners, and ensuring global energy security. The implementation of new projects demonstrates the country's ability to adapt to global policy changes and not lose its position in global energy markets.

As the key tasks that Russian WINCS solve in the country's energy policy, we will single out:

· Strengthening economic ties by increasing export volumes;

· Expansion of the geographical presence due to new mining, processing and transportation projects;

· Ensuring the energy security of partner countries by increasing export volumes on favorable terms;

· Increasing the prestige of Russia through promising technological developments in the fuel and energy sector.

Vertically integrated companies in Russia have gone through a rapid development path in an extremely unfavorable economic and political environment. The important policy decisions taken in the early 1990s, including the transformation of the internal structure of the fuel and energy complex and the transfer of management to companies that can freely use their own capital, allowed the oil and gas industry to improve.

Further reorganization in the first decade of the noughties, with the allocation of two state-owned and one private giant, made it possible to strengthen the centralized nature of industry management and set strategic development impulses.

References
1. Alekperov, V. Y. (1996). Vertically integrated oil companies in Russia: Methodology of formation and implementation. Autopan.
2. Matveychuk, A. A. (2008). Pioneers of Russian oil entrepreneurship. Russian Entrepreneurship, 2-2, 149-153. EDN: LILEBJ
3. Urazgaliev, V. Sh. (2013). Formation and development of the oil industry in the Russian Empire. Bulletin of Saint Petersburg University. Economics, 1, 69-80. EDN: PXZXIF
4. Novikov, M. N. (2016). From the history of the Nobel brothers' oil corporation. History and Pedagogy of Natural Science, 2, 44-47. EDN: WZTZTT
5. Ostrovskaya, E. N. (2012). Domestic experience in the development of vertically integrated structures. Economics and Management: Analysis of Trends and Development Prospects, 1-2, 129-133. EDN: RERNAD
6. Khalilova, T. V., & Kurgaeva, Z. Yu. (2011). Specifics of industry management of enterprises for complex development and use of hydrocarbon raw materials: From the USSR to Russia. Bulletin of Kazan Technological University, 5, 208-213. EDN: NPIYGX
7. Maganov, R., Galustov, A., & Vakhrushev, G. (2000). Features of the reform of the oil industry in the early 1990s. Izvestia, 87.
8. Slavkina, M. V. (2012). "... there was no own Chernomyrdin": The role of personality in the development of the oil and gas industry in post-Soviet history. Bulletin of the Peoples' Friendship University of Russia. Series: History of Russia, 1, 59-73. EDN: ORJSQF
9. Donin, A. N., & Nikolaev, A. N. (2016). "Gazprom": From ministry to state gas concern. Industry: Economics, Management, Technologies, 2(61), 66-70. EDN: VYWLPB
10. Ermakov, V. (2017). New configuration of Russian export gas pipelines to Europe. HSE University.
11. Strelkov, A. V. (2013). Russian gas export in the post-Soviet period (history, problems, prospects). Culture, Science, Education: Problems and Prospects, 180-182. EDN: QZGXWN
12. Zaytsev, Yu. K. (2018). Social investments of Russian business abroad. International Processes, 16(3), 189-201. https://doi.org/10.17994/IT.2018.16.3.54.11 EDN: HGJWVM
13. Izmailova, M. A. (2019). Corporate social responsibility of Russian TNCs as a factor of sustainable development of global society. MIR (Modernization. Innovations. Development), 10(2), 213-227. https://doi.org/10.18184/2079-4665.2019.10.2.213-227 EDN: SVOGDY
14. Bolgar, A. V., & Ilyushenko, A. A. (2011). Companies with predominant state participation as an informal tool of internal and external policy of Russia: The case of OAO "Gazprom" and OAO "Rosneft". VII All-Russian Conference "Youth and Science", Section "Global Problems of Modernity and Geopolitics".
15. Golomedov, V. I. (2013). Strategies of Russian VINKs in the context of the global market. Bulletin of MGIMO University, 5(32), 162-168. EDN: RFXJEL
16. Mirgorod, D. A., & Parubochaya, E. F. (2023). Nuclear energy as a tool of Russia's foreign policy in the Middle East. Bulletin of Volgograd State University. Series 4: History. Regional Studies. International Relations, 28(2), 214-225. https://doi.org/10.15688/jvolsu4.2023.2.18 EDN: PANRYN

First Peer Review

Peer reviewers' evaluations remain confidential and are not disclosed to the public. Only external reviews, authorized for publication by the article's author(s), are made public. Typically, these final reviews are conducted after the manuscript's revision. Adhering to our double-blind review policy, the reviewer's identity is kept confidential.
The list of publisher reviewers can be found here.

Review of the article "Vertically integrated oil and gas companies of Russia. The history of formation and their role in the country's foreign policy today" The subject of the study is the history of formation and the role of vertically integrated oil and gas companies of Russia (VINK) in Russia's foreign policy in the modern period. Research methodology. In the article, the author does not write about the methodological aspects of the research, however, it can be understood from the text that the work is based on the principles of science, consistency, historicism. When writing the work, the author uses general scientific methods: analysis, synthesis, generalization, as well as problem-chronological, historical-genetic and other methods. Relevance. The author of the reviewed article notes that vertically integrated oil and gas companies (VICS) play an important role in the country's economy and make a significant contribution to the federal budget, and emphasizes that their role as an external actor in "the implementation of large infrastructure projects for the extraction and processing of energy resources" is particularly important, acting as "an important tool of Russian energy diplomacy, contributing to the enhancement of the country's image on the world stage and the formation of new trade and economic partnerships." The relevance of the role of the WINC is increasing at the present time, when the collective West is trying to isolate our country and impose a set of sanctions in order to weaken Russia, vertically integrated oil and gas companies in Russia are expanding the geography of contacts, forming new partners, promoting the interests of our country on the world stage and contribute to ensuring global energy security. The study of the history of the formation of vertically integrated oil and gas companies in Russia and their role in the international relations of our country in modern conditions seems relevant and timely. Scientific novelty is determined by the formulation of the problem and research objectives. Style, structure, and content. The style of the article is generally scientific, there are descriptive elements. The language is clear and precise. The structure of the paper is logically composed and contains subheadings that help the reader to better perceive the scientific material. At the beginning of the article, the author reveals the relevance of the topic. Next, the author writes about the emergence of vertically integrated oil and gas companies in Russia in the third quarter of the 19th century, changes in the energy industry management system during the Soviet period of our country's history (he notes the advantages of the industry management system in the USSR - vertical integration and disadvantages- directive economy, a large number of executive authorities involved in the management of the industry, bureaucracy Transformational changes in Russian society in the 1990s, the transition to a market economy, the privatization of state property, and the initiative of individual former Soviet industry directors led to the emergence of vertically integrated oil and gas companies. The article presents three main types of organizations in the oil industry and their role and importance in the country's economy. It is particularly noted that "the emergence of vertically integrated oil and gas companies in the conditions of the post-Soviet crisis made it possible to preserve the industry and give an impetus to development, transferring control of the entire production chain from production to supply to the end user in hands more or less free from the bureaucratic pressure of a planned economy." The author analyzes the place of the Russian Military industrial complex in the country's foreign policy, paying special attention to ensuring international energy security through energy supplies, and highlights the role of Gazprom. The activities of Rosneft, which has concluded contacts with a number of developing countries, are noted. The article analyzes the role of the VINCS in the international arena, the importance of the symbiosis of government and business in the development of relations in the field of economics and international relations, analyzes the positive factors of Russia's eastern policy and the role of the VINCS in it, as well as the state corporation Rosatom, which is active in a number of countries in Africa and Asia. The paper concludes with objective conclusions on the research topic. The bibliography of the article consists of 16 sources (these are the works of Russian researchers on the research topic, written in the last three decades. Appeal to the opponents. The appeal to the opponents was carried out at the level of the work done. Conclusions, the interest of the readership. The article is written on a topical topic and will be of interest to readers of the International Relations magazine. There are typos in the article.

Second Peer Review

Peer reviewers' evaluations remain confidential and are not disclosed to the public. Only external reviews, authorized for publication by the article's author(s), are made public. Typically, these final reviews are conducted after the manuscript's revision. Adhering to our double-blind review policy, the reviewer's identity is kept confidential.
The list of publisher reviewers can be found here.

The subject of the peer-reviewed study is the factor of foreign economic activity of Russian vertically integrated oil and gas companies (hereinafter referred to as VICS) in the country's foreign policy. The Russian oil and gas sector has played a significant role in foreign policy since the late Soviet era and continues to do so to this day. Accordingly, the scientific relevance and practical significance of the research topic chosen by the author of the reviewed article should be recognized as very high. Unfortunately, the author himself, having paid too much attention to the history of the origin and development of domestic WINCS, did not say a word about either the subject of the study or the methodology used in the process. But from the context, it can be understood that the theoretical and methodological basis of the research was the theory of neorealism in international relations, and the main methods used were institutional and historical (when analyzing the history of the origin and development of oil and gas industry institutions), some elements of systemic analysis (which presented these institutions as one of the elements of the country's economic system), as well as statistical analysis of secondary data (in the study of key economic indicators of Russian oil and gas companies). The correct application of these methods allowed the author to obtain results that have signs of scientific novelty and reliability. The fact that Russia uses oil and gas economic instruments to put pressure on other countries is well known. However, it is the systematic study of the WINK as one of the factors of Russian foreign policy that seems to be quite recent. In addition to the general shift in the angle of view, the author highlights the main tasks solved by Russian VICS in foreign energy policy, which may also be of interest to modern science. Finally, the author's forecast of the further development of the VICS and their role in Russian foreign policy is of interest. Structurally, the reviewed work makes a positive impression: its logic is consistent and reflects the main aspects of the research. The following sections are highlighted in the text: - "Introduction", where it is too short (literally in two sentences!) a scientific problem is posed and its relevance is substantiated, but there is no definition of the subject of the study, its goals and objectives, as well as the theoretical and methodological basis; - "The emergence of vertically integrated oil and gas companies in Russia", where, on the contrary, the history of WINK in Russia is unnecessarily detailed; - "The place of vertically integrated companies in foreign policy Russia", in turn, consisting of three subsections that reveal the main tasks that Russian WINCS solve in the country's foreign policy: "Ensuring international energy security through energy supplies", "Support for developing countries" and "Symbiosis of government and business"; - "Conclusion", which summarizes the results of the study, makes conclusions and prospects for further research are outlined. The style of the reviewed article is scientific and analytical. There are a small number of stylistic elements in the text (for example, repetitions of the words: "Today the largest ... are the largest..."; or the use of jargon like "involved in the work of neftegaz", while in the very next sentence the reader finds the quite correct expression "oil and gas industry"; there are also simply strange expressions combining incongruities like this sentence "The deep crisis of the financial and economic system of the former USSR [when does the expression "crisis of the financial and economic system" refer to? by the time of the late USSR? apparently, yes, considering that the expression "early 90s" is used in the future tense; then why is the USSR "former"? – Rec.] led to the collapse of the raw materials industry and the emergence in the early 90s...."; or the grammatically correct, but stylistically strange agreement of the proposal "... Small companies... will again come under the de facto control of the state, being absorbed by Rosneft [Rosneft company? somehow it is necessary to coordinate these parts of the sentence, and not with the nominative case, in which the name of the Rosneft company stands – rec.]"; another example of a similar stylistic decision: "...How did this happen to [companies? – Rec. Gazprom, and then Rosneft"; or the use of quotation marks in one case and the rejection of them in another: "...In 2015, Rosneft signed a four-party agreement with the Venezuelan company PDVSA [in the first case, there is no defining word "company" next to the name, but the name is in quotation marks; in the second case, on the contrary, the word "company" is there, and its name is used without quotation marks; although it should be the other way around]"; actually, the title of the article, consisting of two sentences, does not look perfect stylistically: it could be combined through a colon; etc.) and grammatical (for example, writing some government positions are capitalized when this is not required by spelling rules, for example: "the post of Deputy Minister of Oil and Gas Industry"; or a missing comma after the adverbial expression "if desired", which does not require (although it allows) separation, but if the author has decided to intonationally highlight it, then the second comma. it was necessary to put in the sentence "The state in attempts to stop the degradation of the country's economy, would not be able to do it with all its desire..."; or banal typos like "they have become the key to positive trends in the oil and gas industry"; etc.) errors, but in general it is written quite competently, in good Russian, with the correct use of scientific terminology. The bibliography includes 16 titles and adequately reflects the state of research on the subject of the article. Although it could be enhanced by including sources in foreign languages. There is no appeal to the opponents due to the lack of theoretical and methodological reflection. The specially specified advantages of the article include a fairly extensive empirical material used for analysis. THE GENERAL CONCLUSION is that the article proposed for review, despite some of its shortcomings, can be qualified as a scientific work that meets the basic requirements for such work. The results obtained by the author will be of interest to political scientists, sociologists, economists, specialists in the field of world politics and international relations, as well as to students of the listed specialties. The presented material, in general, corresponds to the subject of the journal "International Relations". Based on the results of the review, the article is recommended for publication.