Рус Eng Cn Translate this page:
Please select your language to translate the article


You can just close the window to don't translate
Library
Your profile

Back to contents

Man and Culture
Reference:

Graphemes as a structural element of the design of subway schemes

Ermakov Egor Viktorovich

ORCID: 0009-0007-1802-3234

Postgraduate student; Business Communications Institute; St. Petersburg State University of Industrial Technologies and Design

197198, Russia, St. Petersburg, Petrogradsky district, Kronverksky Prospekt, 67/13 letter A, 22

ermakov159753@gmail.com

DOI:

10.25136/2409-8744.2025.2.73478

EDN:

OZBRHQ

Received:

24-02-2025


Published:

03-05-2025


Abstract: The focal point of this study pertains to the role of fundamental structural and compositional elements of infodesign of transport schemes, which collectively influence the viewer's perception of visual language. These elements have been delineated as 'graphemes'. The analytical framework encompasses their structural components, the functional role they play in navigation, the aesthetic principles that govern the organization of scheme space, and the cultural-semiotic significance that reflects local identity. A particular focus of the study is the interaction of graphemes with the user, exploring how their shape and composition influence information perception, emotional response, and navigation facilitation within the context of urban transport systems. The objective of this study is to explore the role of 'graphemes' in the design of transport schemes, and to attempt to develop a methodology of approaches to the introduction of certain symbols or signs into the design of metro schemes, taking into account their cultural, functional and aesthetic criteria, expressed in our own interpretation of the St. Petersburg metro scheme based on this approach. The research was conducted using the following methods: information design, semiotics and psychology. These methods included prototyping, comparative analysis, case study and narrative method. The results of the study confirm that the integration of graphemes increases the intuitiveness of the systems and their cultural adaptation strengthens the identity of the urban environment. Using the author's interpretation of the St Petersburg metro scheme as an example, it is shown how local symbols (e.g. historic buildings) can be organically integrated into the design. The following necessary steps for further research are highlighted as prospects: testing the proposed solutions through sociological surveys of passengers to assess their practical effectiveness; developing flexible methods for scaling 'graphemes', taking into account the expansion of transport networks and changes in the urban context.


Keywords:

grapheme, navigation system, subway, subway scheme, sign, infodesign, infographics, prägnanz, design semiotics, symbol

This article is automatically translated. You can find original text of the article here.

Introduction

In the traditional sense, a grapheme is a linear–axial structure of a letter mark or a minimal unit of written speech corresponding to a phoneme in spoken speech. In the context of studying information design, the question arises whether a similar structural organization should be integrated into the design of transport schemes, considering the navigation scheme itself as a sign.

In the framework of this study, a grapheme will be understood as a sign formed by the lines of the diagrams of subway lines and other transport systems, which is a kind of "skeleton" of the map, perceived by the viewer before its direct content. The first use of the term grapheme in this context is found in Ilya Birman's practical guide "Design of transport schemes".

The relevance of this study is due to the fact that studying the role of graphemes as structural elements of navigation scheme design can play an important role in forming a convenient and functional approach to their design, as well as positively influence the perception and experience of using schemes by passengers.

The purpose of this study is to study the role of grapheme in the design of transport schemes, as well as an attempt to develop a methodology for approaches to the implementation of certain symbols or signs in the design of the metro scheme, taking into account their cultural, functional and aesthetic criteria, expressed in their own interpretation of the St. Petersburg metro scheme based on this approach.

Currently, issues related to the semiotic approach to the study of cartography and information design are poorly understood in the scientific community. This problem is partly reflected in scientific works on the semiotics of design, thematic cartography and visual communication systems by E. V. Zherdev, A.V. Ikonnikova, N. I. Barsukova, V. S. Pavlov, O. G. Novichkova, N. I. Natus, D. A. Potapov and others [1, 3-5, 7-9], where the authors explore the theory of signs and communication systems, as well as their implementation in the field of information design, but the role of the organizing symbol (grapheme) in the context of navigation infographics is practically not considered.

The object of this study is the design of subway schemes, and the subject is the role of graphemes as an information design tool for transport schemes. The material for the study was 12 current subway schemes in the following cities: Moscow, Nagoya, Beijing, London, Cleveland, San Francisco, Paris, Barcelona, Madrid, New York, Mexico City, and St. Petersburg.

Research materials and methods

12 metro schemes from different cities of the world served as the material for this study. The selected schemes were divided into two main categories: those that include graphemes, and those that do not have such organizing elements at their core. This separation made it possible to conduct a visual analysis, identify the grounds for the use of graphemes, and evaluate their contribution to the overall readability of the schemes.

The research was conducted using information design methods, fundamentals of semiotics and psychology, including prototyping, comparative analysis, case study, and narrative method.

A comparative analysis revealed the differences between the two categories of schemes, which allowed us to determine which elements and shapes are most effective in their design. The narrative method, in turn, made it possible to interpret the data obtained during the analysis of the schemes. Prototyping was used to explore the possibilities of graphemes in simplifying navigation through complex metro schemes using the example of the St. Petersburg metro.

Results

In the context of route scheme design, a grapheme can be considered as a fundamental element of their structure, performing the function of a sign. Within the framework of semiotics, a sign is an object that is perceived by visual analyzers, and also transmits certain information. Thus, a grapheme can play the role of not only a structuring compositional element in a scheme, but also have a semantic meaning at its core.

According to a study by E. V. Zherdev, who studied the relationship between composition and metaphorical imagery in design, when a person perceives a design object through associative connections, a primary impression appears in the first seconds of interaction, which allows him to evaluate this object both positively and negatively from the point of view of aesthetics [3]. At the same time, T. A. Putintseva's research shows a tendency to simplify the representation of signs, which contributes to the formation of various associations due to the greater space for the viewer's imagination. This leads to a wider application of such a graphic design technique as "fragmentation", which consists in the fact that individual design elements have their own meaning, but when combined, a new meaning is formed, different from the original ones [10]. Consequently, the application of the principles of semiotics in design makes it possible to take into account both aesthetic and semantic aspects in the study of graphemes in subway schemes.

In the context of this study, an analysis of the subway schemes of the following cities was carried out: Beijing, Nagoya, London, Moscow, Cleveland, San Francisco, St. Petersburg, Barcelona, Paris, New York, Madrid, Mexico City. This choice was due to the need to study different approaches to cartographic design in the context of urban navigation in different cities of the world (see Figure 1).

Analyzing the presented schemes, we have identified two main types of composite solutions. The diagrams located in the first line demonstrate the presence of a pronounced central axial element, which serves as the organizing principle of the entire composition. In contrast, the schemes of the second line are characterized by a more complex and less ordered structure, where there is no clearly defined central element, which makes it difficult to perceive complex information.

Figure 1 of the subway scheme

Fig.1 Subway schemes

The further simplification of the schemes, carried out by designer Peter Dovak by removing station names and secondary information (see Figure 2), makes it possible to see more clearly the basic compositional principles underlying each of the schemes (Dovak P. Mini Metros URL: https://www.behance.net/gallery/42513037/Mini-Metros ). So, in grapheme schemes, one can observe either a clearly traceable geometric shape formed by a circular line (examples of the cities of Moscow, Nagoya, Beijing, London), or a shape created by crossing broken lines, which is associated with the image of a human figure or symbolic sign (Cleveland, San Francisco).

Figure 2 Simplified subway schemes

Fig.2 Simplified subway schemes

The first group includes the schemes of the following cities: Moscow, Nagoya, Beijing and London. On the Moscow and Nagoya metro diagrams, the grapheme is an annular line, represented as a circle. The circle, as a basic archetypal image in design, symbolizes integrity, continuity and dynamism [6], which helps to maintain the compositional structure and facilitates orientation in the space of the scheme, forcing the viewer's gaze to move along the ring and concentrate on the compositional center of the scheme.

As part of the design of the Beijing Subway scheme, a different approach is used to visualize ring lines: they are represented as geometric shapes with right angles (square and polygon). This geometric shape is associated with stability, stability and rationality [6], which is dictated not only by topology, but also by the cultural and historical context, since in the center of the diagram is a symbol of Chinese history - the Forbidden City, the geometry of which also obeys the shape of a square.

On the London Underground diagram, you can highlight another grapheme - a polygon resembling the shape of a bottle lying on its side. This element performs the function of a compositional core, highlighting the urban center, around which other, more chaotic and disparate lines are organized.

An analysis of the subway maps of the cities of Cleveland and San Francisco revealed the absence of ring lines, but the general configuration of the lines in these diagrams may be associated with human silhouettes. On the Cleveland metro map, the lines are arranged in such a way that they create an association with a falling person, while on the map of San Francisco, the lines resemble the figure of a man with his hands joyfully raised up. The contrasting lines in these diagrams and the specific angles of their inclination contribute to the formation of an expressive and memorable image. This facilitates the process of visual perception and allows passengers to more easily assimilate and reproduce from memory the structure of the subway scheme.

In the context of communicative design and semiotics, an analysis of the subway schemes of the following group of cities, including St. Petersburg, Barcelona, Paris, New York, Madrid and Mexico City, reveals the absence of central axial elements in the compositional structure of the map. This absence leads to the creation of visually overloaded and difficult-to-perceive circuits, where navigation is complicated due to the high density of heterogeneous information. Such a circuit design may be due to the unique topology and individual characteristics of the subway lines of each city. However, the key task of a metro circuit designer is to transform any topology and line layout into a more readable and orderly form, therefore, the design of these circuits can be improved.

As part of the research, alternative design concepts for the St. Petersburg metro scheme were developed. The main emphasis was placed on the development of grapheme as a central compositional element, which is absent in the modern scheme. As a result, seven conceptual variants of graphic symbols for the St. Petersburg metro scheme were created (Figure 3). The first two variants are graphemes located in the central part of the diagram, which silhouetted resemble raised bridges — the iconic symbol of St. Petersburg, as well as the metro logo in the form of the letter "M" (graphemes 1, 2). The remaining five variants demonstrate graphemes in the form of geometric shapes: a circle (grapheme 3), a trapezoid and square (grapheme 4), trapezoid (grapheme 5), as well as variations of the square (grapheme 6-7). These strict geometric shapes visually correlate with the architectural traditions of classicism, characteristic of the historical buildings of St. Petersburg.

Figure 3 Grapheme development based on the St. Petersburg Metro scheme

Fig.3 Development of a grapheme based on the scheme of the St. Petersburg metro

Discussion

As a result of the comparative analysis, it was revealed that the use of such structural elements as graphemes greatly simplifies the process of orientation in the scheme, and also creates a more understandable and memorable symbol for the user. Of the developed grapheme variants based on the St. Petersburg metro scheme, three were chosen as the most successful (graphemes 2, 3, 7).

Grapheme 2 combines rounded and broken lines, promotes easy memorization due to the formation of an associative connection with the metro logo and the symbol of the city – raised bridges. Grapheme 3 is perceived not only as a visual accent highlighting the city center due to the circle, but also conveniently shows transfer options between different metro lines. Grapheme 7, whose shape is a square with rounded corners, combines the convenience and emphasis of grapheme 3, and also reflects the classicism of the architecture of the city center, or can be associated with the famous courtyards-wells.

The proposed symbols not only reflect the cultural peculiarities of St. Petersburg, but also simplify navigation by using simple signs and forms, which follows from such a principle of perceptual psychology as the law of precedence proposed by M. V. Wertheimer, according to which integral and complete forms are better captured by perception when they are characterized by internal organization, symmetry, and clear boundaries. and balance, as well as similarity to simple geometric shapes [2]. Consequently, graphemes may have different structures and symbols at their base, but their presence optimizes the interaction of passengers with the metro scheme, which corresponds to the main goals of the information design.

Conclusion

Thus, graphemes play an important structural role in the design of subway circuits. The integration of graphic symbols not only simplifies interaction with the scheme, but can also reflect the historical and cultural symbols of the city. The interdisciplinary approach in the study made it possible to justify the introduction of such a term "grapheme" by linking design and semiotics, as well as considering information design objects as sign systems. As a result of the analysis, further research of grapheme implementation options using sociological surveys of subway passengers is recommended. It is also necessary to develop an approach to the use of graphemes, taking into account the possible scaling of the metro network.

References
1. Barsukova, N. I. (2022). Semiotic functions of figurative-associative forms of design in urban environment. Bulletin of Slavic Cultures, 65, 359-371.
2. Wertheimer, M. V. (1987). Productive thinking (S. F. Gorbov & V. P. Zinchenko, Eds.; V. P. Zinchenko, Introductory article). Progress.
3. Zherdev, E. V. (2005). Features of the interaction between composition and metaphorical imagery in the context of design semiotics. Bulletin of OGU, 1, 73-82.
4. Ikonnikov, A. V. (1989). Design of transport systems: Some problems of integrated design. Technical Aesthetics, 57, 60-74.
5. Laptev, V. V. (2014). Thematic cartography as a special direction of information design. International Journal of Cultural Studies, 3, 85-92.
6. Makhlina, S. T. (2018). Communicative features of design semiotics. Bulletin of St. Petersburg State Institute of Culture, 2, 14-18.
7. Novichkova, O. G., & Natus, N. I. (2014). Design of navigation systems as one of the areas of contemporary design. Tsarskoye Selo Readings, XVIII, 180-183.
8. Pavlova, V. S. (2011). Features of the application of semiotics in graphic advertising design. Almanac of Theoretical and Applied Research in Advertising, 1, 81-92.
9. Potapov, D. A. (2023). Graphic design in the optics of semiotics and interpretive sociology. St. Petersburg Sociology Today, 19, 49-59.
10. Putintseva, T. A. (2015). Technologies for finding creative solutions in the design of "Symbolic Forms". Bulletin of OGU, 5, 57-62.

First Peer Review

Peer reviewers' evaluations remain confidential and are not disclosed to the public. Only external reviews, authorized for publication by the article's author(s), are made public. Typically, these final reviews are conducted after the manuscript's revision. Adhering to our double-blind review policy, the reviewer's identity is kept confidential.
The list of publisher reviewers can be found here.

The subject of the research in the article submitted for publication in the journal "Man and Culture", as the author briefly reflected in the title ("Graphemes as a structural element of the design of subway schemes") and fully presented in the goal setting of scientific research ("The purpose of this study is to study the role of grapheme in the design of transport schemes ..."), is the role of grapheme, as a structural element (in an object) in the design of transport schemes. If brevity and conventionality in the formulation of the subject and object of research are acceptable in the title of a scientific article, then in the introductory comments, as the reviewer notes, it is desirable to verify their formulations as much as possible, revealing the degree of thoughtfulness of the research program. Otherwise, even if the formal semantic unity of the elements of the research program is observed, incidents may arise that reduce the quality of the planned publication and make it difficult to unambiguously understand the author's thought. Unfortunately, this is how it turned out in the presented article ("The object of this study is subway schemes, and the subject is graphemes in transport schemes"): 1) the grammar of the agreement in the Russian language of the singular and plural members of the sentence is violated ("object... are schemes"..., "the subject is graphemes ..."); 2) the logic of the correlation of the subject of research with the object and empirical material is violated: graphemes are not found in all schemes, respectively, the logic of sampling schemes without graphemes is not clear. That's if the object of research is still the design of diagrams, in the toolkit of which a grapheme can be used in the scope of the concept specified by the author ("grapheme will be understood as a sign formed by the lines of the diagrams of subway lines and other transport systems, representing a kind of "skeleton" of the map, perceived by the viewer to its direct content"), and the subject — nevertheless, the role (function) of such an infodesign tool as grapheme, then it becomes obvious the expediency of comparing different design options (with and without graphemes) and the logic of sampling empirical material. In this case, the reviewer proceeds from the interest of both the editorial board of the journal and the author in improving the quality of the planned publication, therefore, he strongly recommends that the author adjust the wording of the object and subject of research in the introduction. Then the final conclusion ("graphemes play an important structural role in circuit design") will fully comply with the stated research program. At the same time, the reviewer clarifies that the comments made do not affect the scientific result presented in the article. The author's final conclusion is well-reasoned and trustworthy. The subject of the study (the role of grapheme in the design of transport circuits) is disclosed by the author at a good theoretical level, and the article deserves publication in a reputable scientific journal. The research methodology is based on the principles of visual ergonomics of information design of transport schemes. The author's methodological package consists of analytical techniques of information design, semiotics and psychology, enhanced by general scientific methods of comparative analysis, case study sampling, as well as special methods of prototyping and narrative analysis of graphemes in the design of transport schemes of the St. Petersburg metro. The authorization of the methodology is relevant to the scientific and cognitive tasks being solved. The results of the study are trustworthy. The author justifies the relevance of the chosen topic by the fact that scientifically based arguments for integrating graphemes into the information design of transport schemes are needed to improve their navigation functions. The scientific novelty of the study, which consists in the scientific substantiation of the expediency of using graphemes in the information design of subway transport schemes, which significantly enhance their visual ergonomics, deserves theoretical attention. The style of the text as a whole is scientific, only in one place should the text be corrected due to the discovered technical error ("As a result of comparative analysis, it was revealed that schemes with graphemes were revealed that ..."). The structure of the article corresponds to the logic of presenting the results of scientific research. The bibliography, taking into account the author's reliance on the analysis of empirical material, sufficiently reveals the problematic area of research; it is designed without gross violations of editorial requirements. Appealing to opponents is quite correct and sufficient. The article is of interest to the readership of the journal "Man and Culture" and after a little revision, taking into account the comments of the reviewer, it can be recommended for publication.

Second Peer Review

Peer reviewers' evaluations remain confidential and are not disclosed to the public. Only external reviews, authorized for publication by the article's author(s), are made public. Typically, these final reviews are conducted after the manuscript's revision. Adhering to our double-blind review policy, the reviewer's identity is kept confidential.
The list of publisher reviewers can be found here.

The reviewed article is devoted to the study of the role of graphemes — structural elements formed by subway lines — in the design of navigation schemes. The author reinterprets the linguistic term "grapheme", expanding it to the visual "skeleton" of the map, which organizes the composition and affects the user's perception. Surprisingly, the author refers to the work of I.B.Birman "Design of transport schemes", but does not provide any reference to this work in the bibliography, nor the author's definition of a grapheme as "a general form that is read before examining signatures and individual lines." According to Birman, "a good grapheme makes the scheme recognizable and understandable, and also gives the passenger's eyes a point of support by which it is convenient to navigate" — such a detailed definition would help the reader immediately enter into the range of issues discussed in the article. The study is based on a comparative analysis of 12 subway schemes, divided into two groups. According to the author, the first group includes schemes with graphemes, and the second group includes schemes without them. The use of methods of semiotics, psychology of perception and information design seems logical to solve the tasks set. Prototyping using the example of the St. Petersburg scheme demonstrates the practical orientation of the work, however, the representativeness of the sample raises questions. For example, the inclusion of cities with a radial ring structure (Moscow, London) and linear systems (San Francisco) is justified, but the lack of analysis of Asian megacities (for example, Tokyo or Seoul) narrows the geographical coverage. In addition, the narrative method used to interpret the data could be supplemented with quantitative measurements (for example, an assessment of the speed of users' perception of schemas). The relevance of the work is beyond doubt: designing convenient navigation systems is a key task for modern megacities. The authors rightly point to the lack of knowledge of the semiotic approach in cartography, which makes their research significant for both design theory and practical urban studies. The author's attention to the cultural context is especially valuable, for example, the connection of the grapheme of the Beijing subway with the Forbidden City. The authors propose an original classification of graphemes, highlighting geometric and associative types, as well as demonstrating their connection with cultural symbols. However, the novelty could be enhanced if the authors made a direct comparison of their findings with existing concepts, for example, with the theory of "visual patterns" by Edward Tufty, based, among other things, on the analysis of examples of visualization of transport networks. The article has a clear structure and a scientific style. Illustrations of subway schemes and grapheme variants are the strong point of the work, but their description in the text is perfunctory. For example, the results section does not specify how the "readability" of the schemes was assessed — through expert analysis or empirical data. In addition, the "Results" and "Discussion" sections partially duplicate each other, which violates the logic of the presentation. The list of references includes 10 titles, mainly by domestic authors (Zherdev, Wertheimer, Barsukova), which reflects a focus on the Russian scientific context. However, for a study with an international focus, there are obviously not enough references to key works by foreign experts, such as Jonathan Barnbrook (design of the London subway) or Massimo Vignelli (author of the New York scheme). And of course, what is completely inexplicable in such a study is the absence of the work of Mark Ovenden, who published a whole series of works on mapping urban transport systems (in 2007, his collection “Transit Maps of the World: The World's First Collection of Every Urban Train Map on Earth” was published; in 2020, his the study “Underground Cities: Mapping the tunnels, transits and networks beneath our feet”; in 2024 – “Iconic Transit Maps: The World's Best Designs”). The limitation of the list of references significantly narrows the theoretical base and reduces the potential for comparative analysis. Critics may challenge both the terminological choice (an extension of the concept of "grapheme") and the methodological rigor. For example, dividing circuits into two categories ("with grapheme" and "without") looks simplistic, since many systems combine elements of both types. The authors should explain the criteria for assigning schemes to a particular group. In addition, the lack of data on how the proposed graphemes affect the actual behavior of passengers (for example, through experiments or surveys) weakens the practical significance of the conclusions. The conclusions of the article logically conclude the study: graphemes improve the readability of diagrams and can reflect the cultural characteristics of cities. However, the recommendations are only general in nature ("further study of implementation options"), whereas specific steps (for example, the stages of implementing graphemes into existing schemes) would enhance the applied value of the work. The article will be of interest to experts in the field of information design, urbanism and semiotics, as well as practicing designers of transport systems. However, for a wide audience, the text may seem highly specialized due to the abundance of terms and the lack of "success stories" (for example, grapheme implementation cases). To publish the article, it is recommended to: - strengthen terminological accuracy (at least give an unambiguous definition of the grapheme at the very beginning); - supplement the analysis with discussions with references to foreign studies; - clarify the methodological criteria (by clarifying the criteria for classifying schemes as "graphemic" and "non-graphemic"). The work represents a significant contribution to the study of information design, combining theoretical analysis with practical developments. Despite some shortcomings, the study opens up new perspectives for the design of navigation systems and deserves publication in the journal "Man and Culture" after making edits that take into account the comments made.