Рус Eng Cn Translate this page:
Please select your language to translate the article


You can just close the window to don't translate
Library
Your profile

Back to contents

Police activity
Reference:

Organization of specialized institutions for the detention of foreign citizens before their expulsion from the territory of the country of temporary residence

SHadrina Liliya Valer'evna

ORCID: 0000-0003-4796-9233

Associate Professor; Department of Administrative Activities of Internal Affairs Bodies; Tyumen Institute for Advanced Training of Employees of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of Russia

75 Amurskaya str., Tyumen, Tyumen region, 625049, Russia

danelyanlv@mail.ru

DOI:

10.7256/2454-0692.2024.6.71819

EDN:

JNWGYC

Received:

27-09-2024


Published:

05-01-2025


Abstract: The subject of the study is the norms of the Russian and foreign legislation of individual countries, which establish measures of administrative coercion applied to foreign citizens and stateless persons located in the territory of the host country, related to detention in special institutions. The purpose of the work is to analyze foreign legislation and identify problems that arise when applying these measures under the legislation of the Russian Federation. The focus on streamlining migration processes in recent years has been clearly manifested in the activities of the state in the form of legislative and managerial measures. Perhaps their essence can be reduced to a single goal: providing conditions for migrants to fully realize their rights in the territory of the host country and their functioning within the framework of the "legal field". The research methodology is based on general scientific (logical, systematic, analysis, generalization) and private scientific (specifically sociological, formal legal) methods. The scientific novelty of the study lies in the development of unified approaches to the detention of foreign citizens and stateless persons in the territory of the host country, in terms of the detention of these persons in institutions on the basis of judicial or administrative decisions, their subordination to internal affairs bodies, as well as the terms of detention of these persons. To date, there is no uniform practice of detaining foreign citizens and stateless persons before being expelled from the host country, which entails a violation of their rights and legitimate interests. Also, Russian legislation does not clearly specify the time limits for which a foreign citizen and stateless persons should be held in special institutions until they are expelled from the territory of the Russian Federation.


Keywords:

special institutions, foreign citizens, stateless persons, deportation, administrative expulsion, readmission, administrative enforcement measures, maintenance of persons, foreign experience, administrative punishment

This article is automatically translated. You can find original text of the article here.

In the Russian Federation, as in most foreign countries [1, p. 85], there are specialized institutions for the detention of foreign citizens in order to ensure their removal from the territory of the country of temporary residence - temporary detention centers for foreign citizens (hereinafter referred to as CSIG, special institutions) (Federal Law No. 115 of July 25, 2002-Federal Law "On the Legal Status of Foreign Citizens in the Russian Federation" // Russian Gas. 2002. July 31).

CCSIG detain foreign citizens during the implementation of three coercive measures related to their expulsion from the territory of residence: administrative expulsion, deportation and readmission, which are directly carried out under the supervision of officials of the specified special institutions.

Such scientists as S.I. Ivanova, E.G. Yuzikhanova, E.A. Letaeva, E.P. Zakharova, S.S. Alekseev, N.V. Vitruk, V.I. Novoselova and others consider the problems of the content, the specifics of the implementation and mechanism of the detention of foreign citizens and stateless persons in specialized institutions.

As noted by E.A. Letaeva, according to statistical data, mainly foreign citizens who are subject to compulsory administrative expulsion from the Russian Federation are held in the CCSIG [2, p.39], this circumstance is due to the fact that the specified administrative punishment is imposed not for violating the regime of stay on the territory of the Russian Federation, but for committing offenses that form the composition of an administrative offense in the field of violations of migration rules.

The date of establishment of such institutions is considered to be 2004 [3, p. 26]. The first institution established in Moscow was actually a pre-trial detention facility with a more lenient regime of detention[4, p.32]. At the same time, as E.A. Letaeva notes, the historical background of such special institutions has a longer history and dates back to the beginning of the 20th century. In 1918, in connection with the appearance of refugees and emigrants, and to keep records of them and control their movement, foreign departments were established as part of the NKVD of the RSFSR, commissariats for internal Affairs and executive committees on the ground [5, p.23]. Since the process of creating special institutions was lengthy for objective reasons, it was legally allowed for the detention of refugees and emigrants in temporary detention facilities and even pre-trial detention facilities [5, p.28].

As O.I. Kopytina rightly notes, "the conditions of detention of this category of persons in the Russian Federation have repeatedly become the causes of complaints and appeals from foreign citizens to the European Court of Human Rights, prosecutor's offices, and human rights organizations, which leads to material and image losses for the state"[6, p.690]. This is partly due to the lack of legislative regulation of the legal status of these institutions [7, pp.44-45].

Of particular note is the attempt to create special institutions for only one category of foreign citizens – citizens subject to readmission. The emergence and formation of special institutions intended for the temporary accommodation of foreign citizens subject to readmission, as noted by Ya.L. Vanyushin, have a short history [8, p.7]. Their appearance in 2007 was caused by the need for the Russian Federation to implement international obligations under readmission agreements, the latter was considered as a highly effective tool for countering illegal migration[8, p.7]. By 2011, a total of 3 special institutions of the Federal Migration Service of Russia with a total capacity of 192 places had been created. In the future, their merger with special institutions in which foreign citizens subject to administrative expulsion and deportation were held was due to the unity of the legal and organizational forms of their activities [8, p.15].

It is obvious that the problem of the detention of minor foreign citizens in the CSIG has not yet been resolved, who may arrive with their parents or independently or may be born on the territory of the Russian Federation, and as A.V. Lupenkov rightly notes, their status directly depends on the status of the parents, namely the length of stay and place of stay[9,pp.67-68]. Due to the impossibility of detaining minors without parents in the Central Detention Center, there is a practice of placing them in the Temporary Detention Center for Juvenile Offenders of the Internal Affairs Body (hereinafter referred to as the Central Detention Center). According to statistics, more than 1.5 thousand people are delivered to these premises annually. At the same time, there is no legal basis for the detention of these persons in the Central Tax Service. In this regard, a legislative expansion of the circle of persons placed in the Central Social Security Service is required, and the introduction of a new category of minors into Federal Law No. 120-FZ of June 24, 1999 "On the basics of the system for the prevention of neglect and juvenile delinquency" – minors subject to return to the state of permanent residence[9, p.73].

Our earlier analysis of the foreign experience of detaining foreign citizens and stateless persons before their expulsion from the territory of the host country showed that there are no uniform international standards, as well as uniform national approaches to ensure the rights and legitimate interests of such citizens, including the grounds for placement in these institutions by decision of judicial or administrative authorities.[1,p.90].

For example, in the Republic of Turkey, migration control is carried out by employees of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of Turkey, who escort foreign citizens to Repatriation Centers. Persons against whom a decision has been taken to deport from the country are being held in reparations centers. The period of detention under administrative supervision in the reparations center should not exceed six months. However, it is allowed to extend this period for no more than six months if the deportation process is not completed, since the foreign citizen refuses to cooperate with local authorities and provide reliable information or documents. (Information letter from the representative of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of Russia in the Republic of Turkey dated April 1, 2020 No. N/G75 N.E. Gasimov. The document was not published.).

In the Republic of India, detention centers for foreigners are also under the jurisdiction of the territorial bodies of the Bureau of Immigration under the Ministry of Internal Affairs of India, but are established by decision of the authorities of the constituent entities of the Republic. If there is a shortage of places in special institutions, foreign citizens can be placed in general-purpose detention facilities. In the Republic of Cyprus, foreigners can also be held in a penitentiary institution if there are no temporary detention centers for illegal migrants.

In the Kingdom of Spain, the maximum period of detention in special centers has not been established; if it is inappropriate to keep them, they are transferred to the care of charitable organizations (Information letter from the representative of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of Russia in the Kingdom of Spain dated 03/25/2020 No. 124 A.M. Trofimets. The document was not published.).

In the Republic of Kazakhstan, foreign citizens are held together with persons subjected to administrative arrest in special reception facilities or temporary detention facilities (Law of the Republic of Kazakhstan dated March 30, 1999 No. 353-1 "On the procedure and conditions of detention of persons in special institutions, special premises providing temporary isolation from society" // https://online .zakon.kz/Document/?doc_id=1012660 (date of application: 05/24/2023); Order of the Minister of Internal Affairs of the Republic of Kazakhstan dated May 23, 2011 No. 232 "On approval of the Rules for organizing the activities of special receivers of internal affairs bodies" // https://online .zakon.kz/Document/?doc_id=31048265&pos=5 ;-106#pos=5;-106 (accessed: 05/24/2023).

Unlike the legislation of the Russian Federation, in the legislation of the Republic of Kazakhstan, the detention of a foreign citizen for his expulsion is not identical to administrative detention, which is a measure to ensure proceedings in cases of administrative offenses, because administrative detention has other purposes and is not related to the enforcement of the decision issued in the case (Articles 787-789 of the Administrative Code of the Republic of Kazakhstan). In accordance with Article 28 of the Law of the Republic of Kazakhstan dated June 19, 1995 No. 2337 "On the legal status of foreigners", this person, with the approval of the prosecutor, is subject to detention for the period necessary for expulsion [10, p.63].

In accordance with Article 59 of the Latvian Immigration Act (the Immigration Act of the Republic of Latvia, adopted by the Seimas on October 31, 2002. URL: https://www.legislationline.org/. (date of application: 07/15/2024) a detained foreign citizen is placed in a temporary detention facility of the State Border Guard (hereinafter referred to as the GPO) or in a placement center separately from persons detained or detained under criminal procedure. The Center is a structural unit of the GPO, which is part of the territorial state border guard. In addition, two specialized Centers have been established in the Republic of Latvia to accommodate detained foreigners who are subject to expulsion, where they are held in accordance with the procedure provided for in Cabinet Rules No. 254 dated May 16, 2017 "Internal Regulations in Premises for the Accommodation of Detained Foreigners and Asylum Seekers" (Information Letter from the Deputy Head of the Migration Office of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of Russia in the Republic of Latvia To the Republic of V.V. Tartyshev dated 05/14/2020 No. 170/ms ).

In order to ensure the deportation of persons who are denied further stay in Germany, to the country of origin or to the State of their first illegal entry, in accordance with the Dublin Agreement, a measure of coercion in the form of detention is applied. The decision to place foreigners in a temporary detention center is made by the district courts. Detention is regulated by Articles 62 and 62 of the Law on Stay. The issues of law enforcement are attributed to the competence of the federal lands.

Currently, temporary detention centers in Germany operate in six countries.: Baden-Württemberg (Pforzheim), Bavaria (Eichstedt), Brandenburg (Eisehüttenstadt), Lower Saxony (Langenhagen), North Rhine-Westphalia (Buren), Rhineland-Palatinate (Ingelheim am Rhein). The maximum periods of detention are legally defined: up to 10 days (for the period preceding deportation, the exact date of which is set, but there is a possibility that the person will attempt to evade it - the so-called Ausreisegewahrsam) and up to 18 months (for persons subject to expulsion for illegal entry into the country, hiding from migration authorities - the so-called Abschiebehaft). According to the CSWR, there are up to 600 places in temporary detention centers for foreign citizens, and the federal government plans to increase this figure to 1,000 places (Information letter from the representative of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of Russia in Germany, R.A. Terentyev, dated 04/14/2020, No. 113. The document has not been published).

According to Article 29 of the Regulations on the Management of Entry and Exit of Foreign Citizens to the People's Republic of China dated July 12, 2013, specialized places for the detention of deported foreign citizens in the country are created, if necessary, by public security agencies. In case of further verification during the detention of a foreign citizen, in accordance with article 60 of the Law of the People's Republic of China "On Entry and Exit", it is necessary to bring the detained foreign citizen to the place of detention or the place of detention of deported foreign citizens within 24 hours. If immediate deportation or expulsion is impossible due to weather conditions, the state of health of a foreign citizen or for other reasons, the foreign citizen must be held in a place of detention or a place of detention of deported foreign citizens on the basis of an appropriate legal document.

The periods of detention in special institutions before the expulsion of foreign citizens from the host country vary, ranging from short–term (Republic of Armenia – 90 days) to long-term (Germany - up to 18 months), or not at all (Kingdom of Spain).

For a long period, the legislation of the Russian Federation did not contain an indication of the deadlines for the detention of foreign citizens and stateless persons in temporary detention centers for foreign citizens, which was the subject of constructive criticism and discussion.

As follows from the Rules of detention (stay) in special institutions of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of the Russian Federation or its territorial body of foreign citizens and stateless persons subject to administrative expulsion from the Russian Federation in the form of forced expulsion from the Russian Federation, deportation or readmission (Decree of the Government of the Russian Federation of December 30, 2013 No. 1306 "On Approval of the Rules for the detention (stay) in special institutions of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of the Russian Federation or its territorial body of foreign citizens and stateless persons subject to administrative expulsion from the Russian Federation in the form of forced expulsion from the Russian Federation, deportation or readmission // Collection of legislation of the Russian Federation. Federation. 2016. No. 26. Art. 4060.) (hereinafter referred to as the Rules), the detention of these persons in special institutions is carried out until the actual implementation of administrative expulsion.

At the same time, a deadline has been legally established for the fulfillment of the requirements set out in the executive document. This period is two months from the date of initiation of enforcement proceedings (Federal Law No. 229-FZ of October 2, 2007 "On Enforcement Proceedings" // Collection of Legislation of the Russian Federation. Federation. 2007. No. 41, article 4849.)

As noted by E.P. Zakharova, there is a need to systematize the analyzed norms by legislating the maximum allowable period of detention of a foreign citizen in a special institution for up to two months, the beginning of which should be determined from the moment the bailiff issues a decree escorting the relevant subjects to the checkpoint across the state border of the Russian Federation (taking into account the timing of the initiation of the case, its subsequent review and appeal)[11, p.61].

It is obvious that if this issue is not resolved, there will be violations of these constitutional provisions, as well as acts of an international nature (for example, the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms, which guarantees everyone the right to freedom and personal integrity). At the same time, it should be noted that the period of stay in a special institution is not counted towards the period of the established ban on entry into the Russian Federation.

Federal Law No. 649-FZ of December 25, 2023 "On Amendments to the Code of Administrative Offences of the Russian Federation" of the Administrative Code of the Russian Federation was supplemented by Article 27.19.1. "Terms of detention of foreign citizens or stateless persons subject to administrative expulsion from the Russian Federation in special institutions", which regulates in detail not only the specified terms, but also the procedure for their extension and appeal.

The term of detention of a foreign citizen or a stateless person subject to forced expulsion from the Russian Federation in a special institution should not exceed ninety days. In the absence of the actual possibility of executing a decision on the imposition of an administrative penalty in the form of administrative expulsion from the Russian Federation of a foreign citizen or a stateless person, the period of detention in a special institution may be extended by a judge at the request of the bailiff implementing the decision on an administrative offense, as well as an authorized official of the internal affairs body, but no more for more than ninety days.

At the same time, Part 15 of Article 27.19.1 of the Administrative Code of the Russian Federation allows for a further extension of the period of detention of a foreign citizen or stateless person subject to forced expulsion from the Russian Federation in a special institution, without specifying the number of such extensions. In this case, the uncertainty of the norm is stated, which does not prohibit the extension of the period of detention of such persons for more than 180 days, which may cause new discussions and fair criticism. It will generate new discussions and fair criticism.

The term of detention of a foreign citizen or a stateless person subject to forced expulsion from the Russian Federation in a special institution is calculated from the date of the decision on administrative expulsion from the Russian Federation, and in the case of an extension of the period of detention - from the date of the judge's ruling on the extension of the period of detention in special institutions of a foreign citizen or a stateless person subject to forced expulsion from the Russian Federation.

It is also necessary to analyze the norm stipulated in Part 4 of Article 27.19 of the Administrative Code of the Russian Federation, which grants the right to make this decision not only to the court, but also to the relevant official of the border agency. This provision contradicts the constitutional imperative that coercive measures involving arrest and detention must require a court decision.

Based on the above, it is necessary to make appropriate legislative changes to the list of entities authorized to make a decision on the placement of a person subject to administrative expulsion in a special institution, leaving only the court.

It should also be noted that the problem of insufficient number of places of detention of foreign citizens in special institutions remains urgent, which naturally follows from the above-mentioned circumstance due to the long periods of detention of foreign citizens, since ensuring their stay in these special institutions and catering are attributed to the scope of expenditure obligations of the federal budget, which is often a reason for a negative reaction from taxpayers.

In turn, the expulsion procedure is attributed to the financial burden of the federal budget due to the inability of the expelled to finance it themselves. This obligation is also imposed on the body that invited them, however, due to the widespread practice of falsifying such invitations, identification of the inviting body is impracticable. As V.A. Kolokoltsev has repeatedly noted, the amount of funds allocated for the purpose of expulsion from the Russian Federation ensured the dispatch of only 30% of the total number of foreign persons who are placed in special institutions [12, p.55].

Thus, the organization of specialized institutions for the detention of foreign citizens before being expelled from the territory of the country of temporary residence in different countries has both similar features and significant differences. To date, there is no uniform practice of detaining foreign citizens before being expelled from the host country, which entails a violation of their rights and legitimate interests.

We believe that it is more appropriate to develop uniform international standards for the detention of such persons, in terms of determining the body of placement in such institutions (judicial or administrative), their jurisdiction over internal affairs bodies, and deadlines for the detention of foreign citizens.

References
1. Ivanova, S.I, & Shadrina, L.V. (2022). Review of international experience in the organization of specialized institutions for the detention of foreign citizens before expulsion from the territory of the country of temporary residence. Scientific digest of the East Siberian Institute of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of Russia, 4(18), 85-90.
2. Letaeva, E.A.(2021). Organization of the service of police officers in special institutions of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of Russia for the maintenance of foreign citizens: a textbook, 35-39. Tyumen: Tyumen Institute for Advanced Training of Employees of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of Russia.
3. Letaeva, E.A. (2021). The administrative and legal status of special institutions of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of Russia for the detention of foreign citizens. Legal science and law enforcement practice, 2, 24-26.
4. Gerasimenko, Yu.V., Gerasimenk, Yu.V. & Ryzhakova, Yu.N. (2011). Organization of special institutions for the detention of foreign citizens and stateless persons subject to administrative expulsion or deportation outside Russia. Scientific Bulletin of the Omsk Academy of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of Russia, 3, 29-32.
5. Letaeva, E.A. (2022). Special institutions of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of Russia for the detention of foreign citizens subject to administrative expulsion, deportation or readmission (theoretical and applied aspect): monograph, 20-23. Tyumen: Tyumen Institute for Advanced Training of Employees of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of Russia.
6. Kopytina, O.I. (2019). Certain legal issues of regulating the activities of temporary detention centers for foreign citizens of the territorial bodies of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of Russia. Actual problems of administrative and administrative procedural law. Collection of articles based on the materials of the X anniversary international scientific and practical conference (Sorokin readings), 585-690. Under the general editorship of A.I. Kaplunov.
7. Letaeva, E.A. (2020). Improving the legal regulation of the organization of temporary detention centers for foreign citizens. Bulletin of the Tyumen Institute for Advanced Training of employees of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of Russia, 2(15), 42-45.
8. Vanyushin, Ya.L. (2023). Special institutions designed for temporary accommodation of foreign citizens subject to readmission: a retrospective of legal status. Legal science and law enforcement practice, 3(65), 6-15.
9. Lupenkov, A.V. (2022). Features of administrative expulsion from the Russian Federation of minor foreign citizens and stateless persons. Legal science and law enforcement practice, 4(62), 67-73.
10. Zubova, E.G. (2016). Administrative coercion measures applied on a delicate basis to foreign citizens and stateless persons: Diss. ... candidate of Law Sciences, 50-63. Saratov.
11. Zakharova, E.P. (2018). Problems of legal regulation of certain measures of administrative coercion applied in connection with violations of migration legislation. Bulletin of the Saratov State Law Academy, 4(123), 58-61.
12. Chepurnova, N.M. (2016). The legal foundations of administrative responsibility: a textbook. N.M. Chepurnova, I.A. Trofimov (Eds.), 45-55. Moscow: Unity-Dana.

First Peer Review

Peer reviewers' evaluations remain confidential and are not disclosed to the public. Only external reviews, authorized for publication by the article's author(s), are made public. Typically, these final reviews are conducted after the manuscript's revision. Adhering to our double-blind review policy, the reviewer's identity is kept confidential.
The list of publisher reviewers can be found here.

The subject of the study. In the peer-reviewed article "Organization of specialized institutions for the detention of foreign citizens before expulsion from the territory of the country of temporary residence", the subject of the study is the norms of law governing public relations in the field of expulsion of foreign citizens from the territory of the Russian Federation. Research methodology. In the course of writing the article, modern research methods were used: general scientific and private (such as dialectical, logical, historical, comparative legal, formal legal, etc.). The methodological apparatus consists of the following dialectical methods of scientific cognition: abstraction, induction, deduction, hypothesis, analogy, synthesis, and the use of typology, classification, systematization and generalization can also be noted. The relevance of research. The topic of the article seems to be important and practically significant, since the problem of illegal migration is currently being updated and the number of offenses committed by foreign citizens on the territory of the Russian Federation is increasing. It seems that "... the presence of specialized institutions for the detention of foreign citizens in order to ensure their removal from the territory of the country of temporary residence – temporary detention centers for foreign citizens" does not solve this problem in essence. It is correctly noted in the literature that "... there is a need for the expediency of systematizing the analyzed norms by legislating the maximum permissible period of detention of a foreign citizen in a special institution, up to two months, the beginning of which should be determined by the moment when the bailiff issued a decree on accompanying the relevant subjects to the checkpoint across the state border of the Russian Federation." One aspect of this problem is financing: "... the amount of funds allocated for the purpose of expulsion from the Russian Federation ensured the dispatch of only 30% of the total number of foreign persons who are placed in special institutions." All these circumstances confirm the importance of doctrinal developments on this issue in order to improve modern domestic legislation and its enforcement. Scientific novelty. Without questioning the importance of previous scientific research, which served as the theoretical basis for this work, nevertheless, it can be noted that this article does not formulate provisions that would be distinguished by scientific novelty. The article does not formulate the author's position on the raised topic. The conclusions are general in nature, for example: "... the organization of specialized institutions for the detention of foreign citizens before being expelled from the territory of the country of temporary residence in different countries has both similar features and significant differences." The author gives other people's opinions on the existing problems of legislation and law enforcement, but does not indicate his point of view. This article is not characterized by scientific novelty and cannot be regarded as a contribution to science. Style, structure, content. In general, special legal terminology was used when writing the article. However, the material submitted for review is replete with typos, grammatical errors, in particular, the cases and conjugation of verbs in sentences are not consistent ("when implementing three coercive measures", "historical prerequisites for the same special institutions", "For today's children", "for committing offenses, forming", "citizens are kept together", etc.). In addition, the article has no logical structure. There is no introduction in which to substantiate the research topic, define its methodology, goals and objectives, and formulate the expected results. In conclusion, only the general conclusion is presented. Bibliography. When writing this article, the author used sources that have not been published: information letters from representatives of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of Russia abroad. These sources relate to official information that the Ministry of Internal Affairs of Russia requests from its representatives to work on improving the regulatory framework and practical activities of internal affairs bodies in the field of migration control (supervision). The use of official information in the private interests of the author(s), in this case for scientific publication, is unacceptable and illegal. Appeal to opponents. The article contains links to the opinions of other experts. However, the author's position is not presented on controversial issues. Conclusions, the interest of the readership. The article submitted for review "Organization of specialized institutions for the detention of foreign citizens before expulsion from the territory of the country of temporary residence" cannot be recommended for publication, since it does not meet the established requirements. Although the article is written on an actual topic, it does not differ in scientific novelty, and official information was used when writing it. A publication on this topic could be of interest to a readership, primarily specialists in the field of administrative law and law enforcement, and could also be useful for teachers and students of law schools and faculties.

Second Peer Review

Peer reviewers' evaluations remain confidential and are not disclosed to the public. Only external reviews, authorized for publication by the article's author(s), are made public. Typically, these final reviews are conducted after the manuscript's revision. Adhering to our double-blind review policy, the reviewer's identity is kept confidential.
The list of publisher reviewers can be found here.

The subject of the research in the article submitted for review is, as its name implies, the problem of organizing specialized institutions for the detention of foreign citizens before being expelled from the territory of the country of temporary residence. The declared boundaries of the study have been observed by the scientist. The methodology of the research is not disclosed in the text of the article. The relevance of the research topic chosen by the author is undeniable and is justified by him as follows: "In the Russian Federation, as in most foreign countries [1, p. 85], there are specialized institutions for the detention of foreign citizens in order to ensure their removal from the territory of the country of temporary residence - temporary detention centers for foreign citizens (hereinafter – CVSIG, special institutions) (Federal Law No. 115-FZ of July 25, 2002 "On the Legal Status of Foreign Citizens in the Russian Federation" // Russian Gas. 2002. July 31). The CCSIG detain foreign citizens in the implementation of three coercive measures related to their expulsion from the territory of residence: administrative expulsion, deportation and readmission, which are directly carried out under the supervision of officials of these special institutions." Additionally, the scientist needs to list the names of the leading experts who have been engaged in the study of the problems raised in the article, as well as reveal the degree of their study. The scientific novelty of the work is manifested in a number of the author's conclusions: "At the same time, Part 15 of Article 27.19.1 of the Administrative Code of the Russian Federation allows for further extension of the term of detention of a foreign citizen or stateless person subject to forced expulsion from the Russian Federation in a special institution, without setting the number of such extensions. We assume that the uncertainty of the norm, which does not establish a categorical prohibition on extending the period containing such persons for more than 180 days, will generate new discussions and fair criticism"; "I would also like to critically perceive the norm enshrined in Part 4 of Article 27.19 of the Administrative Code of the Russian Federation, which gives the right to make this decision not only to the court, but also to the relevant official of the border authority. This provision runs counter to the constitutional imperative that coercive measures involving arrest and detention must necessarily presuppose the existence of a court decision. By virtue of the above, it is necessary to make appropriate legislative changes to the list of entities authorized to make a decision on placing a person subject to administrative expulsion in a special institution, leaving only the court as such," etc. Thus, the article makes a certain contribution to the development of domestic legal science and, of course, deserves the attention of potential readers, but needs thorough revision. The scientific style of the research is fully sustained by the author. The structure of the work is quite logical. In the introductory part of the work, the scientist substantiates the relevance of his chosen research topic. In the main part of the article, the author explores the problem of organizing specialized institutions for the detention of foreign citizens before being expelled from the territory of the country of temporary residence and suggests ways to solve it. The final part of the work contains conclusions based on the results of the study. The content of the article corresponds to its title, but is not without drawbacks. Thus, the author writes: "The CCSIG contain foreign citizens in the implementation of three coercive measures related to their expulsion from the territory of their stay: administrative expulsion, deportation and readmission, which are directly carried out under the supervision of officials of these special institutions" - "measures". The scientist notes: "As E.A. Letaeva notes, according to statistical data, the Central Migration Service mainly contains foreign citizens who have been given administrative punishment in the form of administrative arrest[2, p.39], which is primarily due to the fact that it is imposed not just for violating the regime of stay in the territory of the Russian Federation, but for the commission of offenses that form part of an administrative offense in the field of violations of migration rules" - "As E.A. Letaeva notes, according to (WHAT?) STATISTICAL DATA, mainly foreign citizens are held in the CSIG, who have been sentenced to administrative punishment in the form of administrative arrest[2, p.39], which is primarily due to the fact that it is appointed not just for violating the regime of stay on the territory of the Russian Federation, but for committing ACTS that constitute administrative offenses in the field of violations of migration rules." The author indicates: "At the same time, as E.A. Letaeva notes, the historical prerequisites for the creation of special institutions have a longer history and date back to the beginning of the 20th century, when in 1918 foreign departments were created as part of the NKVD of the RSFSR, commissariats for internal affairs and executive committees in connection with the appearance of refugees and emigrants to keep their records and control displacement[5,p.23]" - "At the same time, as E.A. Letaeva notes, the prerequisites for the CREATION of such special institutions have a longer history and date back to the beginning of the XX century, when in 1918 foreign departments were established as part of the NKVD of the RSFSR, commissariats for internal Affairs and executive committees in the field in connection with with the advent of refugees and emigrants to keep records of them and control their movement [5, p.23]". Thus, the article needs careful proofreading - it contains multiple typos, spelling, punctuation and stylistic errors (the list of typos and errors given in the review is not exhaustive!). The author should avoid continuous quoting. It should be diluted by an independent critical analysis of the cited provisions. The bibliography of the study is presented by 12 sources (dissertation work, scientific articles, textbook). From a formal point of view, this is enough, from the actual point of view, the work is largely of a compilation nature, which is confirmed by numerous footnotes to the sources of information used. There is an appeal to the opponents, but it is of a general nature. The author does not enter into a scientific discussion with specific scientists, referring to certain sources to confirm his judgments or to illustrate certain provisions of the work. There are conclusions based on the results of the study ("Thus, the organization of specialized institutions for the detention of foreign citizens before being expelled from the territory of the country of temporary residence in different countries has both similar features and significant differences. To date, there is no uniform practice of detaining foreign citizens before being expelled from the host country, which entails a violation of their rights and legitimate interests. We believe it is more correct to develop uniform international standards for the maintenance of such persons, in terms of determining the body of placement in such institutions (judicial or administrative), their jurisdiction over internal affairs bodies, deadlines for the detention of foreign citizens," etc.), however, they are general in nature and do not reflect all the scientific achievements of the author of the work. The interest of the readership in the article submitted for review can be shown primarily by specialists in the field of administrative law, provided that it is finalized: disclosure of the research methodology, additional justification of the relevance of its topic, introduction of additional elements of discussion, concretization of conclusions based on the results of the study, elimination of shortcomings in the design of the work.

Third Peer Review

Peer reviewers' evaluations remain confidential and are not disclosed to the public. Only external reviews, authorized for publication by the article's author(s), are made public. Typically, these final reviews are conducted after the manuscript's revision. Adhering to our double-blind review policy, the reviewer's identity is kept confidential.
The list of publisher reviewers can be found here.

The reviewed publication examines the organization of specialized institutions – temporary detention centers for foreign citizens, which primarily contain citizens who are subject to forced administrative expulsion from the Russian Federation for committing offenses that constitute an administrative offense in the field of violations of migration rules. The methodology of the study is based on the study of legislative acts and regulatory documents of various countries on the detention of foreign citizens in specialized institutions. The relevance of the topic is due to the need to ensure law and order in the territory of the Russian Federation, the insufficient number of places of detention of foreign citizens in special institutions, due to the long periods of detention of foreign citizens, as well as the considerable amount of expenditure obligations of the federal budget and the associated negative reaction of taxpayers. The scientific novelty of the study consists in the conclusions about the lack of uniform practice of detaining foreign citizens before expulsion from the host country, the frequent violation of their rights and legitimate interests, as well as proposals for the development of uniform international standards for the detention of such persons, in terms of determining the body of placement in such institutions (judicial or administrative), their subordination to internal affairs bodies, deadlines for the detention of foreign citizens in temporary detention centers. The publication says that temporary detention centers for foreign citizens contain foreign citizens in the implementation of three coercive measures related to their expulsion from the territory of their stay: administrative expulsion, deportation and readmission, which are directly carried out under the supervision of officials of such special institutions. The authors analyze the Russian and foreign experience of keeping foreign citizens and stateless persons in Turkey, India, Spain, Kazakhstan, Latvia, Germany, Armenia before their expulsion from the country and conclude that there are no uniform international standards, as well as uniform national approaches to ensure the rights and legitimate interests of such citizens, including the grounds for placement in these institutions by decision of judicial or administrative authorities. The bibliographic list includes 12 sources – scientific articles, monographs and dissertations on the problem under consideration. The text of the publication contains targeted references to the list of references confirming the existence of an appeal to opponents. As a remark, it is worth noting that the text of the publication is not properly structured, it does not highlight and title such sections generally accepted in modern scientific articles as Introduction, Material and methods, Results and their discussion, Conclusion. In addition, it is necessary to carefully check and edit the text, because there are typos and inconsistent phrases in it. The topic of the article is relevant, the material reflects the results of the research conducted by the authors, corresponds to the topic of the journal "Police Activity", may arouse interest among readers, it is recommended for publication after finalizing the materials in accordance with the comments made.