Рус Eng Cn Translate this page:
Please select your language to translate the article


You can just close the window to don't translate
Library
Your profile

Back to contents

National Security
Reference:

Russian-Chinese relations: achievements, problems and prospects

El'nikova Yuliya Vasil'evna

ORCID: 0000-0002-8478-4716

Doctor of Economics

Professor of the Department of Regional and Sectoral Policy of the Kursk State Agrarian University named after I.I.Ivanov

70 Karl Marx St., office 357, Kursk, Kursk region, 305021, Russia

gniiivm.h@ya.ru
Other publications by this author
 

 

DOI:

10.7256/2454-0668.2025.2.71763

EDN:

OMOXOW

Received:

22-09-2024


Published:

03-05-2025


Abstract: The article presents conclusions from the analysis of the current state of Russian-Chinese cooperation, as well as the prospects for its development in new geopolitical conditions. Before the Ukrainian crisis, the two countries' rapprochement was facilitated by the complementarity of Russia and China. After the start of the special military operation, relations between Moscow and Beijing transformed into a strategic alliance that arose as a result of the long-term confrontation between both sides and the West. The main characteristics of the foreign policy of Russia and China are the desire to promote a polycentric world order and the denial of the use of force in international affairs, which underlines the desire of the two countries for close cooperation in solving global problems.The purpose of the study was to study the real dynamics of relations between Russia and China after the start of a special military operation, with an emphasis on the main prospects and threats of such cooperation for Russia's national security.  The research methodology included methods of source studies, system analysis, economic theory, political science, documentary studies, historiography, analogy and computational linguistics. The main conclusion of the study is that the alliance of Russia and China is not an equal partnership on mutually beneficial terms. To avoid geo-economic and strategic dependence on China, Russia needs to diversify its energy exports. Russia is quite successful in circumventing the sanctions restrictions of the United States and its allies, using the Chinese market to fill the commodity deficit. At the same time, China's share in Russian imports will continue to grow, but there will be no full replacement, since Chinese companies and Chinese authorities are afraid of the announcement of secondary sanctions. Given the similarity of the political and economic conditions of both countries, their interdependence will only increase, despite the inequality in economic power. And yet Beijing has not yet become a full-fledged ally of Moscow in the fight against Western influence. In this regard, Russia needs to expand and deepen cooperation with other Asian countries.


Keywords:

russian-chinese relations, national security of Russia, economic sanctions, Asia-Pacific region, military-technical cooperation, challenges of the world system, ukrainian crisis, export of energy carriers, sanction restrictions, geopolitical interests

This article is automatically translated. You can find original text of the article here.

Introduction.

In a report at the Twentieth Congress of the Communist Party of China, Xi Jinping noted that the international situation in recent years has been characterized by various deficits (peace deficit, development deficit, security deficit, and governance deficit) that have put humanity in front of unprecedented challenges [1-3]. Statements about the unstable and dangerous state of the global system are also heard in official speeches by members of the Russian Government [4].

The transformational processes of the 2020s contributed to the peak of conflict in the world order [5, 6]. The aggravation of local conflicts, the slow pace of global economic recovery after the COVID-19 pandemic, and the beginning of Russia's Special Military Operation in Ukraine became a turning point for the world order in the post-Cold War era [7, 8]. Antagonism between different groups of countries has intensified in the global political arena, which has become one of the main trends in the development of international relations [9, 10].

Many experts note that in addition to all of the above, the growing threat of terrorism and cyber attacks, the difficult food situation, the effects of climate change and various biological threats create a contradiction between globalization and closure within national borders [11, 12]. At the same time, strategic competition between developed countries has become more intense, and strategic coordination and cooperation have become more difficult.

In the economy, these trends are manifested through deglobalization, sanctions wars, protectionism, and politically motivated unfair competition. The crisis in Ukraine accelerated the restructuring of global supply chains and production chains, which provoked increased volatility in stock and currency markets in most countries, rising prices for consumer goods, minerals and energy resources [13].

Over the past few years, Russia and China have fully faced the full range of external challenges. The main challenges for Russia are focused on the European direction: the escalation of the conflict with the West and the subsequent new round of US and EU sanctions. In such circumstances, the international situation is also tense for China: external pressure on politics, economics, science and technology is increasing, which is aggravated by the strategic rivalry between the People's Republic of China (hereinafter – PRC) and the United States. Many Chinese experts point out that the US government is using the Ukrainian crisis to mobilize its allies in the Asia-Pacific region (hereinafter referred to as the APR) and to accelerate the implementation of the Indo-Pacific Strategy, as well as to create a multi-level, multidisciplinary and interregional system of security alliances in East Asia through AUKUS and the Quadrilateral Security Dialogue (QUAD). [10, 15-17]. The struggle between countries for geopolitical dominance and dominance in the Eurasian markets has reached a critical point. Thus, against the background of the slow recovery of global markets after the COVID-19 pandemic, the emergence of new dividing lines undermines the foundations of the global economic system, leads to negative consequences for the international situation, and slows down the progress of humanity as a whole.

Undoubtedly, in such circumstances, it is fundamentally important to build international relations based on dialogue, cooperation, and respect for the sovereignty and territorial integrity of States. The Russian-Chinese relations are an example of such relations. The main characteristic of the foreign policy of both the Russian Federation and the People's Republic of China (hereinafter referred to as the PRC) is the desire to promote a polycentric world order, as well as the promotion of a position of denial of the use of force in international affairs, which underlines their desire for the need for close cooperation in solving global problems. In this regard, it is relevant to consider the dynamics of the development of Russian-Chinese relations in terms of prospects and hidden threats to the national security of the Russian Federation.

The purpose of the study was to study the dynamics of relations between Russia and China after the start of the CDF and to reveal the main prospects and threats of such cooperation, with an emphasis on the main prospects and threats of such cooperation for Russia's national security.

Materials and methods.

The selection and analysis of sources on the research topic by keywords (Russian-Chinese relations, national security of Russia, economic sanctions, the Asia-Pacific region, military-technical cooperation, challenges of the global system, the Ukrainian crisis, energy exports, sanctions restrictions, geopolitical interests) in specialized bibliographic databases (RSCI, Polpred, EBSCO eBook, Academic reference – CNKI, China National Knowledge Infrastructure – CNKI, WanfangData, abstract reviews of INION RAS). The research methodology included methods of source studies (the study of historical sources with an emphasis on their involvement in scientific practice), system analysis (induction, deduction, expert analysis), economic theory (scientific abstraction), political science (a combination of historical and logical analysis), documentation (information analysis), historiography (historical and comparative method), analogy (direct, subjective, and symbolic analogy) and computational linguistics (self-referencing).

Results and discussion.

The events and trends of recent years have had a decisive impact on the development of Russian-Chinese relations in almost all areas. Relations between the Russian Federation and China have not only withstood numerous challenges posed by the Ukrainian crisis, but have significantly strengthened over the past year: Beijing has supported Moscow in its efforts to ensure national security, and Russia has provided diplomatic support to China in resolving the Taiwan crisis (2022) [10, 18].

Modern Russian-Chinese relations are officially defined by the parties as "relations of comprehensive partnership and strategic cooperation entering a new era" [19]. The most important factor in strengthening bilateral relations is the level of interaction between the top officials. Intensive contacts at the highest and highest levels are carried out between the countries: the leaders of the countries have met more than 40 times [19].

The most important event in bilateral relations was the visit of the Russian delegation to China (March 20-22, 2023), which not only created a solid foundation for deepening cooperation between the two countries in a number of key areas, but also became a signal to the international community about the inviolability of partnership between the two countries. During the visit of the Chairman of the Government of the Russian Federation to China (May 23-24, 2023), several interdepartmental agreements were signed, the purpose of which is to develop interstate economic cooperation [10].

At the same time, it is the economic ties between the Russian Federation and the PRC that have been subjected to the most serious challenges. The sanctions policy of the countries of the "global West" against Russia has provoked a reassessment of the risks of bilateral financial, trade and economic cooperation. In this regard, in 2022, many analysts argued that the development of trade and investment cooperation between Russia and China had stopped due to the fear of imposing secondary sanctions on Chinese businesses. In practice, relations between the Russian Federation and China not only did not remain at the same level, but began to rapidly expand and deepen. Recently, relations between Moscow and Beijing have become more multifaceted and multidimensional.

One of the important areas of cooperation between Russia and China is energy. The Russian Federation is one of the largest fuel exporters to the Chinese market: in 2022, gas supplies from Russia to China via the Power of Siberia gas pipeline reached a record level of 15.5 billion. cubic meters, and by 2025 it is planned to reach the design annual capacity of 38 billion cubic meters. cubic meters. By the end of 2023, gas exports to China via the Power of Siberia-1 gas pipeline amounted to 22.7 billion cubic meters, which is 1.5 times more than in 2022 [19]. As part of the development of cooperation in this area, the Russian Federation and China will continue to work on the construction of the Power of Siberia-2 gas pipeline [20].

Russia is also a leader among oil suppliers to China: in 2023, the Russian Federation increased oil supplies to China by 24% to 107.024 million tons. In addition, the countries will continue to work on expanding cooperation in the field of nuclear energy: the construction of nuclear power plants (NPP) in China using Russian technologies. The commissioning of new units of the Tianwan NPP is planned for 2026-2027, and the Xudapu NPP for 2027-2028 [19]. The Russian Federation and China are also working on a project for a pool-type fast neutron reactor with sodium cooling (CFR-600) and on the development of renewable energy sources.

The development of innovative technologies is also an important area of economic cooperation between the two countries. One of the main projects in this area is the creation of an Innovative Scientific and Technological Center in Russia and China, which will conduct research in the field of information, space, environmental technologies and their energy efficiency, as well as the development of new materials and technologies. In addition, the Russian Federation and China plan to create joint innovation funds and experience exchange programs in the field of innovation: artificial intelligence is one of the promising areas in this field [20, 21].

The most important component of bilateral relations is trade and economic cooperation between the Russian Federation and China: by the end of 2023, the trade turnover between China and Russia reached 227.8 billion dollars [19, 21]. According to the General Administration of Customs of the People's Republic of China, the trade turnover between China and Russia in January-March 2024 increased by 5.2% compared to the same period in 2023, amounting to 56.68 billion dollars [19]. At the same time, there is an imbalance between imports and exports in the product range. Russian exports are based on mineral products, wood and pulp and paper products, metals and products made from them, foodstuffs and agricultural raw materials, etc. In the structure of Russian imports, the main share of supplies falls on machinery, equipment and vehicles, chemical industry products, textiles and footwear, metals and products made from them, etc.

It should be noted that Russian experts claim that the price of raw materials exported by the Russian Federation no longer reflects the ratio of supply and demand on the world market, but is a tool in geopolitical games. In this regard, discussions are increasingly taking place in scientific circles about artificially lowering the price of Russian raw materials (setting a politically determined price level for hydrocarbons), which in the long run makes such trade beneficial exclusively for China. Domestic experts argue that in order to offset the geo-economic and strategic dependence on China, the Russian Federation needs to diversify its energy exports [5].

As for the import of Chinese goods, in 2023 it fully satisfied the basic needs of Russia in consumer goods. In some cases, we can already talk about the complete capture of the Russian market for certain types of Chinese-made products. For example, in 2022, Xiaomi and Realme accounted for 70% of the market in the smartphone segment [22]. A similar trend is observed in the automotive market: by the end of 2024, Chinese companies plan to sell 1.2 million passenger cars of four major brands in Russia. At the same time, most experts note unjustified overestimation of prices for cars that are of insufficient quality for operation in the territory of the Russian Federation.

The bilateral balanced trade turnover has become more uneven due to a decrease in the range of semi-finished products and high-value-added goods supplied from Russia to China. For example, in 2023, exports of semi-finished steel products from Russia to China decreased 3.4 times, which in monetary terms means a fourfold decrease in exports to $300 million [5].

Consequently, despite the positive trends in cooperation, it can be argued that China is mainly interested in gaining access to cheap natural resources from the Russian Federation, maximizing the use of Russian territory, obtaining the right to use the Northern Sea Route, as well as expanding its presence in the Russian market of goods and services. At the same time, the number of large joint ventures of Russian-Chinese origin is extremely small, and Chinese direct investments in Russia in 2023 amounted to only about $2.35 billion (compared with 4.48 billion in 2019) [19]. In this regard, the key task for 2024-2025 for the states is to transfer mutual trade turnover to a higher level by diversifying its structure.

Political cooperation is also deepening.: Moscow and Beijing adhere to a common position on most issues on the international agenda at the venues of the UN Security Council and the General Assembly, the Group of Twenty and other international formats. On February 4, 2022, a joint statement by the Russian Federation and the CND noted that the countries adhere to the principles of government, international law, the unacceptability of sanctions pressure and interference in the internal affairs of other states, and the inclusiveness of international security [10, 23]. Today, there is almost complete consensus between Russia and China on all these issues.

In turn, military and security relations are a motivating factor in the development of strategic cooperation between the Russian Federation and the PRC [24]. Despite the positive trends, we can say that there are currently no serious prerequisites for the transformation of Russian-Chinese relations into extreme forms (military alliance or confrontation). On the contrary, cooperation between countries in the field of defense is based on non-alignment, non-confrontation and non-targeting against third countries and is aimed at maintaining peace and stability in the region and around the world [25].

At the same time, this cooperation should not be evaluated too positively. Today, Russia practically does not occupy any other significant positions in the Chinese market, except for the export of hydrocarbons. At the same time, Chinese investors have a limited presence in the territory of the Russian Federation. In turn, in practice, oil and gas exports to China are more important to Moscow than to Beijing. This situation in the energy sector highlights the disparity in bilateral economic ties. Limited only to the supply of hydrocarbons, it is impossible to create a solid foundation for cooperation capable of solving all problems in economic relations between the Russian Federation and China in the future [26]. There are problems in other areas as well. For example, if the volume of bilateral trade is steadily increasing, then the investment sector is facing difficulties. The share of foreign direct investment from China continues to grow in many countries, while in Russia this indicator has not increased since 2014 [27]. Also, during the period from 2009 to 2018, the goals of the Cooperation Program between Northeast China, the Russian Far East and Eastern Siberia were not achieved, which led to the development of a new program for the period from 2018 to 2024 [28].

The gap between expectations and reality is particularly noticeable in the field of services and high technology. With the exception of the energy sector, the Chinese government does not exercise control over the international activities of private companies, which independently make investment decisions based on the same principles as multinational corporations from other countries. Russia is still a secondary market for them. Even after the launch of the Eastern Opening Strategy in February 2022, ties with China have not yet been able to compensate for Russia's loss of access to Western technologies and capital markets.

Due to the lack of serious economic levers of influence on Pyongyang, Russia's position as a participant in international efforts to resolve the situation on the Korean peninsula has significantly weakened. The situation is not much better now in Russia's policy towards the countries of Southeast Asia, which has traditionally been characterized by neutrality and balance. Although Russia's dialogue with the Association of Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN) has been developing quite successfully in recent years, many of its members, as the alliance with China strengthens, see Moscow not as an independent political actor in the region, but primarily as an ally of Beijing [29, 30].

Let's note the fact that China has tools that could mitigate the impact of sanctions imposed by the United States and the European Union on Russia. But Beijing is not going to provoke the leaders of its two dominant markets (the United States and the European Union). In turn, the United States is increasing pressure on China and wants to impose sanctions against Chinese companies due to cooperation between Beijing and Moscow. The Chinese government officially called the claims of the American authorities groundless and stressed that China takes a "prudent and responsible position." Meanwhile, Russian business continues to complain about difficulties in settlements with Chinese counterparties [31, 32]. China also refused to cooperate with Russia on the creation of the CR929 wide-body airliner [5]. Thus, the Russian Federation cannot fully rely on China in everything. At the same time, Moscow is not going to abandon cooperation with Beijing and the exchange of technologies with it.

In this regard, Russia is expanding its cooperation with other Asian countries: Vladimir Putin's visit to the Democratic People's Republic of Korea on June 18-19, 2024, as a result of which the heads of the countries signed the Comprehensive Strategic Partnership Agreement; on June 20, 2024, the Russian-Vietnamese negotiations, as a result of which the heads of Russia and Vietnam signed a number of documents on the expansion of cooperation between the two countries.

It is not easy for the Western press to interpret the Asian trip of the Russian President: on the one hand, the meeting between Vladimir Putin and Kim Jong-un, and on the other, a visit to Vietnam, which has strategic cooperation agreements with Russia, the United States, China, India and South Korea [33]. But they all regard this event as an attack on the West and the building of a new "axis of evil."

At the same time, the real meaning of these visits was addressed precisely to China, which is afraid of Western sanctions in order to help Russia circumvent them. Thus, the DPRK is of particular importance to China in the context of a possible "American arc from Japan to the Philippines." The development of strategic cooperation between Moscow and Pyongyang removes North Korea from Beijing's influence. Vietnam can become Russia's "window" to global financial markets for Russia. At the same time, the United States will not sacrifice relations with this country for the sake of anti-Russian policy, since a huge amount of time and effort has been spent to normalize them. This means that what China was forbidden, Vietnam was allowed [34]. Thus, the results of Vladimir Putin's Asian visit should force China to adhere to the agreements reached earlier with the Russian Federation.

Conclusion.

The study of the dynamics of relations between Russia and the PRC after the start of the CBR made it possible to reveal the main prospects and threats of such cooperation, with an emphasis on the main prospects and threats of such cooperation for Russia's national security.

In modern geopolitical conditions, relations between Russia and China have been tested for strength, demonstrate a high degree of stability and determine the economic, political and business side not only of the two countries, but also of the Eurasian continent as a whole. Cooperation is implemented according to the model of "relations of great powers of a new type", which meets all modern international realities, the geopolitical interests of the two countries coincide. China enables Russia to pursue a diverse foreign policy, and Moscow supports Beijing in developing mutually beneficial trade, scientific and technical cooperation in the Asia-Pacific region [35-37].

The study showed that the countries pursue independent economic policies and actively develop cooperation in various fields. In turn, Beijing is extremely pragmatic towards Russia.: China is trying to take advantage of the favorable market conditions for Russian energy resources – China's share in Russian imports will continue to grow, but there will be no complete replacement. This is due to the fact that Chinese companies and Chinese authorities are afraid of the announcement of secondary sanctions. Given the similarity of the political and economic conditions of both countries, their interdependence will only increase, despite the disparity in economic power.

At the same time, the tilt towards China places certain restrictions on Russia's cooperation with other Asian countries – there is a risk of losing the status of a neutral country that is not involved in any conflicts in the region. In this case, the multi-vector policy is effectively reduced to zero, and the priorities of foreign policy are determined in the context of relations with China.

The results of the study suggest that Russia needs to step out of China's shadow and become an actor in economic and political processes in the Asian region so that key Southeast Asian countries continue to view Russia as a natural counterweight to China.

References
1. Jinping, Xi. Carrying high the great banner of socialism with Chinese specificity, cohesively struggling for the comprehensive construction of a modernized socialist state: a report at the 20th All-China Congress of the Communist Party of China on October 16, 2022. // China.cn. – Retrieved from http://download.china.cn/en/2022/Full%20text% of the%20report%2020%20to%20Congress%20CCP.pdf. (date of appeal: 30.06.2024).
2. Morozov, Yu.V. (2024). Problems and prospects of relations between China and Russia in the conditions of the military crisis in Ukraine. Power, 3, 51-61.
3. Ustyukhin, V.Yu. (2024). Russian-Chinese Foreign Trade Cooperation: Foundations and Prospects. Currency Regulation. Currency controls, 8, 46-56.
4Meeting of the International Discussion Club "Valdai". President of Russia. Retrieved from http://kremlin.ru/events/president/news/69695
5. Dikarev, A.D. Russia-China Relations in 2023. MGIMO. – Retrieved from https://mgimo.ru/about/news/experts/russia-china-2023/?utm_source=yandex.ru&utm_medium=organic&utm_campaign=yandex.ru&utm_referrer=yandex.ru
6. Galimzyanova, A.K. (2024). Relations between Russia and China in the conditions of formation of a new world order. Diplomatic Service, 1, 34-41.
7. Wang, W. (2023). China's economic future and Russian-Chinese cooperation. Scientific Proceedings of the Free Economic Society of Russia, 3, 104-109.
8. Wang, L., & Shao, M. (2024). Sino-Russian Cooperation in a New Era: Mode, Content and Value. Current Problems of Humanities and Social and Economic Sciences, 1(101), 26-32.
9. Fu, Y., & Demidenko, D.S. (2024). Review and analysis of Russian-Chinese economic relations in modern conditions. Economics and management: problems, solutions, 1(142), 79-83.
10. Russia-China Dialogue: Model 2023: Report No. 87. 2023 [K.V. Babaev, A.V. Kortunov, Feng Yujun, Gao Zixiang, et al.; under ed. E.O. Karpinskoy, A.P. Aleksandrova, P.V. Bakulina et al.]; Russian Council for International Affairs (RCMA). Moscow: NP RSMD.
11. Fedorov, R.V., Biktimerov, T.R., & Gretchenko, A.A. (2023). Russian-Chinese economic cooperation in conditions of import substitution. Economics and management: problems, solutions, 1(133), 59-66.
12. Ostashevsky, V.D. (2023). Reorientation of the Russian economy as a consequence of the imposed sanctions (on the example of relations with China). Bulletin of the Russian New University. Series: Man and Society, 3, 80-85.
13. Crisis in Ukraine: Implications for World Trade and Development: WTO Report. Ministry of Economic Development of the Russian Federation. Retrieved from https://www.economy.gov.ru/material/file/aff3daeef4e61 afecc4248f5fe936628/vto_report_crisis_v_ukraine_consequences_for_peace.pdf
14. Xu, M., Liu, W., & Korotaev, A.V. Development of Russian-Chinese relations in the modern world. Questions of political science, 7(95), 3577-3586.
15. Zhou, Y. (2023). Russian-Chinese relations at the beginning of the XXI century: achievements and problems. Ethnosocium and interethnic culture, 8(182), 79-86.
16. Ren, Ya. (2024). National interests of the Russian Federation in relations with the People's Republic of China. Economy and Management: Problems, Solutions, 5(146), 116-122.
17. Chan, N.M., Chan, F.T., & Kuznetsova, G.V. (2024). Modern Russian-Chinese relations and prospects for their further development. Monetary Regulation. Currency controls, 3, 58-63.
18. Serikbaeva, A.D., & Titova, N.N. (2024). Specificity of Russian-Chinese relations at the present stage. Theories and problems of political research, 1-1, 56-63.
19. Interstate relations between Russia and China. RIA Novosti. Retrieved from https://ria.ru/20240703/otnosheniya-1956991043.html
20. Khakimova, A.S., & Kuskov, A.N. (2023). Development of priority directions and forms of economic interaction of Russia with China in 2023-2025. Economy and Business: Theory and Practice, 3-2(97), 128-131.
21. Ivanov, A.A., & Bogomolov, A.V. (2022). Architecture of heterogeneous information environment integration of information resources of enterprises solving problems of investment in human capital. Mathematical methods in technology and technology, 8, 76-79.
22. Prokhin, E.A. Russia and China: results of cooperation and prospects of development of relations. ROSKONGRESS. Retrieved from https://roscongress.org/materials/rossiya-i-kitay-resultaty-sotrudnichestva-i-perspektiviy-razvitiya-vzaimootnosheniy-/
23. Kukharenko, S.V. (2023). Russia and China: from cooperation to strategic partnership. Russia and China: history and prospects of cooperation, 13, 448-451.
24. Relations between China and Russia. Official website of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs of China. Retrieved from https://www.fmprc.gov.cn/web/ gjhdq_676201/gj_676203/oz_678770/1206_67911 0/sbgx_679114/
25. Sino-Russian defense cooperation does not threaten third countries – MO PRC. News of Moscow "MOSCOW 24". Retrieved from https://www.m24.ru/news/politika/29072023/602882
26. Yang, C. (2017). Redefining Russia’s Pivot and China’s Peripheral Diplomacy. China–Russia Relations and Regional Dynamics. Pivots to Peripheral Diplomacy. Solna, SIPRI, 7-13.
27. Jiaxue, S. (2021). Current state of foreign direct investment from China to Russia. Spring Days of Science: Collection of Proceedings of the International Conference of Students and Young Scientists (Yekaterinburg, April 22-24, 2021). Pp. 1079-1087. Yekaterinburg, UrFU.
28. Kapoor, N. Russia’s Pivot to Asia – A 10-Year Policy Review. Valdai Discussion Club. Retrieved from https://valdaiclub.com/a/highlights/ russia-s-pivot-to-asia-a-decadal-policy-review/
29. Streltsov, D. Russia's policy of turning to the East: problems and risks. Russian Council for International Affairs. Retrieved from https://russiancouncil.ru/analytics-and-comments/comments/ russiyskaya-politika-povorota-na-vostok-problemy-i-riski/
30. Detochenko, L.V., & Fesenko, V.V. (2024). Analysis of modern Russian-Chinese relations in the trade and economic sphere: features and prospects of development. Bulletin of the Volgograd State University. Economics, 1, 141-151.
31Threats of direct appointment. Kommersant. Retrieved from https://www.kommersant.ru/doc/6744121
32. Nikulin, A.S., Khlopotov, R.S., & Kulakova, M.A. (2023). International relations and their influence on the management of national defense of the Russian Federation. Trends of development of the system of international relations and their influence on the management of national defense of the Russian Federation, 316-327.
33. Vladimir Putin's visit to Vietnam and the DPRK does not give rest to the Western press. NTV. Retrieved from https://www.ntv.ru/novosti/2832591/
34. China decided to "throw" Russia: an expert explained why Putin went to the DPRK and Vietnam. News portal Moscow Komsomolets. Retrieved from https://www.mk.ru/politics/2024/06/28/china-reshil-kinut-rossiyu-expert-explained-why-putin-ezdil-v-kndr-i-vetnam.html
35. Poleshchenko, D.V., & Slobodyanik, V.V. (2022) Russian-Chinese foreign trade relations under sanctions. Russian Foreign Economic Bulletin, 3, 94-112.
36. Shuli Ren Why China Won’t Help Russia Around Sanctions. Bloomberg. Retrieved from https://www.bloomberg.com/opinion/articles/2022-03-08/why-china-won-t-help-russia-around-sanctions
37. Babaev, K.V. (2024). Five achievements and five prospects of Sino-Russian relations. Power, 2, 43-56.

First Peer Review

Peer reviewers' evaluations remain confidential and are not disclosed to the public. Only external reviews, authorized for publication by the article's author(s), are made public. Typically, these final reviews are conducted after the manuscript's revision. Adhering to our double-blind review policy, the reviewer's identity is kept confidential.
The list of publisher reviewers can be found here.

The subject of the research in the peer-reviewed publication is the achievements, problems and prospects of Russian-Chinese relations. The research methodology is based on the study and generalization of scientific publications on the topic under consideration, the application of a systematic approach to the study of Relations between the Russian Federation and the People's Republic of China. The authors attribute the relevance of the work to the need to consider the dynamics of the development of Russian-Chinese relations in the context of prospects and hidden threats to the Russian Federation. The scientific novelty of the reviewed study consists in the results of an assessment of the dynamics of relations between Russia and China after the start of a special military operation, the prospects for their development and threats to such cooperation. The following sections are highlighted in the text of the article: Results and discussion, Conclusion and Bibliography. The authors note that relations between the Russian Federation and China have not only withstood numerous new challenges that arose in connection with the Ukrainian crisis, but have also significantly strengthened: Beijing supported Moscow in its quest to ensure its own security, Russia provided diplomatic support to China during the crisis around Taiwan (2022). In the publication, the most important factor in strengthening bilateral relations The level of interaction between the top officials was named, attention was drawn to intensive contacts at the highest and highest levels: the leaders of the countries met more than 40 times. The sanctions policy of the countries of the "global West" against Russia, according to the authors, provoked a reassessment of the risks of bilateral financial and trade and economic cooperation. The article shows the development of cooperation between Russia and China in the field of energy, innovative technologies, trade and economic cooperation, political cooperation and security. It was noted that cooperation between the countries in the field of defense is based on non-alignment, non-confrontation and non-targeting against third countries and is aimed at maintaining peace and stability in the region and around the world. It is shown from the reserves that Russia practically does not occupy significant positions in the Chinese market, except for the export of hydrocarbons, limited only to the supply of hydrocarbons, it is impossible to create a solid basis for cooperation. The bibliographic list includes 37 sources – Internet resources, scientific publications of foreign and domestic authors in Russian and foreign languages on the topic under consideration. The text contains address references, which confirms the existence of an appeal to opponents. As comments, it should be noted that, firstly, the initial introductory part of the text is not entitled as "Introduction", secondly, the publication does not specify the methods of scientific research by which the source materials were transformed into the results obtained - it seems appropriate to supplement the text with the section "Materials and methods of research", in-Thirdly, there are typos in the text and in the names of sections (for example, "Results"), editing of the formulation of the research goal is required to eliminate the words "main prospects and threats of such cooperation" that are repeated in it. The reviewed article corresponds to the direction of the journal "National Security / nota bene", reflects the results of the work carried out by the authors, but before its publication it is necessary to finalize the material in accordance with the comments made.

Second Peer Review

Peer reviewers' evaluations remain confidential and are not disclosed to the public. Only external reviews, authorized for publication by the article's author(s), are made public. Typically, these final reviews are conducted after the manuscript's revision. Adhering to our double-blind review policy, the reviewer's identity is kept confidential.
The list of publisher reviewers can be found here.

The subject of the peer-reviewed study is the development of Russian-Chinese relations in recent years (the author, unfortunately, did not specify the period he chose for analysis). The methodology of the study is also completely undeveloped, which has a natural consequence of the journalistic nature of the final results. When listing the methods used, "methods of source studies [which ones? – Rec.], system analysis [traces of its application could not be found – rec.], economic theory [and what kind of "method" is this? – rec.], political science [similar question – rec.], documentary studies [similar question – rec.], historiography [similar question – rec.], analogies [similar question – rec.] and computational linguistics [a similar question is rec.]". That is, the theoretical and methodological basis of the reviewed work is either an unused system analysis, or ... entire scientific disciplines and subdisciplines, but not specific methods. From this it can be concluded that the author did not really understand what exactly he was doing. This impression is only reinforced when reading the description of the empirical base of the study: this description is so vague ("the selection was made [by what criteria and from what sources? – Rec.] and an analysis of the sources on the research topic was carried out [which sources? – Rec.] by keywords [which keywords exactly? – Rec.] in specialized bibliographic databases [in which databases? – Rec.] and among trustworthy Internet resources [among which exactly are "Internet resources" and what does "trustworthy" mean? this is a very subjective criterion – rec.]"), which leaves no doubt about the complete absence of theoretical and methodological reflection in the reviewed work. The journalistic nature of this work does not allow us to make judgments about its scientific novelty: only those results that are obtained by correct scientific methods can be recognized as scientific; journalistic results do not belong to such. Therefore, the author should work out the available SCIENTIFIC approaches to solving the scientific problem chosen by him for research, conduct a critical analysis of these approaches, determine his own methodological (and not disciplinary) choice, argue this choice and work out the collected empirical material using selected SCIENTIFIC methods. Only after that it will be possible to make a conclusion about the presence or absence of scientific novelty of the results obtained. Structurally, the work will also have to be rebuilt in accordance with the logic that will reflect the main points of the research, and not the subjective considerations of the author. Accordingly, the style of the article will have to be changed: scientific methodology and a specific theoretical context always set a certain conceptual framework and terminological vocabulary, which will deprive the article of its journalistic character. In addition, the text contains a fairly large number of stylistic (for example, stylistically not very successful tautological combinations like "the situation is becoming", etc.) and grammatical (for example, the term "Special military operation" is usually written with a capital letter, although, of course, this term has not yet been definitively established, but the expression below For some reason, the author writes "the Ukrainian crisis" with a capital letter, but for some unknown reason refuses to use the term "Special military operation"; or uncoordinated proposals "Manifestations of instability not only exacerbate conflicts and security shortages, but also form ...", "... The aggravation of the conflict with the West and the new round that followed ...", "The purpose of the study was to study the real dynamics ... with an emphasis on ensuring the national security of Russia", etc.; or the separate spelling of the word "the above"; or the erroneous spelling of the short form of the adjective "limited" in the expression "Chinese investors are limited represented"; etc.) errors, which also became one of the arguments in the adoption of decisions on the need to finalize the article. There are also some problems with terminology, for example, the term "politicization", which, according to the author, "has become one of the main trends in the development of international relations." If politicization is understood as the commonly used meaning of this term, i.e. the action according to the meaning of the verb "politicize" (to give something a political character, to involve in political activity), then it is not entirely clear what the author means in this: how can international relations be "politicized" if they are initially politicized? It is not for nothing that there is a stable expression "world politics and international relations", which link international relations (economic, humanitarian, migration, etc.) and world politics into a single process, which is designed to regulate these relations. The author (if we proceed from the context) for some reason linked world politics with instability and conflicts, which is not always the case. There are also questionable statements, for example, the connection postulated by the author between the "struggle between countries for geopolitical dominance and dominance in Eurasian markets" and the desire of these countries to create "new dividing lines". The desire to "dominate the Eurasian markets" is also doubtful here, given how many European and American companies have left Russia in recent years, as well as China's rather sluggish activity in filling the gap in these markets. In addition, globalization contributes to the "domination" of foreign markets, which until today has sought to destroy any "dividing lines" rather than create them. So the author needs to determine exactly what he sees as a threat, and combine such contradictory processes into one causal relationship. The bibliography includes 37 titles, including sources in foreign languages, and adequately reflects the state of research on the subject of the article. There is no appeal to the opponents due to the lack of theoretical and methodological elaboration of the article. The advantages of the reviewed work include a fairly extensive empirical material, which was attracted for analysis, but unfortunately remained without proper elaboration. GENERAL CONCLUSION: the article proposed for review at this stage of its preparation can be qualified as a scientific work that only partially meets the basic requirements for works of this kind. The author has collected quite a lot of empirical material, but the complete lack of theoretical and methodological reflection did not allow him to correctly pose and solve a scientific problem, reducing the work to journalistic subjective and evaluative reasoning on a given topic. Therefore, this article needs to be finalized. If the collected material is worked out by scientific methods, there is a high probability of obtaining non-trivial scientific results that will be of interest to political scientists, sociologists, sinologists, specialists in world politics and international relations, as well as students of these specialties. The presented material corresponds to the subject of the journal "National Security / nota bene" and after appropriate revision can be recommended for publication.

Third Peer Review

Peer reviewers' evaluations remain confidential and are not disclosed to the public. Only external reviews, authorized for publication by the article's author(s), are made public. Typically, these final reviews are conducted after the manuscript's revision. Adhering to our double-blind review policy, the reviewer's identity is kept confidential.
The list of publisher reviewers can be found here.

Review The subject of the study is the state of Sino-Russian relations and the identification of problems and prospects of these relations for the national security of Russia. The research methodology is based on the principles of science, consistency and objectivity. The following research methods are used in the work: The research methodology is based on methods that are used in various fields of knowledge. Among them: source studies — the study of historical documents and their use in scientific practice; system analysis — induction, deduction, expert assessment; economic theory — scientific abstraction; political science — a combination of historical and logical analysis; documentary studies — information analysis; historiography — historical and comparative method; analogy - direct, subjective and symbolic analogy; computational linguistics — self-referencing. Relevance. The transformational processes of the 2020s led to the peak of conflict in the world order. The aggravation of local conflicts, the slow pace of global economic recovery after the COVID-19 pandemic and the beginning of Russia's war in Ukraine became a turning point for the post-Cold War world order. Antagonism between different groups of countries has intensified, which has become the main trend in international relations. External challenges such as terrorism, cyber attacks, food problems, climate change and various biological threats "create a contradiction between globalization and closure within national borders," there is an increase in strategic competition between developed countries and a decrease in strategic cooperation. Negative phenomena are also growing in the economic sphere, which leads to unfair competition, various prohibitions, and protection of their producers. The crisis in Ukraine has changed the supply chain of goods, which has made prices for goods and energy unstable. Russia and China have fully faced these challenges in recent years. For Russia, the main problems are the conflict with the West and sanctions. China is experiencing external pressure from the United States in politics, science, economics, and technology. In addition, according to Chinese experts, the United States is using the Ukrainian crisis to strengthen its allies in Asia. The United States is using the Ukrainian crisis to strengthen its allies and implement its strategy in the East Pacific region and counter Chinese power and influence. In these circumstances, the Russian Federation and China, which strive for a polycentric world order, deny the use of force in international affairs and have begun close cooperation to solve global problems. Considering the dynamics of Russian-Chinese relations in terms of prospects and hidden threats to the national security of the Russian Federation is undoubtedly relevant and important. Scientific novelty is determined by the formulation of the problem and the objectives of the study. The article provides a comprehensive analysis of the relations between Russia and China after the start of the special military operation (SVO), identifies the main prospects and threats of cooperation for Russia's national security. Style, structure, content. The style of the article is scientific with descriptive elements. The structure of the work is aimed at achieving goals and objectives and consists of three sections: Introduction; Materials and methods; Results and discussion. The introduction shows the relevance of the topic, reveals the purpose and objectives and novelty. In the section "Materials and methods", the methods on which the author of the study relied when writing the work are disclosed and the sources that form the basis of the study are noted. The section "Results and discussion" provides an analysis of Russian-Chinese relations in various fields: meetings and contacts of top officials of the state, interaction in the field of economics, energy, development of innovative technologies, trade and economic cooperation. The article notes the controversial issue of the price of raw materials exported from Russia to China and the profitability of such trade only for China. Other controversial factors of import and export in the relationship between countries are also noted. The text of the article contains a lot of interesting materials and data on Russian-Chinese relations. In conclusion, the author draws objective conclusions and the main conclusion is that "Russia needs to get out of the shadow of China and become an actor of economic and political processes in the Asian region so that key countries of Southeast Asia continue to consider Russia as a natural counterweight to China" The bibliography of the work consists of 37 sources in Russian and English on the research topic and related topics. The bibliography is well designed. The appeal to the opponents is presented at the level of information and bibliography collected during the work on the topic. Conclusions, the interest of the readership. The article is written on a topical topic and will be of interest to specialists and a wide range of readers.