Library
|
Your profile |
Urban Studies
Reference:
Karpenko, E.A. (2024). The evolution of theater placement in the urban space of the city using the example of Moscow from the late 17th to the early 20th century. Urban Studies, 2, 98–107. https://doi.org/10.7256/2310-8673.2024.2.70923
The evolution of theater placement in the urban space of the city using the example of Moscow from the late 17th to the early 20th century.
DOI: 10.7256/2310-8673.2024.2.70923EDN: FWJRZQReceived: 28-05-2024Published: 04-06-2024Abstract: The current trend of urban sprawl in major cities is creating conditions for territorial injustice in the distribution of cultural assets. One of the key problems in the modern theater urban development of Moscow is associated with the uneven distribution of theater complexes between the city core and the periphery. The object of the study is the theater as an element of the cultural environment of urban space. The subject of the study is the spatial features of theater placement in the urban structure and its influence on shaping the city's cultural landscape, as well as the spatial evolution of the city itself. The research objective is to establish urban planning correlations between theater location in the city structure and the spatial development of the city through the evolution of theater placement in Moscow from the late 17th to the early 20th century. The research methodology during the historical phase is based on studying bibliographic sources and cartographic analysis. Examination of contemporary issues involved collecting, updating, and visualizing geospatial data on the present urban placement of theaters. The scientific novelty of the study lies in utilizing a spatial approach to examining Moscow's urban cultural environment retrospectively from the late 17th to the early 20th century. This spatial approach enables identifying the correlation between sociocultural phenomena and the structure of Moscow's urban space during this period. The research identified characteristic temporal stages in the evolution of theater placement in Moscow from the late 17th to the early 20th century, coupled with the city's immediate spatial development. The research results can serve as a starting point for developing a comprehensive urban strategy aimed at enhancing the quality of the city's cultural environment through the strategic placement of theater complexes. Keywords: theater, cultural area, spatial organization, urban evolution, core, periphery, historical cartography, Moscow, urban structure, Geoinformation analysisThis article is automatically translated. You can find original text of the article here.
Introduction Urban planning placement of cultural objects in the city plays a key role not only in the development of the city, but also in the formation of stable value orientations among its residents. L.B. Kogan, L.N. Kogan and E.A. Orlova are well–known experts in the field of research of the cultural environment of the city. L.N. Kogan in his research identifies several main characteristics of cultural city environments: - culture of the urban spatial sphere: culture of streets, courtyards, public institutions, etc. [1, p.48]; - the cultural level of the city's population, its cultural needs, interests and orientations [1, p.48]. Throughout its history, the theater has played and continues to play one of the main roles in shaping the cultural environment of the city. The evolution of Moscow's theatrical life and its architecture is revealed in the works of A.V. Anisimov, L.M. Starikova, S.K.Bogoyavlensky, as well as in the book "The World – Theater. Architecture and Scenography in Russia" (A. G. Stepina, A. A. Petrova). Despite the fact that the history of the theater and its architecture from its appearance to the end of the Soviet period has been extensively studied, the issues of theater placement through the spatial prism of the "cultural environment of the city" is an urgent task. According to official open data from the Ministry of Culture of the Russian Federation, there are 82 theaters in Moscow in 2022[2]. The total seating capacity is 59574 seats (34166 - main seats, 25408 – additional seats)[2]. According to the estimate of the permanent population of Moscow, as of January 1, 2024, 7,513,000 people of working age (men aged 16-61 years, women aged 16-56 years) live in Moscow[3]. Based on this, it can be concluded that for every able-bodied resident of the capital, there are 0.007 seats in the auditorium. According to unofficial data collected as a result of geoinformation analysis of open data sources and their updating, there are about 215 theaters in Moscow and nearby areas. Despite the indicator, which is 2 times numerically higher than the official values, the number of seats does not grow proportionally either. Most unofficial theaters have small stages or do not have their own venue at all. To date, theatrical life is concentrated mainly within the Garden Ring (the largest concentration of theaters is in the Tverskoy, Arbatsky and Presnensky districts). There are 136,080 people living within this region[4], which is only 1.8% of the total working-age population. 94% of the working-age population lives outside the central administrative district of Moscow. The statistical data are also compounded by the lack of urban planning rationing for the placement of theaters in Moscow. The concept of a theater as an object of cultural and educational activity is not found in the current legal framework of urban planning documentation in Moscow. In accordance with the decree of the Government of Moscow dated December 21, 2021 No. 2152-PP "On approval of standards for urban planning design of the city of Moscow in the field of trade, service and provision of comfortable and favorable living conditions for citizens in residential facilities", only cultural, educational and leisure facilities (libraries, exhibition halls, museums, clubs, dance halls, cultural centers, multifunctional entertainment centers). The issue of rationing theaters was also raised in Soviet times. Sociological surveys of viewers and surveys conducted in 1973-1976 showed that the frequency of visits to theaters is in no way related to the distances to them. The service radius here has practically no meaning [5, p.12]. However, both Soviet researchers and drafters of regulatory documents agree on one thing - transport accessibility plays an important role. To assess the spatial accessibility of theaters, we will refer to the draft regional standards for urban planning in St. Petersburg in 2015. The calculated indicator of the minimum acceptable level of provision of the population of St. Petersburg with theaters is 4.74 seats with transport accessibility up to 60 minutes[6]. Figure 1 shows the current location of theaters relative to the modern administrative boundaries of the city. Transport accessibility within 1 – 1.5 hours is illustrated by the isochron construction method. Fig.1. Modern placement of theaters in Moscow and nearby areas. Significant changes in the theatrical appearance of Moscow have always been caused by a number of processes: political, economic, cultural and integration and are inextricably linked with the development of the city itself. The history of theater buildings in Moscow, as well as throughout Russia, has been documented since the end of the XVII century, but in a tangible perspective, Moscow's theatrical life is perceived starting from the Theater Square (the beginning of the XIX century). The chronological framework of the study is formed by the main stages of the formation of the administrative borders of the capital since the end of the XVII century and combined with the historical stages of the formation of the theatrical life of Moscow. The end of the XVII – beginning of the XVIII century – the border of Moscow is defined by the boundaries of the fortress walls of the Earthen city. The prerequisite for the emergence of the theater at this time was the Western European course of Tsar Alexei Mikhailovich [7, p.29]. The first theatrical space in Moscow is the Funny Palace in the Kremlin (built in 1651 as the residential chambers of boyar Ilya Danilovich Miloslavsky)[8]. By now, the palace has been rebuilt several times and has lost its eloquent functional purpose. In 1672, a "Comedy temple" was built in the village of Preobrazhenskoye, which continued to exist until 1676[9, p.12]. By order of Peter the Great, a "Comedy Temple" was built on Red Square (1703-1733)[9, p.12]. Theatrical performances of that time were also given in the theater hall of the Lefort house, specially equipped for these purposes[9, p.13]. In 1701. The first "school" theater at the Slavic-Latin Academy was opened in Moscow, and the Moscow Hospital, founded by decree of Peter I in 1706 in Lefortovo, also became the site for the anatomical theater at the medical school [7, p.30]. Figure 2 shows the key theatrical structures of that time and their position relative to the urban planning structure of the city at that time. Fig.2. Moscow theaters of the late XVII – early XVIII century. The Kremlin was the historical center of the city, and the first elite theater of that time was located within its borders. The first public theater "Comedy Temple" is located in the central part of the core. The city at that time, by today's standards, was compact. And with the population of Moscow at that time (about 200 thousand people), the theater should have been a success. However, the "Comedy Temple" on Red Square, which could accommodate up to 400 spectators, was not a success among the townspeople[9, p.13]. An unprepared public and weak transport links between the core of the city and the periphery led to the demolition of the building in 1735. Nevertheless, the theater's place in the structure of the urban core was a foregone conclusion. The middle of the XVIII – beginning of the XIX century – the border of Moscow is formed along the Kamer-Kollezhsky val. In the middle of the XVIII – early XIX century, Moscow was assigned the role of a provincial city in connection with the transfer of the capital to St. Petreburg. In 1710, the population of Moscow was about 160 thousand people. According to the "revision tales", the population of Moscow began to decline at the beginning of the XVIII century, reaching a minimum by 1740 (138.4 thousand people), and then gradually began to approach the level of the beginning of the century (in 1776, the population of Moscow was 161 thousand people)[10]. Before the outbreak of the Patriotic War of 1812, approximately 270 thousand people lived in Moscow, and after the end of the war – 215 thousand [10]. In 1742, the city's border was expanded to the Kamer-Kollezhsky Val[11]. At the same time, the border was not an actual one, but a customs one[11]. At this historical stage, the periphery of the Earthen City is structured and acquires the character of the periphery of the core. The periphery shifts to the boundaries of the Chamber-Collegiate shaft. In the current spatial organization, theatrical life was already polycentric, but still gravitating towards the core. The town-planning formation of the theater square in the core of the city is a distinctive feature of this period. Compositionally The Theater Square is a rectangle framed by four two-story buildings with identical facades. The Znamenka district (the Znamensky Opera House and the Arbat Theater) acquires the character of linear placement of theaters. There are pockets of theaters on the periphery (in the north-east – the Locatelli Theater and the theater at the Red Gate, in the south-west – the people's theater on the Maiden Field), which negatively affects their popularity. Theaters on the periphery were not successful [9, p.16], the majority of the population She still lived within the boundaries of the Earth City. A special place is occupied by chaotic centers of domestic serf theaters within and outside Moscow. Home performances prepared the townspeople for the perception of professional theater[7, p.34]. Fig.3. Theaters of Moscow in the middle of the XVIII – early XIX century.
fig.4. Theaters of Moscow in the middle of the XIX century – the beginning of the XX century. Conclusions: References
1. Kogan, L.N. (1992). Sociology of culture. Ekaterinburg: URGU.
2. Theaters. Summary data Statistical information. Open data portal of the Ministry of Culture of the Russian Federation.(2022). Retrieved from https://opendata.mkrf.ru/opendata/7705851331-stat_theaters_svod 3. Distribution of the population by age groups for 2010-2022. Office of the Federal State Statistics Service for Moscow and the Moscow Region. (2022). Retrieved from https://77.rosstat.gov.ru/folder/64634 4. Estimation of the population of Moscow as of January 1, 2024 and on average for 2023. Directorate of the Federal State Statistics Service for Moscow and the Moscow Region. (2024). Retrieved from https://77.rosstat.gov.ru/folder/64634 5. Anisimov, A.V. (1979) Formation of a system of theatrical entertainment buildings in major cities Arkhitektura SSSR, 10(12), 64. Retrieved from https://tatlin.ru/lib/arxitektura_sssr_10_1979 6. Draft standards for urban planning of St. Petersburg. Government of St. Petersburg. Committee on Urban Planning and Architecture. (2015). Retrieved from http://old.kgainfo.spb.ru/img/flash/2015_12_30/30122015.pdf 7. Stepina, A. G., & Petrova, A. A. (2017). The world is a theater. Architecture and scenography in Russia Moscow: Kuchkovo pole. 8. Starikova, L. (2011). «Call comedy masters to the Moscow State»: At the origins of Russian-Italian theatrical relations. Modern Drama, 3(4), 231-240. Retrived from https://theatre-library.ru/sovremennaya_dramaturgiya/2011-3 9. Anisimov, A.V. (1984). Moscow theaters. Time and architecture Moscow: Moscow worker. 10. Filippov, V. (2003). Dynamics of the ethnic and religious composition of the population of Moscow. On the way to the census (pp. 277-313). Moscow: Aviaizdat. 11. Gutnikov, V.A., & Strakhova, V.N. (2021). Ecological and toponomic losses of the consequences of objects in the city of Moscow. Urban planing, 1(71), 70-83. 12. Kalmykov, S.V., Mishenev, IU.D., Roshchevkin, V.T., & Senin, A.S. (2008). The Moscow Circular Railway is 100 years old. Moscow: LKI. 13. Pilyugin, A. A. (2003). The Reforms in the Imperial Theaters: 1882: the history of the organization the creative process in Russian theater, 127-128. Russia, Moscow: GITIS. 14. Pyataeva, O. V. (2008). Russian circus 1900-1917. Essay on history News of the Russian State Pedagogical University named after. A. I. Herzen, 60(212), 216-220.
Peer Review
Peer reviewers' evaluations remain confidential and are not disclosed to the public. Only external reviews, authorized for publication by the article's author(s), are made public. Typically, these final reviews are conducted after the manuscript's revision. Adhering to our double-blind review policy, the reviewer's identity is kept confidential.
|