Ðóñ Eng Cn Translate this page:
Please select your language to translate the article


You can just close the window to don't translate
Library
Your profile

Back to contents

Philology: scientific researches
Reference:

The Pushkin Myth in modern literature for children (based on the works of K. Strelnikova, M. Bershadskaya, Ai eN (Irina Krestyeva))

Marinina Yuliya Anatol'evna

PhD in Philology

Associate Professor; Department of Russian and Foreign Philology; Nizhny Novgorod State Pedagogical University named after Kozma Minin

603095, Russia, Nizhny Novgorod region, Nizhny Novgorod, Ulyanova str., 1

umarinina@gmail.com
Other publications by this author
 

 
Malyutina Oksana Aleksandrovna

ORCID: 0009-0004-2133-0807

PhD in Law

Associate Professor; Department of Civil Law and Procedure; Nizhny Novgorod Academy of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of the Russian Federation

603095, Russia, Nizhny Novgorod, Ulyanova str., 1, room 406

maljutinaoa@mail.ru

DOI:

10.7256/2454-0749.2024.6.70877

EDN:

FYKWQN

Received:

29-05-2024


Published:

02-07-2024


Abstract: The article presents an understanding of the functioning and role of the Pushkin myth in modern Russian children's literature. In the book of short stories by Kristina Strelnikova "The Magnificent Wreath of Wreaths", Maria Bershadskaya "Pushkin and Company" (the tenth story from the cycle "Big Little Girl"), the novella "P.Ushkin and Pixels" by AI eN (Irina Krestyeva), the story of Ksenia Dragunskaya "Pushkin is urgently needed!" Alexander Sergeevich Pushkin appears not only in the image of a great poet. His presence in modern texts for children, on the one hand, is due to the presence of the Pushkin myth in culture as a whole, on the other – the early acquaintance of children with the work and facts of the poet's biography. The specificity of the image of the personality and creativity of A.S. Pushkin is due to the peculiarities of children's perception: the biography and creativity of the writer are transferred to the everyday sphere. During the research, historical, cultural, comparative and biographical methods of literary criticism were used. A.S. Pushkin in modern literature for children and adolescents is transformed from the image of a brilliant writer into the image of a friend whose everyday life is no less interesting and fascinating than his works. The texts of K. Strelnikova, M. Bershadskaya, and Ai eN reflect the facts of Pushkin's biography (studying at the Tsarskoye Selo Lyceum, marriage, duel), as well as his works (poems, fairy tales are quoted). The Pushkin myth is undoubtedly the most significant literary myth, the myth of genius in Russian culture, which does not lose its relevance over time, but on the contrary, is becoming increasingly widespread in the mass consciousness. Modern children's literature actively uses trends characteristic of "adult" literature, including mythologization, the inclusion of myths about the "new cultural hero", which, of course, is A.S. Pushkin.


Keywords:

biographical myth, Pushkin's myth, mythologization, cultural hero, children's literature, author's image, intertextuality, Bershadskaya, Strelnikova, image of a child

This article is automatically translated. You can find original text of the article here.

The Pushkin myth is undoubtedly the most significant literary myth in Russian culture, which does not lose its relevance over time, on the contrary, it is becoming more widespread: "The state idea–the Pushkin brand, born at the end of the XIX century, has been transformed many times since then, leaving, however, some common features: Pushkin is a humanitarianst, Pushkin is a genius, Pushkin is integrity ("our everything"), Pushkin is an expression of the spirit (national or international), etc." [1, p. 154].

Understanding the mechanisms of formation and representation of the Pushkin myth in modern culture has become the subject of reflection for many researchers in domestic and foreign literary studies [2, 3, 4, 5, 6]: Russian Russian Pushkin as one of the creators of the "Russian Idea" [3, p.10], Pushkin is "the demiurge of the entire literary-centric Russian culture"[4, p.174] and others. A. Smith talks about the role of F.M. Dostoevsky's "Pushkin's Speech" in the formation of the Pushkin myth [7], V.V. Markovich explores the "transformation of the Pushkin myth" in the poetry of the Leningrad underground [8, p. 4]. Today, the Pushkin myth is actively functioning in the Internet space in creolized texts, memes, motivators and demotivators, jokes, pie rhymes, etc. [9, p. 360].

T.G. Shemetova defines the specifics of the Pushkin myth among other socio-cultural myths: "The Pushkin myth occupies a special place among other domestic myths, if only because of all other "literary" and even other personalized myths, it is the only fundamentally "national" (nationwide) one that has grown into consciousness at the level of a stereotypical scheme" [10, p. 122]. Indeed, his existence as a "nationwide" is confirmed, among other things, by the spread of the myth of Pushkin in literature for preschool and primary school children, which, by its nature, is bi-directional and simultaneously addressed to both the child and the adult reader.

In the "History of the tenth. Pushkin and Company" (2015) from the cycle "Big Little Girl" by Maria Bershadskaya, Sonya, a friend of the main character of the stories, Zhenya, "chains" herself to the window frame with a bicycle lock: "... I decided to play Prisoner.

"What prisoner?" I was surprised.

– In this one. Who sits outside the window in a damp dungeon" [11, pp. 6-7].

Maria Bershadskaya starts from the well-known and commonly used expression "And who is to blame? Pushkin?" (there may be another verb in place of the verb 'guilty'). As L.I. Saraskina notes, "And who will turn off the light? Pushkin?"– in this expression, as well as in its numerous analogues, the connection with the real biography and personality of the first poet of Russia is almost completely lost: no one uttering such a phrase needs to know anything about Pushkin's poetry or about himself" [12, p.130]. In Bershadskaya's text, this is presented as follows: "Who hasn't finished the porridge again? Pushkin?!”, “And who's going to clean up their shoes? Pushkin, or what?!“…

... And suddenly it turned out that Pushkin was really to blame for Sonya turning into a prisoner and crying under the window" [11, p. 7]. In the situation of "crying under the window" <Our italics. – Y.M.> there is also a reference to Pushkin's texts: "The Prisoner", "The Tale of the Dead Princess and the Seven Heroes", "The Tale of Tsar Saltan..." etc.

The poet's appearance in the lives of the children – the heroes of the story – is explained very simply: any "cultured person", according to Sonya's grandmother, should know who A.S. Pushkin is, because children "go through him at school" [11, p.30].

In addition, the text of the story about a big little girl includes facts from the life of A.S. Pushkin (dates of birth, marriage, the growth of the poet and N.N. Goncharova), various ways of quoting Pushkin's texts ("Sad time!..", "Winter Morning" ("Frost and sun...")) and graphic images showing the poet in different situations: in a bathing suit, at a cupboard with blueberry jam, with a bird's nest on his head, etc. (a book with illustrations by Sasha Ivoilova was published by KompasGid publishing house).

Illustrations can also be called a kind of "quotes": they resemble the painting by Pyotr Konchalovsky "Pushkin in Mikhailovsky" (1930-1932). Perhaps it is this portrait that forms the basis of illustrations in connection with the history of the painting itself: the original version represented the demythologization of the image of the great poet shown in bed with bare feet, on the one hand, and the creation of a new myth – about the simplicity and closeness of genius to each person. However, this version of the image did not correspond to the official idea of Pushkin, and his legs had to be "covered" with a blanket [13, p.30].

Sonya comes up with and tells his Wife and Mishka stories about how Pushkin washed the window, wrote poetry ("mixing" words and "fluffing" rhymes), did not like to comb his hair and did not wash curtains, etc. These anecdotal stories about Pushkin and his entourage are always told on occasion and correlate with the activities of the children. It is Sonya who is the creator of these stories, because "My great-grandfather was a Pushkin scholar, he studied Pushkin all his life. And maybe I'll discover something that no one knew about at all. Even my great-grandfather" [11, p. 13]. Obviously, there are autobiographical motives in the appeal to the personality and creativity of A.S. Pushkin: "My mother, studying at the Faculty of Physics and Mathematics of the University of Tartu, listened to lectures by Y. M. Lotman. A.S. Pushkin was idolized in the family, my mother read a lot to her daughter" [14].

At the end of the book, Sonya writes poetry herself: "When Pushkin grew up big, he only liked noodle soup. Refused cutlets. I couldn't stand the vinaigrette..." [11, p.45]. After reading her poem, Sonya remembers the bicycle lock code and is released. The code – 199 – indicates the birthday of the girl herself, on September 19: "What does Pushkin have to do with it?!

– What's that got to do with it?! Sonya was indignant and, spreading her arms, collapsed on the sofa. – I've read about Pushkin. And I wrote a verse. Don't you understand?! So, I am also a poet..." [11, p.46]. There is an identification of the heroine of the story, Sonya, and the hero of her stories, A.S. Pushkin. Thus, in the story of Maria Bershadskaya, A.S. Pushkin is a character close to children, very "his own" and understandable to them, his life or some obscure, unfamiliar things are easily imagined, interpreted through understandable categories ("Before there was no Internet. And if you wrote something, how do you know if everyone likes it or not? That's what KID GLOVES were invented for. Instead of likes. Pushkin read his poems, and everyone threw gloves at him. And then he collected them and counted them. He had both one hundred and two hundred likes" [11, p. 12]).

The main character of the collection of short stories "The Magnificent Wreath of Wreaths" (2017) by Kristina Strelnikova invented the "time machine". He gets acquainted with Pushkin, Gogol, Leo Tolstoy, Prishvin, Paustovsky and other writers. A.S. Pushkin in stories about Vena Venchikov is also very close to the boy: they talk, discuss poems, and then Venya shares in literature lessons memories of meetings with Alexander Sergeevich (about how Pushkin writes poetry with goose feathers and as the horses of Pushkin and Lermontov argue, which of them the poets dedicated more poems to).

The work of A.S. Pushkin as a precedent text is included in the works of K. Strelnikova: they use different types of citations: verbatim and non-verbal, allusions and reminiscences ("Pushkin dreams, writes down in a notebook everything he sees: frost and the sun, a wonderful day, the moon like a pale spot" [15, p.8]; "A friend of my harsh days, my decrepit horse." And again: "I remember a wonderful moment, you appeared to me like a fleeting vision, like a horse of pure beauty" [15, p.11]). Also included in the stories of Kristina Strelnikova are facts from the poet's life: the duel, his visits to Mikhailovskoye, his role in the formation of the Russian literary language, and others, i.e. the image of A.S. Pushkin is embedded in the conventional historical and cultural context of the XIX century (he writes with goose feathers and ink, wears a cape and a top hat) and generally corresponds to the ideas about the life of the writer, it is not transferred to the present. However, here, as in the text of Maria Bershadskaya, comic situations are created (Pushkin "sat on his favorite oak tree, dangled his legs and talked with mermaids" [15, p.32] or the dispute between Pushkin's horse and Lermontov's horse), a humorous effect is achieved through the transformation of quotations from the writer's works and word creation, and the source should be understandable to the main audience – children. For example, these are references to the introduction to the poem "Ruslan and Lyudmila": "... And Pushkin began to read healing incantatory poems to him. Especially about Lukomorye and the Black Sea region. That is, on the contrary" [15, p.32].

Currently, we can say that the very "Word "Pushkin" has become the conceptual core of culture: it is found in anecdotes, sayings, sayings. All this is the result of the development of the Pushkin myth by modern society, represented in the space of Russian literature" [16, p.11]. It is on the functioning and meaning of the word that the text of the story is based.Ushkin and Pixels" (2022) by AI eN (Irina Borisovna Krestyeva). The main character is "the smallest student in the class" Pashka Ushkin [17, p.95]. The story contains references to the texts of A.S. Pushkin and his biography, they are introduced into the narrative through the image of literature lessons (in the chapter "Ushkin, Pushkin and the learning process", the guys retell the "Tale of the Fisherman and the Fish", they recall the duel). There is also a comparison of the situations in which the heroes of the story find themselves (Pasha and Lusha got lost in the Prioksky Reserve) and the heroes of A.S. Pushkin. Lusha says: "Now I understand the problem of Pushkin's heroes in the story "Blizzard"!" [17, p.110]. The sound of the initial and surname pushes Pasha to think that he and Alexander Sergeevich Pushkin are similar, and Pashka also decides to become a writer and composes a fairy tale about the "golden fish" (the son of a goldfish).

The finale of the story and Pavlik's essay show that the main thing is to be yourself, not to try to be like someone else, even if it is Pushkin himself: "Actually, I will first be a great artist, and then the president. And between the president and the artist, I probably will be, I don't know who else. By anyone. But I will not become a science fiction writer for anything, and I will not think of composing any comics or musicals" [17, pp. 187-188]. Aya eN tells the story of a hero who is both like everyone else and not like that ("Pavlik had plump lips, curly hair, palms wet with excitement and a strange, different view of the world from everyone else. It so happened that in his previous life Pavlik was a little sea turtle, and in the next he was going to become a great land hypnotist. Now his life was intermediate, ordinary, but it was there. It was! And it was so great!

Pashka silently put the ball with patches on the desk and went out into the spring" [17, p. 189]).

The reference to the name of the great Russian poet in this text suggests to the reader that every person is unique, everyone is special.

M.N. Virolainen, exploring the formation of the Pushkin myth, notes that the idea of it enters the consciousness of the Russian person from childhood: "The idea that Pushkin is the "first" is firmly entrenched in our minds in a school—like way. He is both the "first poet" (i.e., the "best", "main" poet), and the "creator of the Russian literary language", and the "first realist"..." [18, p. 335]. In connection with this statement, the study of the Pushkin myth in children's literature is considered important and timely: an appeal to the poet's work and life not only in the aspect of studying his works in literature lessons, but also in a wide cultural field ensures the existence of a national myth in which Alexander Sergeevich is both a great Russian poet, a genius, and at the same time At the same time, a person living the simplest life, close to everyone.

Today, "in the context of Russian literature of the XX-XXI centuries, the image of Pushkin generates a new mythological space in which new, original ones are added to established mythologems: various writers build plots that help express today's understanding of life in general, fate and Pushkin's poetry in particular" [19, p.206]. The Pushkin myth in modern culture continues to be created using new forms: the Internet space, literary memes and social advertising, seasonal restaurant menus, etc. However, the basis is the perception of the Pushkin myth as part of national cultural memory, an element of the "myth of Great Russian Literature" as a whole [20, p.50] - remains unshakeable regardless of the new forms of embodiment.

References
1. Tumanov, D.V. (2013). Virtualization of the image of A.S. Pushkin in the traditions of postmodernism. In: Scientific notes of Kazan University. Humanitarian sciences, 6, 153-161.
2. Sandler, St. (2003). Commemorating Pushkin. Russia's Myth of a National Poet. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
3. Reid, R. & Andrew, J. (Ed.). (2003).  Two Hundred YEars of Pushkin: Alexander Pushkin: Myth and Monnument. Amsterdam, New York, NY: Rodopi.
4. Khamidulin, A. M., & Babaeva, A. V. (2024) Experience in testing content analysis in the study of the concept “Russian Idea”. In: Bulletin of Minin University, 1, 10. doi:10.26795/2307-1281-2024-12-1-10
5. Erlikh, S.E. (2013). The myth of Pushkin in modern Russian journalism. Bulletin of the Russian State University for the Humanities. Series: Literary Studies. Linguistics. Culturology, 12(113), 173-178.
6. Horowitz, B. (1996). The Myth of A.S. Pushkin in Russia's Silver Age. M.O. Gershenzon, Pushkinist. Evanstone, Illinois: Northwestern University Press.
7. Smith, A. (2013). Pushkin as a Cultural Myth: Dostoevskii’s Pushkin Speech and Its Legacy in Russian Modernism. In: Dostoevskii’s Overcoat: Influence, Comparison, and Transposition (pp. 123-147). Amsterdam, New York, NY: Rodopi.
8. Markovich, V.V. (2005). Transformation of Pushkin’s myth about the poet and poetry in the lyrics of the Leningrad underground poets. In: Bulletin of St. Petersburg University, 1, 3-14.
9. Abramova, V.I., & Arkhangelskaya, Yu.V. (2023). Pushkin’s myth in Runet folklore: biographical aspect. In: Scientific notes of the Novgorod State University, 4(49), 357-361. doi:10.34680/2411-7951.2023.4(49).357-361
10. Shemetova, T.G. (2012). Personification of historical memory in myths about Pushkin and Brodsky. In: Bulletin of the Russian State University for the Humanities. Series: Literary Studies. Linguistics. Culturology, 18(98), 115-123.
11. Bershadskaya, M. (2016). Big little girl. Tenth story. Pushkin and company. Moscow: KompasGid.
12. Saraskina, L.I. (2018). Pushkin’s myth in Russian culture: legends, anecdotes, cliches. In: Artistic culture, 4, 128-161.
13. Faryno, E. (2014). Monuments to Pushkin from a bird's eye view. In: Culture and text, 2, 5-92.
14. Bershadskaya Maria Vladimirovna. In: ProDetLit. All-Russian Encyclopedia of Children's Literature. Retrieved from https://prodetlit.ru/index.php/%D0%91%D0%B5%D1%80%D1%88%D0%B0%D0%B4%D1%81%D0%BA%D0%B0%D1%8F_%D0%9C%D0%B0%D1%80%D0%B8%D1%8F_%D0%92%D0%BB%D0%B0%D0%B4%D0%B8%D0%BC%D0%B8%D1%80%D0%BE%D0%B2%D0%BD%D0%B0
15. Strelnikova, K. (2017). Magnificent Venya Venchikov. Moscow: Egmont Russia Ltd.
16. Vairakh, Yu.V., & Kazorina, A.V. (2019). The author's form of manifestation of Pushkin's myth in the prose of M.A. Bulgakov and S. Dovlatov’s story “The Reserve”. In: Philological Sciences. Questions of theory and practice, 10, 11-15.
17. Aya eN (2022). Azot and Seledochkina. P. Ushkin and pixels. Moscow: Nigma.
18. Virolainen, M.N. (1995). Cultural hero of the “new time”. In: Legends and myths about Pushkin (pp. 329-349). St. Petersburg: Academic Project.
19. Shemetova, T.G. (2010). Pushkin’s myth: functioning in modern literature. In: Bulletin of the Buryat University, 10, 201-206.
20. Parts, L. The Chekhovian Intertext: Dialogue with a Classic. The Ohio State University Press.

First Peer Review

Peer reviewers' evaluations remain confidential and are not disclosed to the public. Only external reviews, authorized for publication by the article's author(s), are made public. Typically, these final reviews are conducted after the manuscript's revision. Adhering to our double-blind review policy, the reviewer's identity is kept confidential.
The list of publisher reviewers can be found here.

The figure of A.S. Pushkin in the history of literature is, of course, iconic. The image is played out from different sides, and there are both positive and negative options. At the beginning of the reviewed article, it was noted that "the Pushkin myth is undoubtedly the most significant literary myth in Russian culture, which does not lose its relevance over time, on the contrary, it is becoming more widespread ...". The purpose of the work is objectively open, the author tries to use the example of the works of K. Strelnikova, M. Bershadskaya, Ai eN (Irina Krestyeva) to consider how the "image of Pushkin" is refracted in modern texts. I believe that the research tasks are being solved systematically, and the assessment is actually accurate. The style of work correlates with the scientific type: for example, "the main character of the collection of short stories "The Magnificent Venya Venchikov" (2017) by Kristina Strelnikova invented a "time machine". He gets acquainted with Pushkin, Gogol, Leo Tolstoy, Prishvin, Paustovsky and other writers. A.S. Pushkin in the story of Vienna Venchikov is also very close to the boy: they talk, discuss poems, and then Venya shares stories from the life of Alexander Sergeevich in literature lessons (how Pushkin writes poetry with goose feathers and how Pushkin's horses argue and Lermontov, to which of them the poets dedicated more poems)," etc. However, in my opinion, the work should be subtracted in order to eliminate seals, inaccuracies, for example: "understanding the mechanisms of formation and representation of the Pushkin myth in modern culture has become the subject of reflection for many researchers in domestic and foreign literary studies..." etc. There are enough examples of using the "image of Pushkin", the system principle is consistent. Proper references have actually been made: "at present, we can say that the very "Word "Pushkin" has become the conceptual core of culture: it is found in anecdotes, sayings, sayings. All this is the result of the development of the Pushkin myth by modern society, represented in the space of Russian literature" [16, p.11]. It is on the functioning and meaning of the word that the text of the story is based.Ushkin and Pixels" (2022) by AI eN (Irina Borisovna Krestyeva). The main character is "the smallest student in the class" Pashka Ushkin [17, p. 95]. In the text of the story there are references to the texts of A.S. Pushkin and the facts of his biography, they are naturally introduced into the narrative through the image of literature lessons (in the chapter "Ushkin, Pushkin and the learning process" the guys retell the "Tale of the Fisherman and the Fish", they recall the duel)." The main requirements of the publication have been taken into account, it would be appropriate to summarize the conclusions, make them more detailed: "in modern Russian–language children's literature, the Pushkin myth continues to be created and function, in which Alexander Sergeevich is both a great Russian poet, a genius, and at the same time a man living the simplest life, close to everyone." In general, the work is interesting, the material can be useful in the study of a number of humanities disciplines. With that said, I would like to state: after a little revision, the article "The Pushkin myth in modern literature for children (based on the works of K. Strelnikova, M. Bershadskaya, Ai eN (Irina Krestyeva)" can be recommended for publication in the journal "Journal: Philology: Scientific Research".

Second Peer Review

Peer reviewers' evaluations remain confidential and are not disclosed to the public. Only external reviews, authorized for publication by the article's author(s), are made public. Typically, these final reviews are conducted after the manuscript's revision. Adhering to our double-blind review policy, the reviewer's identity is kept confidential.
The list of publisher reviewers can be found here.

The article submitted for consideration "The Pushkin myth in modern literature for children (based on the works of K. Strelnikova, M. Bershadskaya, AI eN (Irina Krestyeva)", proposed for publication in the journal Philology: Scientific Research, is undoubtedly relevant, since the author examines the reception of A. S. Pushkin's creativity in the works of modern children writers. Indeed, as the author claims, the Pushkin myth is undoubtedly the most significant literary myth in Russian culture, which does not lose its relevance over time, on the contrary, it is becoming more widespread. A recognized classic of Russian literature, the texts of whose works have become precedent In the article, the author identifies the peculiarities of the functioning of the Pushkin myth in the cultural space of our time, convincingly proving the precedent essence of the texts. The article is innovative, one of the first in Russian philology devoted to the study of such issues. The article presents a research methodology, the choice of which is quite adequate to the goals and objectives of the work. The author turns, among other things, to various methods to confirm the hypothesis put forward. The article uses comparative typological, biographical methods, as well as the method of intertextual analysis, aimed "at identifying intertextual associative connections and techniques that serve to create such connections - intertext figures. The scientific work was carried out in line with modern scientific approaches, professionally, in compliance with the basic canons of scientific research. Structurally, the work consists of an introduction containing the formulation of the problem, the main part, which traditionally begins with a review of theoretical sources and scientific directions, a research and a final one, which presents the conclusions obtained by the author. Structurally, the article consists of several semantic parts, namely: introduction, literature review, methodology, research progress, conclusions. It should be noted that the conclusion requires strengthening, it does not fully reflect the tasks set by the author and does not contain prospects for further research in line with the stated issues. The bibliography of the article contains 20 sources, but among them there are both domestic works and works by foreign researchers. Unfortunately, the article does not contain references to fundamental works such as PhD and doctoral dissertations. We believe that references to authoritative works, such as monographs, doctoral and/or PhD dissertations on related topics, which could strengthen the theoretical component of the work in line with the national scientific school. The comments made are not significant and do not detract from the overall positive impression of the reviewed work. Typos, spelling and syntactic errors, inaccuracies in the text of the work were not found. In general, it should be noted that the article is written in a simple, understandable language for the reader. The work is innovative, representing the author's vision of solving the issue under consideration and may have a logical continuation in further research. The article will undoubtedly be useful to a wide range of people, Pushkin philologists, literary critics, undergraduates and graduate students of specialized universities. The overall impression after reading the reviewed article "Pushkin's Myth in modern literature for children (based on the works of K. Strelnikova, M. Bershadskaya, Ai eN (Irina Krestyeva)" is positive, it can be recommended for publication in a scientific journal from the list of the Higher Attestation Commission.