Ðóñ Eng Cn Translate this page:
Please select your language to translate the article


You can just close the window to don't translate
Library
Your profile

Back to contents

The union of criminalists and criminologists
Reference:

Dolotov R.O. Methodological problems of defining a “cost” of social reaction to crime

Abstract: The  author analyzes the methodological bases of creation of cost estimating methods, related to the reaction of the society (the state) to crime, particularly, the estimation of costs of ensuring the public authorities’ work,  aimed at combating crime and solving other problems, in the situations, when the amount of on-budget expenditures, assigned to the provision of the “reaction” to the fact of committing a crime (detection and imposition of criminal liability), is not normatively established. The author applies general and special scientific methods: analysis, synthesis, the structural-logical, statistical, and other methods of scientific cognition. The author proposes his own methodology of public costs estimating, related to the court’s activities in criminal cases consideration, based on the time, spent by courts on criminal cases (materials) consideration. As additional variables, the author offers considering the amount of such work, the budget of these agencies, the normative production resources per worker in a year, the actual number of workers of the agency, who are responsible for these duties. The author concludes about the need for adopting new judges’ workload norms. 


Keywords:

expenditure, crime, society, reaction, costs, estimation, methodology, basis, analysis, combating


This article can be downloaded freely in PDF format for reading. Download article

This article written in Russian. You can find original text of the article here .
References
1. Babaev M.M., Kvashis V.E. Tsena prestupnosti: problemy teorii i praktiki // Rossiyskiy kriminologicheskiy vzglyad. 2009. ¹2. S. 246–259.
2. Volkov V.V., Dmitrieva A.V., Pozdnyakov M.L., Titaev K.D., Rossiyskie sud'i kak professional'naya gruppa: sotsiologicheskoe issledovanie. Institut problem pravoprimeneniya Evropeyskogo universiteta v S-Peterburge. SPb.2012.
3. Godovoy otchet ob ispolnenii byudzheta // Ofitsial'nyy sayt Kaznacheystva Rossii URL: http://www.roskazna.ru/federalnogo-byudzheta-rf/yi/doc/fb_2013.rar.
4. Dolotov R.O. Tsena prestupnosti — istoriya voprosa // Biblioteka ugolovnogo prava i kriminologii. 2013. ¹ 1 S. 146-155.
5. Dolotov R.O. Tsena prestupnosti kak kriminologicheskiy pokazatel': nekotorye metodologicheskie aspekty // Kriminologicheskiy zhurnal Baykal'skogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta ekonomiki i prava. 2012. ¹ 3. S. 15-21.
6. Luneev V. V. Aktual'nye kriminologicheskiy problemy v Rossii //Rossiyskiy kriminologicheskiy vzglyad. 2009. ¹ 4. S. 169-186
7. Luneev V.V. Kurs mirovoy i rossiyskoy kriminologii: uchebnik. V 2 t. T. I. Obshchaya chast' / V.V. Luneev. – M.: Izdatel'stvo Yurayt, 2011.
8. Normy nagruzki sudey, sudebnykh ispolniteley i rabotnikov apparata rayonnykh (gorodskikh) sudov (utv. Postanovleniem Mintruda RF, Minyusta RF ot 27 iyunya 1996 g. N 41b/06-74-125)
9. Osnovnye statisticheskie pokazateli deyatel'nosti sudov obshchey yurisdiktsii za 2013 god.// Ofitsial'nyy sayt Sudebnogo departamenta pri Verkhovnom Sude RF. URL: http://www.cdep.ru/index.php?id=79&item=2360
10. Otchet o rabote sudov po rassmotreniyu ugolovnykh del po pervoy instantsii za 2013 po forme ¹1 (razdel 1) URL: http://www.cdep.ru/index.php?id=79&item=2361.
11. Otchet Sudebnogo departamenta VIII Vserossiyskomu s'ezdu sudey o deyatel'nosti Sudebnogo departamenta pri Verkhovnom Sude Rossiyskoy Federatsii za 2009-2012 gody. URL: http://www.cdep.ru/userimages/Otchet_Sudebnogo_departamentaVIII_VSS_-_2012.pdf
12. Rabochiy dokument «Ekonomicheskie i sotsial'nye posledstviya prestupnosti: novye zadachi v oblasti issledovaniya i planirovaniya», podgotovlennogo Sekretariatom OON dlya Pyatogo Kongressa OON po preduprezhdeniyu prestupnosti i obrashcheniyu s pravonarushitelyami. Zheneva, Shveytsariya, 1-12 sentyabrya 1975 g.