|
Library
|
Your profile |
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.|
Actual problems of Russian law
Reference:
Kostin, A.A.
The problem of prejudicial effect of the decisions
of international commercial arbitrations in the
legislation of the Russian Federation
// Actual problems of Russian law.
2014. ¹ 3.
P. 493-498.
URL: https://en.nbpublish.com/library_read_article.php?id=64018
Kostin, A.A. The problem of prejudicial effect of the decisions of international commercial arbitrations in the legislation of the Russian FederationAbstract: The article concerns the definition of the “prejudicial effect” as a quality of a judicial act upon its entry into force, according to which the facts established by a judicial act are binding when other cases with the same parties are being adjudicated. Special attention is paid to the prejudicial effect of the decisions of international commercial arbitrations. Based upon the practice of the Supreme Arbitration Court of the Russian Federation (Ruling of the SAC of the Russian Federation N. VAS-17458/11), the author comes to a conclusion that the decisions international commercial arbitrations and the decisions of the state arbitration (commercial) courts have the same legal force according to the interpretation of the SAC of the RF of the Art. III of the New York Convention of 1958. Since the decisions of international commercial arbitrations have equal legal force the article contains a conclusion on the presence of prejudicial force of the decisions of international commercial arbitrations, since prejudicial force is an inalienable quality of a judicial act, which came into force. The conclusion on the presence of the prejudicial force of the decisions of the arbitral tribunal is supported by the reference to the decision of the ECHR in a case of Ates Mimarlik Mühendislik A.S v. Turkey. Keywords: international commercial arbitration, prejudicial force, the SAC of the Russian Federation, the ECHR, arbitration agreement, legal certainty, arbitration process, s state arbitration courts, the New York Convention, the ad hoc arbitral tribunal.
This article can be downloaded freely in PDF format for reading. Download article
This article written in Russian. You can find original text of the article here . References
1. Erpyleva N.Yu. Mezhdunarodnyy kommercheskiy arbitrazh: institutsionno-normativnyy mekhanizm pravovogo regulirovaniya // Zakonodatel'stvo i ekonomika. 2011. N 1.
2. Novoselova L.A., Rozhkova M.A. K voprosu o sile sudebnykh aktov arbitrazhnogo suda //Vestnik VAS RF. 2003. N 5. 3. Bereziy A.E., Musin V.A. O preyuditsii sudebnykh aktov //Vestnik VAS RF. 2001, N 4. Skvortsov O.Yu. O nekotorykh voprosakh vzyskaniya ubytkov v treteyskom sudoproizvodstve // Ubytki i praktika ikh vozmeshcheniya: Sbornik statey /otv. red. M.A. Rozhkova. M.: Statut, 2006. 5. Kurochkin S.A. Gosudarstvennye sudy v treteyskom razbiratel'stve i mezhdunarodnom kommercheskom arbitrazhe. M.: Volters Kluver, 2008. 6. Yarkov, V. V. (Vladimir Vladimirovich) Yuridicheskie fakty v tsivilisticheskom protsesse-M. : Infotropik Media, 2012 7. Skvortsov, O.Yu. Treteyskoe razbiratel'stvo predprinimatel'skikh sporov v Rossii: Problemy, tendentsii, perspektivy M.:Volters Kluver, 2005. 8. Seglin B.S. Ispolnenie resheniy Mezhdunarodnogo kommercheskogo arbitrazhnogo suda pri TPP RF i inykh mezhdunarodnykh arbitrazhnykh sudov //Khozyaystvo i pravo. 1998. N 10. |
© 1998 – 2024 Nota Bene. Publishing Technologies. NB-Media Ltd.
Eng
