|
Library
|
Your profile |
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.|
Actual problems of Russian law
Reference:
Simonova, S.V. (2013). Introducing the regime
for specially designated areas
for public events: legal mistakes
as an aspect of legal regulation. Actual problems of Russian law, 12, 1529–1534. https://en.nbpublish.com/library_read_article.php?id=63500
Simonova, S.V. Introducing the regime for specially designated areas for public events: legal mistakes as an aspect of legal regulationAbstract: The article includes analysis of legal mistakes made by federal and regional legislators when introducing the category of specially designated areas for public events and when establishing their status and procedures for the use of such areas. Much attention is paid to the nature of legal and ideological mistakes (due to miscalculations in the need for the specially designated areas for public events, which did not make access of citizens to the freedom of association any easier); legal contents mistakes (related to inconsistencies in the use of terminology by legislator, ambiguous provisions of federal legislation on meetings and informational redundancy of acts on special areas at the regional level). As a result of the study the author formulates propositions on the improvement of Russian normative legal acts in order to overcome the mistakes and make the access of citizens to freedom of associations. Keywords: jurisprudence, constitutional law, legal mistake, legislation of the constituent subjects of the Russian Federation, public event, freedom of association, specially designated areas, legal ideological mistakes, legal contents mistake, technical legal mistakes.
This article can be downloaded freely in PDF format for reading. Download article
This article written in Russian. You can find original text of the article here . References
1. Blankenagel' A., Levin I.G. Svoboda sobraniy i mitingov v Rossiyskoy Federatsii-sdelano v SSSR?: "Luchshe my ne mozhem" ili "Po-drugomu ne khotim"? // Sravnitel'noe konstitutsionnoe obozrenie. – 2013. – N2. – S. 55-62.
2. Shugrina E. Novye pravila organizatsii i provedeniya publichnykh meropriyatiy: chto skazhet Konstitutsionnyy Sud RF? // Munitsipal'noe pravo. – 2012. – ¹3. – S. 2-11. 3. Shugrina E.S. Proverka konstitutsionnosti pravil organizatsii i provedeniya publichnykh meropriyatiy // Aktual'nye problemy rossiyskogo prava. – 2013. – ¹4 (29). – S. 377-388. |
© 1998 – 2025 Nota Bene. Publishing Technologies. NB-Media Ltd.
Eng
