Ðóñ Eng Cn Translate this page:
Please select your language to translate the article


You can just close the window to don't translate
Library
Your profile

Back to contents

Actual problems of Russian law
Reference:

Savchenko, D.A. "To wish the Tsar good in everything": the pledge of the nationals to the Moscow Tsar (early XVII century)

Abstract: The article is devoted to the studies of the legal system of the Moscow kingdom in early XVII century. The author studies legal nature of the religious pledge to the tsar of the people of the Moscow kingdom. Based upon the analysis of the text of cross-kissing writs of late XVI — early XVII centuries, the author defines their types and functions. The cross-kissing writs are regarded as public legal means of influence on will and conscience of the people of the state. The author provides characteristic features of state legal means, criminal legal means and procedural means, as provided for in the cross-kissing writs, as well as consequences for non-compliance with the obligations (loss of mercy of God, church damnation, capital punishments and other types of punishment by the king). The article singles out the types of «cross» crimes, which included violations of the «cross-kissing» pledge. The author provides most detailed analysis of the obligation «not to wish evil» to the king, and the obligation to inform against the crime, of which one got to know. The author evaluates the «cross-kissing» as means of prevention of encroachments upon the bases of political regime of the Moscow state and king himself


Keywords:

Moscow kingdom, legal system, pledge, cross-kissing writ, «cross» crime, preventive role of pledge, punishments, evil intention, witchcraft, obligation to inform against a crime.


This article can be downloaded freely in PDF format for reading. Download article

This article written in Russian. You can find original text of the article here .
References
1. Akty, sobrannye v bibliotekakh i arkhivakh Rossiyskoy imperii arkheograficheskoy ekspedi-tsiey imperatorskoy akademii nauk. — SPb., 1836. — 410 s.
2. Akty vremeni mezhdutsarstviya (1610 g. 17 iyulya — 1613 g.). — M., 1915. — 240 s.
3. Akty vremeni pravleniya Tsarya Vasiliya Shuyskogo. 19 maya 1606 g. — 17 iyulya 1610 g. — M., 1914. — XVIII, — 421 s.
4. Karamzin N.M. Istoriya gosudarstva Rossiyskogo. T. XI. SPb., 1824. — 477 s.
5. Knyaz'kov S.E. O kvalifikatsii politicheskikh prestupleniy kontsa XVI — nachala XVII vv. // Re-alizm istoricheskogo myshleniya. Problemy otechestvennoy istorii perioda feodalizma. — M., 1991. — S. 123–124.
6. Pamyatniki istorii Smutnogo vremeni. — M., 1909. — 104 s.
7. Savchenko D.A Pravovoe znachenie krestotseloval'nykh zapisey kontsa XVI — nachala XVII vv. // Pra-vovye problemy ukrepleniya rossiyskoy gosudarstvennosti. Ch. 25. Tomsk, 2005. — S. 62–66.
8. Savchenko D.A. Otvetstvennost' za gosudarstvennye prestupleniya v Moskovskom tsarstve per-voy poloviny XVII v. Novosibirsk, 2013. — 147 s.
9. Tel'berg G.G. Ocherki politicheskogo suda i politicheskikh prestupleniy v Moskovskom gosu-darstve XVII v. — M., 1912. — 342 s.
10. Kollmann Nancy Shields. Crime and punishment in early modern Russia. — Cambridge, 2012. — 488 p.
11. Lukovskaya D.I., Solov'ev A.A. Pravovaya sistema: deyatel'nostno-integrativnyy podkhod // Pravo i politika. — 2011. — ¹ 10. — C. 1612–1618