Ðóñ Eng Cn Translate this page:
Please select your language to translate the article


You can just close the window to don't translate
Library
Your profile

Back to contents

LEX RUSSICA (Russian Law)
Reference:

Soktoev, Z.B. Causal link in the road and transportation crimes

Abstract: The author evaluates the Issue of causal link in the road and transportation crimes. The author shows that it does not suffice to use the common everyday meaning of the cause, or philosophical category of causality, logical means for its establishment in order to establish causality in road transportation crimes. It is necessary to take Into account the criminal law aspect of this Issue, when all of the causing circumstances, including the actions of a person, should be regarded in their totality as a single systemic cause, which generates socially dangerous consequences by influencing the object of crime. The basis for the criminal law mechanism for the road transportation crime is the influence of criminal act on the object of crime. This Influence destroys the relations of secure road-traffic safety, and contradicts its social goals The destruction of the socially secure situation In the sphere of driving mechanical transportation vehicles creates a dangerous situation (conditions) In the process of road traffic. The conclusions of the article are of interest for the further development of the causal link In the criminal law.


Keywords:

jurisprudence, causality, causal link, road, transportation, crime, dangerous, situation, mechanism.


This article can be downloaded freely in PDF format for reading. Download article

This article written in Russian. You can find original text of the article here .
References
1. Blagov E.V., Motovilovker E.A. Konstruktsii prichinnoy svyazi professora N.S. Tagantseva // Kategorial'nyy apparat ugolovnogo prava i protsessa. — Yaroslavl', 1993.
2. Gobbs T. K chitatelyu. O teme. Izbrannye proizvedeniya: v 2 t. — M., 1964. T. 1.
3. Grinberg M.S. Tekhnicheskie prestupleniya. — Novosibirsk, 1992.
4. Ermakov F.Kh. Problemy ustanovleniya neposredstvennoy prichinnoy svyazi v dorozhno-transportnykh proisshestviyakh // Rossiyskaya yustitsiya. — 2008. — ¹ 6.
5. Zhalinskiy A.E. Prichinnost' v strukture ugolovnoy otvetstvennosti // Rossiyskiy ezhe-godnik ugolovnogo prava. ¹ 1. 2006. — SPb., 2007.
6. Ilarionov V.A. Ekspertiza dorozhno-transportnykh proisshestviy. — M., 1989.
7. Knyazev N.A. Prichinnost': novoe videnie klassicheskoy problemy. — M., 1992.
8. Knyazeva E.N., Kurdyumov S.P. Osnovaniya sinergetiki. — SPb., 2002.
9. Kozachenko I.Ya., Kurchenko V.N., Zlochenko Ya.M. Problemy prichiny i prichinnoy svyazi v institutakh Obshchey i Osobennoy chastey otechestvennogo ugolovnogo prava: voprosy teorii, operativno-sledstvennoy i sudebnoy praktiki. — SPb., 2003.
10. Kozlov A.P. Prichinnaya svyaz' i bezdeystvie v ugolovnom prave // Problemy ugolovnoy po-litiki: sovetskiy i zarubezhnyy opyt. — Krasnoyarsk, 1989.
11. Kosheleva A.Yu. Osobennosti prichinnoy svyazi v sostavakh prestupleniy, sovershaemykh pu-tem bezdeystviya. — M., 2009.
12. Kudryavtsev V.N. Osnovnye voprosy prichinnoy svyazi v sovetskom ugolovnom prave: dis. … kand. yurid. nauk. — M., 1952.
13. Kudryavtsev V.N. Prichinnost' v kriminologii (O strukture individual'nogo prestupnogo povedeniya). — M., 1978.
14. Luk'yanov V.V. Sostav i kvalifikatsiya dorozhno-transportnykh prestupleniy i admini-strativnykh pravonarusheniy. — M., 2003.
15. Malinin V.B. Prichinnaya svyaz' v ugolovnom prave. — SPb., 2000.
16. Mill' Dzh. St. Sistema logiki sillogicheskoy i induktivnoy. Izlozhenie printsipov do-kazatel'stva v svyazi s metodami nauchnogo issledovaniya / per. s angl.; pod red. V.N. Iva-novskogo. — M., 1914.
17. Mikhalkin N.V. Logika i argumentatsiya v sudebnoy praktike. — SPb., 2004.
18. Muzyka A.A., Bagirov S.R. Prichinnaya svyaz': ugolovno-pravovoy ocherk. Khmel'nitskiy, 2009.
19. Plotnikov A.I. Ob'ektivnoe i sub'ektivnoe v prestuplenii. — M., 2011.
20. Pobegaylo E.F. Problema prichinnoy svyazi v tvorchestve V.N. Kudryavtseva // Sovremen-nye problemy teorii i praktiki bor'by s prestupnost'yu. Pervye Kudryavtsevskie chteniya (10 aprelya 2008 g.): sb. nauch. trudov / nauch. red. S.V. Maksimov. — M., 2009.
21. Romanov N. O prichinnoy svyazi v dorozhno-transportnykh prestupleniyakh // Sotsialistiche-skaya zakonnost'. — 1981. —¹8.
22. Soktoev Z.B. Prichinnost' v prestupleniyakh v dorozhno-transportnykh prestupleniyakh: ugo-lovno-pravovaya kharakteristika: dis. … kand. yurid. nauk. — Krasnoyarsk, 2001.
23. Spontannost' i determinizm. — M., 2006.
24. Tagantsev N.S. Russkoe ugolovnoe pravo. Lektsii. Chast' obshchaya: v 2 t. — M., 1994. T. 1.
25. Ter-Akopov A.A. Otvetstvennost' za narushenie spetsial'nykh pravil povedeniya. —M., 1995.
26. Ter-Akopov A.A. Ustanovlenie prichinnoy svyazi po ugolovnomu delu // Sovetskaya yustitsiya. — 1985. — ¹17.
27. Traynin A.N. Obshchee uchenie o sostave prestupleniya. — M., 1957.
28. Traynin A.N. Uchenie o souchastii. — M., 1941.
29. Feyerbakh L. Istoriya filosofii. Sobranie proizvedeniy: v 3 t. — M., 1967. T. 1.
30. Yarmysh N.N. Teoreticheskie problemy prichinno-sledstvennoy svyazi v ugolovnom prave (filosofsko-pravovoy analiz). — Khar'kov, 2003