|
Library
|
Your profile |
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.|
Journal of Foreign Legislation and Comparative Law
Reference:
Dabizha T.G. (2012). Scientific and Practical Foundation
of Attorney-Client Privilege in Common Law
and Continental Law Countries. Journal of Foreign Legislation and Comparative Law, 3, 169–175. https://en.nbpublish.com/library_read_article.php?id=61335
Dabizha T.G. Scientific and Practical Foundation of Attorney-Client Privilege in Common Law and Continental Law CountriesAbstract: The author gives an analytical review of the juridical approaches to attorney-client privilege in common law and continental law countries. The article investigates the legal nature and the contents of attorney-client privilege, including the penalty review for it disclose. Keywords: attorney-client privilege, the contents of attorney-client privilege, the legal nature of attorney-client privilege, penalty for disclose an attorney-client privilege, common law countries, continental law countries.
This article can be downloaded freely in PDF format for reading. Download article
This article written in Russian. You can find original text of the article here . References
1. Konstitutsiya RF ot 12.12.1993 g. (red. ot 30.12.2008 g.).
2. UPK RF ot 18.12.2001 g. (red. ot 21.07.2011 g.). 3. FZ «Ob advokatskoy deyatel'nosti i advokature» ot 31.05.2002 g. (red. ot 11.07.2011 g.). 4. Ukaz Prezidenta RF ot 06.03.1997 ¹ 188 (red. ot 23.09.2005) «Ob utverzhdenii Perechnya svedeniy konfiden-tsial'nogo kharaktera». 5. Kodeks professional'noy etiki advokata ot 31.01.2003 g. (red. ot 05.04.2007 g.) //www.consultant.ru 6. Rekomenduemye prakticheskie mery po zashchite informatsii, sostavlyayushchey predmet advokatskoy tayny. Sovet FPA RF ot 30.11.2009 g. //www.fparf.ru 7. Kodeks povedeniya evropeyskikh yuristov (Code of Conduct for European lawyers) ot 28.10.1998 g. (s izm. ot 19.05.2006 g.) //www.ccbe.eu 8. Ugolovnyy kodeks Frantsii (Code pénal) ot 22.07.1992 g. (s izm. ot 06.02.2012 g.) //www.legifrance.gouv.fr 9. Ugolovnyy kodeks Niderlandov (Wetboek van Strafrecht) ot 03.03.1881 g. (s izm. ot 03.01.2012 g.) //www.lexius.nl 10. Ugolovnyy kodeks Shvetsii (Brottsbalk) ot 21.12.1962 g. (s izm. 15.12.2011 g.) //www.lagen.nu 11. Polozheniya ugolovnogo protsessa Anglii: ikh vliyanie na obyazannosti advokata pered klientom. Prakticheskoe ruko-vodstvo. (Criminal Procedure Rules: impact on solicitors’ duties to the client, Practice note, UK) ot 31.03. 2008 g. //www. lawsociety.org.uk 12. Federal'nye pravila o dokazatel'stvakh, SShA (Federal Rules of Evidence, USA) ot 02.01.1975 g. (s izm. ot 01.12.2011 g.) // http://federalevidence.com 13. Shvedskiy kodeks sudebnoy protsedury (Swedish Code of Judicial Procedure ) ot 1942 g. (s izm. ot 07.07.2011 g.) // http://www.sweden.gov.se 14. Zakon o konfidentsial'noy informatsii Shvetsii (Secrecy Act) ot 20.03.1980 g. (s izm. ot 01.04.2000 g.) //http:// www.wipo.int 15. Natsional'nyy Reglament advokatskoy deyatel'nosti vo Frantsii (Réglement Intérieur National de la profession d’avocat) ot 31.12.1971 g. (s izm. ot 10.03.2011 g.) //www.legifrance.gouv.fr 16. Kodeks povedeniya advokatov Niderlandov (Gedragsregels voor advocaten Kartelregel) ot 1992 g. //www. tuchtrechtspraak.nl 17. Tipovye pravila professional'nogo povedeniya yuristov (Model Rules of Professional Conduct — by ABA) ot 1983 g. //www.americanbar.org 18. Tikhomirov Yu.A. Publichnoe pravo. M.: BEK, 1995. S. 55. 19. Pilipenko Yu.S. Advokatskaya tayna: teoriya i praktika realizatsii: diss. … d-ra yurid. nauk. M., 2009. 20. Dovidas Vitkauskas, Voskobitova M., Petrova T., otchet po prektu: «Uchastie advokata v dokazyvanii v ugolov-nom protsesse», mart 2011 g. //www.fparf.ru 21. Adam Dodek «Le privilège du secret professionnel entre l’avocat et son client Défis pour le XXIe siècle» Université d’Ottawa, février 2011. 22. Cooper, Sandler, Kaufman & Shime LLP — Toronto Criminal Law Firm «The Lawyer’s Duty of Confidentiality» july 2009 //www.criminal-lawyers.ca 23. Regina v. Derby Magistrates’ Court (1996), in Hobbs v. Hobbs and Cousens (1960) P. 112, Stevenson J. P. http:// caselaw.lp.findlaw.com 24. Three Rivers District Council and others (Respondents) v. Governor and Company of the Bank of England (Appellants) (2004) UKHL 48 //www.publications.parliament.uk 25. Taylor LJ in Balabel v Air India (1988) Ch 317 //www.publications.parliament.uk 26. Alfred Crompton Amusement Machines Ltd v. Customs and Excise Commissioners (No. 2) (1974) AC 405 Lord Cross of Chelsea P. 429 //www.lawsociety.org.uk 27. Southwark and Vauxhall Water Co. v. Quick (1878) 3Q.B.D. P 315, 320 //www.publications.parliament.u |
© 1998 – 2025 Nota Bene. Publishing Technologies. NB-Media Ltd.
Eng
