|
Library
|
Your profile |
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.|
Philosophy and Culture
Reference:
Popov, E. A. (2010). Culture and Society in Spiritual and Non-spiritual Images. Philosophy and Culture, 4, 56–59. https://en.nbpublish.com/library_read_article.php?id=57320
Popov, E. A. Culture and Society in Spiritual and Non-spiritual ImagesAbstract: The article reveals the most important aspects of relations between culture and society from the point of view of ‘spiritual and non-spiritual’. Both culture and society appears to reach harmony at the point of ‘spirituality’. On the other hand, the latter is impossible without the system of ‘non-spirituality’. ‘Non-spirituality’ gives impulse for culture and society to resist all what is alien to them. Keywords: philosophy, cultural sciences, society, spirituality, non spirituality, image, values, anti values, human, social
This article is unavailable for unregistered users.
Click to login or register
References
1. Rozin V.M. Sovremennaya kul'turologiya: problemy formirovaniya i metodologicheskiy ideal // Lichnost'. Kul'tura. Obshchestvo. M., 2005. Vyp. I. S. 127–145.
2. Lapin N.I. Antroposotsietal'nyy podkhod: metodologicheskie osnovaniya, sotsiologicheskie izmereniya // Voprosy filosofii. 2005. ¹ 2. S. 17–29. 3. Rutkevich M.N. Vosproizvodstvo naseleniya i sotsial'no–demograficheskaya situatsiya v Rossii // Sotsiol. issledovaniya. 2005. ¹ 7. S. 22–30. 4. Yanitskiy O.N. Rossiya kak ekosistema // Sotsiol. issledovaniya. 2005. ¹ 7. S. 84–94. 5. Liotar Zh.–F. Sostoyanie postmoderna / Per. s fr. M., 1998. 6. Kelle V.Zh. Intellektual'naya i dukhovnaya sostavlyayushchie kul'tury // Voprosy filosofii. 2005. 6. ¹ 10. S. 38–54. 7. Likhachev D.S. Kul'tura kak tselostnaya sreda // Novyy mir. 1994. ¹ 7. 8. Pelipenko A.A. Zakat logotsentrizma // Chelovek. 2005. ¹ 5. 9. Porus V.N. Obzhit' katastrofu. Svoevremennye zametki o dukhovnoy kul'ture Rossii // Voprosy filosofii. 2005. ¹ 11. 10. Kachanov Yu.L. Istina i politicheskiy kontekst v nauchnykh praktikakh sotsiologov // Sotsiol. issledovaniya. 2005. ¹ 9. S. 14–22. |
© 1998 – 2025 Nota Bene. Publishing Technologies. NB-Media Ltd.
Eng
