Ðóñ Eng Cn Translate this page:
Nota Bene. Books, journals, publishing technologies.
Please select your language to translate the article


You can just close the window to don't translate ☒
Library
 Your profile
Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Back to contents

Law and Politics
Reference:

Svininykh E.A. Exclusion from participation in public procurement as a means of fighting corruption in accordance with the law of the European Union, Great Britain, United States, and Russian Federation

Abstract: This article presents the analysis of the institution of excluding parties from participating in public procurement due to corruption violations. The author defines the notion, legal nature, and types of exclusion of parties from public procurement according to the law of the European Union, Great Britain, United States, and Russian Federation. A special attention is given to the comparative analysis of the basis and terms of exclusion within Russian and foreign legislations, including removal from participation for third-party corruption violations. The author determines possible ways to improve this institution within Russian legislation, and notes the need to broaden the bases for exclusion from participation due to corruption violations. For information purposes it is reasonable to create and maintain a registry of participants of public procurement that have previously been excluded due to corruption or other violations.

Keywords:

state needs, exclusion of suppliers, contract system, contracting, government contract, public procurement, government procurement, state order, corruption, fighting corruption

This article can be downloaded freely in PDF format for reading. Download article

This article written in Russian. You can find original text of the article here .
References
1. United States v. Bizzell, 921 F2d 263 (10th Cir 1990).
2. Trepte, P. Regulating Procurement : Understanding the Ends and Means of Public Procurement Regulation. – Oxford : Oxford University Press, 2004. – 432 p.
3. The Public Contracts Regulations 2015 (Regulation 57). [Elektronnyy resurs]. – Rezhim dostupa: URL: http://www.legislation.gov.uk/uksi/2015/102/regulation/57/made (data obrashcheniya: 15.05.2015).
4. Piselli, E. The Scope for Excluding Providers Who Have Committed Criminal Offences under the EU Procurement Directives // Public Procurement Law Review. – 2000. – Vol. 6. – pp. 267 – 286.
5. Schooner, S. The Paper Tiger Stirs : Rethinking Exclusion and Debar-ment // Public Procurement Law Review. – 2004. – Vol. 13. – ¹ 5. – pp. 211 – 217.
6. Sope, W.-El. Fighting Corruption in Public Procurement : A Comparative Analysis of Disqualification or Debarment Measures. – Oxford-Portland : Hart Publishing, 2012. – xlix + 306 p.
7. Tillipman, J. A House of Cards Falls : Why "Too Big to Debar" is All Slogan and Little Substance // Fordham Law Review Res Gestae. – 2012. – Vol. 80. – Paper 7. – pp. 49 – 58.
8. Hamdani, A., Klement, A. Corporate Crime and Deterrence // Stanford Law Review. – 2008. – Vol. 61. – ¹ 2. – pp. 271 – 310.
9. Mandatory Exclusion : Office of Government Commerce Guidance on the Mandatory Exclusion of Economic Operators in the New Procurement Regulations. [Elektronnyy resurs]. – Rezhim dostupa: URL: http://webarchive.nationalarchives.gov.uk/20110601212617/http:/www.ogc.gov.uk/documents/Mandatory_Exclusion_Guidance_-_February_2010_Update_on_new_template_(2).pdf (data obrashcheniya: 15.05.2015).
10. Federal Acquisition Regulation [Elektronnyy resurs]. – Rezhim dostupa: URL: https://www.acquisition.gov/?q=browsefar (data obrashcheniya: 15.05.2015).
11. Bae v. Shalala, 44 F3d 489 (7th Cir 1995).
12. Directive 2014/24/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 26 February 2014 on public procurement and repealing Directive 2004/18/EC // Official Journal of the European Union. – 2014. – L 94/65.
13. Arrowsmith, S. The Law of Public and Utilities Procurement. – London : Sweet & Maxwell, 2005. – cxxxviii + 1547 p.
14. Rol' predprinimatel'skikh struktur v protivodeystvii korruptsii [Tekst] : nauch. –prakt. posob. / otv. red. N.G. Semilyutina, E.I. Spektor. – M.: IZiSP, Kontrakt, 2012. – 240 s.
15. Ugolovnyy kodeks Ros. Federatsii ot 13 iyunya 1996 g. ¹ 63-FZ // Sobr. zakonodatel'stva Ros. Federatsii. – 1996. – ¹ 25, st. 2954.
16. Khramkin, A.A. Protivodeystvie korruptsii v goszakupkakh [Tekst] : monogr. / A.A. Khramkin. – M. : Yurisprudentsiya, 2011. – 152 s.
17. Anechiarico, F., Jacobs, J. Purging Corruption from Public Contracting : The Solutions are Now Part of the Problem // New York Law School Law Review. – 1995. – Vol. 40. – pp. 143 – 175.
18. Po delu o proverke konstitutsionnosti polozheniy podpunkta 1 punkta 3 i abzatsa pervogo punkta 6 stat'i 9 Zakona Rossiyskoy Federatsii «O vynuzhdennykh pereselentsakh» v svyazi s zhaloboy grazhdanina M.A. Mkrtychana : postanovlenie Konstitutsionnogo Suda Ros. Federatsii ot 21 noyab. 2002 g. ¹ 15-P // Sobr. zakonodatel'stva Ros. Federatsii. – 2002. – ¹ 48, st. 4829.
19. Ob otkaze v prinyatii k rassmotreniyu zhaloby grazhdanina Lazareva Sergeya Fedorovicha na narushenie ego konstitutsionnykh prav polozheniem chasti vtoroy stat'i 331 Trudovogo kodeksa Rossiyskoy Federatsii : opredelenie Konstitutsionnogo Suda Ros. Federatsii ot 26 yanv. 2010 g. ¹ 127-O-O. [Elektronnyy resurs]. Dokument ofitsial'no opublikovan ne byl. Dostup iz sprav.-pravov. sistemy «Konsul'tantPlyus».
20. O kontraktnoy sisteme v sfere zakupok tovarov, rabot, uslug dlya obespecheniya gosudarstvennykh i munitsipal'nykh nuzhd : fed. zakon ot 5 apr. 2013 g. ¹ 44-FZ // Sobr. zakonodatel'stva Ros. Federatsii. – 2013. – ¹ 14, st. 1652.
21. Yukins, C. Suspension and Debarment : Re-examing the Process // Public Procurement Law Review. – 2004. – Vol. 13. – ¹ 5. – pp. 255 – 259
22. Kodeks Rossiyskoy Federatsii ob administrativnykh pravonarusheniyakh ot 30 dek. 2001 g. ¹ 195-FZ // Sobr. zakonodatel'stva Ros. Federatsii. – 2002. – ¹ 1 (chast' 1), st. 1; 2008. – ¹ 52 (chast' 1), st. 6235.
23. Antonova, E.Yu. Sovremennye kontseptsii korporativnoy (kollektivnoy) ugolovnoy otvetstvennosti [Tekst] / E.Yu. Antonova // Sovremennoe pravo. – 2011. – ¹ 6. – S. 135 – 140.
Nota Bene
 
For authors
 
Other
 
Our sites
© 1998 – 2024 Nota Bene. Publishing Technologies. NB-Media Ltd.