Ðóñ Eng Cn Translate this page:
Please select your language to translate the article


You can just close the window to don't translate
Library
Your profile

Back to contents

Law and Politics
Reference:

Ruvinskiy, R.Z. 9 theses on modern war and transformation of the international legal order

Abstract: Based upon the analysis of the recent events in Libya, Syria, and Ukraine the author views the changes in the system of the modern international legal order. Special attention is paid to the issues of transformation of the state sovereignty, changes in the form and character of the modern war, outdating and weakening of the nation-state, growing role of the NGOs in the national and international legal relations, as well as to the problems of preservation of international law as an authoritative system for the regulation of relations in the global arena. The author studies the role of destructive methods and imperialistic interests of certain states in the modern political processes. The general methodological basis for the study is of materialistic and dialectic character, it is manifested by the wish to deal with the political and legal events in their development and mutual connections, turning to their economic fundamentals. In the process of research for this article the author employed problem-categorical approach, allowing to single out the most important elements of the matters, which were studied, he also involved systemic approach, method of analysis and the method of historical political interpretation as a specialized legal method. The article raises the issues, which were not previously objects of complex studies in the framework of Russian political and legal sciences. The study develops the ideas of the leading representatives of the modern foreign political and legal sciences. The author draws a conclusion on the current processes of destruction (fragmenting) of the national legal orders and transformation of the international legal order, pushing the states to the side of this order, making the war between the states the “global civil war”, making public interests (reflecting common interests, interests of a community as a totality) follow the private interests of small social groups. The author establishes the need for the governments of the modern states to support national interests of their states without turning to look at the opinion of the global establishment. The author also supposes that it is possible that several power poles may form within the framework of the new international legal order.


Keywords:

Failed states, international law, nation state, civil war, legal order, sovereignty, shadow law, legitimacy, crisis, imperialism.


This article can be downloaded freely in PDF format for reading. Download article

This article written in Russian. You can find original text of the article here .
References
1. Sazonova K.L. Mezhdunarodnoe pravo i ukrainskii konflikt: chto bylo, chto budet, chem serdtse uspokoitsya. // NB: Mezhdunarodnoe pravo.-2014.-1.-C. 1-15. DOI: 10.7256/2306-9899.2014.1.11666. URL: http://www.e-notabene.ru/wl/article_11666.html
2. Bunevich D.S.. Pokholodanie ukrainsko pol'skikh otnoshenii i interesy Rossii // Mezhdunarodnye otnosheniya. – 2013. – ¹ 4. – S. 439-442. DOI: 10.7256/2305-560X.2013.4.9268.
3. States at Risk: Fragile Staaten als Sicherheits-und Entwicklungsproblem / Hg. U. Schneckener. Berlin: SWP-Studie, 2004.
4. Sampford Ch. Failed States and the Rule of Law // Jindal Journal of International Affairs. 2011. Vol. 1. No. 1. P. 119-147.
5. Miéville Ch. Between Equal Rights: A Marxist Theory of International Law. L.: Pluto Press, 2005.
6. Lalos D. Between Statehood and Somalia: Reflections of Somaliland Statehood // Washington University Global Studies Law Review. 2011. Vol. 10. No. 4. P. 789-812.
7. Brooks R.E. Failed States, or the State as Failure? // The University of Chicago Law Review. 2005. Vol. 72. No. 4. P. 1159-1196.
8. Brousseau E., Sgard J., Schemeil Y. Delegation without borders: On individual rights, constitutions and the global order // Global Constitutionalism. 2012. Vol. 1, No. 3. P. 455-484.
9. Jayasuriya K. Globalization, Law and the Transformation of Sovereignty: the Emergence of Global Regulatory Governance // Indiana Journal of Global Legal Studies. 1999. Vol. 6, No. 2. P. 425-455.
10. Kalamkaryan R.A. Vklyuchennost' Rossiiskoi Federatsii v deyatel'nost' Mezhdunarodnogo Suda OON v dele obespecheniya mezhdunarodnoi zakonnosti i pravoporyadka // NB: Mezhdunarodnoe pravo. — 2013.-¹ 2.-S.85-118. DOI: 10.7256/2306-9899.2013.2.691. URL: http://e-notabene.ru/wl/article_691.html
11. Kalamkaryan R.A.. Rossiya v universal'nom mirovom pravovom prostranstve // Mezhdunarodnoe pravo i mezhdunarodnye organizatsii / International Law and International Organizations. – 2013. – ¹ 3. – S. 394-407. DOI: 10.7256/2226-6305.2013.3.7740.
12. Khardt M., Negri A. Mnozhestvo: voina i demokratiya v epokhu imperii. M.: «Kul'turnaya revolyutsiya», 2006. 559 s.
13. Shmitt K. Gosudarstvo kak konkretnoe ponyatie, svyazannoe s opredelennoi istoricheskoi epokhoi // Logos. 2012. ¹ 5 (89). S. 205-215.
14. Shmitt K. Diktatura. Ot istokov sovremennoi idei suvereniteta do proletarskoi klassovoi bor'by. SPb.: Nauka, 2005. 326 s.
15. Gegel' G.V.F. Filosofiya prava. M.: Mysl', 1990. 524 s.
16. Manoilo A.V.. O protivodeistvii rasprostraneniyu ideologii «tsvetnykh revolyutsii» v universitetskoi studencheskoi srede // Mezhdunarodnye otnosheniya. – 2013. – ¹ 4. – S. 420-423. DOI: 10.7256/2305-560X.2013.4.9755.
17. Palombella Dzh. Osobennosti global'nogo prava i vzaimodeistvie razlichnykh pravoporyadkov // Sravnitel'noe konstitutsionnoe obozrenie. 2012. ¹ 6 (91). S. 28-55.
18. Kostyukhin A.A., Kireev S.A. Siriya: grazhdanskaya voina ili realizatsiya strategii 4GW? // Mezhdunarodnye otnosheniya.-2013.-2.-C. 177-184. DOI: 10.7256/2305-560Kh.2013.02.10.
19. Tsygankov P.A.. Negosudarstvennye uchastniki mirovoi politiki: vzaimodeistvie s gosudarstvami i mezhpravitel'stvennymi organizatsiyami // Mezhdunarodnye otnosheniya. – 2013. – ¹ 3. – S. 312-317. DOI: 10.7256/2305-560X.2013.3.8977.
20. Kostenko N.I.. Rol' Organizatsii Ob''edinennykh Natsii po resheniyu problem pravosudiya perekhodnogo perioda i gospodstva prava v konfliktnykh // Mezhdunarodnoe pravo i mezhdunarodnye organizatsii / International Law and International Organizations. – 2013. – ¹ 4. – S. 560-571. DOI: 10.7256/2226-6305.2013.4.10012.
21. Shmitt K. Nomos Zemli v mezhdunarodnom prave jus publicum europaeum // Karl Shmitt. Nomos Zemli v prave narodov jus publicum europaeum. SPb.: «Vladimir Dal'», 2008. S. 5-476.
22. Sazonova K.L. «Bol'shaya pyaterka» i mirotvorcheskaya deyatel'nost' Organizatsii Ob''edinennykh Natsii: politicheskie i pravovye vyzovy i ugrozy // NB: Mezhdunarodnoe pravo. — 2013.-¹ 2.-S.1-15. DOI: 10.7256/2306-9899.2013.2.4769. URL: http://e-notabene.ru/wl/article_4769.html
23. Shmitt K. Teoriya partizana. M.: Praksis, 2007. 301 s.
24. G. G. Shinkaretskaya Mezhdunarodnoe pravoi mirnoe uregulirovanie // Mezhdunarodnoe pravo i mezhdunarodnye organizatsii / International Law and International Organizations. - 2011. - 3. - C. 144 - 150.
25. O. G. Shul'ts Mezhdunarodnye standarty i politika «dvoinykh
26. standartov» v voprosakh mezhdunarodnogo
27. sotrudnichestva v oblasti prav cheloveka // Natsional'naya bezopasnost' / nota bene. - 2011. - 5. - C. 167 - 180.
28. A.Kh. Saidov Pax Kantiana: filosofsko-pravovoe uchenie I.Kanta o mire. Chast' 2. Okonchanie // Filosofiya i kul'tura. - 2010. - 5. - C. 96 - 101.