The Decree of the Plenum of the Supreme Court of the Russian Federation on the judicial practice on criminal cases for extremist crimes: scientific commentary.


	Law and Politics Reference: Bykov, V.M. (2011). The Decree of the Plenum of the Supreme Court of the Russian Federation on the judicial practice on criminal cases for extremist crimes: scientific commentary. Law and Politics, 9, 1477–1484. https://en.nbpublish.com/library_read_article.php?id=51585 Bykov, V.M. The Decree of the Plenum of the Supreme Court of the Russian Federation on the judicial practice on criminal cases for extremist crimes: scientific commentary. Abstract: The article is devoted to the new Decree of the Plenum of the Supreme Court of the Russian Federation of June 28, 2011 n.11 “On judicial practice in criminal cases on extremist crimes”. The author provides the general contents of the Decree, then points out some questionable positions and shortcomings. While treating the new Decree as a whole positively, the author thinks that is should be amended. Keywords: jurisprudence, crime, extremism, public calls, criminal responsibility, extremist community, organized group, qualification, responsibility, leader. This article is unavailable for unregistered users. Click to login or register References 1. Agapov P.V., Bykov V.M.Razvitie vzglyadov Verkhovnogo Suda RF na priznaki organizovannoy grupp.//Advokatskaya praktika.2003.№5. 2. Bykov V. Priznaki organizovannoy gruppy v postanovleniyakh Plenuma Verkhovnogo Suda RF.//Ugolovnoe pravo.2001.№3. 3. Bykov V. Chto takoe organizovannaya prestupnaya gruppa?//Rossiyskaya yustitsiya.1995.№10. 4. Bykov V. Priznaki organizovannoy prestupnoy gruppy.//Zakonnost'.1998.№9. 5. Bykov V.M., Kolesnikova T.V. Organizovannaya gruppa vymogateley.//Sledovatel'.2000.№4. 6. Bykov V.M. Vidy prestupnykh grupp: problemy razgranicheniya.//Ugolovnoe pravo.2005.№2. 7. Bykov V.M., Kunitsyna A.V.Taktika vyyavleniya organizatorov prestupnykh grupp. Uchebnoe posobie.-Saratov, Saratovskiy yuridicheskiy institut MVD RF.2005. 8. Bykov V. M. Novoe postanovlenie Plenuma Verkhovnogo Suda RF o sudebnoy ekspertize po ugolovnym delam: nauchnyy kommentariy.//Pravo i politika.2011.№2. 9. Galiakbarov R.R.Mnozhestvennost' prestupleniy.//Ugolovnoe pravo Rossiyskoy Federatsii. Obshchaya chast'. Uchebnik dlya studentov vysshikh uchebnykh zavedeniy, obuchayushchikhsya po spetsial'nosti “Yurisprudentsiya”. Pod red. Zasluzhennogo deyatelya nauki RF, doktora yuridicheskikh nauk, professora R.R.Galiakbarova.-Saratov.1997. 10. Petryanin A.V.Motiv prestupleniya i problema ego opredeleniya pri sovershenii prestupleniy ekstreimistskoy napravlennosti.//Sledovatel'.2010.№11. 11. Postanovlenie Plenuma Verkhovnogo Suda RF ot 21 dekabrya 2010 goda №28 “O sudebnoy ekspertize po ugolovnym delam”.//Rossiyskaya gazeta. 2010. 30 dekabrya

Journals

Books

Bykov, V.M. The Decree of the Plenum of the Supreme Court of the Russian Federation on the judicial practice on criminal cases for extremist crimes: scientific commentary.