Ðóñ Eng Cn Translate this page:
Please select your language to translate the article


You can just close the window to don't translate
Library
Your profile

Back to contents

Administrative and municipal law
Reference:

Problems of efficiency of law enforcement activity in national security system of the Russian Federation

Begeza Vitaliy Vasilevich

ORCID: 0000-0002-5201-520X

Senior Lecturer, Department of Public Administration and National Security, Russian Presidential Academy of National Economy and Public Administration

119602, Russia, Moscow, Vernadsky ave., 84 with 1

89250240000@mail.ru
Other publications by this author
 

 

DOI:

10.7256/2454-0595.2022.2.37631

EDN:

OKXHYW

Received:

02-03-2022


Published:

04-07-2022


Abstract: The author examines the problem of the effectiveness of pro-security agencies in the system of national security of the Russian Federation on the basis of an analysis of regulatory legal acts and the effectiveness of law enforcement agencies. According to the National Security Strategy of the Russian Federation, approved by the Decree of the President of the Russian Federation (hereinafter referred to as the Strategy), national security is understood as a state characterized by the protection of the individual, society and the state from internal and external threats, in which the implementation of the constitutional rights and freedoms of citizens of the Russian Federation, decent quality and standard of living, sovereignty, independence, state and territorial integrity, sustainable socio-economic development of the Russian Federation. Obviously, there is an internal and external impact on national security. At the same time, this impact is carried out on the foundations of the independence and independence of the state, as well as the basic rights and freedoms of its citizens. When solving the issues of creating a system of national security, it is necessary to proceed from the fact that the object of protection in this case is very complexly structured, diverse, consisting of many diverse structural elements, which results in the complexity of structuring the relationship of these elements. According to the fair opinion of some scientists, the security system itself reflects the process of interaction of national interests and threats to them, is functional, while the security system aims to protect national interests, is an organizational system of means, methods, subjects (bodies).


Keywords:

national security, law enforcement activities, internal affairs bodies, legal basis, types of national security, public safety, personal security, state security, executive authorities, ensuring national security

This article is automatically translated. You can find original text of the article here.

            The term "national security" is one of the controversial concepts of modern Russian science. The Financial dictionary contains a short term "national security" devoid of clear formulations, defining it as the security of the multinational people of the Russian Federation, acting as the bearer of sovereignty and the sole source of power in the Russian Federation.

       I. I. Sanrazhevsky's dictionary interprets national security as the protection of the individual, society and the state from threats of an internal and external nature, resistance to factors that have an adverse impact, a guarantee of stable development of society's progress, contributing to ensuring constitutional rights, freedoms, decent quality and standard of living of citizens, sovereignty, territorial integrity and sustainable development, defense capability and security states. 

The Political Science Dictionary defines national security as a set of "internal and external conditions, the fulfillment of which ensures stable political, socio-economic, spiritual and cultural development of society, independence, protection of sovereignty and territorial integrity of the state." 

A detailed interpretation of the term "national security" is given in the economic dictionary, which defines it as "a set of officially accepted views on the goals and state strategy in the field of ensuring the security of the individual, society and the state from external and internal threats of a political, economic, social, military, man-made, environmental, informational and other nature, taking into account the available resources and opportunities" 3.

Among the scientists who have devoted their research to the interpretation of the term "national security", it should be noted T.N. Balashova, V.P. Bulavin, V.G. Vishnyakov, S.V. Gunich, V.V. Danileiko, V.A. Zolotarev, E.S. Izzatdust, V.A. Kalamanov, Y.S. Kanin, I.B. Kardashov, V.A. Kolokoltsev, K.A. Krasnov, A.A. Kukovsky, V.E. Makarov, V.V. Mamonov, Yu.I. Migacheva, N.A. Molchanova, K.S. Nezhinskaya, D.E. Pogorelogo, G.G. Popova, A.A. Prokhozheva, V.L. Raigorodsky, V.M. Redkous, V.D. Samoilov, I.I. Sanrazhevsky, E.T. Sibagatullina, V.Y. Fesenko, K.V. Filippov, O.A. Chelpachenko and many others. Analyzing the works of these scientists and practitioners, regardless of the time period in relation to the adoption of the Strategy, an opinion was expressed regarding the category under study, it should be noted that "national security" is understood as a "state" (including "conditions"), less often a "system" or "level" of security (existence), which in principle does not contradict the adopted Strategy.  

 So, G.G. Popov expresses the idea that "national security, representing a state of protection of vital interests of such social subjects as the individual, society and the state, is a public attitude about the realization of these interests."

A.A. Prokhozhev and other authors of the textbook "General Theory of National Security" express the opinion that "... national security implies a threefold component, each component of which is equally important – the security of the individual, the security of society and the security of the state" and suggest that it should be understood as "the protection of vital interests of the individual, society and the state in various spheres vital activity from internal and external threats, ensuring the sustainable progressive development of the country."

E.S. Izzatdust, analyzing the concept under study, expresses the idea that there is no unified approach to the interpretation of the term "national security". According to E.S. Izzatusta in modern Russian conditions, the concept of "national security" unites individual security, public and state. The main objects of security are the rights and freedoms inherent in the individual, social material and spiritual values, the constitutional system, sovereignty and ensuring the territorial integrity of the state.

Thus, summarizing the considered definitions of the concept of "national security" and taking as a basis their non-contradictionStrategies, as the most correct interpretation of the term in question, we will take the definition contained in the National Security Strategy of the Russian Federation.

        According to the National Security Strategy of the Russian Federation approved by the Decree of the President of the Russian Federation[1] (hereinafter referred to as the Strategy), national security is understood as a state characterized by the protection of the individual, society and the state from internal and external threats, in which the implementation of the constitutional rights and freedoms of citizens of the Russian Federation, decent quality and standard of living, sovereignty, independence, state and territorial integrity, sustainable socio-economic development of the Russian Federation.

Obviously, there is an internal and external impact on national security. At the same time, this impact is carried out on the foundations of the independence and independence of the state, as well as the basic rights and freedoms of its citizens.

When solving the issues of creating a system of national security, it is necessary to proceed from the fact that the object of protection in this case is very complexly structured, diverse, consisting of many diverse structural elements, which results in the complexity of structuring the relationship of these elements. According to the fair opinion of some scientists, the security system itself reflects the process of interaction of national interests and threats to them, is functional, while the security system aims to protect national interests, is an organizational system of means, methods, subjects (bodies) [2].

The content of national security is represented by the personal security of each citizen, public security and, directly, state security. This circumstance suggests that national security should be understood as the state of protection of the three named subjects from internal and external threats, which allows ensuring constitutional rights, freedoms, decent quality and standard of living of citizens, sovereignty, territorial integrity and sustainable development of the Russian Federation, defense and security of the country.

The protection of national security is the direct activity of the State.

It is no secret that it is the protection of national security that is the fundamental task for the successful functioning of the state, ensuring comfortable living conditions for its citizens.

As a number of experts rightly point out, the specifics of the problems in the field of ensuring the security of the national level is the change in the world order of countries with common roots caused by political and psychological processes[3].

The system of ensuring and protecting national security is also represented by a set of subjects that interact, as well as various bodies, forces, and means of ensuring security at the national level, provided through existing legal norms.

The dominant place in the system of ensuring the protection of public importance, fundamental rights and freedoms of man and citizen, is assigned to law enforcement agencies.

This circumstance is dictated by the legal nature and functions of the designated state bodies, first of all, by giving them state-governmental powers that contribute to responding to the events in a timely and necessary manner[4].

A special place in the system of law enforcement agencies is assigned to the internal affairs bodies. These bodies are endowed with the widest scope of powers and have broader competence in the use of coercive measures of an administrative nature[5].

Ensuring security at the national level is a very complex system. The specified system consists, among other things, of the appropriate means and resources. At the same time, the main objects of national-level security are the individual, society and the state. The criterion for ensuring the security of each of these objects is satisfaction in the use of a specific object of each of the objects.

So, for individuals, this subject will be constitutional rights and freedoms, as well as decent quality and standard of living.

In the modern understanding, public security is formed as a certain aggregate characteristic of the security of each person, and state security must be studied through the versatility of personal protection.[6]

Considering the issues of the national security system, it is important to emphasize that, as a general rule, the national security system should be understood as the relationship of persons and national security bodies that ensure the implementation and protection of national interests within the framework of normative legal acts.

In this regard, it is important to emphasize that the priority role in the performance of the duty of ensuring national security belongs to the President of the Russian Federation[7].

Thus, the supremacy, the center of the system of security agencies is represented by the President of the Russian Federation.

In this regard, it is logical to assume that the system of national security agencies is represented by bodies accountable to the President of the Russian Federation.

In addition, the national security system includes all three branches of government.

The legislative creates the necessary legal framework, on the basis of which direct activities to ensure national security will subsequently be carried out, determines the terms of authority of the bodies carrying out this activity to ensure national security, establishes the legal status of the subjects of the relations under consideration.

Executive authorities are, in fact, directly executing activities to ensure national security.

The judicial system acts as a means of protecting the constitutional rights and freedoms of citizens in the field of national security protection.

Designating the system of branches of government, it should also be noted that the amendments to the Constitution of the Russian Federation adopted on July 1, 2020 also introduced into legal circulation such a type of power as public[8]. This institution is completely new for domestic legislation. At the same time, there is no clear specification of the very concept of public power, nor its functions, competencies and other status-forming features. It remains to be hoped that in the near future this gap will be eliminated by the legislator.

In accordance with Article 80 of the Constitution of the Russian Federation, the President of the Russian Federation is the guarantor, among other things, of human and civil rights and freedoms, and also takes measures to protect the sovereignty of the Russian Federation, its independence and state integrity.

Thus, the coordination of activities to ensure national security is carried out by the President of the Russian Federation.

Also, according to the Constitution of the Russian Federation (Article 83), in order to assist the head of state in exercising his powers on issues of ensuring national interests and security of the individual, society and the state, as well as maintaining civil peace and harmony in the country, protecting the sovereignty of the Russian Federation, its independence and state integrity, preventing internal and external threats, the President of the Russian Federation forms The Security Council of the Russian Federation.

The Security Council of the Russian Federation carries out its activities on the basis of the Regulation[9]. This Provision defines the tasks, functions, its structure, the procedure for carrying out activities, the legal status of its management and employees.

The analysis of the provisions of the Strategy makes it possible to come to the conclusion that the national security system includes a significant number of authorities, both of a "forceful", "military" nature of activity, and "civilian".

At the same time, it seems possible to refer to the main, central bodies carrying out activities to ensure national security:

- Ministry of Defense of the Russian Federation;

- Ministry of Internal Affairs of the Russian Federation;

- The Federal Security Service of the Russian Federation;

- foreign intelligence agencies;

- Rosgvardiya.

Ministry of Defense Of the Russian Federation (Ministry of Defense Is a federal executive authority that performs functions for the development and implementation of state policy, regulatory and legal regulation in the field of defense, other functions established by federal constitutional laws, federal laws, acts of the President of the Russian Federation and the Government of the Russian Federation in this area, as well as authorized federal executive authority in the field of property management and disposal The Armed Forces of the Russian Federation and organizations subordinate to the Ministry of Defense of the Russian Federation[10].

The Ministry of Internal Affairs of the Russian Federation (the Ministry of Internal Affairs of Russia) is a federal executive body responsible for the development and implementation of state policy and regulatory regulation in the field of internal affairs, in the field of control over the turnover of narcotic drugs, psychotropic substances and their precursors, in the field of migration (hereinafter referred to as the sphere of internal affairs), as well as law enforcement functions for federal state control (supervision) in the field of internal affairs[11].

The Federal Security Service of the Russian Federation (FSB of Russia) is a federal executive authority that, within its powers, exercises state administration in the field of ensuring the security of the Russian Federation, combating terrorism, protecting and protecting the state border of the Russian Federation (hereinafter referred to as the state border), protecting internal sea waters, territorial sea, exclusive economic zone, the continental shelf of the Russian Federation and their natural resources, ensuring the information security of the Russian Federation and directly implementing the main activities of the Federal Security Service bodies defined by the legislation of the Russian Federation, as well as coordinating the counterintelligence activities of federal executive bodies authorized to carry it out[12].

The powers of foreign intelligence agencies are regulated by the Federal Law "On Foreign Intelligence"[13].

The troops of the National Guard of the Russian Federation (hereinafter referred to as the National Guard troops) are a state military organization designed to ensure state and public security, protect human and civil rights and freedoms[14].

Rosgvardiya carries out:

- participation in the protection of public order, ensuring public safety;

- protection of important state facilities, special cargo, structures on communications in accordance with the lists approved by the Government of the Russian Federation;

- participation in the fight against terrorism and extremism;

- participation in ensuring the regimes of the state of emergency, martial law, the legal regime of the counter-terrorist operation;

- participation in the territorial defense of the Russian Federation;

- assistance to the border authorities of the Federal Security Service in the protection of the State Border of the Russian Federation;

- federal state control (supervision) over compliance with the legislation of the Russian Federation in the field of arms trafficking and in the field of private security and private detective activities, as well as ensuring the safety of fuel and energy complex facilities, over the activities of security units of legal entities with special statutory tasks and departmental security units;

- protection of particularly important and sensitive objects, objects subject to mandatory protection by the National Guard troops, in accordance with the list approved by the Government of the Russian Federation, protection of property of individuals and legal entities under contracts;

- ensuring, by decision of the President of the Russian Federation, the security of senior officials of the subjects of the Russian Federation (heads of the highest executive bodies of state power of the subjects of the Russian Federation) and other persons.

The leadership of the National Guard troops is carried out by the President of the Russian Federation.

The National Guard troops exercise the following powers:

- general powers;

- special powers (coercive measures): detention; opening of a vehicle; entry (penetration) into residential and other premises, land plots and territories (water areas); cordon (blocking) of terrain areas (water areas), residential and other premises, buildings and other objects; formation and maintenance of data banks about citizens;

- powers to ensure the regimes of the state of emergency, martial law and the legal regime of the counter-terrorism operation and powers related to participation in the counter-terrorism operation;

- other powers provided for by federal constitutional laws, this Federal Law, other federal laws and other regulatory legal acts of the Russian Federation.

The powers of the National Guard troops are exercised by management bodies, associations, formations, military units, subdivisions, organizations and military personnel (employees) of the National Guard troops in the manner prescribed by federal constitutional laws, this Federal Law, other federal laws, regulatory legal acts of the President of the Russian Federation, the Government of the Russian Federation, as well as regulatory legal acts of the authorized federal executive authority in compliance with the requirements of the legislation of the Russian Federation on the protection of state secrets.

Analysis of the provisions regulating the activities of specific executive authorities suggests that in the field of national security, executive authorities are divided into two main types – those for which this direction is the main type of professional activity, and those for which it is a secondary task. At the same time, the main part of the first group consists of paramilitary structures.

At the same time, the body directly carrying out activities to ensure national security is determined based on a specific type of security (for example, economic security, transport security, etc.). That is, various executive authorities of the same level perform functions to ensure national security. At the same time, some of them provide national security in a broad sense ("in general"), and some – its individual types. The organization of effective national security requires a clear coordination of the actions of various authorities in this area, ensuring full-fledged interaction, which requires a clear legal regulation.

In addition, each of the federal executive authorities has its own vertical structure, which also requires a clear delineation of powers to ensure national security, respectively, in general and special at each level.

Considering the issues of the system of bodies ensuring national security in the Russian Federation, it seems necessary in this context and briefly to explore the possibility and expediency of including local self-government bodies in this system.

The issues of legal regulation, the creation of an effective, democratic system of organization of local self-government occupy an essential place in the scientific works of recent decades, and is also a very controversial topic in the field of law enforcement.

This circumstance is caused, first of all, by the constitutional and legal nature of the institution of local self-government in our country – the main provisions regulating the institution of local self-government are fixed in the main law of our country, which determines the huge, state significance of this legal institution.

It seems that the increased attention of the legislator and the scientific sphere to the issues of local self–government is directly due to the legal nature of this institution - it is through local self-government that any citizen can most effectively exercise his right to govern, the right to participate in power.

It should be noted that the development of local self-government regulation is determined by the local traditions of the respective region.

Local self-government in Russia is considered in three aspects, as:

- the constitutional basis of the system;

- the right to resolve local issues by the people;

- democracy[15].

Local self-government, as the basis of the constitutional system, is a component of the foundations of a democratic state[16]. International legislation clearly establishes as one of the fundamental signs of a legal, democratic state the principle of organizing local self-government[17].

Our Basic Law establishes that it is local self-government that ensures the independent solution of local issues by the population (Article 130), thus, it seems possible to say that local self-government performs managerial functions - the population independently, within the framework of delegated powers, manages the relevant territory, therefore, and to ensure security at the appropriate level.

The institution of local self-government allows each citizen to directly exercise their rights to ensure their interests at the local level.

 Local self-government is a form of direct expression of will.

Local self-government in the Russian Federation, as discussed above, is, among other things, a form of the exercise of power by the people, which provides the population with independence in solving issues of local importance, through the relevant local self-government bodies or directly[18].

It seems possible to say that the primary level at which a citizen can exercise his rights and freedoms is the level of local, direct human activity.

At the same time, the analysis of the norms of legal regulation of the organization and activities of self-government bodies at the local level allows us to talk about the trend of statisization, which makes it impossible to declare a significant independent participation of local self-government bodies in ensuring national security.

The factors that caused these circumstances are, first of all, socio-economic and political. Thus, the weakness of the post-Soviet Russian state had various consequences. These factors have also influenced local government policies. The vertical dimension of the decline in state potential is manifested in the lack of control by the federal authorities over the regional processes of institution-building.

The practical consequence of this decline has been the ongoing regionalization of local government reform, which has led to large differences in the degree of autonomy allowed to local authorities and in the degree of democracy achieved at the local level.

The central Government's lack of a state-building strategy at the regional and local levels has led to disastrous results for local authorities in some regions. These factors, as noted, led to the reform of the organization and activities of the local self-government system.

At the same time, it seems extremely promising to involve local self-government bodies to actively participate in ensuring national security. At the same time, as specific areas requiring local self-government regulation reform in order to achieve this goal, we can name:

- providing an opportunity at the local level to independently determine the structure of local self-government bodies based on territorial features, historical traditions and the strategic importance of this territory;

- the role of the state in the organization and functioning of local self-government should be reduced to monitoring compliance with legislation in the activities of local self-government bodies, excluding the direct impact of the state on the described legal relations;

- creation of an effective base of anti-corruption measures at the local self-government level in order to organize an effective system of ensuring national security;

- in the development of the previous paragraph – the exclusion of any influence, interference in the process of formation of local self-government bodies.

It seems extremely necessary for the legislator to reform the system of local self-government, based on the fact that local self-government is recognized and guaranteed by the State, and not established by it.

Summing up, it is possible to note the following.

The system of ensuring national security is interpreted as the relationship of persons and national security bodies that ensure the implementation and protection of national interests within the framework of normative legal acts.

The supreme, coordinating person of the national security system is the President of the Russian Federation.

It is possible to divide the main single-level bodies in the national security system into general and special ones.

Depending on the level of government, the bodies in the national security system are divided into federal, territorial and local (municipal).

To ensure national security, it is necessary to have a clear interaction between different executive authorities and different levels of a particular authority, which requires an appropriate legal framework.

References
1. Decree of the President of the Russian Federation of 02.07.2021 N 400 "On the National Security Strategy of the Russian Federation"-https://www.consultant.ru/document/cons_doc_LAW_389271 /.
2. Resolution of the Constitutional Court of the Russian Federation No. 9-P of 30.11.1992 // Legal reference system ConsultantPlus.
3. Final and transitional provisions of the Constitution of the Russian Federation adopted on December 12, 1993 by a national referendum, taking into account the amendments made by the Law of the Russian Federation on the Amendment to the Constitution of the Russian Federation of March 14, 2020 N 1-FKZ "On improving the regulation of certain issues of the organization and functioning of public power" // Reference legal system ConsultantPlus.
4. The Regulation "On the Security Council of the Russian Federation", approved. Decree of the President of the Russian Federation dated 07.03.2020 N 175 "On some issues of the Security Council of the Russian Federation" // Collection of Legislation of the Russian Federation. 2020. N 10. St. 1323.
5. Decree of the President of the Russian Federation of 16.08.2004 N 1082 "Questions of the Minister
6. The decree of the President of the Russian Federation dated 21.12.2016 699 N "On approval of the Regulations on the Ministry of internal Affairs of the Russian Federation and the Model regulations on the territorial body of the Ministry of internal Affairs of the Russian Federation on the subject of the Russian Federation" (as amended on 25.12.2019) // meeting of the legislation of the Russian Federation. 2016. N 52 (Part V). St. 7614.
7. The decree of the President of the Russian Federation dated 11.08.2003 N 960 "Issues of Federal security service of the Russian Federation" (as amended on 03.07.2018) // meeting of the legislation of the Russian Federation. 2003. N 33. St. 3254.
8. Federal law of 10.01.1996 N 5-FZ "On foreign intelligence" (edition of 09.11.2020) // meeting of the legislation of the Russian Federation. 1996. N 3. St. 143.
9. Federal law of 03.07.2016 N 226-FZ "About the army national guard of the Russian Federation" // meeting of the legislation of the Russian Federation. 2016. N 27 (Part I). St. 4159.
10. The European Charter of local self-government of 15 October 1985. // SPS Konsultantplyus.
11. Federal law of 06.10.2003 N 131-FZ "On General principles of organization of local self-government in the Russian Federation" // meeting of the legislation of the Russian Federation. 2003. N 40. St. 3822.
12. Medvedev, M. V. Approaches to the interpretation of the concept of "national security" / M. V. Medvedev. - Text: direct // Young scientist. - 2020. - ¹ 23 (313). - pp. 517-520. - URL: https://moluch.ru/archive/313 / 71316/ (date of appeal: 21.06.2022).
13. Poddubny A. O. On the question of the concept of "national security" / Poddubny A. O. // Russian Justice. - 2019. - No. 6. - pp. 6-7.
14. Stepanov A.V. The concept of the category "National security": theoretical and legal analysis / Stepanov A.V. // Bulletin of the Perm University. Legal sciences. - 2015. - ¹ 2 (28). // [ Electronic resource] - URL: https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/ponyatie-kategorii-natsionalnaya-bezopasnost-teoretiko-pravovoy-analiz.
15. Popov G.G. Migration security of Russia (Institutional and legal analysis): diss. ... cand. jurid. sciences'. Rostov– on-Don, 2006. 140 p
16. General theory of national security: textbook / under the general editorship of A.A. Prokhozhev. M.: RAGS, 2005.
17. Izzatdust E.S. National security in the context of human rights protection: conceptual approaches, Russian political practice: dis. ... cand. polit. M., 2006. 186 p.
18. Kardashova I. B. of the MIA of Russia in the system of ensuring national security of the Russian Federation. – M., 2006. P.25.
19. Shevchenko A. V., Titov V. B. Integration processes provide local security in the system of regional and national security of Russia // State and municipal management. Scientific notes of SKAGGS. 2015. No. 3. p. 64.
20. Pekhtereva Z. A. Application of administrative restraint measures by law enforcement agencies of the Russian Federation : dis. ... cand. jurid. sciences'. Rostov n/A, 2008. p. 14.
21. Varguzova A. A. Administrative and legal regulation of the activities of internal affairs bodies in the field of public security of the Russian Federation: monograph. M., 2007. p. 75.
22. Gunich S.V. Forms and methods of activity of the internal affairs bodies of the Russian Federation in the system of ensuring national security // State power and local self-government. 2016. No. 1. pp. 50-55.
23. Kamilova D.V. Constitutional and legal nature of local self-government in modern Russia // Law and Law. 2019. No. 2. p. 54
24. Zyuzina T.E. On the nature and genesis of modern Russian local self-government // History of the state and law. 2015. No. 11. p. 6
25. URL:https://www.consultant.ru
26. https://www.rsl.ru/
27. https://lib.ranepa.ru/ru/informatsionnye-resursy
28. https://megapro.ranepa.ru/MegaPro/Web

First Peer Review

Peer reviewers' evaluations remain confidential and are not disclosed to the public. Only external reviews, authorized for publication by the article's author(s), are made public. Typically, these final reviews are conducted after the manuscript's revision. Adhering to our double-blind review policy, the reviewer's identity is kept confidential.
The list of publisher reviewers can be found here.

A REVIEW of an article on the topic "Problems of the effectiveness of law enforcement in the national security system of the Russian Federation". The subject of the study. The article proposed for review is devoted to topical issues of the effectiveness of law enforcement activities in the national security system of the Russian Federation. The author identifies problems in this area and tries to offer his own solution to them. The subject of the study was the norms of Russian legislation, the opinions of scientists, and the practice that has developed in Russia regarding national security. Research methodology. The purpose of the study is not stated directly in the article. However, it can be clearly understood based on the title and content of the article. The purpose of the study can be designated as the establishment and resolution of individual problems of the effectiveness of law enforcement activities in the national security system of the Russian Federation. Based on the set goals and objectives, the author has chosen the methodological basis of the study. In particular, the author uses a set of general scientific methods of cognition: analysis, synthesis, analogy, deduction, induction, and others. In particular, the methods of analysis and synthesis made it possible to summarize and share the conclusions of various scientific approaches to the proposed topic, as well as to draw specific conclusions from empirical materials. The research was based on special legal research methods. In particular, the methods of analysis of normative legal acts (in particular, acts establishing the basic principles of ensuring the national security of the Russian Federation) were used. In particular, the following conclusion: "The Ministry of Internal Affairs of the Russian Federation (Ministry of Internal Affairs of Russia) is a federal executive authority responsible for the development and implementation of state policy and regulatory regulation in the field of internal affairs, in the field of control over the turnover of narcotic drugs, psychotropic substances and their precursors, in the field of migration (hereinafter - the sphere of internal affairs), as well as law enforcement functions for federal state control (supervision) in the field of internal affairs." Methods of generalization and analysis of doctrinal literature were to be used as one of the elements of the research methodology. Unfortunately, most of the conclusions of the author of the article are based on a regulatory framework. There is almost no discussion or discussion of doctrinal literature. For example, the article states that "The powers of foreign intelligence agencies are regulated by the Federal Law on Foreign Intelligence." At the same time, a reference is made to a doctrinal source (authors: Shevchenko A.V., Titov V.B.), however, such a reference here does not seem correct, because if the powers of the authorities are established by law, then this is hardly the opinion of other scientists. Other references to doctrinal literature raise similar questions. Thus, the author of the article is recommended to use the methods of generalization and analysis of scientific literature more correctly. Thus, in general, the methodology chosen by the author is not fully adequate to the purpose of the study, does not allow to study all aspects of the topic in its entirety. Relevance. The relevance of the stated issues is beyond doubt. There are both theoretical and practical aspects of the significance of the proposed topic. From the point of view of theory, security issues are relevant and necessary at the moment. At the same time, it is known (both from everyday views and from scientific ones) that the effectiveness of law enforcement as an element of ensuring security leaves much to be desired. Scientific research in this regard can help to eliminate these problems. On the practical side, it should be recognized that problems often arise in the work of law enforcement agencies. Scientifically based recommendations to them to improve safety can be very important. Thus, scientific research in the proposed field should only be welcomed. Scientific novelty. The scientific novelty of the proposed article raises significant doubts. First, it can be expressed in the author's specific conclusions. However, most of the conclusions are based on the use of the law, often they do not represent anything independent. For example, following the results of the article, the author notes that "Summing up, it is possible to note the following. The national security system is interpreted as the relationship between individuals and national security agencies that ensure the implementation and protection of national interests within the framework of normative legal acts. The supreme coordinating person of the national security system is the President of the Russian Federation." However, it is quite obvious that this conclusion follows directly from the law. What is the scientific novelty of the author's article, it should be clarified. Secondly, the author has not conducted a serious analysis of the doctrinal literature, thus there may be questions about whether the proposed conclusions are exactly the author's. The opinions of other authors should be used to highlight their differences from the opinion of the author of the reviewed article. Thus, the materials of the article may be of particular interest to the scientific community from the point of view of developing a contribution to the development of science, but for this purpose the conclusions of the article and the scientific novelty must be clarified. That is, the conclusions of the article should be revised and clarified. Style, structure, content. The subject of the article corresponds to the specialization of the journal "Administrative and Municipal Law", as it is devoted to legal issues of ensuring the security of the Russian Federation. The content of the article fully corresponds to the title, since the author considered the stated problems and achieved the research goal. The quality of the presentation of the study and its results should be recognized as fully positive. The subject, objectives, methodology and main results of the study follow directly from the text of the article. The design of the work generally meets the requirements for this kind of work. No significant violations of these requirements were found. Bibliography. The quality of the literature used should be evaluated. The author actively uses the literature presented by authors from Russia (Kardashova I. B., Shevchenko A.V., Titov V.B., Pekhtereva Z. A., Varguzova A. A. and others). However, the opinions of some scientists were not properly disclosed in the article, as mentioned above. In addition, it is worth increasing the number of new sources, since almost all of them (except for one article published in 2019) were published more than five years ago. Thus, the works of the above authors correspond to the research topic, but they do not always have a sign of sufficiency, they do not always contribute to the disclosure of various aspects of the topic. Appeal to opponents. The author has not conducted a serious analysis of the current state of the problem under study. The author is recommended to expand the scientific literature, as well as to reveal all the different approaches to the problem. Conclusions, the interest of the readership. The conclusions are fully logical, as they are obtained using a generally accepted methodology. The article may be of interest to the readership in terms of the systematic positions of the author in relation to the issues stated as the purpose of the article, however, only in the case of a significant clarification of the scientific novelty in the article. Thus, a number of observations should be made. 1. The scientific novelty of the article should be clarified. 2. Expand the methodological arsenal of the article by increasing work with theoretical and empirical sources. 3. Expand the bibliography. Based on the above, summarizing all the positive and negative sides of the article, "I recommend sending it for revision"

Second Peer Review

Peer reviewers' evaluations remain confidential and are not disclosed to the public. Only external reviews, authorized for publication by the article's author(s), are made public. Typically, these final reviews are conducted after the manuscript's revision. Adhering to our double-blind review policy, the reviewer's identity is kept confidential.
The list of publisher reviewers can be found here.

The subject of the study is a complex of problems of public relations related to law enforcement activities in the field of ensuring national security of the Russian Federation. The research methodology covers theoretical and practical aspects. The author applied general theoretical methods such as the logical method, analysis, deduction and induction methods. The relevance of the chosen topic is due to the changing circumstances in the modern world, as well as the complexity of the current security situation. The scientific novelty of the presented article consists in the author's vision of the problem under study, in the conclusions and suggestions made in the article. The style of the article is descriptive. The author consistently describes and analyzes the identified problems. The structure of the article has an introductory part, where the author offers a terminological apparatus, introductory theses. The following is an analysis of scientists who have studied the problem, and documents of strategic importance are being studied. After that, the author proceeds directly to the substantive part. The author proceeds from the fact that the object of national security protection is very complexly structured, diverse, consisting of many diverse structural elements, which results in the complexity of structuring the relationship of these elements. The author deduces a formula according to which the content of national security is represented by the personal safety of each citizen, public safety and, directly, state security. The author concludes that the system of national security agencies is represented by bodies accountable to the President of the Russian Federation. In addition, the national security system includes all three branches of government. The author analyzes in detail the role of each branch of government in ensuring national security at the federal, regional and local levels. The analysis of the norms of legal regulation of the organization and activities of local self-government bodies at the local level allows the author to conclude about the trend of statistication, which makes it impossible to declare a significant independent participation of local self-government bodies in ensuring national security. It is interesting to conclude that the central Government's lack of a State-building strategy at the regional and local levels has led to disastrous results for local authorities in some regions. These factors have led to the reform of the organization and activities of the local self-government system. At the same time, the author considers it promising to involve local self-government bodies in active participation in ensuring national security. The author identifies specific areas that require reforming the regulation of local self-government in order to achieve this goal. The author identifies at least four such areas. In particular, the following: providing an opportunity at the local level to independently determine the structure of local self-government bodies, based on territorial characteristics, historical traditions and the strategic importance of this territory; the role of the state in the organization and functioning of local self-government should be reduced to monitoring compliance with legislation in the activities of local self-government bodies, excluding the direct impact of the state on the described legal relations; creation of an effective base of anti–corruption measures at the local self-government level in order to organize an effective system of ensuring national security; in development of the previous paragraph, the exclusion of any influence, interference in the process of formation of local self-government bodies. One of the key conclusions of the author is that the main single-level bodies in the national security system can be divided into general and special ones. The author also emphasizes the fact that in order to ensure national security, it is necessary to have clear interaction between both various executive authorities and various levels of a particular authority, which requires an appropriate legal framework. The bibliography consists of twenty-eight sources. As a remark, it is worth noting that the sources are dated mainly to the period up to 2020, which allows us to assume that the material used by the author when writing the article may be outdated. This argument only detracts from the assumption that general theoretical approaches to national security problems have remained unchanged, and the author's proposals are relevant and have elements of scientific novelty. The article as a whole may be of interest to readers.