Ðóñ Eng Cn Translate this page:
Please select your language to translate the article


You can just close the window to don't translate
Library
Your profile

Back to contents

International Law and International Organizations
Reference:

International cooperation in the field of information security: general characteristics and the Russian approach to the study

Duben' Andrei Kirillovich

Scientific Associate, Institute of State and Law of the Russian Academy of Sciences; Assistant, Department of Civil and Administrative Proceedings, Russian State University of Justice

119019, Russia, Moscow region, Moscow, Znamenka str., 10

k.duben@mail.ru
Other publications by this author
 

 

DOI:

10.7256/2454-0633.2022.1.37490

Received:

06-02-2022


Published:

01-03-2022


Abstract: Information security acts as the basic concepts of modern international relations. The level of penetration of information technologies and global networks into society is directly related to the level of development of the country. The Russian Federation has undertaken a number of foreign policy initiatives aimed at ensuring international information security and proclaiming the transparent course taken by the country to create conditions for the establishment of a full-fledged international legal regime for the formation of a secure information environment. The article discusses the main trends in the formation of an international regime to ensure information security. It is revealed that international cooperation makes it possible to establish problem-oriented approaches to identifying threats from other states to the internal information infrastructure and critical facilities of the state in order to undermine territorial integrity. The author comes to the conclusion that interstate agreements in the field of international information security make it possible to establish problem-oriented approaches to identifying threats from other states to the internal information infrastructure and critical facilities of the state in order to undermine territorial integrity. At the same time, the development of joint measures for the development of normative legal norms of international law determined the stages of achieving the specified safety indicators, resource provision and legal support. In order to develop legal support for international information security, further interstate cooperation is necessary in order to seek to increase interaction and improve the international legal framework for the implementation of specific joint initiatives in the field of international information security.


Keywords:

international law, international cooperation, information security, challenges and threats, cyberbullying, cybercrime, military and political threats, information society, information law, information sphere

This article is automatically translated. You can find original text of the article here.

Currently, in the context of new challenges and threats in information law, issues of legal support for international information security are becoming particularly relevant. A number of adopted normative legal acts of strategic planning indicate the important role of solving the problems of legal support and further formation of the international information security system [1].

It is especially important that the normative legal acts regulating issues of international information security have a comprehensive approach to threats in the field of information security, which is a necessary element in strategic planning of confrontation, global information threats of modern society. It should be noted that foreign concepts regarding international information security issues are aimed at solving the problems of cyber threats and cyber attacks, which determine conceptual approaches to developing certain measures to combat information threats.

Considering the issue of the formation of an international information security system, it should be noted that at the initiative of the Russian Federation in 1998, for the first time, a United Nations Resolution (hereinafter referred to as the UN) was adopted, which determined the procedure for facilitating the solution of problems in the field of international information security. Thus, for the first time in the international arena, the issue of international information security was discussed.

Russian initiatives in the field of international information security have influenced the further development of this topic on the agenda of international bodies and organizations. It should be emphasized that after the adoption of the above-mentioned UN Resolution, the Secretary-General presented a report at the 54th session, which was based on the issues of general assessment of information security problems, including the establishment of basic definitions in this area, including the regulation of unauthorized interference or misuse of information and communication technologies that would affect internal integrity states violating the constitutional order [2, p. 145].

We believe that the discussion of these issues at such a high level has influenced further development in international law. At the same time, the active position of the Russian Federation in this matter contributed to the adoption of normative legal acts of international organizations. For example, in 2005, a group of experts on the legal support of international information security was established on the basis of the UN. The work of this Group contributed to solving a number of issues, including the identification and identification of challenges and threats that were of an international nature, preventing the spread of information processes in the internal affairs of another State, countering the use of information and telecommunications technologies in illegal actions, preventing the spread of cyber attacks and cybercrime, establishing international responsibility for computer crime, including computer terrorism. Meanwhile, based on the results of the work of the group of experts on international information security, a global culture of international cybersecurity and protection of critical infrastructure was formed. It is important to note that this Group was headed by representatives of the Russian delegation and, thanks to the Russian side, was able to come to a consensus on various issues of international information security.

To date, work in this direction continues, as the Minister of Foreign Affairs of the Russian Federation Sergey Lavrov has repeatedly noted, tasks on international information security issues are coming to the forefront of the interstate agenda, a common position has been formed that the Russian Federation in this matter is a supporter of consolidating efforts in the interests of effectively resolving issues on this topic. At the same time, Russia is taking a number of initiatives on this topic, in particular, one of the latest proposals is the creation of a universal international code of conduct in the cybersphere [3]. According to Sergey Lavrov, a dangerous large-scale confrontation in the information environment creates the need to create common standards and rules in the international information space [4]. A number of scientists in the field of information law note that the initiatives coming from the Russian Federation have made a significant contribution to the development and improvement of legal norms defining the rules in the cybersphere, in addition, these proposals have contributed to the adoption of rules among states to prevent the negative potential of the use of information and telecommunications technologies to violate international peace and law and order [5]. In addition, discussions on international information security issues made it possible to formulate the position of the Russian Federation on the formation of an information security system in the international aspect, countering illegal actions using information technologies, the functioning of the global Internet and the further development of the network in the international segment, the fight against cyber attacks and computer crimes.

Topical issues of the development of international cooperation in the field of international information security are still the subject of consideration at the UN [6, p. 146].

Of particular note is the Report of the UN Group of Governmental Experts (hereinafter referred to as the UN GGE) on achievements in the field of informatization and telecommunications in the context of international information security, in which challenges, threats, risks and factors that affect the vulnerability of information security related to the use of information technologies were formed [7]. The GPE referred to these risk groups as threats that can encroach on the infrastructure of information and communication technologies as an object of crime, as well as the use of information technologies as a means of criminal actions.

 We believe that these risks and factors are relevant today, while criminal actions in cyberspace are of high public danger, which are expressed by a high degree of latency and significant complexity of investigation due to the international nature of these crimes. In view of this, one of the key tasks of our time is to ensure an effective and optimal information and legal and criminal law policy in the fight against this type of crime at the international level.

One of the landmark events in the international arena on issues of international information security was the approval of the UN Resolution, which defined a set of international rules, norms and principles of responsible behavior of states on the issue of security in the use of information and telecommunications technologies [8]. According to the scientist D. Stauffacher, the acts adopted by the UN contribute to the development of information law in terms of regulating legal relations affecting the subject and object of this branch of law, in addition, the activities of the UN demonstrate the institutionalization of work on information security issues, the result of which should be the development of a unified terminology in the field of international information security [9].

At the same time, for the implementation and fulfillment of the above goals and objectives, it is important to note that international information security should be one of the priority areas in the national security system of a particular state. Thus, the Russian Federation has adopted a number of strategic planning documents confirming the priority among the most important directions in international policy: Fundamentals of the State Policy of the Russian Federation in the Field of International Information Security; National Security Strategy; Strategy for the Development of the Information Society in the Russian Federation for 2017-2030; On measures to ensure the information security of the Russian Federation when using information and telecommunication networks international information exchange; the Doctrine of Information Security of the Russian Federation, etc. [10].

It is impossible to ignore the interregional cooperation in which the Russian Federation participates within the framework of signed agreements and participation in regional organizations and forums.

One of the first interstate agreements on cooperation in the field of international information security is the agreement between the Russian Federation and Brazil. It is important to note that within the framework of this cooperation, challenges and threats have been identified that in one way or another can create conditions for the vulnerability of information and communication technologies in international conflicts and for hostile purposes both in the socio-economic and military spheres. In addition, the main threats in the field of ensuring international information and communication security under this agreement include: information and technical means that are used to carry out terrorist activities and for terrorist purposes, as well as the use of a dominant position in the field of information and communication means and technologies to the detriment of the interests and security of other states [11]. It is worth noting that this interregional agreement for the first time identified priority areas in the field of international information security, which established that the following will be carried out between states on an ongoing basis: exchange of experience; training of information specialists; conducting joint scientific and educational programs within the framework of international conferences and seminars; protection of national critical infrastructures.

As T.A. Polyakova rightly noted, the chosen approach in this international agreement corresponds to the position of the Russian Federation designated in 1998 in the resolution of the UN General Assembly "Achievements in the field of informatization and telecommunications in the context of international security" on the establishment of threats to international information security. The above position is reflected in the format of bilateral agreements between the BRICS members.

The Declaration and Action Plan adopted following the results of the VI BRICS Summit (Brazil, July 15, 2014) determined that the use of information and telecommunication technologies based on universally recognized principles and norms of international law are of paramount importance for an open and secure information space between the BRICS member States. Academician T.Y. Khabrieva noted that these innovations in international legislation have played an important role for further cooperation in the framework of international information security, since it was determined for the first time that the use of information and communication technologies as a weapon can violate both the interests of the state, in particular violation of the sovereignty of the state, and constitutional human rights in the form of the right to inviolability private life [12].

Of particular interest is the agreement between the Russian Federation and the Republic of Belarus on cooperation in the framework of international information security, which significantly expanded the list of threats to information security, which for the first time in international law provides for the creation of a monitoring system and joint response to emerging threats [13]. It is important to note that these approaches have made it possible to protect the interests of states in the conditions of informatization and the emergence of new threats in this area, the creation of mechanisms to respond to risks and challenges in the information sphere, further integration into the system of international information security, improvement of the international legal framework and practical mechanisms of cooperation on various international platforms.

At the same time, as S.N. Pykhtin rightly notes, states should legislatively establish challenges and threats to information security with a further plan of measures to prevent them, as well as reduce their negative consequences in case of their manifestation. The experience of the United Kingdom, the United States, Germany, South Korea and Japan suggests that one state cannot provide security solely by its own efforts and means. Countering cyberattacks will require the organization of collective protection at the international level within the framework of BRICS, CSTO and SCO [14, p. 73].

At the same time, considerable attention is paid to the issues of legal regulation of information security in the work of the International Committee of the Red Cross (hereinafter - the ICRC).

The positions of the named organization on the applicability of international law to cyber operations are published on the official website of the ICRC. The document calls on States to develop a common position on whether the existing norms in the field of information security are sufficient or new ones are required. If States deem it necessary to develop new norms, they should take as a basis and strengthen the existing legal framework. At the same time, the ICRC believes that further discussion is needed, especially among States, on how to interpret and apply the norms of international law in cyberspace [15]. We believe that the stated positions of the ICRC undoubtedly imply the need for further discussion of these issues both on various international platforms and at the national level.

Thus, interstate agreements in the field of international information security have made it possible to establish problem-oriented approaches to identifying threats from other states to the internal information infrastructure and critical facilities of the state in order to undermine territorial integrity. At the same time, the development of joint measures for the development of normative legal norms of international law determined the stages of achieving the specified safety indicators, resource provision and legal support. We believe that in order to develop legal support for international information security, further interstate cooperation is necessary in order to increase cooperation and improve the international legal framework for the implementation of specific joint initiatives in the field of international information security.

References
1. Ukaz Prezidenta RF ot 02.07.2021 ¹ 400 «O Strategii nacional'noj bezopasnosti Rossijskoj Federacii» // SZ RF. 05.07.2021, ¹ 27 (chast' II), st. 5351.
2. Modeli pravovogo regulirovaniya obespecheniya informacionnoj bezopasnosti v usloviyah bol'shih vyzovov v global'nom informacionnom obshchestve: monografiya / pod obshch. red. d.yu.n., professora T.A. Polyakovoj. – Saratov: Amirit, 2020. - 254 p.
3. Lavrov: SSHA soznatel'no zamalchivayut neobhodimost' principa nedelimosti bezopasnosti // Setevoe izdanie «RIA Novosti». 27.01.2022. URL: https://ria.ru/20220127/bezopasnost-1769766830.html (data obrashcheniya: 28.01.2022).
4. Lavrov prizval vyrabotat' universal'nyj mezhdunarodnyj kodeks povedeniya v kibersfere // Setevoe izdanie «TASS». 28.09.2020. URL: https://tass.ru/politika/9567741 (data obrashcheniya: 28.01.2022).
5. Artamonov V.A., Artamonova E.V., Kulak L.A. Bezopasnost' informacionno-kommunikacionnyh tekhnologij v kontekste ustojchivogo razvitiya sociuma // Cifrovaya transformaciya. 2019. ¹ 2. pp. 36 – 45.
6. Modeli pravovogo regulirovaniya obespecheniya informacionnoj bezopasnosti v usloviyah bol'shih vyzovov v global'nom informacionnom obshchestve: monografiya / pod obshch. red. d.yu.n., professora T.A. Polyakovoj. – Saratov: Amirit, 2020. - 254 p.
7. Doklad Gruppy pravitel'stvennyh ekspertov po dostizheniyam v sfere informatizacii i telekommunikacij v kontekste mezhdunarodnoj bezopasnosti (A/68/98*) // Oficial'nyj sajt OON. URL:http://www.un.org/ga/search/view_doc.asp?symbol=A/68/98&referer=/english/&Lang=R (data obrashcheniya: 20.01.2022).
8. Ob itogah deyatel'nosti Rabochej gruppy OON otkrytogo sostava po dostizheniyam v sfere informatizacii i telekommunikacij v kontekste mezhdunarodnoj bezopasnosti (476-15-03-2021) ot 15 marta 2021 g. // Oficial'nyj sajt MID RF. URL: https://www.mid.ru/foreign_policy/un/ /asset_publisher/U1StPbE8y3al/content/id/4632970 (data obrashcheniya: 22.01.2022).
9. SHtauffaher D. Pora sozdat' edinuyu peregovornuyu ploshchadku po problemam kiberprostranstva pod egidoj Pervogo komiteta GA OON (2 aprelya 2021 g.) // Oficial'nyj sajt RSMD. URL: https://russiancouncil.ru/analytics-and-comments/interview/pora-sozdat-edinuyu-peregovornuyu-ploshchadku-po-problemam-kiberprostranstva-pod-egidoy-pervogo-komi/ (data obrashcheniya: 29.01.2022).
10. Ukaz Prezidenta RF ot 12.04.2021 ¹ 213 «Ob utverzhdenii Osnov gosudarstvennoj politiki Rossijskoj Federacii v oblasti mezhdunarodnoj informacionnoj bezopasnosti» // SZ RF. 19.04.2021, ¹ 16 (CHast' I), st. 2746.
11. Rasporyazhenie Pravitel'stva RF ot 13.05.2010 ¹ 721-r «O podpisanii Soglasheniya mezhdu Pravitel'stvom Rossijskoj Federacii i Pravitel'stvom Federativnoj Respubliki Brazilii o sotrudnichestve v oblasti obespecheniya mezhdunarodnoj informacionnoj i kommunikacionnoj bezopasnosti» // SZ RF. 24.05.2010, ¹ 21, st. 2628.
12. BRIKS: kontury mnogopolyarnogo mira: monografiya / O.A. Akopyan, N.M. Bevelikova, K.M. Belikova i dr.; otv. red. T.YA. Habrieva. M.: IZiSP, YUrisprudenciya, 2015. // SPS «Konsul'tant plyus».
13. Rasporyazhenie Pravitel'stva RF ot 17.09.2013 N 1672-r «O podpisanii Soglasheniya mezhdu Pravitel'stvom Rossijskoj Federacii i Pravitel'stvom Respubliki Belarus' o sotrudnichestve v oblasti obespecheniya mezhdunarodnoj informacionnoj bezopasnosti» // SZ RF. 23.09.2013, ¹ 38, st. 4880.
14. Pyhtin S.N. Informacionnye vojny kak ugroza nacional'noj bezopasnosti Rossijskoj Federacii Informacionnye vojny. 2020, ¹ 2 (54). pp. 71-74.
15. Mezhdunarodnoe gumanitarnoe pravo i kiberoperacii vo vremya vooruzhennyh konfliktov: izlozhenie pozicii MKK // URL: https://www.icrc.org/ru/document/mezhdunarodnoe-gumanitarnoe-pravo-i-kiberoperacii-vo-vremya-vooruzhennyh-konfliktov (data obrashcheniya: 27.01.2022 g.)

Peer Review

Peer reviewers' evaluations remain confidential and are not disclosed to the public. Only external reviews, authorized for publication by the article's author(s), are made public. Typically, these final reviews are conducted after the manuscript's revision. Adhering to our double-blind review policy, the reviewer's identity is kept confidential.
The list of publisher reviewers can be found here.

A REVIEW of an article on the topic "International cooperation in the field of information security: general characteristics and the Russian approach to study". The subject of the study. The article proposed for review is devoted to topical issues related to the legal regulation of relations on international cooperation in the field of information security. The author highlights general theoretical approaches to the stated problems, as well as these issues from the perspective of Russian legal acts and domestic policy. The subject of the study was normative legal acts in the field of international cooperation, speeches by politicians, opinions of scientists, and doctrinal literature. Research methodology. The purpose of the study is not stated directly in the article. At the same time, it can be clearly understood from the title and content of the work. The purpose can be designated as the consideration and resolution of certain problematic aspects of the issue of legal regulation of relations on international cooperation in the field of information security, as well as problems arising in this field of activity. Based on the set goals and objectives, the author has chosen the methodological basis of the study. In particular, the author uses a set of general scientific methods of cognition: analysis, synthesis, analogy, deduction, induction, and others. In particular, the methods of analysis and synthesis made it possible to summarize and share the conclusions of various scientific approaches to the proposed topic, as well as draw specific conclusions from the doctrinal literature. The most important role was played by special legal methods. In particular, the author actively applied the formal legal method, which made it possible to analyze and interpret the norms of current legislation (first of all, the norms of international legal acts, the provisions of the legislation of the Russian Federation). For example, the following conclusion of the author: "Considering the issue of forming an international information security system, it should be noted that, at the initiative of the Russian Federation, in 1998, for the first time, a United Nations Resolution (hereinafter referred to as the UN) was adopted, which defined the procedure for facilitating the solution of problems in the field of international information security. Thus, for the first time in the international arena, the issue of international information security was discussed." In addition, the author actively makes generalizations and specific conclusions based on the statements of Russian politicians, which is necessary in the context of the purpose of the study. For example, the following: "Today, work in this direction continues, as Foreign Minister of the Russian Federation Sergey Lavrov has repeatedly noted, tasks on international information security issues are coming to the forefront of the interstate agenda, a common position has been formed that the Russian Federation in this matter is a supporter of consolidating efforts in the interests of effectively resolving issues on this topic. At the same time, Russia is taking a number of initiatives on this topic, in particular, one of the latest proposals is the creation of a universal international code of conduct in the cybersphere." Thus, the methodology chosen by the author is fully adequate to the purpose of the study, allows you to study all aspects of the topic in its entirety. Relevance. The relevance of the stated issues is beyond doubt. There are both theoretical and practical aspects of the significance of the proposed topic. From the point of view of theory, the topic of international cooperation in the field of information security is complex and necessary. Firstly, from a general theoretical point of view, the essence of information security as a type of national security, its relationship with other types of security, is interesting. This issue is also of interest in the international legal aspect due to the different legislation of different countries. Secondly, today, given the development of technical means, the Internet, and the easy exchange of information between representatives of various states, it is not possible to ensure information security exclusively at the national level. It is possible and realistic to guarantee it only in combination with the actions of various States, subject to their cooperation. On the practical side, it should be recognized that Russia is pursuing an independent policy in the field of information security. At the same time, it conducts, of course, a certain level of cooperation with other countries. Identifying the specifics of Russian politics can be interesting from a scientific and practical point of view. Thus, scientific research in the proposed field should only be welcomed. Scientific novelty. The scientific novelty of the proposed article is beyond doubt. Firstly, it is expressed in the author's specific conclusions. Among them, for example, is the following conclusion: "interstate agreements in the field of international information security have allowed us to establish problem-oriented approaches to identifying threats from other states to the internal information infrastructure and critical facilities of the state in order to undermine territorial integrity. At the same time, the development of joint measures for the development of normative legal norms of international law determined the stages of achieving the set safety indicators, resource provision and legal support. We believe that in order to develop legal support for international information security, further interstate cooperation is necessary in order to strive to increase interaction and improve the international legal framework for the implementation of specific joint initiatives in the field of international information security." These and other theoretical conclusions can be used in further scientific research. Secondly, the author suggests ideas for comparing various international acts and domestic Russian legislation. In particular, "The agreement between the Russian Federation and the Republic of Belarus on cooperation in the framework of international information security, which significantly expanded the list of threats to information security, which for the first time in international law provides for the creation of a monitoring system and joint response to emerging threats [13], gives special interest. It is important to note that these approaches have made it possible to protect the interests of states in the context of informatization and the emergence of new threats in this area, the creation of mechanisms to respond to risks and challenges in the information sphere, further integration into the international information security system, improvement of the international legal framework and practical mechanisms of cooperation on various international platforms." The above conclusion may be relevant and useful for the correct understanding and interpretation of legislation. Thus, the materials of the article may be of particular interest to the scientific community in terms of contributing to the development of science. Style, structure, content. The subject of the article corresponds to the specialization of the journal "International Law and International Organizations", as it is devoted to legal problems related to the understanding of international law and issues of international cooperation. The content of the article fully corresponds to the title, as the author considered the stated problems and achieved the research goal. The quality of the presentation of the study and its results should be recognized as fully positive. The subject, objectives, methodology and main results of the study follow directly from the text of the article. The design of the work generally meets the requirements for this kind of work. No significant violations of these requirements were found. Bibliography.
The quality of the literature used should be highly appreciated. The author actively uses the literature presented by authors from Russia (Artamonov V.A., Artamonova E.V., Kulak L.A., Zharova A.K., Polyakova T.A., Danelyan A.A. and others). Many of the cited scholars are recognized scholars in the field of international law. I would like to note the author's use of a large number of normative legal acts of the Russian Federation, as well as the provisions of international documents and treaties, which made it possible to give the study a law enforcement orientation. Thus, the works of the above authors correspond to the research topic, have a sign of sufficiency, and contribute to the disclosure of various aspects of the topic. Appeal to opponents. The author conducted a serious analysis of the current state of the problem under study. All quotes from scientists are accompanied by author's comments. That is, the author shows different points of view on the problem and tries to argue for a more correct one in his opinion. Conclusions, the interest of the readership. The conclusions are fully logical, as they are obtained using a generally accepted methodology. The article may be of interest to the readership in terms of the systematic positions of the author in relation to the problem of understanding Russian international policy in the field of information security. Based on the above, summing up all the positive and negative sides of the article, "I recommend publishing"