Library
|
Your profile |
Pedagogy and education
Reference:
Litvin, D.V., Mangasarova, L.A. (2023). Subject-Generated Environments as the Basis for the Formation of a Personal-Developing Digital Educational Environment. Pedagogy and education, 1, 41–55. . https://doi.org/10.7256/2454-0676.2023.1.36837
Subject-Generated Environments as the Basis for the Formation of a Personal-Developing Digital Educational Environment
DOI: 10.7256/2454-0676.2023.1.36837.2EDN: IQYCWTReceived: 10-11-2021Published: 04-04-2023Abstract: This article discusses the features of forming a personality-developing educational environment in the context of global digitalization. The concept of the digital educational environment is revealed in the context of its personality-developing nature, the basic scheme of the functioning of the subject-generated environments in the digital educational environment is substantiated, the factors determining the personality-developing potential of the digital educational environment are highlighted, as well as the features of the teacher's activity on the formation of the developing the environment by digital means in the refraction of traditions and innovations. The traditional understanding of the educational environment is undergoing a significant transformation due to digitalization. The study showed that the formation of a developing digital educational environment should be carried out with a mandatory emphasis on the subject-generated characteristics of the environment, resolving the contradiction between the diversity and openness of potentially developing resources, on the one hand, and the uncertainty, non-obviousness of the results of interaction of subjects, on the other hand. For the teacher, the digital educational environment acts as a discrete education, whereas for the student, it is a single structured digital space (a single environment). A teacher's activity is the formation of a developing environment by digital means, giving it developing functions associated with pedagogical competence to fill the environment with appropriate situational and event content, contributing to the generation of environments in education by students themselves and filling them with authentic meaning. The teacher's specified competencies depend on the completeness of the theoretical understanding of the peculiarities of the emergence of subject-generated environments in the digital educational environment. The scientific novelty of this research lies in the fact that, for the first time, a personality-developing digital educational environment is considered through the concept of subject-generated environments, which brings the student's personality to the center of relevant educational projects. The development of the student's personality in the DEE is a multifactorial and open subject-dependent process with variability of resources for self-change, the research attitude corresponding to the post-non-classical stage of the development of science. Keywords: educational environment, personality development, digitalization, student-centered education, system approach, subject-containing systems, subject-subject interaction, pedagogical competencies, situational-event content, pedagogical designThis article written in Russian. You can find original text of the article here . References
1. National project "Education" [Electronic resource]. Website of the Ministry of Education of the Russian Federation. https://edu.gov.ru/national-project (date of access: 07.11.2021).
2. On the state information system "Modern digital educational environment": Decree of the Government of the Russian Federation No. 1836 (2020, Nov. 16) [Electronic resource]. Official Internet portal of legal information. Retrieved from http://publication.pravo.gov.ru/Document/View/0001202011190005?index=0&rangeSize=1 (date of access: 07.11.2021). 3. Zima, N.A. (2005). Globalization of culture and the specifics of its manifestation in Russia (Ph. D. thesis). Stavropol State University. Stavropol. 4. Vypryazhkina, Zh.N. (2005) Political and legal transformation of civil society institutions in the context of globalization (Doctoral dissertation). Rostov Law Institute of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of Russia. Rostov-on-Don. 5. Kirillova, N.B. (2006). Media culture: from modern to postmodern. Moscow: Academic Project. 6. Kravtsov, S.S. (2021). Not a single number. Website of the Ministry of Education of the Russian Federation [Electronic resource]. https://edu.gov.ru/press/3312/ne-cifroy-edinoy/ (date of access: 07.11.2021). 7. Eskov, V.M., Zinchenko, Yu.P. & Filatova O.E. (2017) Signs of a paradigm and substantiation of the third paradigm in psychology. Bulletin of Moscow University. Ser 14. Psychology, 1, pp. 3–17. https://doi.org/10.11621/vsp.2017.03.22. 8. Strigunov, Yu.V. (2009). Intergenerational relations in modern Russian society: the dynamics of the values of the older generation and youth (Ph. D. thesis). South Federal University. Rostov-on-Don. 9. Vagin, D.Yu. (2015). Continuity of generations in the sphere of spiritual and moral values of modern youth of Russia (Ph. D. thesis). Nizhny Novgorod State Pedagogical University. Nizhny Novgorod. 10. Baudrillard, J. (1983). Ecstasy of communication. In Editor H. Foster, The Anti-Aesthetic. In Essays on Postmodern Culture (pp. 126-133). Port Townsend: Bay Press. 11. Robert, I.W. (2021). Development of the axiology of education during the period of digital transformation. Human capital, 2, 12(156), pp. 9–14. https://doi.org/10.25629/HC.2021.12.35. 12. Weindorf-Sysoeva, M.E. & Subocheva, M.L. (2021). Digital didactics: features of the organization of learning in an educational organization. Human capital, 2, 12(156), pp. 15–22. https://doi.org/10.25629/HC.2021.12.36. 13. Lodge, J. M., Kennedy, G. & Lockyer, L. (2020). Digital learning environments, the science of learning and the relationship between the teacher and the learner. In A. Carroll, R. Cunnington & A. Nugent (eds.) Learning under the lens: Applying findings from the science of learning to the classroom. Abingdon, UK: CRC Press. 14. Sorokova, M.G. (2020). Digital educational environment of the university: who is more comfortable learning in it? Psychological science and education, 25(2), pp. 44–58. https://doi.org/10.17759/pse.2020250204. 15. Lorenz, B., Kikkas, K., Laanpere, M. & Laugasson, E. (2016). A Model to Evaluate Digital Safety Concerns in School Environment. 9753. 707–721. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-39483-1_64. 16. Azhmukhamedov, I.M., Kuznetsova, V.Yu. & Stanishevskaya, A.V. (2021). Software product for risk management when using a digital educational environment. Caspian Journal: Management and High Technologies, 3, pp. 72–81. 17. Shilova, O.N. (2020). Digital educational environment: pedagogical view. Person and education, 2(63), pp. 36–41. 18. Flagship Universities as Drivers of Regional Development: A Collection of Case Studies of the Best Practices of Flagship Universities in Russia. Website of the Belgorod State Technological University (BSTU) named after V.G. Shukhov. https://www.bstu.ru/about/overall_info/basic (date of access: 01/07/2022). 19. Bilenko, P.N., Blinov, V.I., Dulinov, M.V., Yesenina, E.Yu., Kondakov, A.M. & Sergeev, I.S. (2019). Didactic concept of digital vocational education and training. Moscow: Pero Publishing House. 20. Nevzorova, A.V. (2017). Studying the possibilities of the information environment of an educational organization in the professional development of a teacher. Education and upbringing, 1, pp. 9–11.
First Peer Review
Peer reviewers' evaluations remain confidential and are not disclosed to the public. Only external reviews, authorized for publication by the article's author(s), are made public. Typically, these final reviews are conducted after the manuscript's revision. Adhering to our double-blind review policy, the reviewer's identity is kept confidential.
Second Peer Review
Peer reviewers' evaluations remain confidential and are not disclosed to the public. Only external reviews, authorized for publication by the article's author(s), are made public. Typically, these final reviews are conducted after the manuscript's revision. Adhering to our double-blind review policy, the reviewer's identity is kept confidential.
|