Рус Eng During last 365 days Approved articles: 2065,   Articles in work: 293 Declined articles: 786 
Library

Back to contents

Culture and Art
Reference:

Transcendental Color Spectrum: Aesthetic Dimension
Kormin Nikolai Aleksandrovich

Doctor of Philosophy

Leading Scientific Associate, Institute of Philosophy of the Russian Academy of Sciences

141335, Russia, Moskovskaya oblast', selo Shemetovo, ul. Tsentral'naya, 75, kv. 26

n.kormin@yandex.ru
Другие публикации этого автора
 

 

Abstract.

The article analyzes the color spectrum as an aesthetic intonation of transcendentalism, that most fully embodies everything from which follows the condition of existence a priori and a posteriori of the given matrix of knowledge of the world, our ontological place in it, creating the preconditions for the philosophical description of the contours of the meaning of a work of art, its semantic features, matrix for the visual synthesis of color, perspective in painting. Being a predestinated by the transcendental nature of the artistic subject, coloristic art project builds a prospect to imagine a color as a cryptic substance, as a direct manifestation of spiritual light, images spirituelles structure, as a blaze of pure reason, memory coloring. Solving a question on how to give a color aesthetics a transcendental meaning, how the aesthetics itself is inserted into the transcendental philosophy structure, the author invokes from Kantian approach, showing as far as coloring as science can be seen as scientia transcendens, realizing the intention of questioning the artistic truth and coinciding with the phenomenology of see-as-color. The following methodology was used: historical-philosophical and aesthetic research, analysis of art in the system of culture, the interdisciplinary methodology of the Humanities to describe artistic reality. The main conclusions are statements about the possibilities of considering color in the context of a global typology of artistic perception, explaining a color as something equivalent to a projection in space, allowing contemplate aesthetically in it. For the first time, transcendental exposition of the aesthetic sense of color is analyzed at the current level, the understanding of structures, primordial in relation to the light wave and color perception of the subject, which can be called transcendental coloristics, is brought to light. 

Keywords: Каnt, color, painting, creativity, meaning of art, modern fine art, philosophy of art, aesthetics, consciousness, Mamardashvili

DOI:

10.7256/2454-0625.2019.6.29973

Article was received:

11-06-2019


Review date:

15-06-2019


Publish date:

19-06-2019


This article written in Russian. You can find full text of article in Russian here .

References
1.
Khaidegger M. Vvedenie v metafiziku. Per. s nem. N. O. Guchinskoi. SPb.: Vysshaya religiozno-filosofskaya shkola, 1998. 302 s.
2.
Smirnov A.V. Soznanie. Logika. Kul'tura. Smysl. M.: Yazyki slavyanskoi kul'tury, 2015. 712 s.
3.
Nitsshe F. Polnoe sobranie sochinenii: v 13 t. T. 12. Chernoviki i nabroski 1885-1887. Pod red. S. V. Kazachkova. Per. s nem. V. M. Bakuseva. M.: Kul'turnaya revolyutsiya, 2005. 560 s.
4.
Shama S. Glaza Rembrandta. Per. s angl. V. Akhtyrskoi. SPb.: Azbuka, Azbuka-Attikus, 2017. 960 s.
5.
Roger A. Court traité du paysage. Paris: Gallimard, 1997. 199 pp.
6.
Talon-Hugon C. L’artialisation des émotions // Nouvelle revue d’esthétique. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France, 2014. Vol. 2. No 14. Pp. 5-8.
7.
Smirnov A.V. Myslit' znachit razvorachivat' svyaznost' // Voprosy filosofii. 2019. № 2. S. 48-60.
8.
Advances in Experimental Philosophy of Logic and Mathematics. Ed. A. Aberdein, M. Inglis. London: Bloomsbury Academic, 2019. 234 pp.
9.
Longworth F., Scarantino A. The Disjunctive Theory of Art: The Cluster Account Reformulated //The British Journal of Aesthetics. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2010. Vol. 50. No. 2. Pp. 151–167.
10.
Guyer P. Seventy-Five Years of Kant… and Counting // The Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism. N.Y.: JSTOR, 2017. Vol. 75. No. 4. P. 351-362.
11.
Calì C. Neuroestetica e fenomenologia della percezione pittorica e musicale // Rivista di Estetica. Torino: Università di Torino, 2008. № 37. R. 21-42.
12.
Morizot J. Esthétique et naturalization // Nouvelle revue d’esthétique. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France. 2015. Vol. 15. No. 1. Pp. 11-22.
13.
Gegel' G. V. F. Lektsii po estetike: v 2-kh tt. Per. B. S. Chernysheva, P. S. Popova, Yu. N. Popova, A. M. Mikhailova. SPb.: Nauka, 2001. T. 2. 603 s.
14.
Kivy P. La parole, le chant et la transparence du médium : note sur la métaphysique de l'opéra // Nouvelle revue d’esthétique. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France, 2013. Vol. 12. No. 2. Pp. 81-91.
15.
Merlo-Ponti M. Rabochie zapisi // Vidimoe i nevidimoe. Pod red. T. V. Shchittsovoi. Per s frants. O. N. Shparagi. Mn.: Logvinov, 2006. S. 241-356.
16.
Gorodeisky K. A New Look at Kant's View of Aesthetic Testimony //The British Journal of Aesthetics. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2010. Vol. 50. No. 1. Pp. 53–70.
17.
Delez Zh. Kino. Pod red. O. Aronsona. Per. s frants. B. Skuratova. M.: Ad Marginem, 2004. 623 c.
18.
Delez Zh. Frensis Bekon: logika oshchushchenii. Pod red. S. L. Fokina. Per. s frants. A. V. Shestakova. SPb.: Machina, 2011. 176 s.
19.
Mamardashvili M. K., Pyatigorskii A. M. Simvol i soznanie (Metafizicheskie rassuzhdeniya o soznanii, simvolike i yazyke). M.: Progress-Traditsiya, Fond Meraba Mamardashvili, 2009. 288 s.
20.
Shelling Fr. Filosofiya iskusstva. Pod obshch. red. M. F. Ovsyannikova. Per. P. S. Popova. M.: «Mysl'», 1999. 608 s.
21.
Vellodi K. Tintoretto's Difference. Deleuze, Diagrammatics and Art History. London: Bloomsbury Academic, 2018. 240 pp.
22.
Laruelle F. Philosophies of Difference. A Critical Introduction to Non-philosophy. London: Bloomsbury Academic, 2019. 256 pp.
23.
Thom R. Esquisse d’ une sémiophysique. Physique aristotélicienne et théorie des catastrophes. Paris: InterÉditions, 1988. 285 p.
24.
Chalmers D. Soznayushchii um. V poiskakh fundamental'noi teorii. Per. s angl. V. V. Vasil'eva. Izd. 2-e. M.: URSS: Knizhnyi dom «LIBROKOM», 2015. 512 s.
25.
About Methodological Advances in Experimental Philosophy (Ed. E. Fischer, M. Curtis). London: Bloomsbury Academic, 2019. 234 pp.
26.
Yum D. Skeptik (per. s angl. A. N. Chanysheva) // Sochineniya. V 2 t. 2-e, dopoln. i ispr., izd. M.: «Mysl'», 1996. T. 2. S. 578 – 598.
27.
Schliesser E. Hume’s missing shade of blue reconsidered from a Newtonian Perspective // The Journal of Scottish Philosophy. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press, 2004. Vol. 2 (2). P. 164-175 .
28.
Garret D. Hume’s naturalistic theory of representation // Synthese. An International Journal for Epistemology, Methodology and Philosophy of Science. Ed.: O. Bueno, C. Dutilh Novaes; W. van der Hoek. Norwell, Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers, 2006. Vol. 152 (3). P. 301–319.
29.
Yum D. Traktat o chelovecheskoi prirode, ili popytka primenit' osnovannyi na opyte metod rassuzhdenii k moral'nym predmetam (per. s angl. S. I. Tsereteli) // Sochineniya. V 2 t. 2-e, dopoln. i ispr., izd. M.: «Mysl'», 1996. T. 1. S. 53–656.
30.
Dekart R. Sochineniya. V 2 t. Pod red. V. V. Sokolova. T. 1. M.: Mysl', 1989. 654 s.
31.
Ortega-i-Gasset Kh. Velaskes. Goiya. Pod red. K. M. Dolgova. Per. s isp. I. V. Ershovoi, M. B. Smirnovoi. M.: Respublika, 1997. 351 s.
32.
Leonardo da Vinchi. Suzhdeniya o nauke i iskusstve. Pod red. A. K. Dzhivelegova. Per. s ital. A. A. Gubera i V. P. Zubova. SPb.: Azbuka, Azbuka-Attikus, 2015. 224 s.
33.
Hoppe H. Synthesis bei Kant : das Problem der Verbindung von Vorstellungen und ihrer Gegenstandsbeziehung in der "Kritik der reinen Vernunft". Berlin; New York: W. de Gruyter, 1983. 252 S.
34.
Kant I. Kritika chistogo razuma: v 2 ch. 2-e izd. (V), ispr. Pod red. B. Tushlinga, N. Motroshilovoi. Per. s nem. N. O. Losskogo, sverennyi Ts. G. Arzakan'yanom i M. I. Itkinym, nov. red. perevoda N. V. Motroshilovoi. // Sochineniya na nemetskom i russkom yazykakh. T. 2. Ch. 1. M.: Nauka, 2006. 1081 s.
35.
Kant I. Kritika sposobnosti suzhdeniya. Pervoe vvedenie v «Kritiku sposobnosti suzhdeniya». Pod red. N. Motroshilovoi, T. Dlugach, B. Tushlinga, U. Fogelya. Per. N. Sokolova, M. Levinoi, Yu. Popova. Novyi ispravlennyi variant perevoda N. V. Motroshilovoi, T. B. Dlugach //Sochineniya na nemetskom i russkom yazykakh. T. 4. M.: Nauka, 2001. 1120 s.
36.
Schulting D. Kant’s Threefold Synthesis On a Moderately Conceptualist Interpretation // Kant's Radical Subjectivism. Perspectives on the Transcendental Deduction. London: Palgrave, 2017. Pp. 257-293.
37.
Kant I. Kritika chistogo razuma. 1-e izdanie (A). Pod red. B. Tushlinga, N. Motroshilovoi. Per. s nem. N. O. Losskogo, sverennyi Ts. G. Arzakan'yanom i M. I. Itkinym, nov. red. perevoda N. V. Motroshilovoi. Podgotovleny k izdaniyu N. Motroshilovoi, T. Dlugach, B. Tushlingom, U. Fogelem. //Sochineniya na nemetskom i russkom yazykakh. T. 2. Ch. 2. //Sochineniya na nemetskom i russkom yazykakh. T. 2. Ch. 2. M.: Nauka, 2006. 936 s.
38.
Rassel B. Istoriya zapadnoi filosofii. Pod red. V. V. Tselishcheva. M. AST Publishers, 2016. 1024 s.
39.
Prishvin M. M. Tsvet i krest. 2-e izd. Sostavlenie, podgotovka teksta V.A. Fateeva. SPb.: OOO «Izdatel'stvo “Rostok”», 2017. 608 s.
40.
Borges M. About Emotion, Reason, and Action in Kant. London: Bloomsbury Academic, 2019. 224 pp.
41.
Kogen G. Teoriya opyta Kanta. Per. s nem. V. N. Belova. M.: Akademicheskii proekt, 2012. 618 s.
42.
Gardiner D. E. Muzyka v Nebesnom Grade: portret Ioganna Sebast'yana Bakha. Per. s angl. R. Nasonova, A. Andrushkevicha. M.: Rosebud Publishing, 2019. 928 s.
43.
Fuko M. Zhivopis' Mane. S prilozhenie «Mishel' Fuko, vzglyad». Pod red. M. Sezon. Per. S frants. A.V. D'yakova. SPb.: «Vladimir Dal'», 2011. 232 s.
44.
Desideri F. Une autre déduction des jugements esthétiques. Pour un dépassement de l’ancienne dichotomie des faits et des valeurs // Nouvelle revue d’esthétique. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France, 2016. Vol. 18. No 2. Pp. 11-27.
45.
Lavelle P. Critique esthétique et philosophie des valeurs : Walter Benjamin, «l’élève de Rickert» //Nouvelle revue d’esthétique. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France, 2016. Vol. 18. No 2. Pp. 63-70.
46.
Rieusset-Lemarié I. Le libre jeu de l’effet d’art. De la charis de l’art élargi au plaisir libre kantien // Nouvelle revue d’esthétique. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France, 2015. Vol. 16. No. 2. Pp. 47-63.
47.
Khaidegger M. Tezis Kanta o bytii. Per. V.V. Bibikhina // Vremya i bytie. Stat'i i vystupleniya. M.: Respublika, 1993. S. 361-381.
48.
Shredinger E. Razum i materiya. Per. s angl. A.V. Monakova. Izhevsk: Regulyarnaya i khaoticheskaya dinamika, 2000. 95 c.
49.
Mamardashvili M. K. Pod znakom Karteziya // Vstrecha s Dekartom. Filosofskie chteniya, posvyashchennye M. K. Mamardashvili. 1994 god. Pod red. V. A. Kruglikova, Yu. P. Senokosova. M.: Ad Marginem, 1996. S. 378-424.
50.
Florenskii P. A. Ikonostas. Sostaviteli tekstov P. A. Florenskogo igumen Andronik (Trubachev), M. S. Trubacheva, P. V. Florenskii. Podgotovka teksta i kommentarii A. G. Dunaeva. M.: Iskusstvo, 1994. 256 s.