Eng During last 365 days Approved articles: 2065,   Articles in work: 293 Declined articles: 786 
Library

Back to contents

Litera
Reference:

Author Aphorism as an Element of the Manipulation Chain in the USA Election Political Discourse
Kereshun Aleksandra Vyacheslavovna

PhD in Philology

temporarily unemployed

664017, Russia, Irkutskaya oblast', g. Irkutsk, ul. Kostycheva, 27/9, kv. 36

alko81@yandex.ru

Abstract.

The subject of the research is aphorisms in political discourse which a frequently met phenomenon. Peculiarity of the electical political discourse preparation is the intent of a speaker to influence the target audience. In his research Kereshun focses on the author aphorism that is used as one of the techniques of influencing the target audience. Thus, the aim of the article is to analyze peucliarities of manipulative use of author aphorism in the political discourse. Aphorism is viewed as the core of a manipulative construct. In his research Kereshun has used the interpretative method and definition analysis method as well as Charles Pears' semiotic theory. The scientific novelty of the research is caused by the fact that the author studies the manipulative potential of aphorism The analysis carried out allows to define the borders as well as describe active elements of the manipulation chain that uses aphorism as the core of the chain. Moreover, the researcher extends and clarifies the definition of aphorism in general. 
 

Keywords: world of actions, world of values, inerpretanta, manipulation, aphorism, discourse, politics, sign, technology, term

DOI:

10.25136/2409-8698.2019.2.27375

Article was received:

10-09-2018


Review date:

18-09-2018


Publish date:

18-06-2019


This article written in Russian. You can find full text of article in Russian here .

References
1.
Vorkachev S.G. Poznavatel'naya sposobnost' cheloveka v aforistike // Aktual'nye problemy filologii i pedagogicheskoi lingvistiki. 2015. 1. S. 106-115.
2.
Dyadyk N.G. Mnogoznachnost' aforizma kak smyslovogo fenomena: gnoseologicheskii aspekt // Lichnost'. Kul'tura. Obshchestvo. 2010. T 12. Vyp.
3.
S. 204-210. 3.Zemlyanskaya E.V. Strukturno-semanticheskie i funktsional'nye osobennosti stilevoi intertekstual'nosti v angloyazychnom aforizme: dis. kand.filol.n. SPb., 2004. 209 s.
4.
Kaplunenko A.M. O tekhnologicheskoi sushchnosti manipulyatsii soznaniem i ee lingvisticheskikh priznakakh // Argumentatsiya vs manipulyatsiya: Vestnik IGLU. Ser. Kommunikativistika i kommunikatsiologiya. Irkutsk : IGLU, 2007.
5.
S. 3-12. 5.Pirs Ch. S. Izbrannye filosofskie proizvedeniya. M.: Logos, 2000. 448 s.
6.
Smirnova U.V. Predposylki k razrabotke lingvisticheskoi teorii manipulyatsii // Evraziiskoe nauchnoe ob''edinenie. 2017. T.2. 2. S. 1-5.
7.
Uaitkhed A.N. Izbrannye raboty po filosofii. M.: Progress, 1990. 717 s
8.
Uspenskii L. V. Korotko ob aforizmakh // Aforizmy. L.: Nauka, 1964. S. 23-24.
9.
Shatalova S.A. Lingvisticheskie osnovy aforizmov i aforistiki v khudozhestvennykh tekstakh Dostoevskogo na materiale romanov Besy i Podrostok: dis. kand.filol.n. M., 2000. 208 s.
10.
Merriam-Webster. Dictionary and Thesaurus. URL: http://https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/mission (data obrashcheniya: 20.08.2018).
11.
Transcript: Read Full Text of Sen. Lindsey Grahams Campaign. URL://http://time.com/3903377/lindsey-graham-campaign-launch-transcript/