Ðóñ Eng Cn Translate this page:
Please select your language to translate the article


You can just close the window to don't translate
Library
Your profile

Back to contents

Psychology and Psychotechnics
Reference:

Dolgopolova I.V. Social Networks in the Life of High School Students: Comparative Analysis of Evaluations Given by School Students and Their Parents

Abstract: The age of social network users is constantly extending. Researchers often view the role of social networks as a negative Internet phenomenon. However, the impact of social networks is not so definitely negative. In this regard, the authors of the present article have decided to analyze the topic of school students using social networks both in the theoretical and practical sense. Meanwhile interpersonal relations of children are often well understood and managed by their parents, virtual communication is not so easy to be managed. For this purpose, the authors have decided to analyze evaluations of social networks provided by children and their parents. The purpose of the research is to analyze and compare roles of social networks in the life of high school students from the view of school students themselves as well as their parents. The research objectives also include to define the frequency and purposes of high school students using social networks, to determine the most popular social networks, etc. The subject of the research is the evaluation of the role of social networks in the life of high school students given by students and their parents. To achieve the research objectives, the author has used the comparative research method to analyze groups of high school students and their parents, 47 people per each, as well as such psychodiagnostic methods as questionnaries and interviews. In her article Dolgopolova presents the results of comparing evaluations provided by school students and their parents regarding the role of social networks in their life including the number of registered accounts, reasons of why school students use social networks, advantages and disadvantages of social networks. The results of the research demonstrate that both children and their parents have a similar understanding of what minuses and pluses of social networks are. However, parents and their children have a different evaluation of how frequent they use social networks as well as the number of social networks. Noteworthy that parents tend to exaggerate the fact that their children may use social networks for academic reasons why children use social networks mostly for communication. The results of the research can be used in further researches of developing social technologies and social communication of children in social networks. The results can be also used in the practical sense, particularly, for psychological and pedagogical training of teachers, parents and during psychological sessions. 


Keywords:

Internet, dependent user, choice of network, account, multitasking, addiction, virtual communication, social network, independent user, uninterested user


This article can be downloaded freely in PDF format for reading. Download article

This article written in Russian. You can find original text of the article here .
References
1. Skachkov M.A., Utemov V.V. Vliyanie sotsial'nykh setey na formirovanie lichnosti sovremennogo podrostka // Nauchno-metodicheskiy zhurnal Kontsept. 2013. ¹ 8. S. 69-73.
2. Chelysheva I.V. Sotsial'nye seti v zhizni sovremennykh shkol'nikov // Mediaobrazovanie. 2014. ¹ 2. S. 121-26.
3. Shakhmartova O.N., Nedoshivina I.V. Issledovanie motivov ispol'zovaniya sotsial'nykh setey mladshimi shkol'nikami // Izvestiya Penzenskogo gosudarstvennogo pedagogicheskogo universiteta im. V.G. Belinskogo. 2012. Vyp. ¹ 28. S. 1348-1353.
4. Shubovich M.M., Yakutova Yu.A. Sotsial'naya aktivnost' starsheklassnikov v sfere sovremennykh informatsionnykh tekhnologiy kak rezul'tat formirovaniya internet-kul'tury // Vestnik Orlovskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Seriya «Novye gumanitarnye issledovaniya». 2012. ¹ 7. S. 238-241.
5. Yur'eva E.A. Vliyanie sotsial'nykh setey na sotsializatsiyu i sistemu tsennostnykh orientatsiy starshikh shkol'nikov // Vestnik Krasnoyarskogo gosudarstvennogo pedagogicheskogo universiteta im. V.P.Astaf'eva. 2012. ¹ 4 (22). S. 218-221.
6. Seryy A.V., Parshintseva A.S. K probleme formirovaniya zavisimosti ot sotsial'nykh setey u shkol'nikov podrostkovogo vozrasta. Problemy pedagogiki. 2016. ¹ 9 (20). S. 12-15.
7. Selin P. Mnogoobrazie sotsial'nykh setey. [Elektronnyy resurs]. Rezhim dostupa: http://posledneeslovo.ru/raznoobrazie-socialnyx-setej.
8. Saglay I.V. Obrazovatel'nye vozmozhnosti sotsial'noy seti «Vkontakte» pri obuchenii shkol'nikov starshey stupeni russkomu yazyku. Problemy pedagogiki. 2015 ¹ 2(3). S. 27-30.
9. Pronina N.A. Rol' sotsial'nykh setey v sisteme vospitaniya shkol'nikov // Novye tekhnologii. 2011. ¹ 1. S. 174-19.
10. Konovalova L.V. Sotsial'nye seti kak novyy faktor sotsializatsii rossiyskikh shkol'nikov // Upravlenie megapolisom. 2015. T. 1. ¹ 3. S. 60-65.
11. Kirka A.V. K voprosu o strukture sotsial'no-setevykh kommunikatsiy // Politika i Obshchestvo. 2015. ¹ 7. C. 863-872.
12. Batkaeva E.R. Fenomen virtualizatsii: sotsiologicheskiy aspekt // Izvestiya PGPU im. V.G. Belinskogo. 2012. ¹ 28. S. 35-37.
13. Voyskunskiy A.E. Aktual'nye problemy psikhologii zavisimosti ot interneta // Psikhologicheskiy zhurnal. 2001. T. 25. ¹ 1. S. 90-100.
14. Gurkina O.A., Mal'tseva D.V. Motivy ispol'zovaniya virtual'nykh sotsial'nykh setey podrostkami // Sotsiologicheskie issledovaniya. 2015. ¹ 5(373). S. 123-130.
15. Efimova G.Z., Zyuban E.V. Vliyanie sotsial'nykh setey na lichnost' // Mir nauki. 2016. ¹ 5. S. 20.