Ðóñ Eng Cn Translate this page:
Please select your language to translate the article


You can just close the window to don't translate
Library
Your profile

Back to contents

History magazine - researches
Reference:

Shpirko S.V., Barankova G.S. On Some Aspects of the Establishment of a Formal Genealogical Classification of Text Lists of Medieval Compositions Using the Theory of Fuzzy Sets (on the Material of “Zakon Sudnyi Liudem”)

Abstract: The article examines the issue of the genealogical classification preserved in the copies of Medieval texts. For its understanding the authors propose an approach based on the use of the theory of fuzzy sets. This approach utilizes the matrix of the fuzzy preference relation, which is founded on the pairwise comparison of the lists with each other. Each element of this matrix is the summation of its components, whose value is determined by the end set of different value factors (types of lection). These factors are considered in their total sum in the form of weight coefficients, which are determined through expert means. In order to eliminate the unavoidable subjectivity in evaluating them, the authors of this work developed an indirect method of expertise. The aim of the proposed method lies in that the given factors are compared pairwise in their value with each other. This way the initial complex problem is substituted by the entirety of more simple ones. Meanwhile the experts operate not with quantitative, but qualitative evaluations. The proposed new approach of expert evaluation allows in a formal way to assess the value of one or another discrepancy in the text. Thus the use of the proposed method plays a key role in the fuzzy classification of the list of Medieval compositions (establishing a genealogical stemming). The use of the examined method is illustrated on a specific example of discrepancy typology.


Keywords:

typologyafuzzy classification, fuzzy relation matrix, function of accessory, weight coefficients, stemmatology, typology, theory of fuzzy sets, indirect expert method, discrepancies, text analysis


This article is unavailable for unregistered users. Click to login or register

References
1. Saaty T.L. Measuring the fuzziness of sets// Journal of Cybernetics. V. 4. 1974. P.53-61.
2. Melikhov A.N., Bernshteyn L.S., Korovin S.Ya. Situatsionnye sovetuyushchie sistemy s nechetkoy logikoy. M., 1990. 272 s.
3. Gal'chenko M. G. O vremeni poyavleniya i kharaktere rasprostraneniya ryada grafiko-orfograficheskikh priznakov vtorogo yuzhnoslavyanskogo vliyaniya v drevnerusskikh rukopisyakh kontsa Kh²V — pervoy poloviny KhV vv. // Lingvisticheskoe istochnikovedenie i istoriya russkogo yazyka./ Sbornik statey. M., 2000. S. 123—152.
4. Belyakova E.V. Ob izdanii Pechatnoy Kormchey// Vestnik tserkovnoy istorii. ¹ 3(11). M., 2008. C. 99-115.
5. Borodkin L.I., Milov L.V. O nekotorykh aspektakh avtomatizatsii tekstologicheskogo issledovaniya (Zakon Sudnyy lyudem)// Matematicheskie metody v istoriko-ekonomicheskikh i istoriko-kul'turnykh issledovaniyakh: sbornik statey. M., 1977. S. 235-280.
6. Florinskiy T.D. Drevneyshiy pamyatnik bolgarskogo prava // Sbornik statey po istorii prava v chest' M. F. Vladimirskogo-Budanova. Kiev, 1904. C.1-28.
7. Pikhoya R.G. Permskaya kormchaya (O predystorii poyavleniya Chudovskoy kormchey 1499 g.)// Obshchestvennoe soznanie, knizhnost', literatura perioda feodalizma. Novosibirsk, 1990. S. 171-175.
8. GA Kostromskoy obl., f. 1486, op.3, d.4.
9. Maksimovich K.A. Zakon Sudnyy lyudem. Istochnikovedcheskie i lingvisticheskie aspekty issledovaniya slavyanskogo yuridicheskogo pamyatnika. M., 2004. 240 s.
10. Sverdlov M.B. Stanovlenie feodalizma v slavyanskikh stranakh. SPb., 1997. 324 s.
11. Shchapov Ya.N. Vizantiyskaya Ekloga zakonov v russkoy pis'mennoy traditsii. SPb., 2011. 240 S.
12. Vasica J. Zakon' sudnyi ljud'm'-Soudni zâkonik pro lid // Magnae Moraviae fontes historici. Brno, 1971. T. 4.P. 147-198.
13. Zakon Sudnyy lyudem kratkoy redaktsii// Tikhomirov M.N., Milov L.V. M.,1961. 177 s.
14. Likhachev D.S. Tekstologiya. M.-L., 1983. 640 s.
15. Zade L. Ponyatie lingvisticheskoy peremennoy i ego primenenie k prinyatiyu priblizhennykh resheniy. M., 1976. 165 s.
16. Shpirko S.V. Primenenie teorii nechetkikh mnozhestv k zadache genealogicheskoy klassifikatsii v tekstologicheskom issledovanii// Istoricheskaya informatika: Informatsionnye tekhnologii i matematicheskie metody v istoricheskikh issledovaniyakh. Barnaul, 2013. ¹ 3. S. 39-51.
17. Basaker R., Saati T. Konechnye grafy i seti. M., 1974. 368 s.
18. Alekseev A.A. Tekstologiya slavyanskoy biblii. Spb., 1999. 190 s.
19. Borodkin L.I., Morozova L.E. Opyt ispol'zovaniya matematicheskikh modeley i EVM v tekstologicheskikh issledovaniyakh// Kolichestvennye metody v gumanitarnykh naukakh. M., 1961. 206 s.
20. Mandel' I.D. Klasternyy analiz. M., 1988. 176 s.
21. Colwell E.C. and Tune E.W. The quantitative relationship between MS text-types// Biblical and patristic studies in memory of R.P.Casey/ Ed. by J.N.Birdsall and P.W.Thomson. Freiburg, 1963. P.25-32.