Ðóñ Eng Cn Translate this page:
Please select your language to translate the article


You can just close the window to don't translate
Library
Your profile

Back to contents

Law and Politics
Reference:

Klimanova O.V. On the validity of qualification of crimes in cases of accelerated prosecution

Abstract: During the hearing of a criminal case with accelerated prosecution there is a question of the bases of qualification of a crime, whether it may be proved not only by set of facts of the case and components of crime, but also agreement between the sides for the purpose of stimulation of the accused (suspect) to reach a compromise. This work examines this issue taking into account the legal nature of the considered institution, which seems somewhat ambiguous because of the unresolved issue of a possibility of its definition as a deal (agreement). The author uses general scientific and private methods of cognition, including methods of formal legal, legal comparative, systemic and structural analysis. As a result of the research the author acknowledges the necessity to define and formalize this institution as a “deal”, because of existence of signs of a deal (agreement), which characterize this concept in private law, and also due to coinciding criminal procedure experience of foreign countries. Proceeding from it, and also in view of the purposes of this institution – acceleration of consideration of criminal case and (or) assistance to justice – in making decision on application of some type of special process, it is necessary to allow for the possibility of qualification of the crime on the basis of the reached agreement. However in this case it is necessary to attach special significance to the legality of making of all legally valid decisions on application of this procedure and ensuring the right for protection for the accused (suspect).


Keywords:

confession, validity of charge, principle of expediency, principle of legality, qualification of crimes, expedited investigation, plea deal, accelerated prosecution, proving, plea bargain


This article can be downloaded freely in PDF format for reading. Download article

This article written in Russian. You can find original text of the article here .
References
1. Bykov V.M., Bykov A.M. Storona zashchity pri zaklyuchenii s prokurorom dosudebnogo soglasheniya o sotrudnichestve // Rossiyskaya yustitsiya. 2010. ¹ 9. S. 18 – 22.
2. Lazareva V.A. Legalizatsiya sdelok o priznanii viny // Rossiyskaya yustitsiya. 1999. ¹ 5. S. 41-44.
3. Rarog A.I. Nastol'naya kniga sud'i po kvalifikatsii prestupleniy: prakticheskoe posobie– M.: Prospekt, 2006. – 224 s.
4. Kruglikov A.P. Dopolnenie UPK RF novoy glavoy o doznanii v sokrashchennoy forme i nekotorye problemy differentsiatsii ugolovnogo sudoproizvodstva // Rossiyskaya yustitsiya. 2013. ¹ 7. S. 45-50.
5. Panokin A.M. Doznanie v sokrashchennoy forme // Aktual'nye problemy rossiyskogo prava. 2014. ¹ 5. S. 914-918.
6. Aleksandrov A.S., Kuchin A.F., Smolin A.G. Pravovaya priroda instituta, reglamentirovannogo glavoy 40 UPK RF // Rossiyskiy sud'ya. 2007. ¹ 7. S. 16-18.
7. Lazareva V.A., Kuvaldina Yu.V. Problemy pravovogo regulirovaniya i primeneniya instituta dosudebnogo soglasheniya o sotrudnichestve // Biblioteka kriminalista: Nauchnyy zhurnal. Vyp. 3 (4). 2012. S. 221-231.
8. Apostolova N.N. Tselesoobraznost' (diskretsionnost') v rossiyskom ugolovnom sudoproizvodstve. Avtoref. dis. ... d-ra yurid. nauk. M., 2010. 62 s.
9. Kuznetsova N.F. Problemy kvalifikatsii prestupleniy: Lektsii po spetskursu «Osnovy kvalifikatsii prestupleniy» – M.: Izdatel'skiy Dom «Gorodets». 2007. – 336 s.
10. Tolkachenko A.A. Osobyy poryadok sudoproizvodstva-mezhdistsiplinarnyy institut // Rossiyskaya yustitsiya. 2011. ¹ 8. S. 36-39.
11. Petrukhin G.I. Rol' priznaniya obvinyaemogo v ugolovnom protsesse // Rossiyskaya yustitsiya. 2003. ¹ 2. S. 24-26.
12. Turner Jenia L. Prosecutors and Bargaining in Weak Cases: A Comparative View. // Erik Luna, Marianne Wade The prosecutor in transnational perspective. New York: Oxford University Press, 2012. S. 102-115.
13. Bakhnovskiy A. V. Sdelka s pravosudiem: osobennosti anglosaksonskoy i kontinental'noy pravovoy traditsii. Avtoref. dis. ... kand. yurid. nauk. Krasnodar, 2008. 19 c.
14. Golovko L.V. Al'ternativy ugolovnomu presledovaniyu kak forma protsessual'noy differentsiatsii (sovremennye tendentsii razvitiya). Avtoref. dis. ... d-ra yurid. nauk. M., 2003. 54 c.
15. Dervan Lucian E. Bargained Justice: Plea Bargaining's Innocence Problem and the Brady Safety-Valve // Utah Law Review Forthcoming. 2012. P. 51-97.
16. Turner Jenia L. Plea Bargaining across borders: criminal procedure. – Wolters Kluwer Law & Business; New York : Aspen Publishers, 2009. – 294 s.
17. Piyuk A.V. Tipologiya sovremennogo ugolovnogo protsessa i problemy primeneniya uproshchennykh form razresheniya ugolovnykh del v sudoproizvodstve Rossiyskoy Federatsii: monografiya – M.: Yurlitinform, 2013. – 264 c.
18. Muratova N.G., Chelyshev M.Yu. O mezhotraslevoy teorii protsessual'nykh soglasheniy: voprosy grazhdanskogo prava, tsivilisticheskogo i ugolovnogo protsessa // Vestnik grazhdanskogo protsessa. 2012. ¹ 4. S. 10-27
19. Eliseev N.G. Protsessual'nyy dogovor – M.: Statut, 2015. – 368 s.
20. Sudebnaya statistika. Ofitsial'nyy sayt Sudebnogo Departamenta pri Verkhovnom Sude Rossiyskoy Federatsii // URL: http://www.cdep.ru/index.php?id=79 (data obrashcheniya: 08.04.2016).
21. Klenova T.V. O sovmestimosti publichnogo i chastnogo interesov v ugolovnom prave // Ugolovnoe pravo. 2006. ¹ 2. S. 41 – 45.
22. Ugolovno-protsessual'nyy kodeks Rossiyskoy Federatsii ot 18.12.2001 ¹ 174-FZ // Parlamentskaya gazeta, ¹ 241-242, 22.12.2001, Rossiyskaya gazeta, ¹ 249, 22.12.2001, Sobranie zakonodatel'stva Rossiyskoy Federatsii, 24.12.2001, ¹ 52 (ch. I), st. 4921.