Ðóñ Eng Cn Translate this page:
Please select your language to translate the article


You can just close the window to don't translate
Library
Your profile

Back to contents

Politics and Society
Reference:

Starkin S.V., Pripisnova E.S. The work of the European think tanks: problems of identification

Abstract: The subject of this research is the analysis of the work of the European “brains trust” necessary for the preliminary assessment of the relevance of the expert-analytical activity in the European political space, as well as an aptitude for generating ideas and provision of the required information on the pertinent issues of the European Union. The article examines the EU political system, as well as formal and informal political processes, within the framework of which the political entrepreneurs attempt to influence the EU policy. In addition to that, the authors conduct identification of the types and levels of the think tanks activity of the European Union, specificities of their work in particular “areas of effect”.  Considering the set tasks, this work uses the traditional for humanitarian disciplines methods of comparative analysis, case studies, theory of political decision-making, etc. The conducted analysis allowed acquiring an idea about the trends of development and work of the think tanks oriented at the European Union. Taking into account the high level of competition within the political environment of the European Union, we can suggest that in the midterm perspective only the large, well-structured, and finances think tanks will be able to continue their existence. One of the most noticeable trends of modernity consists in the expansion of research dedicated to the European Union in the programs of the national think tanks, which reflects the growing influence of the EU policy.


Keywords:

decision-making process, political planning, European Union, political technologies, political process, political expertise, analytical institutes, political forecast, political analysis, political elite


This article can be downloaded freely in PDF format for reading. Download article

This article written in Russian. You can find original text of the article here .
References
1. Sherrington P. Shaping the Policy Agenda: Think Tank Activity in the European Union // Global Society. 2000. ¹ 14:2. R. 173-189.
2. Makarychev A.S. Sistema vneshnepoliticheskogo planirovaniya i analiza: opyt SShA 70-90-Kh godov // Mirovaya ekonomika i mezhdunarodnye otnosheniya. 1994. ¹ 12
3. Starkin S.V. Analiticheskie instituty razvedyvatel'nogo soobshchestva SShA vo vneshnepoliticheskom protsesse. Monografiya. Nizhniy Novgorod, 2011.
4. Stone D., Garnett M. Think Tanks, Policy Advice and Governance / Think Tanks Across Nations. A Comparative Approach. Stone D., Denham A. Garnett M. (eds.). Manchester: Manchester University Press, 1998. R. 1-20.
5. Wallace W. Ideas and Influence / Think Tanks Across Nations. A Comparative Approach. Stone D., Denham A. Garnett M. (eds.). Manchester: Manchester University Press, 1998. R. 226.
6. Denham A., Garnett M. British Think-Tanks and the Climate of Opinion. London: UCL Press, 1998. R. 16-17.
7. Peters G. Agenda-setting in the European Community // Journal of European Public Policy. 1994. Vol. 1. ¹ 1. R. 9-26.
8. Mazey S., Richardson J. The Command of the Lobby / The European Commission. Edwards G., Spence D. (eds.). London: Cartermill, 1995. R. 169-201.
9. Matlary J. H. The Role of the Commission: A Theoretical Discussion / At the Heart of the Union: Studies of the European Commission. Nugent N. (ed.). London: Macmillan, 1997. R. 273.
10. Laffan B. From Policy Entrepreneur to Policy Manager. The Challenge facing the European Commission // Journal of European Public Policy. 1997. Vol. 4. ¹ 3. R. 422-438.
11. Mazey S., Richardson J. Transference of Power, Decision Rules and Rules of the Game / Mazey S., Richardson J. Lobbying in the European Community. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1993. R. 10.
12. Commission of the European Communities, An Open and Structured Dialogue between the Commission and Special Interest Groups. Brussels, SEC(92), 2272. 2 December 1992.
13. Poskrebysheva E.S., Starkin S.V. Vneshnepoliticheskaya strategiya «Soyuza pravykh sil» i prognozy Natsional'nogo razvedyvatel'nogo soveta SShA: sravnitel'nyy analiz // Istoricheskie, filosofskie, politicheskie i yuridicheskie nauki, kul'turologiya i iskusstvovedenie. Voprosy teorii i praktiki. 2011. ¹ 2-3. S. 144-148.
14. Poskrebysheva E.S., Starkin S.V. Amerikanskiy opyt formirovaniya pravoliberal'nykh vneshnepoliticheskikh strategiy // Vestnik Orlovskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Seriya: Novye gumanitarnye issledovaniya. 2011. ¹ 1 (15). S. 70-73.
15. Starkin S.V., Poskrebysheva E.S. Paradigma «glubinnoy ekologii» A.Neysa v kontekste razvitiya ekopolitologii // Istoricheskie, filosofskie, politicheskie i yuridicheskie nauki, kul'turologiya i iskusstvovedenie. Voprosy teorii i praktiki. 2013. ¹ 4-1 (30). S. 164-168.
16. N. A. Tsivadze Pravovye voprosy sotrudnichestva Rossii i Evropeyskogo Soyuza v oblasti nauchnykh issledovaniy // Mezhdunarodnoe pravo i mezhdunarodnye organizatsii / International Law and International Organizations. - 2011. - 3. - C. 40 - 50.
17. Yatsenko I.A. Problemy nauchnogo obespecheniya gosudarstvennogo upravleniya i protsessa podderzhki prinyatiya upravlencheskikh resheniy // Pravo i politika. - 2014. - 8. - C. 1133 - 1138. DOI: 10.7256/1811-9018.2014.8.8095.