Ðóñ Eng Cn Translate this page:
Please select your language to translate the article


You can just close the window to don't translate
Library
Your profile

Back to contents

Philology: scientific researches
Reference:

Rol'gayzer A.A. Features of the Language-Specific Categorization of Celestial Bodies Concepts

Abstract: In this article Rolgayzer describes the main means of the language-related categorization of celestial bodies in the Russian and French languages. The researcher also defines the most efficient lexico-grammatical means that express categories of evaluation, time, amount and dimension. The phenomenon of categorization covers all spheres and aspects of human existence. The subject of the research is the language-related objectivation of category features as one of the ways  to order and describe the conceptual picture of the world. The object of the research is celestial bodies concepts verbalized in the form of Sun, Moon and Stars. In the course of the research the author has used the method of the conceptual analysis to define and describe category features constituting the structure of the viewed concepts as well as the method of the contextual analysis. The scientific novelty of the research is caused by the fact that the author defines category features of celestial bodies concepts in terms of Russian and French linguocultures. The main conclusion of the research is that categorization is one of the basic terms of the humanity and the main means of the systematizatino of objects and phenomena in the surrounding world. 


Keywords:

linguoculture, conceptual analysis, objectivization, celestial bodies, cognitive system, characteristic, concept, categorization, category, worldview


This article can be downloaded freely in PDF format for reading. Download article

This article written in Russian. You can find original text of the article here .
References
1. Kratkiy slovar' kognitivnykh terminov / pod obshch. red. E.S. Kubryakovoy. M., 1997. 245 s.
2. Boyarskaya E.L. Kategorizatsiya kak bazovaya kognitivnaya protsedura // Vestnik BFU im. I. Kanta. 2011. ¹2. S 18-28.
3. Emel'yanova L.Yu. K voprosu o kategorizatsii znaniy v yazyke // Uchenye zapiski RGSU. 2013. ¹3 (116). S. 133-141.
4. Ma T.Yu. Klassicheskie, prototipicheskie i aktsidentnye kategorii // Vestnik NNGU. 2010. ¹5-1. S. 373-377.
5. Magirovskaya O.V. Osobennosti kontseptualizatsii i kategorizatsii mira v ramkakh kognitivnoy deyatel'nosti nablyudatelya // Vestnik ChelGU. 2008. ¹21. S. 105-114.
6. Bochkarev A.E. K probleme kategorizatsii v teorii prototipov: pro et contra // Vestnik NNGU. 2015. ¹1. S. 249-254.
7. Pimenova M.V., Balashova N.P. Somaticheskie metafory luny v sovremennykh poeticheskikh proizvedeniyakh // Gumanitarnyy vektor. Seriya: Filologiya, vostokovedenie. 2015. ¹ 4 (44). S. 32-38.
8. Sidorova N.P. Sopostavitel'nyy analiz struktur i sposobov aktualizatsii russkogo i angliyskogo kontseptov luna i moon: avtoref. dis. ... kand. filol. nauk. Kemerovo, 2010. 22 s.
9. Rol'gayzer A.A. Kontseptual'nye issledovaniya prirodnogo mira (na primere kontseptov ‘zvezda' i ‘étoile') // Vestnik Kemerovskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. 2013. ¹ 4-1 (56). S. 169-174.
10. Pimenova M.V., Kondrat'eva O.N. Vvedenie v kontseptual'nye issledovaniya. M.: Flinta, 2011. 176 s.
11. Karasik V.I. Yazykovoy krug: lichnost', kontsepty, diskurs. Volgograd: Peremena, 2002. 477 s.
12. Arutyunova N.D. Yazyk i mir cheloveka. 2-e izd., ispr. M.: «Yazyki russkoy kul'tury», 1999. 896 s.
13. Tolstoy N.I. Vremeni magicheskiy krug (po predstavleniyam slavyan) // Logicheskiy analiz yazyka. Yazyk i vremya; Otv. red. N.D. Arutyunova, T.E. Yanko. M.: «Indrik», 1997. S. 17–27.
14. Rol'gayzer A.A. Ob'ektivatsiya arkhetipicheskikh mental'nykh obrazovaniy v russkom i frantsuzskom yazykakh (na primere slov «zvezda» i «étoile»): avtoref. dis.... kand. filol. nauk. Volgograd, 2015. 20 s.