Ðóñ Eng Cn Translate this page:
Please select your language to translate the article


You can just close the window to don't translate
Library
Your profile

Back to contents

International relations
Reference:

Kolyadin A.M. Modern political elite: features and trends

Abstract: The author studies the modern peculiarities of political elite, conditioned by the global policy circumstances and the national political process. This scientific interest is caused by, firstly, the strengthened contradictions between the fundamental provisions of conventional study of elites and the current political practice, in which the new specific features of “elite” and “political class” emerge, and secondly, the nature of the so-called “transition” or “hybrid” regimes, in which elite configurations significantly differ from theoretical patterns, which hasn’t been understood sufficiently enough. The research methodology is based on the works of G. Mosca, V. Pareto, R. Michels, J. Ortega y Gasset, E. Schattschneider, C. W. Mills and the key modern thinkers as R. Putnam, T. Dye and others. The author detects the features, characterizing the specificity of the modern political establishment of Russia; special attention is paid to the recruiting mechanisms and instruments, supporting the sustainable reproduction of elite. The author considers the influence of the topical trends of information and media space on the nature of relations of power and the formation of elite community, both in the national and international dimension. 


Keywords:

agenda, executive authority, society, power, media, globalization, political process, elite, communication, Russia


This article can be downloaded freely in PDF format for reading. Download article

This article written in Russian. You can find original text of the article here .
References
1. Bogatyrev S.V. Genezis i stanovlenie novoi politicheskoi elity Rossiiskoi Federatsii (2000-2012) // Politika i Obshchestvo. 2015. ¹ 1. C. 116 - 123. DOI: 10.7256/1812-8696.2015.1.10867.
2. Telin K.O., Polosin A.V. Mediarynki: krizis vmesto sistemy // Trendy i upravlenie. 2016. ¹ 1. C. 85 - 89. DOI: 10.7256/2307-9118.2016.1.17723.
3. Sharma C.K. Emerging Dimensions of Decentralisation Debate in the Age of Globalisation-Indian Journal of Federal Studies 19 (1), 2009, pp.47-65.
4. Merkel W. Is There a Crisis of Democracy? // APSA Working Paper, 2013 http://www.democracybarometer.org/Papers/Merkel_2013_APSA.pdf.
5. Bonnett A. Unruly Places: Lost Spaces, Secret Cities, and Other Inscrutable Geographies-Houghton Mifflin Harcourt, 2014. P. 44.
6. Telin K.O. Demokratiya i identichnost': korrelyatsiya v usloviyakh neopredelennosti // Mir i politika. 2013. S. 54. http://mir-politika.ru/3380-demokratiya-i-identichnost-korrelyaciya-v-usloviyah-neopredelennosti.html
7. Pokrovskii N.E. Diskussionnye problemy sotsiologicheskogo kongressa / N.E. Pokrovskii // Sotsiologicheskie issledovaniya. 2003. ¹ 2. S. 76 - http://www.isras.ru/files/File/Socis/2003-02/Pokrovski.pdf.
8. Bek U. Obshchestvo riska. Na puti k drugomu modernu / U. Bek. M.: Progress-Traditsiya, 2000. S. 281-288.
9. Motorin D.I. Kniga elit: posobie po konstruirovaniyu budushchego. SINEL, 2014. S. 29.
10. Barinova D.S. Metodologicheskie aspekty issledovaniya virtual'nogo prostranstva Interneta. M.: Tsentr perspektivnykh metodologii sotsial'no-gumanitarnykh issledovanii, 2010. S. 115-116.