Ðóñ Eng Cn Translate this page:
Please select your language to translate the article


You can just close the window to don't translate
Library
Your profile

Back to contents

Administrative and municipal law
Reference:

Voronin S.A. Supervisory function of the Prosecution Service (theoretical aspect)

Abstract: The research subject is the supervisory function of the Russian Prosecution Service. The research object is the Prosecution Service of the Russian Federation. The author considers such aspects as the role and the function of prosecution agencies which help to implement the tasks and to achieve the objectives of the general prosecution agency. The author applies the method of historical and legal analysis to prove that the functions of the Prosecution Service have been forming gradually, together with the social relations formation. In terms of the fact that the Prosecution Service is, according to the law, a system of agencies, the effectiveness of its supervisory activities should also have a system character, i.e. it should be ensured by the productive structural and functional linkages of all elements of the prosecutor’s supervision system. The research methodology is based on the analysis of the current legislation in the sphere of prosecutor’s supervision via use of the retrospective historical and legal and doctrinal analysis. The author substantiates the modern understanding of the function of prosecutor’s supervision, reveals the development trends of the supervisory function of the Russian and the Soviet Prosecution Service, and concludes about the historical grounds of impracticality of its reduction. The novelty of the research consists in the introduction and explanation of the term “prosecutor’s supervision mechanism”; the author reveals the disputable and contradictory character of some provisions contained in the related literature. Special attention is paid to the issues of supervisory activity priorities. This problem is studied using the example of struggle against terrorism and supervision over the so-called resonant cases. The author advises eliminating such a definition from the law enforcement practice. The author concludes about the fragmentarity of particular elements of prosecutor’s supervision mechanism studying, about the topical and even opportunistic understanding of supervision, the stop-and-go style, especially in the new decrees of the Prosecutor General actualizing particular spheres and objects of supervision. 


Keywords:

prosecution service, supervisory, function, object, supervision, mechanism, law, state functions


This article can be downloaded freely in PDF format for reading. Download article

This article written in Russian. You can find original text of the article here .
References
1. Federal'nyy zakon ot 17.01.1992 N 2202-1 (red. ot 28.11.2015) «O prokurature Rossiyskoy Federatsii»// Sobranie zakonodatel'stva RF. 1995. ¹ 47. St. 4472; 2015. ¹ 48 (chast' I). St. 6720.
2. Prikaz General'nogo prokurora ot 19.11.2009 g. ¹ 362 «Ob organizatsii prokurorskogo nadzora za ispolneniem zakonodatel'stva o protivodeystvii ekstremistskoy deyatel'nosti» // General'naya prokuratur RF Ofitsial'nyy sayt: www.genproc.gov.ru
3. Prikaz General'nogo prokurora RF ot 7 dekabrya 2007 g. ¹ 195 «Ob organizatsii prokurorskogo nadzora za ispolneniem zakonov, soblyudeniem prav i svobod cheloveka i grazhdanina»// Ofitsial'nyy sayt General'noy prokuratury RF.
4. Zakonoproekt «O vnesenii izmeneniy i dopolneniy v Federal'nyy zakon «O prokurature Rossiyskoy Federatsii» (avtory – Pokhmelkin V.V. i dr.)// Ofitsial'nyy sayt gosudarstvennoy Dumy.
5. Polozhenie ob upravlenii po nadzoru za ispolneniem zakonov o federal'noy bezopasnosti, mezhnatsional'nykh otnosheniyakh i protivodeystvii ekstremizmu, utv. General'nym prokurorom RF 05.12.2007 g. // Ofitsial'nyy sayt General'noy prokuratury RF: www.genproc.gov.ru
6. Doklad General'nogo prokurora na zasedanii Soveta Federatsii Federal'nogo Sobraniya RF ot 24.04.2011 g. «O sostoyanii zakonnosti i pravoporyadka v 2010 g. i o prodelannoy rabote po ikh ukrepleniyu»// Ofitsial'nyy sayt General'noy prokuratury RF: www.genproc.gov.ru
7. Bessarabov V.G. Prokurorskiy nadzor: ucheb. M.: TK Velbi, Izd-vo Prospekt. 2006. 536 s.
8. Vystuplenie Rukovoditelya Administratsii Prezidenta Rossii S. Ivanova na torzhestvennom zasedanii, posvyashchennom 292-y godovshchine rossiyskoy prokuratury 10 yanvarya 2014 g.// Prezident Rossii. Ofitsial'nyy sayt http://www.kremlin.ru/events/administration/20045
9. Grigor'ev V.N. Prokurorskiy nadzor: ucheb./ V.N.Grigor'ev, A.V. Pobedkin, V.N. Yashin, V.N. Kalinin M.: Eksmo. 2006. 544 s.
10. Istoriya sovetskoy prokuratury v vazhneyshikh dokumentakh/ Pod red. K. A. Mokicheva. M., 1952. 388 s.
11. Kazantsev S. M. Prokuratura Rossiyskoy imperii: istoriko-pravovoe issledovanie: diss… d-ra yurid. nauk. 12.00.01. SPb., 2003. 455 c.
12. Koshlevskiy V. D. Mesto i rol' prokuratury v mekhanizme rossiyskogo gosudarstva: avtoref. diss... kand. yurid. nauk: 12.00.01. Saratov, 2008. 22 s
13. Kulenko O.I. Funktsii rossiyskoy prokuratury i ikh konstitutsionnaya priroda// Vestnik Chelyabinskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. 2008. ¹8. S. 50-56.
14. Lenin V.I. O «dvoynom» podchinenii i zakonnosti// Poln. sobr. soch. 5-e izd. T. 45. S. 197-201.
15. Mel'nikov N.V. Prokurorskiy nadzor – samostoyatel'naya forma osushchestvleniya prokurorskoy vlasti v Rossii// Gosudarstvo i pravo. 2003. ¹ 5. S. 34-41.
16. Morozova L.A. Teoriya gosudarstva i prava. Izd. 3-e pererab. i dop. M.: Eksmo. 2010. 384 s.
17. Murashin G.A. Organy prokuratury v mekhanizme sovetskogo gosudarstva. Kiev, 1972. 178 c.
18. Sinel'shchikov Yu.P. Nastol'naya kniga prokurora. M., Ekslit, 2002. 850 s.
19. Sovetskaya prokuratura. Istoriya i sovremennost'. M., 1977. 244 s.
20. Triks A.V. Spravochnik prokurora SPb: Piter. 2007. 160 s.
21. Shobukhin V.Yu. Status rossiyskoy prokuratury. SPb: OOO «Universitetskiy izdatel'skiy konsortsium «Yuridicheskaya kniga». 2009. 244 c.
22. Shobukhin V.Yu. Nadzor za ispolneniem zakonov kak odnogo iz osnovnykh napravleniy deyatel'nosti prokuratury // Pravovedenie. 2007. ¹ 6. S. 24-33.