Ðóñ Eng Cn Translate this page:
Please select your language to translate the article


You can just close the window to don't translate
Library
Your profile

Back to contents

Law and Politics
Reference:

Borozenets N.N. The essence, means, and limits of the prosecutor’s work in criminal proceedings

Abstract: The subject of this research is the work of prosecutors, particularly in ensuring rights and legal interests of sides of criminal proceedings during the pre-trial stages. Problems in this field of prosecutorial work consist in the theoretic uncertainty and practical difficulties of realizing the authority that is aimed at protecting, defending, and in if necessary, restoring the violated rights of the sides of criminal proceedings. At the same time, the key characteristics of prosecutorial work (essence, means, and limits) remain debatable. The author makes a conclusion on the fulfilment of the legal enforcement by several empowered subjects of the criminal procedural relations. At the same time, law enforcement in prosecutorial work differs in a unique combination of traits and attributes. Law enforcement by a prosecutor represents practical realization of initiative, independent actions in determining violations of rights of the parties in criminal proceedings and application of authority in their resolution (means of law enforcement).


Keywords:

defense, protection, rights, participants, law enforcement, prosecutor, criminal proceedings, restoration, compensation


This article can be downloaded freely in PDF format for reading. Download article

This article written in Russian. You can find original text of the article here .
References
1. Kapinus N.I. Protsessual'nye garantii prav lichnosti pri prime-nenii mer presecheniya v ugolovnom protsesse: dis. ... d-ra yurid. nauk. – M., 2001
2. Bagautdinov F.N. Obespechenie publichnykh i lichnykh interesov pri rassledovanii prestupleniy. – M. – 2004. – S. 60–62.
3. Gladysheva O.V. Teoreticheskie osnovy obespecheniya zakonnykh inte-resov lichnosti v ugolovnom sudoproizvodstve. – M., 2012. – S. 34.
4. Nekenova S.B. Printsip obespecheniya prava litsa na razumnyy srok ugolovnogo sudoproizvodstva: avtoref. dis. … kand. yurid. nauk. – Volgo-grad, 2015. – S. 12, 14.
5. Sheyfer M.M. Yavlyaetsya li zashchitnik polnopravnym sub'ektom doka-zyvaniya v ugolovnom protsesse? // Materialy Mezhdunar. nauch. konf. SPb., 2010. http://www.iuaj.net/taxonomy/term/38.
6. Federal'nyy zakon ot 17 yanvarya 1992 g. ¹ 2202-1 (red. ot 22 dekabrya 2014 g., s izm. ot 17 fevralya 2015 g.) «O prokurature Rossiyskoy Federatsii»// Vedomosti SND RF i VS RF. 1992.¹ 8.St. 366
7. Bessarabov V.G., Kashaev K.A. Zashchita rossiyskoy prokuraturoy prav i svobod cheloveka i grazhdanina. – M.: Gorodets, 2007. – S. 10.
8. Postanovlenie Konstitutsionnogo suda RF ot 29 iyunya 2004 g. ¹ 13-P«O proverke konstitutsionnosti otdel'nykh polozheniy statey 7, 15, 107, 234 i 450 Ugolovno-protsessual'nogo kodeksa Rossiyskoy Federatsii v svyazi s zaprosom gruppy deputatov Gosudarstvennoy Dumy» // SPS «Konsul'tan-tPlyus».
9. Kurochkina L.A. Problema obespecheniya prokurorom prav uchastnikov sudebnogo razbiratel'stva: dis…. kand. yurid. nauk. – M., 2003. – S. 11.
10. Samoylova T.N.Pravozashchitnaya funktsiya prokurora v ugolovnom su-doproizvodstve // Vestnik Udmurtskogo universiteta. – 2008. Vyp. 2. – S. 56