|
Library
|
Your profile |
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.|
Administrative and municipal law
Reference:
Khurtin D.O.
Special reasons for exemption of administrative liability for the violation of intellectual property rights
// Administrative and municipal law.
2015. ¹ 9.
P. 925-928.
URL: https://en.nbpublish.com/library_read_article.php?id=66882
Khurtin D.O. Special reasons for exemption of administrative liability for the violation of intellectual property rightsAbstract: Administrative liability for intellectual property rights violation is established in the articles 7.12 and 14.10 of the Code of Administrative Offences of the Russian Federation; it is one of the ways to protect intellectual property rights. The subject of the article is the possibility of exemption of administrative liability for such offences, and the study of the problem of the need for introduction of additional reasons for condonation in such cases. The author uses the methods of analysis, analogy, modeling; the research is also based on the study of legal regulations and law-enforcement practice. The author concludes that it is necessary to amend the articles 7.12 and 14.10 of the Code of Administrative Offences of the Russian Federation with special reasons for exemption of administrative liability for the violation of intellectual property rights in case of indemnification and reconciliation with an aggrieved party. Keywords: administrative legislation, administrative liability, exemption of liability, reconciliation with aggrieved party, intellectual property right, patent rights, administrative offence, special reasons, property damage
This article can be downloaded freely in PDF format for reading. Download article
This article written in Russian. You can find original text of the article here . References
1. O. V. Markova Perspektivy pravovoy zashchity intellektual'noy sobstvennosti i sposoby ukrepleniya ustoychivogo elementa sistemy pravovoy zashchity intellektual'noy sobstvennosti // Politika i Obshchestvo.-2012.-6.-C. 101-106.
2. Stulov S.A. Pravovoy rezhim okhrany i zashchity avtorskikh prav na programmnoe obespechenie dlya EVM // Informatsionnoe pravo. 2010. ¹ 3. S. 20-23. 3. Voynikanis E.A. Pravo intellektual'noy sobstvennosti v tsifrovuyu epokhu: paradigma balansa i gibkosti. M.: Yurisprudentsiya. 2013. 552 s. 4. Reshenie Sovetskogo rayonnogo suda g. Orel po delu ¹ 5-136/2013 ot 25.06.2013 g. 5. Reshenie Vyaznikovskogo gorodskogo suda Vladimirskoy oblasti po delu ¹5-37-2011 ot 08.07.2011 g. 6. Ugolovnyy kodeks Rossiyskoy Federatsii ot 13.06.1996 ¹ 63-FZ (red. ot 08.06.2015) // SZ RF. 1996. ¹ 25. St. 2954. 7. Grazhdanskiy kodeks Rossiyskoy Federatsii (chast' chetvertaya) ot 18.12.2006 ¹ 230-FZ (red. ot 31.12.2014) // SZ RF. 2006. ¹ 52 (1 ch.). St. 5496. 8. Dolgikh I.P. Byt' ili ne byt' institutu osvobozhdeniya ot administrativnoy otvetstvennosti v Rossiyskoy Federatsii? // Yuridicheskie issledovaniya. — 2015.-¹ 1.-S.1-15. DOI: 10.7256/2409-7136.2015.1.13775. 9. Zhdanov N.M., Zhdanova A.N. Osvobozhdenie ot administrativnoy otvetstvennosti // Administrativnoe pravo i protsess. 2012. ¹ 4. S. 61-65. 10. Federal'nyy zakon ot 08.06.2015 ¹ 140-FZ "O dobrovol'nom deklarirovanii fizicheskimi litsami aktivov i schetov (vkladov) v bankakh i o vnesenii izmeneniy v otdel'nye zakonodatel'nye akty Rossiyskoy Federatsii" 11. Channov S.E. Osnovaniya dlya osvobozhdeniya ot administrativnoy otvetstvennosti // Grazhdanin i pravo. 2011. ¹ 4. S. 3-14. 12. Kodeks Rossiyskoy Federatsii ob administrativnykh pravonarusheniyakh ot 30.12.2001 ¹ 195-FZ (red. ot 29.06.2015) // SZ RF. 2002. ¹ 1 (ch.1). St. 1. 13. Orlov I.V. Nevmenyaemost' kak osvobozhdenie ot administrativnoy otvetstvennosti // Yurist. 2003. ¹ 1.S. 23-26. |
© 1998 – 2024 Nota Bene. Publishing Technologies. NB-Media Ltd.
Eng
