Ðóñ Eng Cn Translate this page:
Please select your language to translate the article


You can just close the window to don't translate
Library
Your profile

Back to contents

Law and Politics
Reference:

Manoylo A.V. Hybrid wars and color revolutions in global politics

Abstract: This article is dedicated to determination of the role of hybrid wars and color revolutions in modern politics. The hybrid wars are being viewed as a new form of armed conflict, in which the use of domestic armed forces is no longer a necessary condition in order to achieve victory over the adversary: “brute force” in a hybrid war is implemented along with non-military methods of affecting the enemy – information-psychological warfare, technologies of soft and smart force, methods of economic pressure, isolation or blockade, and instruments of traditional diplomacy. The color revolutions are examined in the article as technologies of organizing government overthrows using acts of mass civil disobedience, transforming into a managed civil apprising. The author determines that color revolutions cannot be elements of hybrid wars, as they are different and incompatible with each other forms of pressure upon the opponent. But it is in namely the color revolution that by dismantling political regimes, create the environment for initiation of external aggression, which then takes on a shape of a hybrid war.


Keywords:

politics, society, USA, state, hybrid wars, color revolutions, democracy, interests, values, security


This article can be downloaded freely in PDF format for reading. Download article

This article written in Russian. You can find original text of the article here .
References
1. Bartosh A. Gibridnye voyny vo vneshney politike SShA i NATO. // Nezavisimoe voennoe obozrenie. 2010, 10 okt. URL: http://nvo.ng.ru/concepts/2014-10-10/1_nato.html (data obrashcheniya 12.05.2015)
2. Makkeyn prorochit «arabskiy stsenariy» Rossii, Kitayu i Izrailyu. // MKRU. http://www.mk.ru/politics/news/2011/08/24/617060-makkeyn-prorochit-quotarabskiy-stsenariyquot-rossii-kitayu-i-izrailyu.html (data obrashcheniya 12.05.2015)
3. Codagnone S., Filippov V. Equity, exit end national identity in a multinational federation: the “multi-cultural constitutional patriotism” project in Russia // Journal of ethnic and migration studies. 2000. V. 26. ¹ 2.. P. 263-288.
4. O.G. Karpovich Osobennosti pozitsiy rossiyskikh
5. i amerikanskikh ekspertov po voprosam
6. demokratizatsii Blizhnego Vostoka // Politika i Obshchestvo. - 2013. - 5. - C. 563 - 567. DOI: 10.7256/1812-8696.2013.05.4.
7. Karpovich O.G. Tsvetnye revolyutsii kak instrument sistemnoy destabilizatsii politicheskikh rezhimov: ugrozy i vyzovy dlya Rossii // Natsional'naya bezopasnost' / nota bene. - 2015. - 1. - C. 73 - 87. DOI: 10.7256/2073-8560.2015.1.14142.
8. Kurilkin A.V. Evolyutsionnoe razvitie psikhologicheskoy bor'by: ot propagandy k psikhologicheskim operatsiyam // Mezhdunarodnye otnosheniya. - 2014. - 3. - C. 472 - 474. DOI: 10.7256/2305-560X.2014.3.11855.
9. Petrenko A.I. Teoreticheskie osnovy organizatsii protivodeystviya ispol'zovaniyu arsenala sil, sredstv i metodov informatsionno-psikhologicheskoy voyny v politicheskikh tselyakh // Trendy i upravlenie. - 2014. - 2. - C. 154 - 167. DOI: 10.7256/2307-9118.2014.2.12412.
10. Vinogradova E.A. Informatsionnye voyny v Latinskoy Amerike // Trendy i upravlenie. - 2014. - 4. - C. 372 - 384. DOI: 10.7256/2307-9118.2014.4.13080.