Ðóñ Eng Cn Translate this page:
Please select your language to translate the article


You can just close the window to don't translate
Library
Your profile

Back to contents

Politics and Society
Reference:

Yamalova E.N. Political Representation and the Issues of Feedback in the new Democracies: the Experience of Post-Soviet Lithuania

Abstract: The object of the research is the process of implementation by the political parties of their major functions under the conditions of the new democracies. Particular emphasis is made on the analysis of the functions of representation, selection, delegation and control. Cooperation between the electorate, political parties, lawmakers and the government is examined through the analytical framework of the principal-agent relations. The major role of political parties as principals in this relations is identified, which means they carry out representation, selection, delegation and control towards the candidates (agents) for the elective offices. An empirical example is the case of post-Soviet Lithuania, whose political development provides the material to analyse the degree of implementation of the major functions of the political parties, as well as to define the main issues of this process. In order to examine the implementation by the political parties of post-soviet Lithuania of the representative, selective, delegative and controlling functions, the theory of the principal-agent relations has been used, as well as methods of quantitative analysis of the electoral statistics. The data of six electoral results of elections to the Lithuanian Seimas from 1992 to 2012 has been used for analysis and comparison. The research has resulted in the conclusion that although the political parties of post-soviet Lithuania, in general, successfully deal with the function of delegation and act as the main actor in this process, they do not fully implement higher functions in the system of principal-agent relations. The political parties of modern Lithuania have problems regarding the control over selected lawmwkers, which is evidenced by the high level of inter-party and inter-faction mobility of the deputy corps. The high level of renewal of the party's cadres during every electoral cycle witnesses the attempts to solve this problem by the party apparatus. Uncertainty of the issues of control over the deputy corps on the part of the parties creates the situation of devalvation of trust towards the party institutions on the part of the electorate, which does not contribute to the process of implementation of the party system, and creates risks for the sustainable functioning of the political system.


Keywords:

electorate, political delegation, political representation, political parties, Lithuania, the Baltic countries, democracy, elections, modernisation, policy


This article can be downloaded freely in PDF format for reading. Download article

This article written in Russian. You can find original text of the article here .
References
1. Kurlov A. B., Sukhanov V. K., Shkel' S. N. Sotsiodinamika politicheskikh prioritetov elektorata v usloviyakh regional'nogo samoupravleniya. Ufa: RIO BashGU, 2003. 232 s.
2. Olson M. Logika kollektivnykh deystviy: obshchestvennye blaga i teoriya grupp. M.: Fond ekonomicheskoy initsiativy, 1995. 174 s.
3. Bowler S., Farrell D., Katz R. Party Cohesion, Party Discipline, and Parliaments // Party Discipline and Parliamentary Government. Columbus: Ohio State University Press, 1999. P. 3-22.
4. Dahlstroma R., Ingramb R. Social Networks and the Adverse Selection Problem in Agency Relationships // Journal of Business Research. 2003. ¹ 56. P. 767-775.
5. Gallagher M., Laver M., Mair P. Representative Government in Modern Europe. London: McGraw-Hill, 2001. 287 p.
6. Law on Election to the Seimas. 9 July 1992 No. I-2721. Vilnius (New edition as 18 July 2000, No. VIII-1870) (As amended by 23 August 2004, No. IX-2429)12 October 2003. [Elektronnyy dokument]: rezhim dostupa: http://www.legislationline.org/documents/action/popup/id/4858 (data obrashcheniya: 11.02.2015).
7. Miiller W. C. Political Parties in Parliamentary Democracies: Making Delegation and Accountability Work // European Journal of Political Research. 2000. ¹ 37. P. 309-333.
8. Ranney A. Candidate Selection // Democracy at the Polls: Comparative Study of Competitive National Elections. Washington, DC: American Enterprise Institute for Public Policy Research, 1981. P. 75-105.
9. Sartori G. Comparative Constitutional Engineering: An Inquiry into Structures, Incentives and Outcomes. New York: Macmillan, 1994. 231 p.
10. Selden S. C., Brewer G. A., Brudney J. L. The Role of City Managers. Are They Principals, Agents, or Both? // American Review of Public Administration. 1999. ¹ 2. P. 124-148.
11. Strom K. Delegation and Accountability in Parliamentary Democracies // European Journal of Political Research. 2000. ¹ 37. P. 261-289.
12. Žvaliauskas G. Application of Ex ante measures in political delegation: The case of Lithuania // Journal of Baltic Studies. 2004. ¹ 3. P. 254-277.
13. Yamalova E.N. Natsionalizm stran Baltii v sravnitel'noy perspektive // Politika i Obshchestvo. - 2015. - 1. - C. 24 - 29. DOI: 10.7256/1812-8696.2015.1.14086.
14. A.V. Manoylo Politicheskaya modernizatsiya
15. sistemy mezhdunarodnykh otnosheniy
16. i rossiyskaya model' informatsionno-
17. psikhologicheskogo upravleniya
18. konfliktami // Psikhologiya i Psikhotekhnika. - 2011. - 7. - C. 130 - 137.