Ðóñ Eng Cn Translate this page:
Please select your language to translate the article


You can just close the window to don't translate
Library
Your profile

Back to contents

Law and Politics
Reference:

Danilova N.V. Responsibility for damage to the environment under the civil law: problems of theory and practice

Abstract: The problems of the implementation of institution of civil-legal responsibility for damages to the environment become the subject of this research. The author presents the issue of the limitation of principles and norms of the civil legislation in regulation of the environmental relations. Analyzing the category “environmental harm” from the position of interests protected by law, the author focuses her attention on the fact that inflicting damage to the environment simultaneously infringes on both, the public environmental interests, and the property rights of private parties. In cases of conflict of interests often emerges the problem of prioritizing protection. Based on the analysis of the acting legislation and legal practice it is evident that the institution for reimbursement of environmental damages does not fulfill its main compensational and restorative function. The author draws a conclusion that in addressing the requests for compensation of environmental harm it is necessary to limit the type of protect such as reimbursement of losses.


Keywords:

Civil responsibility, environmental harm, environment, losses, natural restitution, reimbursement of losses, public interests, private interests, methods of compensation.


This article can be downloaded freely in PDF format for reading. Download article

This article written in Russian. You can find original text of the article here .
References
1. Kurakin I.A. Teoretiko-pravovoi analiz norm Grazhdanskogo kodeksa RF, reglamentiruyushchikh nastuplenie otvetstvennosti pri pravomernom prichinenii vreda // Politika i Obshchestvo. 2011. 7. C. 39-44.
2. Sukhova E.A. Grazhdansko-pravovaya otvetstvennost' za pravonarusheniya v oblasti okhrany i ispol'zovaniya zemel': analiz zakonodatel'stva i praktiki // Zakonodatel'stvo i ekonomika. 2006. ¹ 7. S. 80-87.
3. Nikishin V.V. Teoreticheskie problemy vozmeshcheniya ekologicheskogo vreda: idei V.V. Petrova i sovremennost' // Ekologicheskoe pravo. 2009. ¹ 2/3. Spetsial'nyi vypusk. S. 28-32.
4. Petrov V.V. Pravovaya okhrana prirody v SSSR. M., 1984.-384 s.
5. Misnik G.A. Vozmeshchenie ekologicheskogo vreda v rossiiskom prave. Avtoref. dis. …dokt. yurid. nauk. M., 2008. – 56 s.
6. Motorin E.P. Pravovye problemy otsenki vreda v sfere prirodopol'zovaniya // Obshchestvo i pravo. 2011. ¹ 1. S. 80-83.
7. Mukhina I.D. Grazhdansko-pravovye delikty v sfere prirodopol'zovaniya: Dis. ... kand. yurid. nauk. Krasnodar, 2004.-196 s.
8. Misnik G.A. Printsipy grazhdansko-pravovoi otvetstvennosti za prichinenie ekologicheskogo vreda // Ekologicheskoe pravo. 2008. ¹ 2. S. 14-20.
9. Krasnova I.O. Pravovoe regulirovanie vozmeshcheniya ekologicheskogo vreda // Ekologicheskoe pravo. 2005. ¹ 4. S. 26-33.
10. Vasil'eva M.I. Publichnye interesy v ekologicheskom prave. M.: Izd-vo MGU, 2003. – 424 s.
11. Glibko O.Ya., Lukin A.A. Pravovye osnovy otsenki i vozmeshcheniya ekologicheskogo ushcherba v Rossiiskoi Federatsii // Rossiiskii yuridicheskii zhurnal. 2011. ¹ 4. S. 201-210.
12. Gribanov V.P. Osushchestvlenie i zashchita grazhdanskikh prav. M., 2000. – 411 s.
13. Ivanova A.L. Vozmeshchenie ekologicheskogo vreda: sravnitel'no-pravovoi analiz evropeiskogo, nemetskogo i rossiiskogo prava: Avtoref. dis. ... kand. yurid. nauk. M., 2006. – 25 s.
14. Brinchuk M.M. Tak sushchestvuet li ekologo-pravovaya otvetstvennost'? // Ekologicheskoe pravo. 2009. ¹ 2/3. Spetsial'nyi vypusk. S. 16-23.
15. Andreev Yu.N. Otvetstvennost' gosudarstva za prichinenie vreda: tsivilisticheskie aspekty. SPb., 2013.-374 s.
16. Babenko L.N. Zemel'nye pravonarusheniya kak osnovanie grazhdansko-pravovoi otvetstvennosti // Arbitrazhnyi i grazhdanskii protsess. 2010. ¹ 2. S. 2-7.