Ðóñ Eng Cn Translate this page:
Please select your language to translate the article


You can just close the window to don't translate
Library
Your profile

Back to contents

Law and Politics
Reference:

Engelgardt A.A. Assessment of crimes as a continuous act or multiplicity (on the example of cybercrimes)

Abstract: The object and subject of this research consist in a content of legal regulation and practice of implementation of the structure of a continuous crime as a type of a complex instantaneous crime. The particular relevance of this research lies in the fact that this article examines the question of distinguishing the continuous crime from the multiplicity of crimes. The author establishes a system of general criteria of distinguishing between the evaluated criminal acts, and offers specific signs that if taken into account in the cases of certain traditional types of crimes (accepting bribes, for example) would allow to differentiate the multiplicity of crimes from a continuous act. The problem of criteria of distinguishing a continuous crime from the multiplicity is reviewed in detail in article on the example of committing crimes in the sphere of computer information (chapter 28 of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation). The article reviews the acting orders of the Supreme Court of the Russian Federation and the assessment of their positions within criminal law literature.


Keywords:

Instantaneous crime, continuous crime, multiplicity of crimes, implementation of criminal legal norms, normative unity, criteria of assessment, computer information, illegal access, contradicting court rulings.


This article can be downloaded freely in PDF format for reading. Download article

This article written in Russian. You can find original text of the article here .
References
1. Ugolovnoe pravo: Uchebnik: v 3 t. T. 1. Obshchaya chast'//Pod obshch. red. A.E. Zhalinskogo.-M.: Gorodets, 2010. S. 546-550.
2. Prigovor Sovetskogo raionnogo suda g. Orska Orenburgskoi oblasti ot 27 iyunya 2014 g./URL: www/ http://rospravosudie.com/law/Stat'ya 273 UK RF (data obrashcheniya 20.10.2014).
3. Primenenie otvetstvennosti za ekologicheskie pravonarusheniya/Otv. red. O.L. Dubovik.-M.: Gorodets, 2007.S.117.
4. Gracheva Yu.V. Sudeiskoe usmotrenie v primenenii ugolovno-pravovykh norm: problemy i puti ikh resheniya: monografiya/Otv. red. A.I. Chuchaev. – M.: Prospekt, 2014.S.96.
5. Zhalinskii A.E. O sisteme istochnikov ugolovnogo prava//Pravo i gosudarstvo: teoriya i praktika. 2006. ¹8. S. 104.
6. Entsiklopediya ugolovnogo prava. T. 3. Ponyatie prestupleniya.-SPb., 2005. S. 301-306.
7. Kil'chitskii I.F., Legkov K.V. Dlyashchiesya i prodolzhaemye prestupleniya. Otdel'nye voprosy praktiki kvalifikatsii dlyashchikhsya prestuplenii v usloviyakh voennoi sluzhby//Pravo v vooruzhennykh silakh. 2013. ¹7.
8. Sudebnaya praktika po ugolovnym delam/sost. G.A. Esakov.-M.: Prospekt, 2005.S.6.
9. Zhalinskii A.E. Argumenty prinyatiya ugolovno-pravovykh reshenii//Ugolovnoe pravo v ozhidanii peremen: teoretiko-instrumental'nyi analiz.-M.: Prospekt, 2008.S.250-253.