Ðóñ Eng Cn Translate this page:
Nota Bene. Books, journals, publishing technologies.
Please select your language to translate the article


You can just close the window to don't translate ☒
Library
 Your profile
Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Back to contents

International Law and International Organizations
Reference:

Fedorchenko A.A. General international law on reparations for victims of crimes in international criminal law

Abstract: This article examines the various aspects and norms of international law on reparation of the victims who suffered losses from the crimes in international criminal law. The following questions are addressed: forms of reparations (restitution and compensation); content of the law on reparation in international law (who is obligated to provide reparations and which form of reparations has to be used); documents on the reparations of general international law. The article reviews court rulings of various international tribunals on the issues of reparations to the victims who suffered from the actions of a particular country. Both, the universal and European laws are examined (law of the Council of Europe and European Union). The author underlines that the most advanced norms regarding reparations are in the legal documents created within inter-American and European legislations on protection of human rights. Experience beyond these two systems demonstrates that victims of mass and major violations of human rights are not only left without any reparations, but this issue is not even being considered.

Keywords:

International law, European law, fair compensation, reparation, restitution, damages, victim.

This article can be downloaded freely in PDF format for reading. Download article

This article written in Russian. You can find original text of the article here .
References
1. Allen D.K., Hartshome J.T., Martin R.M. Damages in Tort. L., 2000, p. 35-42.
2. Schafer S. Victimology: The Victim and His Criminal. 1977, p.14.
3. Tunkin G.I. Teoriya mezhdunarodnogo prava. M., 2001. S.326.
4. Smbatyan A.S. Protsessual'nye resheniya v ramkakh neot'emlemoy i podrazumevaemoy kompetentsii ORS VTO//Mezhdunarodnoe pravo i mezhdunarodnye organizatsii, ¹ 2 (10), 2012. S. 113.
5. G.G. Shinkaretskaya. Iz'yatie iz kompetentsii sudebnykh uchrezhdeniy del, otnosyashchikhsya k vnutrenney kompetentsii gosudarstva // Pravo i politika. – 2010. – ¹ 3.
6. G.G. Shinkaretskaya. Zapret zloupotrebleniya mezhdunarodnoy sudebnoy protseduroy kak faktor obespecheniya sudebnogo protsessa // Pravo i politika. – 2010. – ¹ 2.
7. R.A. Kalamkaryan, Yu.I. Migachev. Vseobshchaya Deklaratsiya prav cheloveka: rol' i znachenie v usloviyakh miroporyadka na osnove gospodstva prava Rule of Law. // Pravo i politika. – 2008. – ¹ 12. – S. 104-107.
8. R.A. Kalamkaryan. Vseobshchaya deklaratsiya prav cheloveka-60 let. Pozitiv mezhdunarodno-pravovogo opyta. // Pravo i politika. – 2008. – ¹
9. Erpyleva N.Yu. Mezhdunarodnyy kommercheskiy arbitrazh: pravovye osnovy funktsionirovaniya // NB: Mezhdunarodnoe pravo. — 2013.-¹ 1.-S.1-74. DOI: 10.7256/2306-9899.2013.1.545. URL: http://e-notabene.ru/wl/article_545.html
10. R. A. Kalamkaryan. Mezhdunarodnyy ugolovnyy sud. // Pravo i politika. – 2002. – ¹ 6. Kalamkaryan R.A. Rol' Mezhdunarodnogo Suda OON v dele podderzhaniya mezhdunarodnogo pravoporyadka // NB: Mezhdunarodnoe pravo. — 2013.-¹ 1.-S.184-214. DOI: 10.7256/2306-9899.2013.1.690. URL: http://e-notabene.ru/wl/article_690.html
11. Kalamkaryan R.A. Vklyuchennost' Rossiyskoy Federatsii v deyatel'nost' Mezhdunarodnogo Suda OON v dele obespecheniya mezhdunarodnoy zakonnosti i pravoporyadka // NB: Mezhdunarodnoe pravo. — 2013.-¹ 2.-S.85-118. DOI: 10.7256/2306-9899.2013.2.691. URL: http://e-notabene.ru/wl/article_691.html
12. Ranchinskaya P.O.. Spetsifika vzaimodeystviya rossiyskogo i mezhdunarodnogo prava v oblasti mezhdunarodnogo kommercheskogo arbitrazha // Pravo i politika. – 2013. – ¹ 10. – S. 104-107. DOI: 10.7256/1811-9018.2013.10.9581.
13. A.S. Smbatyan. Perspektivy suda EvrAzES v sisteme organov mezhdunarodnogo pravosudiya // Mezhdunarodnoe pravo i mezhdunarodnye organizatsii / International Law and International Organizations. – 2013. – ¹ 1. – S. 104-107. DOI: 10.7256/2226-6305.2013.01.7.
14. R. A. Kalamkaryan. Mezhdunarodnyy sud OON kak administrativno-pravovoy organ mirovogo soobshchestva po mirnomu razresheniyu mezhdunarodnykh sporov // Mezhdunarodnoe pravo i mezhdunarodnye organizatsii / International Law and International Organizations. – 2011. – ¹ 2
15. Sazonova K.L. K voprosu o sootnoshenii mezhdunarodnykh prestupleniy gosudarstva, norm jus cogens i obyazatel'stv erga omnes v sovremennom mezhdunarodnom prave // Pravo i politika.-2013.-9.-C. 1175-1181. DOI: 10.7256/1811-9018.2013.9.9410.
16. R. A. Gurbanov Evropeyskaya sudebnaya set' i Evroyust kak osnovnye sub'ekty sotrudnichestva organov pravosudiya gosudarstv-chlenov ES v sfere ugolovnogo pravosudiya. // Mezhdunarodnoe pravo i mezhdunarodnye organizatsii / International Law and International Organizations.-2011.-4.-C. 113-120.
17. V. A. Oganesyan Resheniya mezhdunarodnykh sudov po pravam cheloveka kak osobyy istochnik razvitiya i soblyudeniya printsipov ugolovnogo pravosudiya // Mezhdunarodnoe pravo i mezhdunarodnye organizatsii / International Law and International Organizations.-2012.-1.-C. 65-7
Nota Bene
 
For authors
 
Other
 
Our sites
© 1998 – 2024 Nota Bene. Publishing Technologies. NB-Media Ltd.