Ðóñ Eng Cn Translate this page:
Please select your language to translate the article


You can just close the window to don't translate
Library
Your profile

Back to contents

Philosophy and Culture
Reference:

Osipov-Gogonenkov, A. S. Cognitive Intuition and the Problem of Reality (Universal Paradigm Shift in the Cognitive Attitude of the Late 19th — the First Quarter of the 20th Century)

Abstract: The article is devoted to the analysis of the subject-object cognitive relations that are viewed based on the example of the artistic image of the window. The metaphor analysis carried out by the researcher allows to describe the main ideas of the Cartesian dualistic paradigm that were further developed during the period of the development of social and humanitarian studies in the first half of the 20th century. Therefore, on one hand, the author reveals the initial problem of the new European subject of knowledge and, on the other hand, outlines the metaphysical aspect of such subjectivity which allows to speak of certain succession in the development of philosophy from classical philosophy to modern problems of rationality. In this regard, the researcher believes the ‘anthropological shift’ in the philosophy of the 20th century to be caused by the ‘epistemological shift’ of the 17th century.


Keywords:

metaphysical grounds of knowledge, non-classical type of rationality, rational validity, contemplative intuition, Cartesian dualism, the window image, metaphor of knowledge, anxiety intuition, subject-centralism, prereflexive reality.


This article can be downloaded freely in PDF format for reading. Download article

This article written in Russian. You can find original text of the article here .
References
1. Chimisso C. Writing the history of the mind: philosophy and science in France, 1900 to 1960s. 2008. ASHGATE e-BOOK: http://www.ashgate.com.
2. La revolution surréaliste. 1924. ¹ 1.
3. Prust M. Protiv Sent-Beva: Stat'i i esse. M.: CheRo, 1999.
4. Rorti R. Filosofiya i zerkalo prirody. Novosibirsk, 1997.
5. Gilyarov A.N. Predsmertnye mysli nashego veka vo Frantsii// Voprosy filosofii i psikhologii. God VIII. Kn. 2 (37). S. 301–328; God VIII. Kn. 3 (38). S. 445–485; God VIII. Kn. 4 (39). S. 702–759. M., 1897.
6. Mallarme S. Sochineniya v stikhakh i proze: Sbornik/ Sost. R. Dubrovkin. M.: Raduga, 1995.
7. Mikeshina L.A., Openkov M.Yu. Novye obrazy poznaniya i real'nosti. M., 1997.
8. Garntsev M.A. Problema absolyutnoi svobody u Dekarta// Logos. ¹ 8. M.: Izd-vo RGGU, 1996. S. 7–16.
9. Dmitriev T.A. Problema metodicheskogo somneniya v filosofii Rene Dekarta. M.: IF RAN, 2007.
10. Dekart R. Razmyshleniya o pervoi filosofii, v koikh dokazyvaetsya sushchestvovanie boga i razlichie mezhdu chelovecheskoi dushoi i telom// Dekart R. Soch. v 2 t.: Per. s lat. i fr. T. 2. M.: Mysl', 1994.
11. Gogonenkova E. Eshche raz o meste metafory v nauchnom diskurse: postneklassicheskii podkhod// Vysshee obrazovanie v Rossii. 2005. ¹ 1. S.141-147.
12. Murat M. Le jugement originel de la réalité// Communications. 2006. Vol. 79. ¹ 1. P. 121–140.
13. Breton A. Manifest syurrealizma// Poeziya frantsuzskogo syurrealizma: Antologiya. SPb.: Amfora, 2004. S. 347-388.
14. Bodler Sh. Tsvety zla. Oblomki. Parizhskii splin. Iskusstvennyi rai. Esse, dnevniki. Stat'i ob iskusstve. M.: Ripol klassik, 1997.
15. Paulan F. Le nouveau mysticisme. P.: Alcan, 1891.